On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Alexander Burger wrote:
>
> A better idea: Why do you bother with ErsatzLisp at all? If you don't
> have Linux or another POSIX system, instead of starting the Java-VM you
> might as well start a Linux-VM and run real PicoLisp with all features,
> and at full spee
Hi Christophe,
> > Partial documentations? Questions why it is not fully implemented?
>
> Indeed. But anyway, here you have another question:
> «why is it not implemented at all?» !
What I meant above is: If we implement only [the trivial] part of binary
I/O, then we also must write a separate d
Hi all,
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Alexander Burger wrote:
>
> Partial documentations? Questions why it is not fully implemented?
Indeed. But anyway, here you have another question:
«why is it not implemented at all?» !
Maybe you could add those binary functions to the
«There is no suppor
Hi Christophe,
> >> Is there a reason why 'wr is not included in Ersatz?
> >
> > It is simply because the whole family of binary I/O functions is not
> > supported.
> >
> > The plain 'wr' would be quite trivial to implement, but then there
> > should be also 'rd' and 'pr' for completeness.
>
> Yo
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Alexander Burger wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
Hi Alex,
>> Is there a reason why 'wr is not included in Ersatz?
>
> It is simply because the whole family of binary I/O functions is not
> supported.
>
> The plain 'wr' would be quite trivial to implement, but then there
Hi Christophe,
> Is there a reason why 'wr is not included in Ersatz?
It is simply because the whole family of binary I/O functions is not
supported.
The plain 'wr' would be quite trivial to implement, but then there
should be also 'rd' and 'pr' for completeness. The latter two functions
need th
Hi,
This may be more a question for Alex.
Is there a reason why 'wr is not included in Ersatz?
Or am I missing something?
chri
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
