On 2024-03-12 10:13, Henrik Grubbström wrote:
The above are probably just two different ways to report the same
error.
It looks like the above it output for the Makefile command:
@linkopts="`pwd`/module.a `echo '$(MODULE_LDFLAGS)' | sed -e
's@$(BASE_LDFLAGS)@@'`"; \
...
I suspect that
Yes, that's sort of what I was getting at. The error seems like it's not
trying to link the gmp library. Is the library present in your
/usr/local/lib? You could try adding -lgmp to modules/linker_options and
modules/Gmp/linker_options? If you can avoid triggering a rewrite of
those files, it
but I guess that's possible.
On 2024-03-10 22:43, Mike Kilmer wrote:
Happy to. Also adding pike@roxen.com back in as we'd gotten off of it.
Gist of output is here.
https://gist.github.com/MikeiLL/7b0e1ff30f909a6194908c025234e3a3
On Mar 10, 2024, at 8:21 PM, William Welliver
wrote:
Hi Mike,
I
Ah, sorry.
Once you build pike (assuming that you've built it and then it won't
install or start), build/darwin-ver-arch/pike is the uninstalled pike
binary. You'd run otool -L on that file. bin/pike is a shell script that
will let you start up pike without installing it by setting arguments
Just want to confirm that on a fresh install of Ventura on M2, pike head builds
fine using home-brew provided nettle/gmp. I think there must be something
strange going on in your build environment...
You can confirm that the gmp library is linked by using otool -L /path/to/pike:
otool -L
Hi Ken-
Apologies for the long post.
I'm primarily a MacOS user here, and I've had nothing but frustration
with MacPorts. In fact, I tried to submit fixes for the problem you're
referring to all those years ago and was met with silence. I eventually
gave up trying. I can provide assistance
Hi Ken,
If you’ve installed pike from a package, there will usually be a set of
additional packages for modules that have extra dependencies, like gtk and
various databases. You can use your package manager to explore and install
those “add on” packages.
If you’ve installed pike by compiling
I always enjoy reading through discussions like this to see if there's
anything to be learned. Obviously, a lot of the comments are familiar
and center around:
a) I already have a preferred language, why would I ever learn something
that isn't already in use by a large percentage of the
Just a quick update: I wrote a (basically empty) program that included 20 empty
files and had no problems on 8.0.1116. So there must be something more to it.
If you can find a minimal test case, we might have better luck.
Bill
> On Apr 26, 2022, at 11:01 AM, David Estopa wrote:
>
> Hello,
Hi David-
I'm not aware of a limitation... is it possible you have a circular
reference somewhere? Do you suspect an overall size limitation, or do
you think it's because of the number of includes? Removing the content
from one or more of the files might give an indication of one vs the
Hello, Friends of Pike!
The Pike development team is pleased to announce the 15th release of
Pike 8.0: build 8.0.1738. I’m in the process of submitting updates for
homebrew and pkgsrc, so the new version should appear there in the near
future.
As always, bug reports, comments and suggestions
More details that might be of use:
http://wiki.gotpike.org/index.pike/PikeDevel/Using+Pike+on+the+Web
Bill
> > I'd like to try that out as a learning medium & instant feedback!
> >
> > Anybody on this list doing this or have done? TIA ..
On 2021-10-19 23:36, Duke Normandin wrote:
But it doesn't have to be a mere summary! It could be the
whole-meal-deal - one point at a time! And it could be expanded for
more advanced features!
That doesn't really seem to be the approach taken in any of the
documents I've looked at (nor does
If you had more complex needs, you could also explore the zip file
module/program loading feature. I think that’s present in 8.0. I could provide
some more details if that’s of interest.
Bill
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 20, 2021, at 1:44 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021
I’ve never seen this site before; I don’t see any reason why there couldn’t be
a Pike entry. Though (I’m sure this is obvious by browsing the site) I think
the intent is more of a one page summary than a comprehensive set of
documentation. Could be the perfect opportunity to take on a
On 2021-10-19 15:45, Christian Töpp wrote:
Btw.. writing pike modules in c ist a nice theme i can write about ;)
I think that'd be excellent... I am aware of existing documentation on
the subject, but it's spread all over the place (on the pike website, on
modules.gotpike.org, my personal
On 2021-10-19 15:44, Chris Angelico wrote:
... and needs to be updated to GTK3 if it's to survive. As the Red
Queen explained it, it takes all the running you can do just to stay
in the same place, and you have to go twice that fast to actually get
anywhere.
Yes, the constant churn puts
This is a superset of a message I sent directly to Duke. I think it would be
useful to have a wider conversation around whether there’s much to be done to
improve Pike’s standing in the world.
The general assertion that getting started with pike is difficult because
there’s no documentation or
(Apologies, this originally went only to Duke)
Hi Duke-
That’s a good place to start. I think it may be less up-to-date than the
tutorial[1] on the pike website, which is also useful if you’re completely new.
I think Hubbe’s material has some interesting low level information, so a
I think there are a lot of lurkers on the general mailing list that are more
active on the -devel list. My sense is that they tend to not get involved
unless us lowly level 1 support folk fail to solve the problem ;)
Bill
> On Oct 18, 2021, at 9:18 PM, Duke Normandin wrote:
>
> @Chris
> Are
I just sent a request off to have the archives loaded (minus the ~100 most
ancient messages that were missing required mail headers). Will send an email
when I hear something back.
Bill
> On Oct 7, 2021, at 1:19 PM, Duke Normandin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 12:59:41 -0400
&g
21 matches
Mail list logo
