Bug#635964: pdfsam (pdf merger and extracter) has upstream 2.2.1 version release. Please update to it.

2011-07-29 Thread shirish शिरीष
Package: pdfsam Version: 1.1.4-1 Severity: wishlist *** Please type your report below this line *** Hi all, Upstream has released pdfsam 2.2.1 6 months back. Can somebody update/upgrade to it. Here's the changelog :- http://www.pdfsam.org/uploads/branch2/changelog-basic.txt 2.2.1

what is remaining to be able to use apk (android package files) files in debian ?

2013-12-16 Thread shirish शिरीष
Hi all, Is it possible to use android package files (apk) in debian or still somethings are missing ? I'm talking in a sort of an emulator way on the desktop. These are the android packages I have installed on my system. I am basically interested in a foss rpg which is/was made for android and

Re: what is remaining to be able to use apk (android package files) files in debian ?

2013-12-16 Thread shirish शिरीष
umm please CC me if somebody answers (sorry for top-posting). On 9/19/13, shirish शिरीष shirisha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Is it possible to use android package files (apk) in debian or still somethings are missing ? I'm talking in a sort of an emulator way on the desktop

Bug#648624: Any updates on upgrading liblwjgl-java to version 1.9.1 ?

2014-04-21 Thread shirish शिरीष
Hi all, Couple of months have passed. While I am subscribed to the bug, could somebody tell if we would get a new enough version of libwjgl-java library before jessie ? @David, did you try to approach upstream and share with them the build issues you had. Perhaps they might have some idea or are

Bug#745634: azureus: New upstream version 5.3.0.0- please up it.

2014-04-23 Thread shirish शिरीष
Package: azureus Version: 4.3.0.6-5 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, Either remove vuze or get the newest stable version 5.3.0.0 in debian. here's the changelog for the same :- http://wiki.vuze.com/w/ChangeLog 2014.02.07 - Vuze 5.3.0.0 UI | Content selection dialog when more

Bug#648624: Any updates gentleman as to how to go forward ?

2015-02-22 Thread shirish शिरीष
Respected Gentlemen, It seems lwjgl has had two releases, one is the legacy 2.9.x series as can be seen at http://blog.lwjgl.org/lwjgl-2-9-2-released/ and the other new/shiny lwjgl 3.0.x rewrite series See http://blog.lwjgl.org/welcome-to-lwjgl-3/ Can somebody package either one of them and

Bug#648624: updates about liblwjgl-java please.

2015-09-05 Thread shirish शिरीष
Hi all, Seems people have given up on it or something. I downloaded libasm4-java and saw the changelog, it has been constantly improving. Can't something about liblwjgl-java . There are couple of games who use/need it. http://sourceforge.net/projects/jewelhunt/

Bug#852678: groovy2: adequate reports obsolete conffile in groovy2, specifically groovy-starter.conf

2017-01-26 Thread shirish शिरीष
Package: groovy2 Version: 2.4.8-1 Severity: normal User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: obsolete-conffile adequate Dear Maintainer, Adequate reports the following - [$] adequate groovy2 groovy2: obsolete-conffile /etc/groovy2/groovy-starter.conf Maybe you could use what pabs (Paul Wise)

Bug#771514: Is the state of affairs the same upstream ?

2017-01-19 Thread shirish शिरीष
Hi all, While there were updates, there doesn't seem to be anything happening here. I can see the warning still - ─[$] javafxpackager javafxpackager has been renamed javapackager The original file may be removed in a future release in lieu of javapackager. Please update your scripts. So it

Bug#850921: openjfx version for openjdk 9.0

2017-01-19 Thread shirish शिरीष
in-line :- On 20/01/2017, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote: > Le 19/01/2017 à 18:49, shirish शिरीष a écrit : > >> Look forward to knowing your plans. > > Hi Shirish, Hi Emmanuel, > As I said last week, I plan to upgrade the openjfx package after the > Str

Bug#850921: openjfx version for openjdk 9.0

2017-01-19 Thread shirish शिरीष
at bottom :- On 11/01/2017, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote: > Le 11/01/2017 à 11:34, shirish शिरीष a écrit : > >> I would suggest to have a new package so people who are on java 8 >> aren't disturbed. While people who want to test out the java 9 a

Bug#850921: openjfx version for openjdk 9.0

2017-01-11 Thread shirish शिरीष
Package: openjfx Version: 8u111-b14-1 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, openjfx stamps out at 8u111-b14-1 > aptitude show openjfx Package: openjfx Version: 8u111-b14-1 State: installed Automatically installed: no Priority: optional Section: java Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers

Bug#850921: openjfx version for openjdk 9.0

2017-01-11 Thread shirish शिरीष
at bottom :- On 11/01/2017, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote: > Le 11/01/2017 à 09:51, shirish शिरीष a écrit : > >> Looking forward to see the package which works with version 9. >> >> While openjdk 9 would be available around the middle of the year f

Bug#858561: maven needs to have a metapackage to install all the libraries

2017-03-23 Thread shirish शिरीष
Package: maven Version: 3.3.9-4 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, There doesn't seem to be a metapackage to install all maven library packages and have to install them manually which is time-consuming. Could something be done about it ? -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.0 APT prefers

Bug#858561: maven needs to have a metapackage to install all the libraries

2017-03-23 Thread shirish शिरीष
Reply at bottom :- On 23/03/2017, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote: > Le 23/03/2017 à 15:20, shirish शिरीष a écrit : > >> There doesn't seem to be a metapackage to install all maven library >> packages and have to install them manually which is time-consumin