Le 10/09/2018 à 17:09, Xavier a écrit :
> Le 10/09/2018 à 07:59, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 7:33 AM Xavier wrote:
>>>
>>> Le 09/09/2018 à 23:36, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 6:17 PM Xavier wrote:
>
> Le 07/09/2018 à 16:36, Xavier a éc
Le 10/09/2018 à 07:59, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 7:33 AM Xavier wrote:
>>
>> Le 09/09/2018 à 23:36, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
>>> On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 6:17 PM Xavier wrote:
Le 07/09/2018 à 16:36, Xavier a écrit :
> Le 07/09/2018 à 13:38, Bastien ROUCA
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 7:33 AM Xavier wrote:
>
> Le 09/09/2018 à 23:36, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
> > On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 6:17 PM Xavier wrote:
> >>
> >> Le 07/09/2018 à 16:36, Xavier a écrit :
> >>> Le 07/09/2018 à 13:38, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 9:45 PM Th
Le 09/09/2018 à 23:36, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
> On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 6:17 PM Xavier wrote:
>>
>> Le 07/09/2018 à 16:36, Xavier a écrit :
>>> Le 07/09/2018 à 13:38, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 9:45 PM Thorsten Alteholz
wrote:
>
> Hi Bastien,
>
>
On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 6:17 PM Xavier wrote:
>
> Le 07/09/2018 à 16:36, Xavier a écrit :
> > Le 07/09/2018 à 13:38, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
> >> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 9:45 PM Thorsten Alteholz
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Bastien,
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> >>>
Le 07/09/2018 à 16:36, Xavier a écrit :
> Le 07/09/2018 à 13:38, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 9:45 PM Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Bastien,
>>>
>>> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> - put together packages that belong together; I am not sure here,
Le 07/09/2018 à 13:38, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 9:45 PM Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>>
>> Hi Bastien,
>>
>> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
- put together packages that belong together; I am not sure here, but
wouldn't it be fine to have just o
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 9:45 PM Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> Hi Bastien,
>
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> >> - put together packages that belong together; I am not sure here, but
> >> wouldn't it be fine to have just one package node-d3 or node-babel
> >> that contains a
Hi,
On Thu, 6 Sep 2018, Pirate Praveen wrote:
I suggest we categorize the packages in NEW and process accordingly. I can help
with categorizing it.
I propose the following,
1. Simple modules that could be embedded - REJECT.
2. Modules that includes a build step, for example that needs babel,
Hi Bastien,
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
- put together packages that belong together; I am not sure here, but
wouldn't it be fine to have just one package node-d3 or node-babel
that contains all corresponding modules (though their different versions
might create pr
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 10:05 AM Xavier wrote:
>
> Le 05/09/2018 à 23:14, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:08 PM Bastien ROUCARIES
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:50 PM Thorsten Alteholz
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi everybody,
> >>>
> >>> as you already know
Le 05/09/2018 à 23:14, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:08 PM Bastien ROUCARIES
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:50 PM Thorsten Alteholz
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everybody,
>>>
>>> as you already know, there is a big number of node packages waiting in
>>> NEW. Does Deb
Le 06/09/2018 à 08:05, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
> On 06/09/18 10:15 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> I suggest we categorize the packages in NEW and process accordingly. I can
>> help with categorizing it.
>>
>> I propose the following,
>>
>> 1. Simple modules that could be embedded - REJECT.
>> 2. Mo
Le 06/09/2018 à 08:05, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
> On 06/09/18 10:15 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> I suggest we categorize the packages in NEW and process accordingly. I can
>> help with categorizing it.
>>
>> I propose the following,
>>
>> 1. Simple modules that could be embedded - REJECT.
>> 2. Mo
On 06/09/18 10:15 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> I suggest we categorize the packages in NEW and process accordingly. I can
> help with categorizing it.
>
> I propose the following,
>
> 1. Simple modules that could be embedded - REJECT.
> 2. Modules that includes a build step, for example that need
On 2018, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 6 2:15:11 AM IST, Thorsten Alteholz
wrote:
>Hi everybody,
>
>as you already know, there is a big number of node packages waiting in
>NEW. Does Debian really need all those packages?
>
>node packages are rather small and often consist only of a few lines of
>
>code. From my
n Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:29 PM Jérémy Lal wrote:
>
>
>
> 2018-09-05 23:14 GMT+02:00 Bastien ROUCARIES :
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:08 PM Bastien ROUCARIES
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:50 PM Thorsten Alteholz
>> > wrote:
>>
>> > > In order to not lose track of the installed
2018-09-05 23:14 GMT+02:00 Bastien ROUCARIES :
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:08 PM Bastien ROUCARIES
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:50 PM Thorsten Alteholz
> wrote:
>
> > > In order to not lose track of the installed software, providing
> something
> > > like debian/modules.embedded mi
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:08 PM Bastien ROUCARIES
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:50 PM Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> >
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > as you already know, there is a big number of node packages waiting in
> > NEW. Does Debian really need all those packages?
> >
> > node packages are
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 10:50 PM Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> as you already know, there is a big number of node packages waiting in
> NEW. Does Debian really need all those packages?
>
> node packages are rather small and often consist only of a few lines of
> code. From my point
Le 05/09/2018 à 22:58, Xavier a écrit :
> Le 05/09/2018 à 22:45, Thorsten Alteholz a écrit :
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> as you already know, there is a big number of node packages waiting in
>> NEW. Does Debian really need all those packages?
>>
>> node packages are rather small and often consist only
Le 05/09/2018 à 22:45, Thorsten Alteholz a écrit :
> Hi everybody,
>
> as you already know, there is a big number of node packages waiting in
> NEW. Does Debian really need all those packages?
>
> node packages are rather small and often consist only of a few lines of
> code. From my point of vie
Hi everybody,
as you already know, there is a big number of node packages waiting in
NEW. Does Debian really need all those packages?
node packages are rather small and often consist only of a few lines of
code. From my point of view it is very unlikely that such packages will
change over ti
23 matches
Mail list logo
