Quoting Paolo Greppi (2017-01-05 15:40:16)
> On 05/01/2017 14:00, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> > On വ്യാഴം 05 ജനുവരി 2017 06:09 വൈകു, Ximin Luo wrote:
> >> This has nothing to do with tools, as Jonas mentioned it is about a
> >> continual time dedication to a FOSS project. Please try to understand
Jonas Smedegaard:
> Quoting Ximin Luo (2017-01-05 13:51:00)
>>
>> [..]
>>
>> The security aspect is just one factor, not the main factor.
>
> Ok, you now tell me that security is not the main factor.
>
> I clearly read your previous email as if security was the main factor
> for rejecting these
Pirate Praveen:
> On വ്യാഴം 05 ജനുവരി 2017 06:44 വൈകു, Ximin Luo wrote:
>> It's normal convention in any organisation or project to temporarily revert
>> a change that is controversial.
>
> ok.
>
>> Adding 10 new people from an event, every time there is an event, is also
>> not sustainable as
FYI: The status of the node-lodash source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 4.16.6+dfsg-1
Current version: 4.16.6+dfsg-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day
Quoting Julien Puydt (2017-01-05 18:41:22)
> On 05/01/2017 18:24, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Quoting Ximin Luo (2017-01-05 17:50:00)
> >> I propose some reasonable checks, to ensure that we get people who are
> >> interested. I disagree that this attitude is flawed.
> >
> > Thanks. Ximin.
> >
> >
Quoting Ximin Luo (2017-01-05 17:50:00)
> I propose some reasonable checks, to ensure that we get people who are
> interested. I disagree that this attitude is flawed.
Thanks. Ximin.
What do others think?
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136
Hi,
On 05/01/2017 18:24, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Ximin Luo (2017-01-05 17:50:00)
I propose some reasonable checks, to ensure that we get people who are
interested. I disagree that this attitude is flawed.
Thanks. Ximin.
What do others think?
Until now the discussion seems to have
Source: npm
Version: 1.4.21+ds-2
Severity: important
Tags: upstream security fixed-upstream
Forwarded: https://github.com/npm/npm/issues/8380
Hi,
the following vulnerability was published for npm.
CVE-2016-3956[0]:
| The CLI in npm before 2.15.1 and 3.x before 3.8.3, as used in Node.js
| 0.10
Hi,
On 05/01/2017 20:39, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I don't think anyone has suggested or implied forcing anyone to do
anything (please help point out if I missed some detail on that!).
I meant if they just attended an event, they may have little motivation
to actually join any team, so getting
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit source nodejs
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'nodejs'
Limit currently set to 'source':'nodejs'
> tags 828457 + pending
Bug #828457 [src:nodejs] nodejs: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
Added tag(s) pending.
>
On വ്യാഴം 05 ജനുവരി 2017 04:22 വൈകു, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> This is great, but is this serious ?
> Anyone knows what's happening ?
Hi Jeremy,
I'm taking a packaging workshop at College of Engineering Pune [1].
This is 4th day of the workshop and many have completed their packages
and are ready for
On വ്യാഴം 05 ജനുവരി 2017 05:23 വൈകു, Ximin Luo wrote:
> Hi, please don't add these people.
>
> People in the alioth group have read-write access to all pkg-javascript git
> repos as well as shell access on that machine.
>
> I don't think it's right to give this many people, who show up at an
Pirate Praveen:
> On വ്യാഴം 05 ജനുവരി 2017 05:23 വൈകു, Ximin Luo wrote:
>> Hi, please don't add these people.
>>
>> People in the alioth group have read-write access to all pkg-javascript git
>> repos as well as shell access on that machine.
>>
>> I don't think it's right to give this many
Jonas Smedegaard:
> Quoting Ximin Luo (2017-01-05 12:53:00)
>> Pirate Praveen:
>>> On വ്യാഴം 05 ജനുവരി 2017 04:22 വൈകു, Jérémy Lal wrote:
This is great, but is this serious ?
Anyone knows what's happening ?
>
>>> I'm taking a packaging workshop at College of Engineering Pune [1].
>>>
On വ്യാഴം 05 ജനുവരി 2017 06:09 വൈകു, Ximin Luo wrote:
> This has nothing to do with tools, as Jonas mentioned it is about a continual
> time dedication to a FOSS project. Please try to understand this.
Yes, it has a lot to do with our tools. If we were using a git hosting
tool like gitlab or
On വ്യാഴം 05 ജനുവരി 2017 06:21 വൈകു, Ximin Luo wrote:
> We don't have hard rules, but we all have our ideas about what is right or
> wrong. For you, it is a question of "are they aware". For me, I explained it
> in my other email, and it roughly overlaps with "are they aware".
I have accepted
Pirate Praveen:
> On വ്യാഴം 05 ജനുവരി 2017 06:09 വൈകു, Ximin Luo wrote:
>> This has nothing to do with tools, as Jonas mentioned it is about a
>> continual time dedication to a FOSS project. Please try to understand this.
>
> Yes, it has a lot to do with our tools. If we were using a git hosting
This is great, but is this serious ?
Anyone knows what's happening ?
Jérémy
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Pirate Praveen:
> On വ്യാഴം 05 ജനുവരി 2017 06:21 വൈകു, Ximin Luo wrote:
>> We don't have hard rules, but we all have our ideas about what is right or
>> wrong. For you, it is a question of "are they aware". For me, I explained it
>> in my other email, and it roughly overlaps with "are they
Quoting Ximin Luo (2017-01-05 13:51:00)
> Jonas Smedegaard:
>> Quoting Ximin Luo (2017-01-05 12:53:00)
>>> Pirate Praveen:
On വ്യാഴം 05 ജനുവരി 2017 04:22 വൈകു, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> This is great, but is this serious ?
> Anyone knows what's happening ?
[...]
I'm taking a packaging
Quoting Pirate Praveen (2017-01-05 14:06:32)
> On വ്യാഴം 05 ജനുവരി 2017 06:21 വൈകു, Ximin Luo wrote:
> > We don't have hard rules, but we all have our ideas about what is right or
> > wrong. For you, it is a question of "are they aware". For me, I explained
> > it in my other email, and it
On വ്യാഴം 05 ജനുവരി 2017 06:44 വൈകു, Ximin Luo wrote:
> It's normal convention in any organisation or project to temporarily revert a
> change that is controversial.
ok.
> Adding 10 new people from an event, every time there is an event, is also not
> sustainable as a team.
I have organized
Quoting Ximin Luo (2017-01-05 16:26:00)
> Jonas Smedegaard:
> > Quoting Ximin Luo (2017-01-05 13:51:00)
> >>
> >> [..]
> >>
> >> The security aspect is just one factor, not the main factor.
> >
> > Ok, you now tell me that security is not the main factor.
> >
> > I clearly read your previous
I have packaged the module aws4 and lintian clean it. I have also tested it
with sbuild. Following is my repository on git.fosscommunity.in :
git...@git.fosscommunity.in:Vinaydp/aws4.git
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
I have built 'md5-o-matic' package and I have made it lintian clean. I have
tested it using 'sbuild'. I want to maintain it in future. I have pushed it to
git.fosscommunity.in. So I kindly request you to grant me access.
Thank you.
P.S.: The link to my project is:
On വ്യാഴം 05 ജനുവരി 2017 10:20 വൈകു, Ximin Luo wrote:
> Let's please talk about the specifics of this situation rather than appealing
> to vague notions of being welcoming.
>
> It's my experience that events like these do not generally result in
> long-term maintainers. Yes, I am indeed
I have built 'tweetnacl package' and i have made it lintian clean. I
have tested it using 'sbuild'. The have pushed the package to
git.fosscommunity.in.
The link to the project is:
https://git.fosscommunity.in/yashashree/tweetnacl. I want to maintain
the package in future.
So I kindly request you
On വ്യാഴം 05 ജനുവരി 2017 10:20 വൈകു, Ximin Luo wrote:
> Let's please talk about the specifics of this situation rather than appealing
> to vague notions of being welcoming.
This is completely arbitrary restriction. I was thinking we evaluate
people based on what they have done, rather than when
I have packaged "has-unicode". I have made it lintian-clean and tested
using sbuilt.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Following is the link to my git repository
https://git.fosscommunity.in/yogirajkulkarni/has-unicode/tree/master
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Yogiraj Kulkarni <
yogirajkulkarni1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have packaged "has-unicode". I have made it lintian-clean and tested
> using sbuilt.
>
Hi,
I have prepared the node-is-obj package for closing ITP:850131
(https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=850131)
It is lintian clean and tested with pbuilder on sid.
I've added the package to the git repo at
https://git.fosscommunity.in/gauravjuvekar/node-is-obj
Please review
FYI: The status of the node-mute-stream source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.0.4-1
Current version: 0.0.7-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
FYI: The status of the node-cli-cursor source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 1.0.2-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a
FYI: The status of the node-command-join source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 1.1.1-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a
FYI: The status of the node-rx source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 4.1.0+dfsg1-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day
FYI: The status of the node-read source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.0.5-1
Current version: 1.0.7-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
FYI: The status of the node-sorted-object source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 2.0.1-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a
Jonas Smedegaard:
> [..]
>
> I (loudly!) oppose treating not-yet-members as inactive: Improving
> security by minimizing activity is a luxury we cannot afford!
>
> [..]
>
> Since when did we validate membership based on how they formulated
> their requests to join?
>
> Were you yourself
38 matches
Mail list logo
