[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#762033: node-highlight: incompatible with nodejs module name: highlight.js
Hi, On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 09:33:41AM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: What's your plan for the three reverse dependencies of libjs-highlight? I filed bugs with patches for ckeditor (#765003) and ipython (#765001). I will fix mdpress myself, as I am its maintainer. Cédric ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#762033: node-highlight: incompatible with nodejs module name: highlight.js
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 23:51:08 +0200 Leo Iannacone l...@ubuntu.com wrote: Source: node-highlight Severity: important Dear Maintainer, This package must be renamed (and installed properly) to node-highlight.js according with upstream module name (see package.json). Please, rename it asap. Leo. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.13.0-35-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#762033: node-highlight: incompatible with nodejs module name: highlight.js
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 23:51:08 +0200 Leo Iannacone l...@ubuntu.com wrote: Source: node-highlight Severity: important Dear Maintainer, This package must be renamed (and installed properly) to node-highlight.js according with upstream module name (see package.json). Please, rename it asap. Leo. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.13.0-35-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] node-highlight: incompatible with nodejs module name: highlight.js
Source: highlight.js Followup-For: Bug #762033 Thanks for your report. I packaged highlight.js as a dependency of another tool, and I am not completely familiar with the JavaScript world. Excuse my naive questions below. I understand that because the package name in the package.json file is hightlight.js, the nodejs package should be named node-hightlight.js. Should I install the package.json file in this node-hightlight.js? Should I rename also the libjs-hightlight to libjs-highlight.js for coherence? Cheers, Cédric signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] highlight.js_7.3+ds-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Paul, On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 09:00:15PM +, Paul Richards Tagliamonte wrote: Hello, Maintainer, I'm sorry, but I've had to reject this package. highlight.js-7.3\tools\yuicompressor.jar Which is a sourceless jar full of code. I think it's packaged, too. I see in your changelog you intended to remove this file, but it ended up in the tarball you uploaded :) Let me know when it's updated, so I can tend to it again! Sorry, I indeed messed with the tarball generation. I am uploading right now the same package with a fixed tarball. Cheers, Cédric signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Comments regarding impress.js_0.5.3-1_amd64.changes
Hi Ansgar, On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 01:03:48PM +, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: Hi, why does d/copyright say Expat or GPL-2+? The upstream sources contain a notice saying Released under the MIT and GPL Licenses. (i.e. any version of the GPL). Note that MIT License might refer to one of several licenses. It would probably be best if upstream included the full text of the licenses to avoid any uncertainties. As indicated in the Comment field of the debian/copyright file, referring to the following url: https://github.com/bartaz/impress.js/issues/225 I asked upstream some clarification about the license. The answer has been what is mentionned in the copyright file: GPL-2+ or Expat. Unfortunately, this does not appear yet clearly in the code. I'll insist that they include clearly the license in the code. Cheers, Cédric signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] [RFR] highlight.js and impress.js
Dear JavaScript team members, I would like to kindly ask you to review my first two JavaScript packages to see if they are conform to what is expected. Those are dependencies of a Ruby tool, mdpress, used to create presentations from Markdown files. The two packages are: - impress.js This one is very simple, and I hope I got it right (at least almost). - highlight.js Here I am less confident, especially about the node-highlight binary package: I ensured that I install the same files as what I would get from the command 'npm install highlight.js'. However, since I am illiterate in nodejs business, I could not check if it was going to work right. In particular would the .css files shipped in the libjs-highlight package be useful for the nodejs-highlight package? Also would you recommend to build the documentation? what would be the name of the -doc package? Thanks in advance for your comments. The packages can be found in the team repository: git://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/impress.js.git git://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/highlight.js.git/ Greetings, Cédric signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] Maintain impress.js and highlight.js in the JavaScript team
Dear members of the Debian JavaScript team, Please Cc: me since I am not (yet) subscribed to the list. I proposed recently to package mdpress, after RFP bug #692864. It is a Ruby tool to make HTML5 presentations using impress.js library. The current code contains convenience copies of impress.js and highlight.js. Since these libraries may be useful elsewhere, I should certainly package them, but since I am new to JavaScript packaging (and JavaScript in general), I thought it would be better to have them maintained by a team. If you agree, could you accept my a request to join your team on Alioth? I may need advice about current best practice in your team. I found the Debian JavaScript Policy on the wiki http://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Policy which is a starting point. The first questions I have are about non minified JavaScript libraries. Impress.js does not ship any minified version. Should I provide one? What is the prefered tool to create one? Thank you in advance! Cheers, Cédric signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
