Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] can we upload node-uuid instead of node-node-uuid?
On 5 July 2014 02:23, Andrew Kelley wrote: > As an upstream author I'm happy to switch to using uid-safe. I don't know > what you're referring to with 'mz'. See this issue: https://github.com/crypto-utils/uid-safe/issues/1 I will patch (for Debian) that module and remove promises stuff... (and it won't depend on 'mz'). -- Ubuntu Member - http://launchpad.net/~l3on Home Page - http://leoiannacone.com GPG Key Id - 0xD282FC25 ___ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] can we upload node-uuid instead of node-node-uuid?
As an upstream author I'm happy to switch to using uid-safe. I don't know
what you're referring to with 'mz'.
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Leo Iannacone wrote:
> On 5 July 2014 00:16, Andrew Kelley wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Leo Iannacone wrote:
> >>
> >> >> Le vendredi 04 juillet 2014 à 12:14 -0700, Andrew Kelley a écrit :
> >> >> > I'd rather patch upstream sources that incorrectly do
> >> >> > require('node-uuid')
> >> >> > instead of patching upstream sources (mine included) that correctly
> >> >> > do
> >> >> > require('uuid').
> >> >>
> >>
> >> May I ask you which module are you going to debianize??
> >
> > https://github.com/andrewrk/groovebasin/
>
> And, what about using this module:
> https://github.com/crypto-utils/uid-safe ??
>
> I will debianize it asap, but without the support to moderize 'mz' ...
>
>
>
> --
> Ubuntu Member - http://launchpad.net/~l3on
> Home Page - http://leoiannacone.com
> GPG Key Id - 0xD282FC25
>
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] can we upload node-uuid instead of node-node-uuid?
On 5 July 2014 00:16, Andrew Kelley wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Leo Iannacone wrote:
>>
>> >> Le vendredi 04 juillet 2014 à 12:14 -0700, Andrew Kelley a écrit :
>> >> > I'd rather patch upstream sources that incorrectly do
>> >> > require('node-uuid')
>> >> > instead of patching upstream sources (mine included) that correctly
>> >> > do
>> >> > require('uuid').
>> >>
>>
>> May I ask you which module are you going to debianize??
>
> https://github.com/andrewrk/groovebasin/
And, what about using this module: https://github.com/crypto-utils/uid-safe ??
I will debianize it asap, but without the support to moderize 'mz' ...
--
Ubuntu Member - http://launchpad.net/~l3on
Home Page - http://leoiannacone.com
GPG Key Id - 0xD282FC25
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] can we upload node-uuid instead of node-node-uuid?
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Leo Iannacone wrote:
>
> >> Le vendredi 04 juillet 2014 à 12:14 -0700, Andrew Kelley a écrit :
> >> > I'd rather patch upstream sources that incorrectly do
> require('node-uuid')
> >> > instead of patching upstream sources (mine included) that correctly do
> >> > require('uuid').
> >>
>
> May I ask you which module are you going to debianize??
>
https://github.com/andrewrk/groovebasin/
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] can we upload node-uuid instead of node-node-uuid?
On Jul 4, 2014 9:39 PM, "Andrew Kelley" wrote:
>
> From https://www.npmjs.org/doc/package.json.html#name
>
> "Don't put "js" or "node" in the name. It's assumed that it's js, since
you're writing a package.json file, and you can specify the engine using
the "engines" field."
>
> If you look at the network graph you can see uuid is at least equally
well maintained, if not better: https://github.com/broofa/node-uuid/network
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>>
>> Le vendredi 04 juillet 2014 à 12:14 -0700, Andrew Kelley a écrit :
>> > The proper package for upstream to depend on is uuid:
>> > https://www.npmjs.org/package/uuid
>> >
>> > I'd rather patch upstream sources that incorrectly do
require('node-uuid')
>> > instead of patching upstream sources (mine included) that correctly do
>> > require('uuid').
>>
>> Could you explain why this choice over
>> https://www.npmjs.org/package/node-uuid
>> ?
>>
May I ask you which module are you going to debianize??
L.
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] can we upload node-uuid instead of node-node-uuid?
>From https://www.npmjs.org/doc/package.json.html#name
"Don't put "js" or "node" in the name. It's assumed that it's js, since
you're writing a package.json file, and you can specify the engine using
the "engines" field."
If you look at the network graph you can see uuid is at least equally well
maintained, if not better: https://github.com/broofa/node-uuid/network
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Le vendredi 04 juillet 2014 à 12:14 -0700, Andrew Kelley a écrit :
> > The proper package for upstream to depend on is uuid:
> > https://www.npmjs.org/package/uuid
> >
> > I'd rather patch upstream sources that incorrectly do
> require('node-uuid')
> > instead of patching upstream sources (mine included) that correctly do
> > require('uuid').
>
> Could you explain why this choice over
> https://www.npmjs.org/package/node-uuid
> ?
>
> Jérémy.
>
>
>
> ___
> Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
> Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] can we upload node-uuid instead of node-node-uuid?
Le vendredi 04 juillet 2014 à 12:14 -0700, Andrew Kelley a écrit :
> The proper package for upstream to depend on is uuid:
> https://www.npmjs.org/package/uuid
>
> I'd rather patch upstream sources that incorrectly do require('node-uuid')
> instead of patching upstream sources (mine included) that correctly do
> require('uuid').
Could you explain why this choice over
https://www.npmjs.org/package/node-uuid
?
Jérémy.
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
[Pkg-javascript-devel] can we upload node-uuid instead of node-node-uuid?
The proper package for upstream to depend on is uuid:
https://www.npmjs.org/package/uuid
I'd rather patch upstream sources that incorrectly do require('node-uuid')
instead of patching upstream sources (mine included) that correctly do
require('uuid').
___
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
