On Tue, 26 May 09 10:00, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2009 m. May 26 d., Tuesday 05:44:25 Armin Berres wrote:
> > with the template provided by Modestas. Is this our new policy? Do we
> > officially not forward bugreports anymore (at least as long as we have
> > no "Bugsqad") and tell p
Hello,
On 2009 m. May 26 d., Tuesday 05:44:25 Armin Berres wrote:
> with the template provided by Modestas. Is this our new policy? Do we
> officially not forward bugreports anymore (at least as long as we have
> no "Bugsqad") and tell people immediately to take this upstream?
> I am just asking,
On Lun 25 May 2009 23:44:25 Armin Berres escribió:
> On Tue, 19 May 09 20:41, trig...@space-based.de wrote:
> > What do you think?
>
> So, no feedback here so far, we are really more IRC than mailinglist
> users.
> What I understand so far is, that installing presubj files for all
> packages is not
On Tue, 19 May 09 20:41, trig...@space-based.de wrote:
> What do you think?
So, no feedback here so far, we are really more IRC than mailinglist
users.
What I understand so far is, that installing presubj files for all
packages is not an option, because e.g. people get used to simply ignore
the pr
On Mar 19 May 2009 15:41:25 trig...@space-based.de escribió:
> Hi again!
>
> As most bugs in our bts are upstream bugs and we do not have the resources
> to forward them properly I suggest the following:
>
> We install presubj files for KDE packages which encourage the users to
> report bugs at bug
Hi again!
As most bugs in our bts are upstream bugs and we do not have the resources
to forward them properly I suggest the following:
We install presubj files for KDE packages which encourage the users to
report bugs at bugs.kde.org, telling them that their chances to see the
bug fixed are much
