On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 04:40:00PM +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Thursday, 17 November 2016 9:44:39 PM AEDT Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > firefox-dev is not in stretch, and it is not planned that it
> > ever will be (see #817954).
> >
> > firefox-esr-dev might be the alternative, but the Mozilla main
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 07:02:23PM +0200, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > AFAICT, Ubuntu has a firefox-dev package that only contains NPAPI
> > headers in /usr/include/firefox. I don't think that would be enough for
>
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 07:25:27AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:47:17AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > I just uploaded iceweasel 30 to unstable, which is the first version not
> > to provide xulrunner-dev. Instead, there is an iceweasel-de
Hi,
I just uploaded iceweasel 30 to unstable, which is the first version not
to provide xulrunner-dev. Instead, there is an iceweasel-dev package,
and it most certainly has things missing. Read: I *know* there are
things missing. I just don't know what specifically reverse build deps
would need.
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:25:53AM +0200, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:47 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > I just uploaded iceweasel 30 to unstable, which is the first version not
> > to provide xulrunner-dev. Instead, there is an iceweasel-dev pac
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 09:48:31AM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> hi Mike and other mozilla maintainers for debian.
>
> I submitted https://bugs.debian.org/739395 to xul-ext-noscript,
> proposing a default search provider which is DuckDuckGo's non-javascript
> interface. David Prévot suggest
