On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:44:10AM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
I don't like long indentations, too.
IMHO, single space indentation and `comma + \n + single_space`
wrapping-style increase readability.
If a consensus has been reached in this discussion, please document it
on the wiki:
Am 25.04.2010 19:18, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
dh7 is not a successor for CDBS.
No, but IMHO it is easier to read.
I am also in favour of dh7 and dpkg-source 3.0 format, btw.
Cheers,
Fabian
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 09:32:04AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 25.04.2010 19:18, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
dh7 is not a successor for CDBS.
No, but IMHO it is easier to read.
I do understand that some find short-form dh7 easier to read than CDBS.
But is that enough reason for making
Am 26.04.2010 09:39, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
I do understand that some find short-form dh7 easier to read than CDBS.
It's just a matter of taste. Before dh7 was introduced I was also in
favour of CDBS, but the new override_* rules really got me. ;)
But is that enough reason for making it
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:21:07PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
It seems that cdbs allows Jonas to be very productive, which is a great
benefit for the packages he is working on. I just hope that his style
of work doesn't mean that no one else but Jonas touches the package
anymore.
Is it
Am 26.04.2010 13:01, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
Is it really fair to draw an image of me against the World?
I seem to recall others happy to use CDBS as well. Just not strongly
agitating about it, as I am.
Erm, I have understood Reinhard speaking *for* you, not against you!
But to be honest,
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 01:05:33PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 26.04.2010 13:01, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
Is it really fair to draw an image of me against the World?
I seem to recall others happy to use CDBS as well. Just not strongly
agitating about it, as I am.
Erm, I have
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 13:05:33 (CEST), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 26.04.2010 13:01, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
Is it really fair to draw an image of me against the World?
I seem to recall others happy to use CDBS as well. Just not strongly
agitating about it, as I am.
Erm, I have
Am 26.04.2010 16:16, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
What I meant to say was that I seem to recall other _in_this_team_ happy
to use CDBS as well. As Reinhard pointed out too.
Alright.
What I questioned was a wording by Benjamin Drung that could only (to
me) be interpreted as in this team we are
Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 16:16 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 03:05:18PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 26.04.2010 14:43, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
I seem to recall others happy to use CDBS as well.
Yes, of course. CDBS is widely used and accepted.
What I
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 04:45:43PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
We could either recommend dh7 or document the packaging patterns
described below by Jonas.
What I would find the most helpful was to document main patterns of
our actual packaging work: This would serve both as technical
Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 17:45 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
Do we wrap lists in debian/control (for example, Build-Depends)?
It is new to me - I had seen it before but you guys made me reflect on
it and have now made CDBS do it by default. In other words: I love it!
I do not like
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 08:16:29PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 17:45 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
Do we wrap lists in debian/control (for example, Build-Depends)?
It is new to me - I had seen it before but you guys made me reflect
on it and have now made CDBS do
Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 20:51 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 08:16:29PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 17:45 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
Do we wrap lists in debian/control (for example, Build-Depends)?
It is new to me - I had seen it
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:57:43PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 20:51 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 08:16:29PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 17:45 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
Do we wrap lists in debian/control
Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 23:16 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:57:43PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 20:51 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 08:16:29PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 17:45
I don't like long indentations, too.
IMHO, single space indentation and `comma + \n + single_space`
wrapping-style increase readability.
--
Alessio Treglia quadris...@ubuntu.com
Ubuntu MOTU Developer | Homepage: http://www.alessiotreglia.com
0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0
think we should properly document this and convert all packages
gradually.
Let's discuss a packaging policy for our team. My favorite would be dh7
and dpkg-source 3.0 format. We shouldn't enforce the switch to
dpkg-source 3.0 right now. Instead we should switch once the uploader
thinks
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Benjamin Drung bdr...@ubuntu.com wrote:
My favorite would be dh7 and dpkg-source 3.0 format.
It's also my favorite one.
We shouldn't enforce the switch to dpkg-source 3.0 right now.
Instead we should switch once the uploader thinks that the
tools are ready
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 06:44:19PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Let's discuss a packaging policy for our team. My favorite would be dh7
and dpkg-source 3.0 format. We shouldn't enforce the switch to
dpkg-source 3.0 right now. Instead we should switch once the uploader
thinks that the tools
Am Sonntag, den 25.04.2010, 19:00 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 06:44:19PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Let's discuss a packaging policy for our team. My favorite would be dh7
and dpkg-source 3.0 format. We shouldn't enforce the switch to
dpkg-source 3.0 right now
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 07:10:52PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Let's recommend dh7 and make it mandatory for new packages. We should
let the uploader decide, when it's the right time to switch from CDBS
to dh7.
Why, if I may ask?
dh7 is not a successor for CDBS.
Kind regards,
- Jonas
22 matches
Mail list logo
