On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Dan S wrote:
>
> 2012/5/14 Felipe Sateler :
> >
> > I'm trying building and it is not using the system boost lib...
>
> Which version of boost lib do you have installed? I think I need to
> change the requirement (to >=1.48
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Dan S wrote:
> 2012/5/10 Felipe Sateler :
>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Dan S wrote:
>>> 2012/5/9 Felipe Sateler :
>>>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Felipe Sateler
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> On 12-05-10 at 04:38pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Dan S
> > wrote:
>
> > > * nova-simd and nova-tt are libraries developed by tim blechmann
> > > (who also deve
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Dan S wrote:
> 2012/5/9 Felipe Sateler :
>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Dan S wrote:
>>>> Hi -
>>>>
>>>> SuperCollider 3.5.x is now out - 3.5.2
ith the fix, will upload ASAP.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Dan S wrote:
>> Hi -
>>
>> SuperCollider 3.5.x is now out - 3.5.2 just released. (Curently the
>> sid package is 3.4.5.) I've imported it into pkg-multimedia git.
>>
&g
t;http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/supercollider.git;a=summary>
I'm taking a look. Good to see scons is gone :)
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.deb
planet.
>
> I hope you will take VLC into consideration by accepting me into the Debian
> Multimedia Maintainers Team.
Welcome!
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debia
son shlibdeps are not working as expected.
I'll look at this.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 05:52, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> On 03/23/2012 02:38 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
> [LADISH]
>
>> We are still missing an explanation on the following sentence:
>>
>> Note that JACK needs to compile with a no-self-connect patch enabled
>&
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:32, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:15, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>> I've been reviewing the Bits, and have a comment:
>>>
>>> The lash->ladish chang
e that I explicitly ask for a team position on this matter. I'm well
> aware of Reinhard position, also thanks to his mail, but I'd like to
> understand if his is the uniform view on the team, or if there are other
> positions within the team.
My impression of reading this list fo
0300 schrieb Felipe Sateler:
>> If you do not want to be an admin, just grant yourself lowered
>> privileges in the team page. I surely hope we didn't decide everyone
>> was forced to be an admin. What we did decide is that anyone who wants
>> to be an admin, can be one (
mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
working with upstream to fix it. I hope to have the build system ready
soonish.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:15, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> I've been reviewing the Bits, and have a comment:
>
> The lash->ladish change is confusing. The part about a patch being
> needed is unnecessary IMO. It should be replaced by a statement of
> wether jackd1 and jackd2
h do).
I'll edit this thing a bit now (mostly cosmetic changes).
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
wed in this repository
>
> Could someone with more git-fu help me delete it?
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2196874/cannot-delete-remote-branch-in-git
The update hook should be the culprit
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-mainta
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:30, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 06:26, Cyril LAVIER
> wrote:
>> Hi pkg-multimedia members.
>>
>> I'm Cyril Lavier, a 25 years old system administrator from France.
>>
>> I would like to join the team to c
maintaining nginx packages.
>
> I'm familiar with the BTS, I would be pleased to contribute to this project
> and help on packages/issues.
>
> Looking forward to work with you.
Hi,
Please apply via the alioth web interface so that we can grant you privileges.
--
Saludos,
Fel
sing the cpu does to
follow branches can be very relevant too. Code compactness is also
important due to cache hits/misses. So I think the only way to tell if
an optimization really is beneficial is via benchmarking.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
f
>
> - use adduser --system rtaudio in jackd-common's postinst scripts
>
> - maybe ask the user about adding user IDs to this new group
>
>
> Do we have to coordinate with debian-devel about the group name?
I think we should. There are probably other applications that need
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 07:12, Dan S wrote:
> 2012/1/22 Felipe Sateler :
>> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 15:00, Dan S wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi -
>>>
>>> SuperCollider just released bugfix release 3.4.5. I've imported it
>>> into the debian-mu
vior you
describe was true...
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
e in the library, then the ABI would
be broken. Is this the case?
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 17:53, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-01-19 at 07:06pm, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> On 12-01-19 at 02:24pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> > During the past month or so I've been very busy, and haven't been
>> > able to finish up the new upst
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 15:08, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-01-19 at 02:24pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> During the past month or so I've been very busy, and haven't been able
>> to finish up the new upstream release of csound. I believe the package
>> is wor
changes in both
versions. There is an embedded copy of the mpadec library (not really
used anywhere else, apparently), which needs checking. Also, there may
be new opcodes and whatnot. Any help will be appreciated.
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multime
7;t. Unfortunately, you have to create yet another account.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
tion
>
>
>
> ___
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
ed an idea,
> which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to
> himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession
> of everyone, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it. -
> Thomas Jefferson
>
>
>
> __
iledges for it. Its all ready for upload, hopefully someone can
> upload it in the next day or two so it makes it into testing in time.
>
Uploaded.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintaine
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 16:12, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 11-12-01 at 03:56pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 15:25, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> >> > I sure prefer if you are not lazy but instead respectful to those
>> >> > develo
undistributable).
[1] More correctly, debian's approach to complying is putting the
stuff in the copyright file.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 00:16, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 11-11-21 at 11:25am, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>> On 2011-11-21 03:26, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> > Looks like there is a strange thing with the install-sh section in
>> > debian/copyright. The license name c
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 21:50, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 11-11-29 at 08:00pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> As discussed in another thread, the autotools stuff need not be
>> documented in the copyright file, and is just unnecessary noise.
>
> Sorry for not paying attentio
hread, the autotools stuff need not be
documented in the copyright file, and is just unnecessary noise.
BTW, I still find it weird that we need to issue weird commands in pd
to load distro-provided externals. Can someone please explain to me
the rationale for such a requirement?
--
Sal
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 07:25, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2011-11-21 03:26, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:49, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>>
>>> right, makes sense.
>>> i a
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:49, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2011-11-15 15:34, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>
>> Sorry I haven't answered, I've been very busy.
>
> aye.
> sorry for perstering then.
>
s to fulfill their
> jobs.
Actually, that is a problem with scons. SCons doesn't distinguish
between 'configure' and 'build', so it performs all tests whenever
invoked. One can try to hack around this like with Dan's patch, but in
the general
oes not
> guarantee puredata-dev?
Sorry I haven't answered, I've been very busy.
It seems to me that the dependency of puredata on puredata-dev should
be transitory (there is no reason to need the -dev package in a user
system). Therefore
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 19:16, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 21:33 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 17:51, Roman Haefeli wrote:
>
>> > I wasn't able to verify that but it certainly doesn't hurt. I replaced
>> > the spac
e build dependency should be
puredata-dev | puredata (<< 0.43), since puredata >= 0.43 is not
enough to build.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 17:51, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> Hi Felipe
>
> Thanks for your remarks.
>
> On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 23:18 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:52, Roman Haefeli wrote:
>> > I uploaded the pd-flite package to git.debian.org
iptions of licenses.
Also, I believe licenses should be either on a separate paragraph or
written in the file paragraph but not both.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.or
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:49, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on updating csound's copyright file, and I have a case I
> did not handle before. Csound ships four datafiles which are the
> result of a Discrete Fourier Transform of data (impulse responses)
we ignore it? If it is a valid
copyright claim, can we redistribute these datasets?
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailma
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 03:02, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 17.10.2011 00:51, schrieb Felipe Sateler:
>> Dan, I'm CCing you to try to get your attention.
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 18:59, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>>> Can we fetch sced3 from upstr
ipt into the current debian
packaging or do we need to wait for the next upstream release?
Otherwise, I'm just going to disable the gedit plugin package for the
time being.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing
g.
This looks fishy. You might want to ask on debian-release.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 03:10, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Mi, Okt 05, 2011 at 23:38:00 (CEST), Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 18:48, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've update (most) pkg-multimedia post-receiv
27;m sorry I can't check right now (otherwise I'd check and change it
myself, but lest this be forgotten), but did you also modify the repo
setup script to add this too? So that new repositories get the right
hook by default.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
_
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 16:17, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Do we want to care? If so, could somebody take the required actions?
Seems like for some reason non ascii characters go mangled up. Don't
know what to do about it, though. I'll try to inspect that when I get
time.
-
ot;
> fi
> cat <<-EOF
> - Subject: ${EMAILPREFIX}$repo/$short_refname: $describe
> + Subject: ${EMAILPREFIX}$subjectdesc $refname_type, $short_refname,
> ${change_type}d. $describe
This and the above are to send more meaningful subje
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 05:25, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 06:35:30PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> What's the difference? Should ecasound2.2 be RMed?
>
> ecasound replaces ecasound2.2, so yes, ecasound2.2 should be removed (I
> don't know ho
What's the difference? Should ecasound2.2 be RMed?
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multi
Can we fetch sced3 from upstream's git repository?
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multi
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 15:43, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 11-08-12 at 01:27pm, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 09:49, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> > > If you cannot live with others applying such tiny changes to your
>> > > pet packages, you sh
people with unsupported old cruft in their system will
continue to have a working system, and it may even enable them to
remove said old cruft from the system.
Jonas, why do you claim it is not a tiny change? In this case it is a
1 line patch that requires no maintainance.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sate
hould be disabled by default and
enabled when needed. They provide zero value for most. Those who need
it can build the static libraries themselves. And they probably
will/should anyways, since static libs will probably be used in some
rare context.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 22:38, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On Jul 26, 2011, at 8:38 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 16:16, Hans-Christoph Steiner
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> There is one more package with the same "fatal erro
ploaded.
Hans, please fix the dependencies on pd and explicitly state the
preferred provider (on this and the other pd-* packages).
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.
ages into squeeze-backports, and maybe others might be
> enthusiastic about this as well.
FYI, there's already a draft at the usual
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/BitsFrom page.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-mai
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 13:10, Dan S wrote:
> 2011/7/20 Felipe Sateler :
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 23:28, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 13:45, Dan S wrote:
>>>> Hi -
>>>>
>>>> 2011/7/14 Robin Gareus :
>>>>>
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 23:50, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On Jun 14, 2011, at 12:31 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 13, 2011, at 8:01 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 14:43, Hans-Christoph Steiner
>>>
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 19:52, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:41, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 13, 2011, at 8:51 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 15:20, Hans-Christoph Steiner
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 23:28, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 13:45, Dan S wrote:
>> Hi -
>>
>> 2011/7/14 Robin Gareus :
>>> Hi Felipe,
>>>
>>> On 07/14/2011 03:30 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>
ll upload when there are more changes
to the package.
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 13:45, Dan S wrote:
> Hi -
>
> 2011/7/14 Robin Gareus :
>> Hi Felipe,
>>
>> On 07/14/2011 03:30 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> (CCing you because I don't know if you are subscribed)
>>
>> I am subscrib
t we already have a
package in the works. Please check it out of our git repository[1] and
check if any of your fixes still apply. We would be very happy to have
you join us in maintaining this package!
[1]
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/supercollider.git;a=summary
--
Salud
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 13:48, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> Hey Felipe,
>
> I'm sorry for the late reply.
>
> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 3:49 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>> Are you sure this is the right bug you are fixing? Jakub fixed this
>>> bug otherwise.
>
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 21:38, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 09:05, wrote:
>> The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
>> commit c1db20a6bd2d32efb2579d7830fee861e539be78
>> Author: Alessio Treglia
>> Date: Thu May 5 14:04:19 2011
es:
> #624982, LP: #771134).
Are you sure this is the right bug you are fixing? Jakub fixed this
bug otherwise.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 16:46, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Felipe Sateler , 2011-06-30, 15:37:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=csound&arch=sparc&ver=1%3A5.13.0~dfsg-3&stamp=1298329817
>>>>
>>>> http
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 15:33, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:56, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> Source: csound
>> Version: 1:5.13.0~dfsg-3
>> Severity: serious
>> Justification: fails to build from source
>> User: debian-sp...@lists.debian.org
>
1&stamp=1309297483
This has happened several times during the past year. Smetana has
always been able to build csound, so this is clearly not a csound
issue. I don't think it is reasonable to file serious bugs against a
package when gcc or swig are segfaulting.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sat
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:41, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On Jun 13, 2011, at 8:51 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 15:20, Hans-Christoph Steiner
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Here are my lowest priority uploads, but I hope to get them upl
what needs
to be done).
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
this?
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 20:00, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 13:30 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> On Jun 13, 2011, at 8:24 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 15:06, Hans-Christoph Steiner
>> > wrote:
>>
from
> collab-maint/puredata.git. IOhannes and I have been asking the maintainers
> to upload for weeks, but they are unresponsive. So perhaps an NMU would be
> appropriate.
What are the changes in puredata? Is there a bug filed?
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 15:13, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On Jun 13, 2011, at 12:20 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 22:20, Hans-Christoph Steiner
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Just to reiterate, the plan is to drop those patches now that
&
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 15:06, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On Jun 12, 2011, at 10:40 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 22:05, Hans-Christoph Steiner
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 19:18 +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>&g
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 14:43, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On Jun 12, 2011, at 10:53 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 22:15, Hans-Christoph Steiner
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 19:30 +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>&g
and
not documented reason on changelog), pd-pdogg (has pristine-tar data
in the master branch, an accidental merge?). Uploaded the rest.
Next time, please do not manually tag the releases (pd-ekext), most
likely the person uploading forgot to push the git tags. F
;t
mean the package is not fit for debian because the copyright file
cannot list all copyright holders.
In other words, I believe it is acceptable to put "others" in the
Files sections, when filling the complete list is too hard.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
__
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 22:15, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 19:30 +0000, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 02:45, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> >
>> > On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:41 -0300, "Felipe Sateler"
>> &
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 22:05, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 19:18 +0000, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> I'm confused. You make a change for puredata >= 0.43. Does this break
>> puredata <0.43? The Depends field suggests that (puredata-core is non
>
phone to me is just an opportunity to be irritated wherever you are."
> - Linus Torvalds
>
>
> ___
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 02:45, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:41 -0300, "Felipe Sateler"
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 21:55, Felipe Sateler
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 19:08, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> &g
d headers? I think the
add_required_headers patch can be removed.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
_
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
> pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
>
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
org[0: 217.196.43.134]: errno=Connection refused
> fatal: unable to connect a socket (Connection refused)
> gbp:error: git returned 128
> gbp:error: Couldn't clone git repository
>
>
> Some problem with server?
Alioth is being upgraded, so it will probably
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 09:04, Dan S wrote:
> 2011/5/15 Felipe Sateler :
>> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 06:07, Dan S wrote:
>>> 2011/5/11 Felipe Sateler :
>>>> Hi, sorry for taking so long.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 15:57, Dan S wrote:
&
cryptic error (e.g. "/usr/bin/jackd not found"), leaving the
> use alone
>
> i therefore suggest to raise dependency-level of libjack towards jackd to
> "suggests" again, so people will actually be able to use their installed
> jack-enabled applications.
I think you
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 06:07, Dan S wrote:
> 2011/5/11 Felipe Sateler :
>> Hi, sorry for taking so long.
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 15:57, Dan S wrote:
>>> 2011/4/16 Felipe Sateler :
>>>
>>>> - I would really like to fold all the -de
Hi, sorry for taking so long.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 15:57, Dan S wrote:
> 2011/4/16 Felipe Sateler :
>
>> - I would really like to fold all the -dev packages into one. I don't
>> see much point in splitting them.
>
> I've discussed it with the upstream devs an
eck this out, but it's on my
todo list. I'll try to check this weekend.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
o use
> the new template, so i decided to fix the problem using packaging
> possibilities.
This is the key part: for most pd externals, the makefile is
essentially the same. Does it make sense to centralize that? What do
others think?
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
__
in the subject (i admit i
> don't type this entire letter for each of the packages).
I see that some bugs (buils system, mostly) will require uploading all
(or most) of the pd externals. Can we do something to avoid that?
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
501 - 600 of 1037 matches
Mail list logo
