On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 20:00, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 13:30 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> On Jun 13, 2011, at 8:24 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 15:06, Hans-Christoph Steiner
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Jun 12, 2011, at 10:40 PM,
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 13:30 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On Jun 13, 2011, at 8:24 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 15:06, Hans-Christoph Steiner
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Jun 12, 2011, at 10:40 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 22:05, Ha
On Jun 13, 2011, at 8:24 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 15:06, Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:
On Jun 12, 2011, at 10:40 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 22:05, Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 19:18 +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 15:06, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On Jun 12, 2011, at 10:40 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 22:05, Hans-Christoph Steiner
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 19:18 +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
I'm confused. You make a change for
On Jun 12, 2011, at 10:40 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 22:05, Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 19:18 +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
I'm confused. You make a change for puredata >= 0.43. Does this
break
puredata <0.43? The Depends field suggests that (p
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 22:05, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 19:18 +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> I'm confused. You make a change for puredata >= 0.43. Does this break
>> puredata <0.43? The Depends field suggests that (puredata-core is non
>> existent until 0.43). If so,
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 19:18 +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> I'm confused. You make a change for puredata >= 0.43. Does this break
> puredata <0.43? The Depends field suggests that (puredata-core is non
> existent until 0.43). If so, the build-depends on puredata << 0.43 is
> wrong.
puredata << 0.43
I'm confused. You make a change for puredata >= 0.43. Does this break
puredata <0.43? The Depends field suggests that (puredata-core is non
existent until 0.43). If so, the build-depends on puredata << 0.43 is
wrong.
Also, doesn't 0.43 bring in the required headers? I think the
add_required_headers
Thanks! The bonus is that I'm a DM now, so once this is uploaded, I
won't need to bother you any more with it ;)
.hc
On Jun 7, 2011, at 2:28 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
I've been a bit busy, I'll try to get to this during the week.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 13:28, Hans-Christoph Steiner
wr
I've been a bit busy, I'll try to get to this during the week.
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 13:28, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> Just a little ping on this. I saw that pd-comport got uploaded, thanks for
> that. This is currently my most urgent pending upload.
>
> .hc
>
> On May 25, 2011, at 2:52
Just a little ping on this. I saw that pd-comport got uploaded,
thanks for that. This is currently my most urgent pending upload.
.hc
On May 25, 2011, at 2:52 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
The 'puredata' package has been split into a suite of packages, and
now
installs its files
The 'puredata' package has been split into a suite of packages, and now
installs its files into /usr/lib/puredata. I updated the
'puredata-import' package to work with this new suite of packages. The
old package will not work properly. Also, I added DM-Upload-Allowed:
yes since I'm now a DM, so
12 matches
Mail list logo
