Package: morituri
Version: 0.1.0-1
Severity: minor
sample session:
> ~$ rip drive
> Usage: rip drive [command]
>
> Use --help to get a list of commands.
> ~$ rip drive --help
> Usage:
> rip [OPTION...] - GStreamer initialization
>
> Help Options:
> -h, --help
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 574280 wishlist
Bug #574280 [morituri] morituri: advertises --help on error messages, but that
option provides no fuerther information
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'minor'
> retitle 574280 morituri: --help option hint could be less c
severity 574280 wishlist
retitle 574280 morituri: --help option hint could be less confusing
thanks
[sent again, properly cc'ed cont...@bugs.debian.org this time]
Hi Peter,
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:05:23AM +0100, Peter Wiersig wrote:
sample session:
> ~$ rip drive
> Usage: rip drive [command
severity 574280 wishlist
retitle 574280 morituri: --help option hint could be less confusing
Hi Peter,
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:05:23AM +0100, Peter Wiersig wrote:
sample session:
> ~$ rip drive
> Usage: rip drive [command]
>
> Use --help to get a list of commands.
> ~$ rip drive --help
> Us
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #introduces a security hole allowing access to the accounts of users who use
> the package
> severity 524805 grave
Bug #524805 [mplayer] mplayer: CVE-2009-0385 integer signedness error
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping p
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 21:42:58 (CET), Philipp Kern wrote:
> It would be great if every team on track could send us a short mail to
> debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
What is our status regarding squeeze?
AFAIUI ffmpeg is done, and I'm not aware of similar pending library
transitions, read: no f
Am 17.03.2010 14:42, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
What is our status regarding squeeze?
For the packages that I have my hands in, I'd recommend to upload
a52dec ASAP to get rid of two minor but annoying bugs (#566385 and
#570508). Also, I have prepared packages for the new upstream version
of l
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:42:04PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Hi!
> How is the state of affairs wrt jack? If we want jack2 for squeeze, we
> should communicate this ASAP!
Let's put it this way: we know that jackd1 is stable, so it qualifies
for a release.
If we vote against jackd2, we're mi
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 14:48:30 (CET), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 17.03.2010 14:42, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
>> What is our status regarding squeeze?
>
> For the packages that I have my hands in, I'd recommend to upload a52dec
> ASAP to get rid of two minor but annoying bugs (#566385 and
> #57
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 14:54:12 (CET), Adrian Knoth wrote:
> From the amount of testing, I'd vote for jackd1, from a feature
> perspective, I'd go for jackd2.
>
> So whoever is concerned, please share your opinion. ;)
What are other distros doing? What are the plans for fedora, gentoo and
opensu
Am 17.03.2010 15:21, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
I'll make a note to upload them soon.
Thanks.
Still, I don't think we should try to switch. E.g. I know that current
mplayer rc3 will not work with ffmpeg 0.6, and I have no idea what else
might break.
Alright, fine with me.
--
Dipl.-Phys. Fab
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:54, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:42:04PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>> How is the state of affairs wrt jack? If we want jack2 for squeeze, we
>> should communicate this ASAP!
>
> Let's put it this way: we know that jackd1 is stable, so i
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 03:23:11PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > From the amount of testing, I'd vote for jackd1, from a feature
> > perspective, I'd go for jackd2.
> >
> > So whoever is concerned, please share your opinion. ;)
> What are other distros doing? What are the plans for fedora, ge
Am 17.03.2010 16:15, schrieb Adrian Knoth:
I have absolutely no idea about their plans. ;)
So maybe we should also stick to jack1 for queeze, make jack2 the
default post-squeeze and kindly ask the backports team to provide
jack2 packages for squeeze afterwards.
--
Dipl.-Phys. Fabian Greffra
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:20:17AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > So whoever is concerned, please share your opinion. ;)
> I would think that at this stage of Linux audio, trying to do pro
> audio with a stable release of debian is nuts.
Not really. ardour-2.8.7, calf-plugins and ffado will be
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 04:41:08PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 17.03.2010 16:15, schrieb Adrian Knoth:
>> I have absolutely no idea about their plans. ;)
>
> So maybe we should also stick to jack1 for queeze, make jack2 the
> default post-squeeze and kindly ask the backports team to provi
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:55, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:20:17AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
>> > So whoever is concerned, please share your opinion. ;)
>> I would think that at this stage of Linux audio, trying to do pro
>> audio with a stable release of debian is nuts.
FYI: The status of the idjc source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.8.1-3
Current version: 0.8.1-4
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
la
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:23:03PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:55, Adrian Knoth wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:20:17AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On the other hand, for casual use of jack, a more stable version
would be preferred over a more featureful one.
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 13:50, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:23:03PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> Also, if my understanding is correct, jack2 is ABI compatible with jack1,
>> so no library transition is needed.
>
> That was my impression too. If so, why don't we ship *b
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 17:13:14 (CET), Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 04:41:08PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
>> Am 17.03.2010 16:15, schrieb Adrian Knoth:
>>> I have absolutely no idea about their plans. ;)
>>
>> So maybe we should also stick to jack1 for queeze, make j
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:09:33PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 13:50, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:23:03PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Also, if my understanding is correct, jack2 is ABI compatible with
jack1, so no library transition is needed.
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:09:33PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 13:50, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:23:03PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >> Also, if my understanding is correct, jack2 is ABI compatible with jack1,
> >> so no library transition
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 06:24:10PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:09:33PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 13:50, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:23:03PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Also, if my understanding is correc
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:24:43PM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:09:33PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 13:50, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:23:03PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> Also, if my understanding is correct
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:29:31PM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 06:24:10PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:09:33PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 13:50, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:23:03PM -0
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 14:46, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:29:31PM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 06:24:10PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:09:33PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17,
Send Your details for the claims of your won prize awarded to you by the Lottery
Board, providing your full information
Names
Address
Country
Lottery Board
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
ambdec_0.4.2-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ambdec_0.4.2-1.dsc
ambdec_0.4.2.orig.tar.gz
ambdec_0.4.2-1.diff.gz
ambdec_0.4.2-1_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
__
(new) ambdec_0.4.2-1.diff.gz optional sound
(new) ambdec_0.4.2-1.dsc optional sound
(new) ambdec_0.4.2-1_i386.deb optional sound
Ambisonic decoder for first and second order
AmbDec is an Ambisonics decoder for up to 36 speakers. It can be used
for both horizontal and full 3-D systems of first, se
libquicktime_1.1.5-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libquicktime_1.1.5-1.dsc
libquicktime_1.1.5.orig.tar.gz
libquicktime_1.1.5-1.diff.gz
libquicktime-doc_1.1.5-1_all.deb
libquicktime1_1.1.5-1_amd64.deb
libquicktime-dev_1.1.5-1_amd64.deb
quicktim
a52dec_0.7.4-14_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
a52dec_0.7.4-14.dsc
a52dec_0.7.4-14.diff.gz
liba52-0.7.4_0.7.4-14_amd64.deb
liba52-0.7.4-dev_0.7.4-14_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
___
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 03:24:19PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 14:46, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
What I propose is to ship the new code as a separate source package
and a separate binary package. The binary package will conflict with
the similar binary package provided
Accepted:
a52dec_0.7.4-14.diff.gz
to main/a/a52dec/a52dec_0.7.4-14.diff.gz
a52dec_0.7.4-14.dsc
to main/a/a52dec/a52dec_0.7.4-14.dsc
liba52-0.7.4-dev_0.7.4-14_amd64.deb
to main/a/a52dec/liba52-0.7.4-dev_0.7.4-14_amd64.deb
liba52-0.7.4_0.7.4-14_amd64.deb
to main/a/a52dec/liba52-0.7.4_0.7.4
Accepted:
libquicktime-dev_1.1.5-1_amd64.deb
to main/libq/libquicktime/libquicktime-dev_1.1.5-1_amd64.deb
libquicktime-doc_1.1.5-1_all.deb
to main/libq/libquicktime/libquicktime-doc_1.1.5-1_all.deb
libquicktime1_1.1.5-1_amd64.deb
to main/libq/libquicktime/libquicktime1_1.1.5-1_amd64.deb
li
Your message dated Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:02:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#566385: fixed in a52dec 0.7.4-14
has caused the Debian Bug report #566385,
regarding a52dec: Uploaders field not correctly written
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:02:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#570508: fixed in a52dec 0.7.4-14
has caused the Debian Bug report #570508,
regarding debian/watch for a52dec does not work
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 15:56, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> There is a problem, though. The library names collide, so one would
>> have to have libjack1-0 and libjack2-0. This would mean that the
>> shlibs files would have to provide alternative dependencies (like
>> ffmpeg is doing for the unstripp
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 04:53:48PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 15:56, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
There is a problem, though. The library names collide, so one would
have to have libjack1-0 and libjack2-0. This would mean that the
shlibs files would have to provide alterna
Adrian Knoth wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:20:17AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On the other hand, for casual use of jack, a more stable version would
>> be preferred over a more featureful one.
> Unfortunately, this is only half of the story. For the occasional use of
> jack, jackd2 is e
40 matches
Mail list logo
