Re: [SCM] gmerlin-avdecoder/master: Update copyright (still BSD-4 flaws to workout, though).

Am 09.12.2010 18:35, schrieb Burkhard Plaum: The ultimate solution would be a GPL replacement for inet_aton() or a (portable!) way to get rid of it, but I'm not sure it's worth the trouble. I think gnulib has an implementation:

Re: [SCM] gmerlin-avdecoder/master: Update copyright (still BSD-4 flaws to workout, though).

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:23:45AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 00:23 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: Does having it sit in the source (and not build it) present any problems? I don't think so, since the BSD-4 stuff does not mix with the GPL-2 stuff. Its kind of grey

Re: [SCM] pd-cyclone/master: Rewrite copyright file: Main licensing changed; Authors dropped; Lack of licensing added!!!

On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 11:59:14PM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 15:32 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: The grandfathered licensing terms include this: > The authors hereby grant permission [...], provided that existing > copyright notices are retained in all copies

Re: [SCM] pd-cyclone/master: Rewrite copyright file: Main licensing changed; Authors dropped; Lack of licensing added!!!

On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 11:54:31PM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 14:14 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 09:17:33AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 07:14, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>> +Copyright: cycling'74; >>> +License: NO

Re: [SCM] rumor/master: Changelog for 1.0.5-1

On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 05:04:47PM -0500, Ryan Kavanagh wrote: Alessio and list, On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 08:54:37PM +0100, Alessio Treglia wrote: On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Above could be merged to a single line like this: > >  * Rewrite rules file using short

Re: [SCM] pd-cyclone/master: Rewrite copyright file: Main licensing changed; Authors dropped; Lack of licensing added!!!

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:08:15AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 11:14 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: If e.g. IOhannes m. zmoelnig is mentioned due to Debian packaging, I suggest to add a copyright (and licensing! they always go together) statement in ebian/rules,

Processing of pd-cyclone_0.1~alpha55-1_amd64.changes

pd-cyclone_0.1~alpha55-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: pd-cyclone_0.1~alpha55-1.dsc pd-cyclone_0.1~alpha55.orig.tar.gz pd-cyclone_0.1~alpha55-1.debian.tar.gz pd-cyclone_0.1~alpha55-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on

Bug#606609: icecast2: affected by privilege escalation vulnerability in logrotate

Package: icecast2 Version: 2.3.2-3 Severity: grave Justification: privilege escalation vulnerability Tags: security There was a privilege escalation vulnerability in logrotate that I reported about four years ago and which finally got fixed in testing rouhgly one year ago (see bug #388608). In len

pd-cyclone_0.1~alpha55-1_amd64.changes is NEW

(new) pd-cyclone_0.1~alpha55-1.debian.tar.gz optional sound (new) pd-cyclone_0.1~alpha55-1.dsc optional sound (new) pd-cyclone_0.1~alpha55-1_amd64.deb optional sound a Pd library of clones of Max/MSP 4.5 objects Cyclone is a library of PureData classes, bringing some level of compatibility betwee

Introducing myself to the team

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello all! I am Bilal Akhtar, 14, and I would like to get involved with this team, mainly with audacious(-*) package maintainance. My previous work has been mainly with Ubuntu, where I am a MOTU developer, and here I could help in fixin

Re: [SCM] gmerlin-avdecoder/master: Update copyright (still BSD-4 flaws to workout, though).

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/10/2010 09:53 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >> Much better would be if upstream (Burkhard) used one of the New BSD or >> GPL'ed version of this file, like: >> http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/head/sys/libkern/inet_aton.c >> http://doxygen.post

Re: [SCM] gmerlin-avdecoder/master: Update copyright (still BSD-4 flaws to workout, though).

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:30:13AM +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: On 12/10/2010 09:53 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: We _must_ rip out the BSD-4 licensed code from our source. We _can_ simply rip it out, and then add a Debian-specific patch reapplying one of those alternative files, i don't

Re: Introducing myself to the team

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 01:24:52PM +0300, Bilal Akhtar wrote: Hello all! I am Bilal Akhtar, 14, and I would like to get involved with this team, mainly with audacious(-*) package maintainance. My previous work has been mainly with Ubuntu, where I am a MOTU developer, and here I co

Re: [SCM] gmerlin-avdecoder/master: Update copyright (still BSD-4 flaws to workout, though).

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 05:53, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:23:45AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> >> On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 00:23 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>> >>> Does having it sit in the source (and not build it) present any >>> problems? I don't think so, si

Re: Hello DebianMultimedia team!

On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 08:30, Duy Hùng Trần wrote: > Hi Jonas and the team, > > I subscribed pkg-multimedia-maintainers and pkg-multimedia-commits already. > I also have a alioth account. I have added you to the alioth project. Welcome aboard! >It's great if I have change to review other's > wor

Re: [SCM] gmerlin-avdecoder/master: Update copyright (still BSD-4 flaws to workout, though).

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 08:28:46AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 05:53, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:23:45AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 00:23 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: Does having it sit in the source (and not b

Re: [SCM] gmerlin-avdecoder/master: Update copyright (still BSD-4 flaws to workout, though).

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:18:42PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:30:13AM +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: On 12/10/2010 09:53 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: We _must_ rip out the BSD-4 licensed code from our source. We _can_ simply rip it out, and then add a Debian-spe

Re: [SCM] gmerlin-avdecoder/master: Update copyright (still BSD-4 flaws to workout, though).

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:50:03PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:30:13AM +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: the main problem i do see now is, that the offending code has been copied into a separate file but not moved (it still exists in a cre component that we cannot e

Processed (with 5 errors): yawn, not funny

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign #606595 logrotate Bug #606595 [bacula-common] bacula-common: affected by privilege escalation vulnerability in logrotate Bug reassigned from package 'bacula-common' to 'logrotate'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions bacula/2.4.4-1

Re: [SCM] gmerlin-avdecoder/master: Update copyright (still BSD-4 flaws to workout, though).

Hi, Am 10.12.2010 11:30, schrieb IOhannes m zmölnig: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/10/2010 09:53 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Much better would be if upstream (Burkhard) used one of the New BSD or GPL'ed version of this file, like: http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/head

Ok to switch gavl back to CDBS?

Hi all, Gavl used to use CDBS for packaging. Two commits ago it was repackaged using short-form dh. I need a newer version for gmerlin-avdecoder, but can only reliably handle CDBS (and won't spent time learning short-form dh). Do anyone object to switching back to CDBS? Or alternatively, p

Re: RFS: advene

Hello On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 22:53 +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > I think you forgot a build dependency (python-gst0.10). I didn't notice > this until I tried to build the package with pbuilder. Thanks for spotting this. It is not needed, and I have fixed this upstream (not yet released but in

Re: Ok to switch gavl back to CDBS?

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Or alternatively, please someone package a newer release of gavl. Do you need a CVS snapshot? -- Alessio Treglia          | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer         | ales...@debian.org Ubuntu Core Developer    | quadris...@ubunt

Re: Ok to switch gavl back to CDBS?

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 03:47:40PM +0100, Alessio Treglia wrote: On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Or alternatively, please someone package a newer release of gavl. Do you need a CVS snapshot? No, I need at least version 1.2.0. Only 1.1.2 is currently packaged. -

Re: Ok to switch gavl back to CDBS?

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 03:47:40PM +0100, Alessio Treglia wrote: On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Or alternatively, please someone package a newer release of gavl. Do you need a CVS snapshot? A snapshot of gmerlin is needed (but not of gavl). Also, I suspect your sn

Re: [SCM] pd-cyclone/master: Rewrite copyright file: Main licensing changed; Authors dropped; Lack of licensing added!!!

On Dec 10, 2010, at 4:14 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:08:15AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 11:14 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: The grandfathered licensing terms include this: > The authors hereby grant permission [...], provided th

Re: Ok to switch gavl back to CDBS?

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 03:47:40PM +0100, Alessio Treglia wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>> >>> Or alternatively, please someone package a newer release of gavl. >> >> Do you need a CVS snapshot? >

Processing of rumor_1.0.5-1_amd64.changes

rumor_1.0.5-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: rumor_1.0.5-1.dsc rumor_1.0.5.orig.tar.bz2 rumor_1.0.5-1.debian.tar.gz rumor_1.0.5-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

rumor_1.0.5-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: rumor_1.0.5-1.debian.tar.gz to main/r/rumor/rumor_1.0.5-1.debian.tar.gz rumor_1.0.5-1.dsc to main/r/rumor/rumor_1.0.5-1.dsc rumor_1.0.5-1_amd64.deb to main/r/rumor/rumor_1.0.5-1_amd64.deb rumor_1.0.5.orig.tar.bz2 to main/r/rumor/rumor_1.0.5.orig.tar.bz2 Override entries for y

Re: RFS: advene

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 03:40:09PM +0100, Olivier Aubert wrote: > Hello Hi :), > I am now looking for a DD team member who would create a git repository > on alioth for it (for the moment I have uploaded the gbp tree at > http://advene.org/debian/advene.git ), and also consider my inclusion in >

Bug#605830: pd-pmpd: FTBFS on non-Linux: undefined references

Hi, Hans-Christoph Steiner (10/12/2010): > I just pushed the relevant changes to the git repo for this package, > pkg-multimedia/pd-pmpd.git. It is based on a patch that worked for > a closely related package, pd-iemnet, where it worked. I don't have > access to a kFreeBSD or Hurd machine, can

Re: [SCM] pd-cyclone/master: Rewrite copyright file: Main licensing changed; Authors dropped; Lack of licensing added!!!

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:19:39AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Dec 10, 2010, at 4:14 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:08:15AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 11:14 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: The grandfathered licensing terms in

Re: Ok to switch gavl back to CDBS?

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 05:22:06PM +0100, Alessio Treglia wrote: On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 03:47:40PM +0100, Alessio Treglia wrote: On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Or alternatively, please someone package a ne

Re: [SCM] pd-cyclone/master: Rewrite copyright file: Main licensing changed; Authors dropped; Lack of licensing added!!!

On Dec 10, 2010, at 12:12 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:19:39AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Dec 10, 2010, at 4:14 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:08:15AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 11:14 +0100, Jo

Re: [SCM] pd-cyclone/master: Rewrite copyright file: Main licensing changed; Authors dropped; Lack of licensing added!!!

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:34:04PM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Dec 10, 2010, at 12:12 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:19:39AM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: I do see notice of copyright in debian/copyright with each line marked Copyright: I know the pr

Re: foo-yc20 released

On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 08:28:17PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > If any other files (which are used for the resulting binaries) is > GPL-2 (i.e. without permitting later revisions), then they are > incompatible. For my packaging stuff I usually use the same license as the upstream sources (jus

Re: [SCM] gmerlin-avdecoder/master: Update copyright (still BSD-4 flaws to workout, though).

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/10/2010 01:25 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > I am now preparing a release for unstable. > > Please do speak up if anyone disagrees with this. personally, i would wait until gmerlin_avdecoder is released. burkhard has put up a pre-release on h

Re: requesting sponsorship for pd-purepd

On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 09:54 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 09:54, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 20:44, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > >> > >> pd-purepd is a library of common operations implemented in Pd rather > >> than C. Its a fledgling effort somew

Re: [SCM] gmerlin-avdecoder/master: Update copyright (still BSD-4 flaws to workout, though).

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 07:56:23PM +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: On 12/10/2010 01:25 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: I am now preparing a release for unstable. Please do speak up if anyone disagrees with this. personally, i would wait until gmerlin_avdecoder is released. burkhard has put up a

Re: foo-yc20 released

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 07:26:50PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 08:28:17PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: If any other files (which are used for the resulting binaries) is GPL-2 (i.e. without permitting later revisions), then they are incompatible. For my packaging