Re: Package should be removed..

2011-02-01 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 07:47:37AM +, Alessio Treglia wrote: Gerardo, Ivan, as Romain said, it doesn't make sense to continue supporting icecast-server. We should file a removal request, I think. Recently in this bugreport someone showed interest in taking over maintainance of icecast-ser

Re: [SCM] ecasound/master: fix fixperms target

2011-02-01 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 11:27:57AM +, zmoelnig-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: unfortunately, dh doesn't set the $(pkgdir) Uhm, it's a makefile, and the variable gets expanded by make, so you could just declare it yourself - like this: pkgdir = debian/python-ecasound override_d

timemachine

2011-02-01 Thread Adrian Knoth
Hi Robert! I've seen you're the current maintainer of timemachine with your last upload dating back to 2005-07-02. There are a couple of new releases and some bugs in the BTS. If you don't mind, I'd like to take care, re-assign the package to pkg-multimedia-maintainers and group maintain it ther

Re: [SCM] ecasound/master: fix fixperms target

2011-02-01 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-02-01 12:32, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 11:27:57AM +, > zmoelnig-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: >>unfortunately, dh doesn't set the $(pkgdir) > > Uhm, it's a makefile, and the variable gets expanded by make

Re: timemachine

2011-02-01 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 02:25:18PM +0100, Adrian Knoth wrote: Hi Robert! I've seen you're the current maintainer of timemachine with your last upload dating back to 2005-07-02. There are a couple of new releases and some bugs in the BTS. If you don't mind, I'd like to take care, re-assign the

Re: timemachine

2011-02-01 Thread Adrian Knoth
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 03:06:23PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Hi! > We already are granted permission to take over all packages from Robert. > Oh, or maybe it was me being granted that in a private mail. Sorry if > that was the case - then I failed to pass on the message. That's good news

Re: [SCM] timemachine/master: Depend von debhelper 8.0

2011-02-01 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 03:01:44PM +, adiknoth-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: Depend von debhelper 8.0 I guess we don't really need 8.0, but just to match the value in the compat file... Well, you bumped that compat level yourself just a moment ago. You also added me as up

Re: timemachine

2011-02-01 Thread Adrian Knoth
On 02/01/11 15:22, Adrian Knoth wrote: >> git.debian.org:/git/pkg-multimedia/timemachine >> Feel free to dive into it, Adrian! > Already working on it, tnx. Done so far. It's lintian clean now and is waiting for a review/upload by an interested DD. ;) Cheers _

Re: Package should be removed..

2011-02-01 Thread Romain Beauxis
I agree though I am not sure whether Gerardo and Ivan were talking about icecast 1 or 2.. I any case, I believe they are welcome to maintain either of them among the multimedia team, right ? Romain On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 5:02 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 07:47:37AM +

Re: Package should be removed..

2011-02-01 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 09:33:41AM -0600, Romain Beauxis wrote: I agree though I am not sure whether Gerardo and Ivan were talking about icecast 1 or 2.. I any case, I believe they are welcome to maintain either of them among the multimedia team, right ? Sure! Except if it is v1 they want to m

Re: [SCM] timemachine/master: Depend von debhelper 8.0

2011-02-01 Thread Adrian Knoth
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 04:26:40PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>Depend von debhelper 8.0 >> >>I guess we don't really need 8.0, but just to match the value in the >>compat file... > Well, you bumped that compat level yourself just a moment ago. Indeed. And chose what was recommend

Re: Package should be removed..

2011-02-01 Thread Romain Beauxis
Well my main concern is about the confusion that can result of having two packages. I believe it would be important to know whether or not the old icecast provides something that icecast2 does not.. On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 09:33:41AM -060

Re: Package should be removed..

2011-02-01 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 10:46:59AM -0600, Romain Beauxis wrote: Well my main concern is about the confusion that can result of having two packages. I believe it would be important to know whether or not the old icecast provides something that icecast2 does not.. Confusion on what packages do i

Re: [SCM] timemachine/master: Depend von debhelper 8.0

2011-02-01 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 05:05:12PM +0100, Adrian Knoth wrote: Note that dh8 is in lenny-backports. I thought we'd been over this enough times already: You may consider it backporting-friendly enough that users can grab an already precompiled backport at backports.debian.org. I don't. And J

Re: Package should be removed..

2011-02-01 Thread Ivan Diaz
Hi All, Yes you are right, icecast2 is the only active package and it don't make sense have active the old release, in this case we support the idea that icecast must be dropped and make it as transitional package to icecast2. Thank you, and have a good day, *Ivan, Gerardo* 2011/2/1 Jonas Smed

Re: Package should be removed..

2011-02-01 Thread Romain Beauxis
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Ivan Diaz wrote: > Hi All, Hi Ivan and Gerardo! > Yes you are right, icecast2 is the only active package and it don't make > sense have active the old release, in this case we support the idea that > icecast must be dropped and make it as transitional package to

Re: Package should be removed..

2011-02-01 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 11:48:06AM -0600, Romain Beauxis wrote: On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Ivan Diaz wrote: Hi All, Hi Ivan and Gerardo! Yes you are right, icecast2 is the only active package and it don't make sense have active the old release, in this case we support the idea that i

Re: Package should be removed..

2011-02-01 Thread Romain Beauxis
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 11:48:06AM -0600, Romain Beauxis wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Ivan Diaz >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi All, >> >> Hi Ivan and Gerardo! >> >>> Yes you are right, icecast2 is the only active package and it don

Re: [SCM] timemachine/master: Depend von debhelper 8.0

2011-02-01 Thread Adrian Knoth
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 06:35:21PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Note that dh8 is in lenny-backports. > I thought we'd been over this enough times already: Not with me. ;) I guess it's been pretty obvious that I'm not used to dh levels, so I was really in the need for some guidance. Anyway,

Bug#607869: vlc: rc.lua inteface listening on tcp doesn't close sockets if remote end closes the connection

2011-02-01 Thread Pierre Ynard
tags 607869 + fixed-upstream thanks Thanks for the hint, this was fixed in http://git.videolan.org/?p=vlc/vlc-1.1.git;a=commitdiff;h=70da8d743d9c008473019076b868bb720c7c8115 Regards, -- Pierre Ynard ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing

Processed: Re: vlc: rc.lua inteface listening on tcp doesn't close sockets if remote end closes the connection

2011-02-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 607869 + fixed-upstream Bug #607869 [vlc] vlc: rc.lua inteface listening on tcp doesn't close sockets if remote end closes the connection Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistan

Re: [SCM] mma packaging annotated tag, upstream/1.7, created. upstream/1.7

2011-02-01 Thread Joel Roth
Michael and others, I wonder if I made a mistake in merging the upstream version. When I try building this package, I get a huge raft of errors. Could someone see if these are common or readily solved? thanks, Joel -- Joel Roth ___ pkg-multimed