On 06/25/2012 10:09 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> On 2012-06-25 02:58, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:25 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig
>> wrote:
>>> pd-iemnet: - pushed standards - fixed build-depends and depends -
>>> updated debian/changelog to the final DEP-5 format - enabled
>
On 06/28/2012 11:28 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>
> I am uploading.
thanks
>
> Commit 192da32 serves 2 purposes: convert to final dep-5 format and
> merge explicit entries into a single generic one. Next time, please
> split the commits accordingly.
i agree, sorry.
fgmarsd
IOhannes
signatur
tag 679318 +pending
thanks
On 06/27/2012 10:32 PM, John Bazik wrote:
> Package: flumotion
> Version: 0.10.0-2
> Severity: grave
> Tags: upstream patch
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> This is the same problem I reported in #672404, but affecting a different
> part of the code (there
On 01/17/2013 10:28 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Hi,
pd-zexy has alternative Build-Depends, however, they don’t work:
[…]
pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy : Depends: puredata-core which is a virtual
package. or
puredata (< 0.43) but it is not
going to
On 01/17/2013 07:33 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Felipe Sateler dixit:
(CCing you because I don't know if you are suscribed)
I’m not, thanks.
Well, your puredata is from before stable... With the current build
depends pd-zexy can be built in stable.
as a matter of fact, i'm not entirely sur
On 01/17/2013 01:43 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
At some point (the changelog doesn't say) before squeeze the header
was moved from /u/include/m_pd.h to /u/i/pd/m_pd.h, which is where
for the record: the old header location is still available (symlinked)
modern packages expect it, which is why y
On 11/11/2011 03:02 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 13:31, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> i hopefully fixed the remaining issues with pd-zexy (namely: depending
>> on puredata-core rather than puredata; not shipping license
On 08/13/2010 02:37 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>>
>>
>> ping.
thanks for reviewing
> Also, the copyright file could use some updating (what are your
> contributions, etc). There are some files with copyrights other than
> yourself.
thanks. there are some contributions in some files, which i have
On 08/13/2010 10:13 AM, IOhannes zmölnig wrote:
>
>>
>> Aand... short-form dh7 seems to not work correctly. since there is a
>> build directory, debian/rules build says that 'build' is up to date. And
>> phony targets do not seem to work with dh7.
>>
On 08/13/2010 12:05 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>
>> so i have now switched from using dh directly to cdbs, assuming that
>> this fixes the issue and to get cdbs addicts back on board :-)
>
> Awesome (for me).
>
> For fairness sake, I should probably mention that I am the only one in
> this team
On 08/13/2010 12:22 PM, IOhannes zmölnig wrote:
> are there any tools for handling the NEWS file?
obviously "dch --news"
done. pushed.
fgmnsard
IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers
On 08/12/2010 11:08 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>
>> I just saw that IOhannes pushed the new 1.0.3 tarball, perhaps he's
>> working it now. IOhannes?
>
> Even if so, it won't hurt to import the intermediary tarball.
>
i have to admit that i'm not very firm at with upstream-tarball.mk (and
cdbs
On 08/24/2010 12:55 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:25:12AM +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> Hmm. Do we then perhaps need to beware of this for helper tools like
> lintian and dh_shlibdeps?
>
> I actually do not think that dh_shlibdeps has any role here, just
> mention
i think the current git for pd-zexy includes 2 fixes that would justify
a new upload:
- fixes kFreeBSD / hurd issue (build-system guessing the wrong
module.extension)
- fixes policy-violation (sse-binaries on x86)
if you agree it would be great if you could review, tag and upload the
package (if
On 11/11/2010 08:30 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> I'd like to have my packages work on all Debian platforms, but I have
> never worked with hurd or kfreebsd, nor have had any feedback that there
> are problems. As far as I can tell, my packages build on all Debian
> platforms.
just cal
On 11/12/2010 06:10 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Ah yes, still learning my way around all the Debian tools, they are
> pretty large. A common snippet would be great, no argument here.
so now, we only have to do it :-)
> About the HURD/kFreeBSD issue, it seems to be a linking issue, do we
hi all,
based on previous suggestion i started to create a (debian native)
package "pd-pkg-tools", which should make packaging of pd-libraries easier.
currently it only contains new snippets for cdbs, but on the long run
i'd like to have dh-shortform makefile snippets as well.
the package itself
On 12/03/2010 02:42 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> 2010/12/3 IOhannes zmölnig :
>> hi all,
>>
>> based on previous suggestion i started to create a (debian native)
>> package "pd-pkg-tools", which should make packaging of pd-libraries easier.
>
> Great!
co
On 12/03/2010 03:23 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> It seems to contain *only* hooks for CDBS and (in the future)
> debhelper), no other PD-specific ressource. I therefore suggest to try
well, this could change at any time :-)
> convince the maintainers of CDBS and debhelper, respectively, to a
On 12/08/2010 06:06 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:00 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 14:23, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2010-12-03 21:26, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Source: pd-iemnet
Version: 0.1-1
Severity: important
i think i fixed the remaining issues with gmerlin-avdecoder.
package appears to be lintian clean.
gmasr
IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.
On 01/14/2011 07:16 PM, IOhannes zmölnig wrote:
> it seems like gmerlin-1.0.0 provides a libgmerlin that is binary
> incompatible with the gmerlin-0.4.3 release.
>
> namely, some symbols have been dropped.
hmm, after closer inspection ofthe output of dpkg-gensymbols, it seems
lik
it seems like gmerlin-1.0.0 provides a libgmerlin that is binary
incompatible with the gmerlin-0.4.3 release.
namely, some symbols have been dropped.
as i understand it, this means that the SONAME has to change.
unfortunately i don't have any real clue what this means in practice.
i guess, a sta
23 matches
Mail list logo
