Re: [SCM] ghostess packaging branch, master, updated. debian/20100326-1-19-g952e4b5

2010-08-26 Thread Jonas Smedegaard

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:16:32AM +, rosea-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org 
wrote:
   changed in build-depends libjack-dev to libjack-dev | 
   libjack-jackd2-dev, assuming this is the right and new approach to 
   handle jack1 and jack2 in debian



- libjack-dev (= 0.105),
+ libjack-dev | libjack-jackd2-dev,



No.  Above means one of these two *specific* implementations are 
required.


When you mean any implementation is required, then instead use this:

  libjack-dev | libjack0.100.0-dev


 - Jonas

--
  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist  Internet-arkitekt
  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: [SCM] ghostess packaging branch, master, updated. debian/20100326-1-19-g952e4b5

2010-08-26 Thread Jonas Smedegaard

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:16:33AM +, rosea-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org 
wrote:

   add control.in



-Build-Depends: autotools-dev,
- cdbs (= 0.4.53),
- debhelper (= 7.0.1),
+Build-Depends: @cdbs@,
 autotools-dev,
+ debhelper (= 7.0.1),


Beware that you did not only add control.in (which is not important to 
mention later in the changelog entry) but also changed 
build-dependencies (which *is* important to tell the world).


It is a good idea to include (at least) the sentences that you will want 
added later to changelog. It can be automated with the tool git dch. 
:-)



 - Jonas

--
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist  Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: [SCM] ghostess packaging branch, master, updated. debian/20100326-1-19-g952e4b5

2010-08-26 Thread Felipe Sateler
On 26/08/10 07:49, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
 On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:16:32AM +,
 rosea-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
changed in build-depends libjack-dev to libjack-dev |   
 libjack-jackd2-dev, assuming this is the right and new approach to   
 handle jack1 and jack2 in debian
 
 - libjack-dev (= 0.105),
 + libjack-dev | libjack-jackd2-dev,
 
 
 No.  Above means one of these two *specific* implementations are
 required.
 
 When you mean any implementation is required, then instead use this:
 
   libjack-dev | libjack0.100.0-dev
 

No. Your solution means either libjack-dev or a virtual package we are
trying to phase out (libjack0.100.0-dev).

We really need to sort this out, but for now packages should just
build-depend on libjack-dev.

-- 
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler

___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers


Re: [SCM] ghostess packaging branch, master, updated. debian/20100326-1-19-g952e4b5

2010-08-26 Thread Jonas Smedegaard

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:03:22AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:

On 26/08/10 07:49, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:16:32AM +,
rosea-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:

   changed in build-depends libjack-dev to libjack-dev |
libjack-jackd2-dev, assuming this is the right and new approach to
handle jack1 and jack2 in debian



- libjack-dev (= 0.105),
+ libjack-dev | libjack-jackd2-dev,



No.  Above means one of these two *specific* implementations are 
required.


When you mean any implementation is required, then instead use 
this:


  libjack-dev | libjack0.100.0-dev



No. Your solution means either libjack-dev or a virtual package we are 
trying to phase out (libjack0.100.0-dev).


We really need to sort this out, but for now packages should just 
build-depend on libjack-dev.


Ok.  My main point still stands :-)

Sorry for the confusion.


 - Jonas

--
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist  Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers