timemachine 0.3.3-2.1 MIGRATED to testing

2017-06-06 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the timemachine source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.3.3-2 Current version: 0.3.3-2.1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you

timemachine is marked for autoremoval from testing

2017-06-02 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
timemachine 0.3.3-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2017-06-18 It is affected by these RC bugs: 863420: timemachine: segfaults on startup ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http

Bug#863420: marked as done (timemachine: segfaults on startup)

2017-06-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 01 Jun 2017 19:34:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#863420: fixed in timemachine 0.3.3-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #863420, regarding timemachine: segfaults on startup to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#863420: timemachine: segfaults on startup

2017-05-27 Thread Chris Lamb
James Cowgill wrote: > I tested your fixes, unfortunately timemachine still segfaults on > startup. This time it occurs in gtk_meterscale_new and it looks like the > same pointer truncation problem there. Huh, how did I miss that. Anyway, I've re-uploaded timemachine 0.3.3-2.

Bug#863420: timemachine: segfaults on startup

2017-05-27 Thread James Cowgill
Hi Chris, On 27/05/17 10:02, Chris Lamb wrote: > tags 863420 + pending patch > thanks > > I've uploaded timemachine 0.3.3-2.1 to DELAYED/5: > > timemachine (0.3.3-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium > > * Non-maintainer upload. > * Fix segmentation fau

Processed: Re: timemachine: segfaults on startup

2017-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 863420 + pending patch Bug #863420 [timemachine] timemachine: segfaults on startup Added tag(s) patch and pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 863420: http://bugs.debian.org/c

Bug#863420: timemachine: segfaults on startup

2017-05-27 Thread Chris Lamb
tags 863420 + pending patch thanks I've uploaded timemachine 0.3.3-2.1 to DELAYED/5: timemachine (0.3.3-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium * Non-maintainer upload. * Fix segmentation fault caused by passing a truncated pointer instead of a GtkType. (Closes: #863420) The

Bug#841276: timemachine - slight improvement of the menu item

2016-10-19 Thread trebmuh
Package: timemachine Version: 0.3.3-2 Dear debian maintainers, please add those lines to the debian/timemachine.desktop file in order for the menu item to provide a comment : Comment=JACK audio recorder for spontaneous and conservatory use Comment[fr]=Enregistreur audio JACK pour une

Bug#829887: timemachine: Uses deprecated gnome-common macros/variables

2016-07-05 Thread biebl
Source: timemachine Version: 0.3.3-2 Severity: normal User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: gnome-common Hi, gnome-common did a cleanup upstream and deprecated quite a few macros and variables. gnome-doc-utils removal === The gnome-doc-utils build

timemachine 0.3.3-2 MIGRATED to testing

2013-10-17 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the timemachine source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.3.3-1 Current version: 0.3.3-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you

Bug#713592: marked as done (timemachine: FTBFS: ld: main.o: undefined reference to symbol 'pow@@GLIBC_2.2.5')

2013-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 06 Oct 2013 13:33:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#713592: fixed in timemachine 0.3.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #713592, regarding timemachine: FTBFS: ld: main.o: undefined reference to symbol 'pow@@GLIBC_2.2.5' to be marked as done. This

Bug#713592: timemachine: FTBFS: ld: main.o: undefined reference to symbol 'pow@@GLIBC_2.2.5'

2013-06-22 Thread David Suárez
Source: timemachine Version: 0.3.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Maybe you need to add explicitly the

Bug#700702: timemachine: Typo's in description

2013-02-16 Thread Justin B Rye
e anything that isn't expressed by the word "recorder", which is already there in the synopsis anyway, I would suggest just throwing out the "and conservatory". (Or maybe "JACK plugin for spontaneous audio capture"? But that's not what's in my patch.)

Bug#700702: timemachine: Typo's in description

2013-02-16 Thread Chris Bannister
Package: timemachine Version: 0.3.3-1 Severity: minor Dear Maintainer, The short description: "JACK audio recorder for spontaneous and conservatory use" Should that really be "conservatory"? Even if it is supposed to be "conservative", it still seems a bit

timemachine 0.3.3-1 MIGRATED to testing

2011-02-20 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the timemachine source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.3.0-3 Current version: 0.3.3-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you

Bug#573463: marked as done (ITA: timemachine -- JACK audio recorder for spontaneous and conservatory use)

2011-02-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 09 Feb 2011 14:34:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#573463: fixed in timemachine 0.3.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #573463, regarding ITA: timemachine -- JACK audio recorder for spontaneous and conservatory use to be marked as done. This means that you

Re: [SCM] timemachine/master: Depend von debhelper 8.0

2011-02-01 Thread Adrian Knoth
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 06:35:21PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Note that dh8 is in lenny-backports. > I thought we'd been over this enough times already: Not with me. ;) I guess it's been pretty obvious that I'm not used to dh levels, so I was really in the need for some guidance. Anyway,

Re: [SCM] timemachine/master: Depend von debhelper 8.0

2011-02-01 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 05:05:12PM +0100, Adrian Knoth wrote: Note that dh8 is in lenny-backports. I thought we'd been over this enough times already: You may consider it backporting-friendly enough that users can grab an already precompiled backport at backports.debian.org. I don't. And J

Re: [SCM] timemachine/master: Depend von debhelper 8.0

2011-02-01 Thread Adrian Knoth
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 04:26:40PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>Depend von debhelper 8.0 >> >>I guess we don't really need 8.0, but just to match the value in the >>compat file... > Well, you bumped that compat level yourself just a moment ago. Indeed. And chose what was recommend

Re: timemachine

2011-02-01 Thread Adrian Knoth
On 02/01/11 15:22, Adrian Knoth wrote: >> git.debian.org:/git/pkg-multimedia/timemachine >> Feel free to dive into it, Adrian! > Already working on it, tnx. Done so far. It's lintian clean now and is waiting for a review/upload by an intere

Re: [SCM] timemachine/master: Depend von debhelper 8.0

2011-02-01 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 03:01:44PM +, adiknoth-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: Depend von debhelper 8.0 I guess we don't really need 8.0, but just to match the value in the compat file... Well, you bumped that compat level yourself just a moment ago. You also added me as up

Re: timemachine

2011-02-01 Thread Adrian Knoth
at's good news. Could still be me that I missed the earlier discussion. ;) > git.debian.org:/git/pkg-multimedia/timemachine > Feel free to dive into it, Adrian! Already working on it, tnx. Cheers -- mail: a...@thur.de http://adi.thur.de PGP/GP

Re: timemachine

2011-02-01 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 02:25:18PM +0100, Adrian Knoth wrote: Hi Robert! I've seen you're the current maintainer of timemachine with your last upload dating back to 2005-07-02. There are a couple of new releases and some bugs in the BTS. If you don't mind, I'd like to take

timemachine

2011-02-01 Thread Adrian Knoth
Hi Robert! I've seen you're the current maintainer of timemachine with your last upload dating back to 2005-07-02. There are a couple of new releases and some bugs in the BTS. If you don't mind, I'd like to take care, re-assign the package to pkg-multimedia-maintainers a