On 2017-01-04 20:08-0500 Pedro Vicente wrote:
>>> Yes that is the expected output, although the window titles should be
>>> different. But actually it may be nicer to at least use 2 different curves.
>>> An easy change. What do you think?
>
> I don't have an opinion on the plot itself, but regar
On 2017-01-05 00:54- p.d.rosenb...@gmail.com wrote:
> 1. Yes [two plots are] expected output, although the window titles
should be different. But actually it may be nicer to at least use 2
different curves. An easy change. What do you think?
Good idea. So, yes please!
> 2. Will do [README.r
>> Yes that is the expected output, although the window titles should be
>> different. But actually it may be nicer to at least use 2 different curves.
>> An easy change. What do you think?
I don't have an opinion on the plot itself, but regarding the test_c_wxwidgets
test, it would be a good i
That looks promising 😊
To answer your questions Alan (sorry for top posting, but I'm on my phone)
1. Yes that is the expected output, although the window titles should be
different. But actually it may be nicer to at least use 2 different curves. An
easy change. What do you think?
2. Will do, p
On 2017-01-04 16:21-0500 Pedro Vicente wrote:
> I did [on CentOS]
> make VERBOSE=1 test_c_wxwidgets >& out.txt &
>
> there were no plots, just black and grey windows that quickly showed and
> disappeared
>
> output is attached
As you can see for yourself there are no warnings or errors so that
l
Hi Alan
I think your current CentOS test is equivalent to just
building the test_wxPLplotDemo target?
yes
Please extend that test to
building the test_c_wxwidgets target as well.
I did
make VERBOSE=1 test_c_wxwidgets >& out.txt &
there were no plots, just black and grey windows that quick
On 2017-01-04 13:04-0500 Pedro Vicente wrote:
> Hi Phil
>
> I got a good plot on CentOS, below output.
> I'll test other Linux later
>
>> So what I
>> would propose is that for this release we attempt to not add or remove
>> anything from the API and just stick with an example that works with
>>
Hi Phil
I got a good plot on CentOS, below output.
I'll test other Linux later
12:40:53: Debug: wxPLplotwindow::wxPLplotwindow
12:40:53: Debug: wxPLplotwindow::wxPLplotwindow
12:40:53: Debug: frame->Create
12:40:53: Debug: Plot() Yielding
12:40:53: Debug: wxPLplotwindow::OnCreate
12:40:53: Debug
Just to add that I've just tested on my Ubuntu 16.04 system logging on
remotely using Cygwin ssh and X11 server and n my work CentOS system
logging on directly. Everything seems fine! Hopefully you will both
get the same results Pedro and Alan.
Phil
On 4 January 2017 at 14:26, Phil Rosenberg wro
Hi All
Right I'm back with sensible access to all my systems and back into my
usual routine.
So, here goes
On 28 December 2016 at 05:00, Pedro Vicente
wrote:
> One small caveat is that I think you can only instantiate the template with
> a class that has this Create()
> signature
>
> Create(wxW
Hi Phil, Alan
I started a new thread, that summarizes all the learnings we have so far on
this and proposes a simple solution that keeps the current API (templates).
1) remotely or in place
First the issue of accessing the machine remotely or in place.
One of my machines that I previously acces
11 matches
Mail list logo
