On 2014-10-16 10:59-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2014-10-16 14:20+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:
>
>>
>> Alan,
>>
>> That sounds like a good idea. There have been a number of useful
>> improvements / fixes since then. We definitely want to try and
>> get the various language bindings and examples back
On 2014-10-19 00:24-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> I plan some further changes to C example 8 which I will take
> responsibility for propagating to C++, Lua, Python, Octave, and Java.
>
> One of those changes is to move to the sombrero function (which looks
> much nicer) as the default and the Rosenb
As of commit f2a8918 I have finished propagating Phil's new plmap* API
and his illustration of that API with the Exmoor contour map page in C
and C++ example 19 to Lua, Python, Octave, and Java. This extra page
is really a nice demonstration of the new API, and I am looking
forward to seeing these
plot development list"
Subject: Re: [Plplot-devel] Our next release
On 2014-10-16 10:59-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> Thanks for that C++ propagation. You have inspired me to take
> responsibility (unless you tell me you have already started it) for
> the propagation of example 8 and 19 C c
On 2014-10-17 08:05- Arjen Markus wrote:
> As there are also the two examples 8 and 19 to extend with the new
features for both Fortran and Tcl, and the coming weeks are littered
with work related events a later date for the release would indeed
give me more opportunity to get the various task
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 2:09 AM
> To: Andrew Ross
> Cc: PLplot development list
> Subject: Re: [Plplot-devel] Our next release
>
> On 2014-10-16 14:20+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:
>
&
On 2014-10-16 10:59-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> Thanks for that C++ propagation. You have inspired me to take
> responsibility (unless you tell me you have already started it) for
> the propagation of example 8 and 19 C changes for our swig-generated
> language bindings (Java, Python, Lua, and Oc
On 2014-10-16 14:20+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:
> [A release] sounds like a good idea. There have been a number of useful
> improvements / fixes since [February].
I agree a release fairly soon is a good idea because I don't want to
disappoint anyone whose work remains unreleased because there has be
On 2014-10-16 14:20+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:
>
> Alan,
>
> That sounds like a good idea. There have been a number of useful
> improvements / fixes since then. We definitely want to try and
> get the various language bindings and examples back into sync
> before then. I've now done the C++ examples
Alan,
That sounds like a good idea. There have been a number of useful
improvements / fixes since then. We definitely want to try and
get the various language bindings and examples back into sync
before then. I've now done the C++ examples to get the process
started.
Andrew
On Tue, Oct 14, 2
Our last release was way back in February of this year so I think it
would be a good idea to get out another release fairly soon, say 6
weeks from now near the beginning of December. That is about the
latest time in a year I would like to make a release so as not to
conflict with Christmas holiday
11 matches
Mail list logo
