Re: [Plplot-devel] This may be a good time for a PLplot release

2008-11-24 Thread Arjen Markus
Alan W. Irwin wrote: >Thanks everyone for the recent series of commits that fixed a lot of bugs >and also arrived at a reasonable stopping point for the wxwidgets device >driver changes. The only additional change planned for this release that I >am aware of is Hez's docbook documentation for his

Re: [Plplot-devel] This may be a good time for a PLplot release

2008-11-21 Thread Alan W. Irwin
Thanks everyone for the recent series of commits that fixed a lot of bugs and also arrived at a reasonable stopping point for the wxwidgets device driver changes. The only additional change planned for this release that I am aware of is Hez's docbook documentation for his OCaml bindings. It would

Re: [Plplot-devel] This may be a good time for a PLplot release

2008-11-20 Thread Andrew Ross
I agree with you both. Let's wait until Steve and his group have time to look at this properly. Andrew On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 05:20:26PM +, Steve Schwartz wrote: > I would agree with this strategy from the project's perspective. That > is, if I were in your shoes, it's what I would do. > >

Re: [Plplot-devel] This may be a good time for a PLplot release

2008-11-20 Thread Steve Schwartz
I would agree with this strategy from the project's perspective. That is, if I were in your shoes, it's what I would do. Cheers Steve On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 15:57 -0800, Alan W. Irwin wrote: > The implementation of the three functions has been delayed according > to what > Steve said above. A pre

Re: [Plplot-devel] This may be a good time for a PLplot release

2008-11-19 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2008-11-19 16:02- Andrew Ross wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:19:39AM +, Steve Schwartz wrote: >> Andrew/Alan, >> >> On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 10:02 +, Andrew Ross wrote: >>> One other thing it would be nice to finalise before a release is what >>> we >>> are going to do with the da

Re: [Plplot-devel] This may be a good time for a PLplot release

2008-11-19 Thread Andrew Ross
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:19:39AM +, Steve Schwartz wrote: > Andrew/Alan, > > On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 10:02 +, Andrew Ross wrote: > > One other thing it would be nice to finalise before a release is what > > we > > are going to do with the date / time handling. I know there was a lot > > of

Re: [Plplot-devel] This may be a good time for a PLplot release

2008-11-19 Thread Steve Schwartz
Andrew/Alan, On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 10:02 +, Andrew Ross wrote: > One other thing it would be nice to finalise before a release is what > we > are going to do with the date / time handling. I know there was a lot > of > discussion about this but we never came to a firm conclusion. If it > doesn

Re: [Plplot-devel] This may be a good time for a PLplot release

2008-11-19 Thread Andrew Ross
Alan, One other thing it would be nice to finalise before a release is what we are going to do with the date / time handling. I know there was a lot of discussion about this but we never came to a firm conclusion. If it doesn't make it into the next development release then fair enough, but we re

Re: [Plplot-devel] This may be a good time for a PLplot release

2008-11-14 Thread Hazen Babcock
On Nov 13, 2008, at 10:38 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: > I have noticed that PLplot development has temporarily slowed down > so this > may be an excellent time for a release. If somebody has active > development > going on right now that they absolutely must get in before the next > release, >

Re: [Plplot-devel] This may be a good time for a PLplot release

2008-11-14 Thread Alan W. Irwin
Hi Andrew: On 2008-11-14 09:34- Andrew Ross wrote: > I agree this may be a good time for a development release. We need to > get README.Release up to date. Things that I can think of off the top of > my head that are missing are the work you have done on the SVG driver DONE plus a mention of

Re: [Plplot-devel] This may be a good time for a PLplot release

2008-11-14 Thread Hezekiah M. Carty
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:38 PM, Alan W. Irwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hazen, assuming nobody says anything would a development release next > weekend (9 days from now) or even this weekend be convenient from your > perspective as release manager? I am planning on writing the OCaml-specific

Re: [Plplot-devel] This may be a good time for a PLplot release

2008-11-14 Thread Andrew Ross
Alan, I agree this may be a good time for a development release. We need to get README.Release up to date. Things that I can think of off the top of my head that are missing are the work you have done on the SVG driver and possibly the changes to function visibility and the addition of valgrind c

Re: [Plplot-devel] This may be a good time for a PLplot release

2008-11-13 Thread Werner Smekal
Hi, On 14.11.2008, at 04:38, Alan W. Irwin wrote: > I have noticed that PLplot development has temporarily slowed down > so this > may be an excellent time for a release. If somebody has active > development > going on right now that they absolutely must get in before the next > release, >

[Plplot-devel] This may be a good time for a PLplot release

2008-11-13 Thread Alan W. Irwin
I have noticed that PLplot development has temporarily slowed down so this may be an excellent time for a release. If somebody has active development going on right now that they absolutely must get in before the next release, please speak up now. Hazen, assuming nobody says anything would a devel