One more thought about the slow response. The disk thing I mentioned
likely will not show up as CPU usage or even disk usage. If there's
some way to show disk access waiting-on-hardware performance of some
sort then that would be the only way other than the drive light
staying on during the
On Fri, 6 May 2016 13:58:32 -0700, in message
572d0578.10...@speakeasy.net, Robert Munro wrote:
> On Thu, 5 May 2016 15:52:04 Dick Steffens wrote:
> > On 05/05/2016 10:10 AM, Neal wrote:
>
> >>> Do you have a tool that can show how busy the hard drive is
> >>> during the seconds the system is
Ideas:
Uninstall Flash, see if problem persists, reinstall if you must.
try a: sudo su -
and then a: lsof -Pni
maybe install smartmontools
and try a: smartctl -a /dev/sd*X*
with sd*X* being your root drive
Is your drive getting full?
look around in your dmesg and your syslog
with: dmesg |
On 05/05/2016 10:10 AM, Neal wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Dick Steffens wrote:
>> top - 09:37:44 up 25 days, 15:53, 2 users, load average: 0.80, 0.44, 0.42
>> Tasks: 225 total, 2 running, 223 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
>> %Cpu(s): 3.6 us, 4.5 sy,
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Dick Steffens wrote:
> top - 09:37:44 up 25 days, 15:53, 2 users, load average: 0.80, 0.44, 0.42
> Tasks: 225 total, 2 running, 223 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
> %Cpu(s): 3.6 us, 4.5 sy, 0.0 ni, 91.7 id, 0.3 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0
On 05/05/2016 09:18 AM, chris (fool) mccraw wrote:
> My primary suggestion is to check swap usage (can also be done with top, or
> free).
KiB Mem: 8113860 total, 7904916 used, 208944 free, 526492 buffers
KiB Swap: 8255484 total, 836256 used, 7419228 free. 2771156 cached Mem
> I know
On 05/05/2016 09:28 AM, Bill Barry wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Dick Steffens wrote:
>
>> On 05/05/2016 08:29 AM, Bill Barry wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Dick Steffens
>> wrote:
My desktop machine used to respond
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Dick Steffens wrote:
> On 05/05/2016 08:29 AM, Bill Barry wrote:
> > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Dick Steffens
> wrote:
> >
> >> My desktop machine used to respond quickly to the opening of a program,
> >> or the
My primary suggestion is to check swap usage (can also be done with top, or
free). I know we're not running MS Windows here, but I have yet to find a
perfectly behaved browser that doesn't eventually leak memory, and if
you're like me, you have a browser running for Quite Some Time between
On 05/05/2016 08:29 AM, Bill Barry wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Dick Steffens wrote:
>
>> My desktop machine used to respond quickly to the opening of a program,
>> or the return from screen saver. Now those actions are slow. The
>> programs appear to run fine.
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Dick Steffens wrote:
> My desktop machine used to respond quickly to the opening of a program,
> or the return from screen saver. Now those actions are slow. The
> programs appear to run fine. This didn't used to be the case, as
> recently
My desktop machine used to respond quickly to the opening of a program,
or the return from screen saver. Now those actions are slow. The
programs appear to run fine. This didn't used to be the case, as
recently as just a few months ago. The most noticeable thing is when
returning from screen
12 matches
Mail list logo