Am 13.05.2012 um 01:07 schrieb Ask Bjørn Hansen:
On May 12, 2012, at 7:13, Peter Hessler wrote:
Wouldn't it make sense to make the IPv6 pool simply be a generic World
pool, with the exception of a few country-specific pools? I agree that
we want the closest servers as is reasonable, but
Hi,
2012/5/25 AlbyVA alb...@empire.org:
[...]
In short, anybody who is in the Internet Networking field ought to start
considering retooling their network for v6. Once the RIR's run out, v4 space
will become a
commodity that will be horse traded on eBay.
Because only the ISPs and/or their
On May 9, 2012, at 16:42, Anssi Johansson wrote:
Hi, 2.pool.ntp.org has supported records for nearly a year now. Are
there plans to expand the IPv6 support to the other zones (,0,1,3) as well?
Perhaps in time for the IPv6 launch day on June 6th?
Yes, I'm considering that. If anything
For instance Germany has the best coverage at 345/105 servers
(v4/v6). Most other countries are much worse. Denmark has 37/3.
Spain 19/2. Italy 25/1. Sweden 24/2. Russia 94/6. Hungary 64/7.
Ukraine 73/4. Australia 60/4. Canada 59/5. Even Japan are just
at 21/3.
Most of the
On May 10, 2012, at 9:01, Rob Janssen wrote:
I expect that the lack of servers in certain countries will be compensated by
the lack of users in same countries.
I'm not concerned if the system has enough capacity to serve the clients, but
rather if there are enough servers to give a little
I already deleted it but somewhere in this thread people asked about
places that support IPv6.
I got a dedicated server from kimsufi.ie (they have a bunch of various
TLDs for different countries but .ie (ireland) is where you go if in US)
that's fairly inexpensive. Downside for someone in US is
One of my servers is from Hetzner [1].
It's located in Germany. They're also inexpensive and offer native IPv6
even with their vServers.
You can do almost anything with it as long as it's legal, they don't
forbid any services.
Regards,
Thomas
On 10.05.2012 18:49, Todd Eddy wrote:
I already
Hi, 2.pool.ntp.org has supported records for nearly a year now. Are
there plans to expand the IPv6 support to the other zones (,0,1,3) as
well? Perhaps in time for the IPv6 launch day on June 6th?
___
pool mailing list
pool@lists.ntp.org
Does anybody know of an IPv6 OpenVPN service? Currently I have FiOS and
Verizon
is blocking just about all useful ports, including NTP. As a result, I've
setup my
FreeBSD box with a VPN link using OpenVPN to Strongvpn.com for my NTP
server.
Works like a charm so I could put it into the pool. But
On May 9, 2012, at 5:33 PM, AlbyVA wrote:
Does anybody know of an IPv6 OpenVPN service? Currently I have FiOS and
Verizon
is blocking just about all useful ports, including NTP. As a result, I've
setup my
FreeBSD box with a VPN link using OpenVPN to Strongvpn.com for my NTP server.
Works
The Tunnel I'm using is in the same region. So no cross country tunneling.
:)
StrongVPN has 215 servers in 10 US locations, one of which is just down the
road from me.
So lag times should be negligible.
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Dave Hart daveh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 10,
On May 9, 2012, at 17:44, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Please don't add machines which are behind a VPN tunnel to the NTP pool.
They will experience additional noisy delays as a consequence of the
VPN crypto which make them undesirable as timeservers.
Two reasons I don't think this is necessarily a
12 matches
Mail list logo
