net/bluetooth-tools
btkey.1:123:2: error: bad child for parent context
This one is rather bad, the nesting of blocks is broken in these manual
pages. I will have a look whether mandoc(1) can be made to cope,
but i recommend pushing the following upstream in any case -
and perhaps commit it
Christian Weisgerber wrote on Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 03:11:26AM +0200:
net/openvpn_bsdauth
openvpn_bsdauth.8:22:16: error: multi-line scope breaks multi-line
scope of Xo
At least on a short time scale, mandoc(1) will not be able to cope
with block nesting errors like the Oo Xo Oc Xc here.
Hi Stuart,
Stuart Henderson wrote on Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:03:43AM +:
On 2010/02/24 00:41, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
- Nearly all names of utilities conflict with our in-tree groff,
so you need to call them by their full paths. Pay attention
to the order of directories in your $PATH
C. Bensend wrote on Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 03:23:47PM -0600:
Ingo Schwarze wrote:
C. Bensend wrote on Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 02:42:34PM -0600:
I'm running into some problems with my home backup server. It
uses rsnapshot to grab backups from multiple hosts several times
a day, and saves them
Wireshark is the world's foremost
Is this now priviledge seperated?
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/net/ethereal/Attic/Makefile#rev1.91
While looking at a question asked by Dorian Buettner on misc,
i noticed two places in packages(7) and pkg_info(1) related
to package signatures that could be clarified.
The fundamental point is that pure BUILD_DEPENDS (e.g. zip in
mozilla-firefox) do not contribute to the signature, while
pure
The attached tarball is also available from
http://www.studis.de/Software/heirloom-sh-050706.tgz
/usr/ports/shells/heirloom-sh/pkg/DESCR:
The Heirloom Bourne Shell is a portable variant of the traditional UNIX
shell. It has been derived from OpenSolaris code, thus implementing the
SVR4/SVID3
Hi Damien,
Damien Miller wrote on Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 01:23:55AM +1100:
On Sun, 28 Dec 2008, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
For the case of Python 2.6, i just tested the following diff
on i386-current. Note that i also changed
@conflict python-=2.6,2.6
because that looks somewhat fishy.
I
Hi Damien,
Damien Miller wrote on Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 07:35:16AM +1100:
Here is the current diff:
You seem to be right that additional @pkgpath markers are not
needed when you have @conflict markers, anyway.
One additional nit, a few directories appear to be missing in
the 2.6 packing list.
Hello Nikolay,
thanks for having a look.
Nikolay Sturm wrote on Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 09:37:16AM +0100:
We have two ports explicitly allowing binding to 0.0.0.0:0,
devel/mico and x11/gnustep/base.
I first looked at devel/mico.
How do these cope with your proposed change?
Does denying
Hi Nikolay, Sebastian, Antoine,
[ Cc:ing the secret maintainers ;-]
Nikolay Sturm wrote on Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 09:37:16AM +0100:
* Ingo Schwarze [2008-12-26]:
I'm not really sure the patch is correct and doesn't break anything
else - though i currently don't see why any port build should
When you have yp(8) configured for group(5) and passwd(5) support
on your ports build machine, some programs, for example tar(1),
will call functions like getgrnam(3), descending into yp_bind(2),
clntudp_create(3), clntudp_bufcreate(3), bindresvport_sa(3), and
ultimately bind(2).
The following
Ted Unangst wrote on Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 05:20:19PM -0500:
Why would I know to use -M? Because I read the man page and want to
see the install-message file? I already installed the damn thing,
so obviously I don't want to see that file.
The install message is not a message explaining how
Damien Miller wrote on Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 04:58:32PM +1000:
Ok, then does anyone need Python-2.3? (I thought it was the one that
Zope used for some reason).
Oops, this nearly slipped while i was away.
Python-2.3 is required by Zope-2.8, and i'm still stuck with Zope-2.8
for one application.
Damien Miller wrote on Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 01:13:39PM +1000:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
Damien Miller wrote on Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 04:58:32PM +1000:
Ok, then does anyone need Python-2.3? (I thought it was the one that
Zope used for some reason).
Oops, this nearly slipped
Will Maier wrote on Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 06:50:11AM -0500:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 01:27:50PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
* Hopefully, Python 2.3 can be dropped in the near future.
If by 'dropped' you mean 'removed from the tree', I imagine this
will happen at some point (though it doesn't
Hi Marc,
Marc Balmer wrote on, May 12, 2008 at 09:42:55PM +0200:
we should really begin to tell the zope people
Well, the last time we tried to talk to them
was not exactly a success. ;)
to begin using recent python versions for zope.
Let's have a quick look at the timeline:
Jul 29, 2003:
Ian McWilliam wrote on Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 10:49:00AM +1000:
deraadt@ wrote in http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=120890031123301w=2
[...] It is the standard behaviour, and is done for very good reasons.
Can anybody explain [...]
You actually cite the explanation yourself, let me rephrase:
Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote on Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 10:49:27AM +0200:
i'm too darn lazy
That was a really good laugh.
You only committed three ports today, did you? :)
Come on, nobody will believe you!
Hi Jacob,
Jacob Meuser wrote on Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 02:14:27AM +:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 01:59:56AM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
On Tuesday 11 March 2008 17:53:50 Jacob Meuser wrote:
I _hate_ it when I change a port locally and up the p level,
and then pkg_add -u downgrades that package
This is really nice - Jacob's and Mikolaj's suggestions are both
very simple, and taken together, they allow to do nearly everything
the u-level could do, but with less code end more elegance...
Jacob Meuser wrote on Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 08:51:40PM +:
private will start at 1000, and be 1000
Brad wrote on Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 05:59:06PM -0400:
On Tuesday 11 March 2008 17:53:50 Jacob Meuser wrote:
I _hate_ it when I change a port locally and up the p level,
and then pkg_add -u downgrades that package.
Hmmm, the p-level is not ideal for keeping track of private tweaks,
imho it's
the time
to have another look. So, i cannot judge 2.1.18 code quality,
but i *guess* it might be worth a look.
Thus, if you like, just give it a try yourself...
Yours,
Ingo
--
Ingo Schwarze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Serverbetrieb usta.de / studis.de
With respect to package updates, the transitive relation OVERRIDES is
defined by the following statement: The command pkg_add -u will
replace a package if and only if among all available MATCHING packages,
one OVERRIDES all others. I'm using ALL CAPS to make formally defined
terms stand out.
Hi Marc,
Marc Espie wrote on Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 09:09:17PM +0200:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 07:53:27PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
S: package Stem (e.g. mutt),
optionally including multi-packages suffixes
N: version Number (e.g. 1.5.16)
pP: official OpenBSD Patch level (e.g. p0
I wrote on Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 12:15:36AM +0200:
Mikolaj Kucharski wrote on Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 02:27:25AM +0100:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 02:28:55AM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
-PKGNAME= ${DISTNAME}p0
+PKGNAME= ${DISTNAME}p0u0
First time I see that kind of patchlevel. Why you used
Of course, the following simple patch is not intended for inclusion
in the tree (i rather sent this upstream), but since mutt is probably
used by several people round here, i thought i might share just in
case anybody finds this useful...
With this patch, if you set askreply, mutt-1.5.16 will ask
In http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-portsm=117587445905884w=2
i submitted a patch to ease @sample handling after pkg_add -r.
See below for the full rationale.
Marc liked the general idea but wanted to do some refactoring.
So here's a reminder, improved in a few respects:
- Do not create and advertise
Hi Jeremy, hi Marc,
Jeremy Evans wrote on Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 09:19:34AM -0700:
On 9/19/07, Marc Espie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 10:50:37PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
I'm running -current, installing most of my packages from snapshot
mirrors. But i'm also frequently
Hi Marc,
Marc Espie wrote on Sun, Aug 26, 2007:
The specific issue of a long PKG_PATH was solved somewhere
between 4.1 and 4.2.
pkg_add(1) now stops at the first path element with valid candidates.
Do you have any tips for the following scenario, which i suspect
might not even be uncommon:
report any regressions.
Thanks for your terrific job on dovecot
and probably on other ports i'm using less,
Ingo
--
Ingo Schwarze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Serverbetrieb usta.de / studis.de
Hi Joshua,
joshua stein wrote on Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 01:17:02AM -0500:
I wrote:
Hi Jasper, hi Steven, hi Wijnand,
i reworked jasper@'s version of the net/jabberd14 port in two
respects. Hopefully, this is now final...
what is going on with this port? is it still being worked on or
This is the best version of the port i have so far:
http://www.studis.de/Software/jabberd14-1.6.0b8.tgz
You can run the port as it is - but you can't stop it. ;-)
There is still a segfault in the exit handler.
To reproduce, start it in the foreground with
sudo -u _jabberd14
Section #9 states:
We recommend you place the license in /usr/local/share/doc/name/.
If you've already have a /usr/local/share/name/ directory for the
application data files, as well as a /usr/local/share/name/doc/
directory for misc stuff (as well as a man page and gnuinfo page), is
Wijnand Wiersma wrote on Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:49:25PM +0200:
2007/4/25, steven mestdagh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ingo Schwarze [2007-04-24, 01:29:52]:
steven mestdagh wrote:
Ingo Schwarze wrote:
jabber server, original implementation in C/C++
it looks like configure does not test for snprintf
Steven Mestdagh wrote on Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 08:06:53AM +0200:
Ingo Schwarze [2007-04-23, 00:00:58]:
COMMENT
jabber server, original implementation in C/C++
it looks like configure does not test for snprintf, and it decides to
compile its own version. can you avoid that and use
COMMENT
jabber server, original implementation in C/C++
DESCR
This is the original C/C++ server implementation of the Jabber protocol,
now known as XMPP. This implementation has been formerly known as just
jabberd as well. Note that jabberd2 (also known as Jabberd 2.x) is not
a newer version of
Hi Steve,
STeve Andre' wrote on Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 10:04:06AM -0400:
On Thursday 12 April 2007 09:31:47 Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Josh Grosse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Originally submitted in January. Now, with:
ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= amd64 i386 armish
as it had been confirmed to run on
Hi Marc,
Marc Espie wrote on Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 09:30:28AM +0200:
the idea is fine, don't worry about the polishing, I'll refactor it
a bit to avoid having so much code in there.
Great, thanks, so i'll just wait and see.
Tell me when i can help with anything (e.g., testing).
- using
Hi Jesse, hi Walt,
Jesse Scott schrieb am Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 05:18:11AM +0100:
walt wrote:
So far I've figured out that I need to switch to xenocara also,
but how? Are the binary snapshots the only way at the moment?
Any way to build from source?
This should help you build xenocara from
Hi Walt,
walt wrote on Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 05:05:48PM -0700:
Ingo Schwarze wrote:
Compiling xenocara itself was not difficult, but after that,
manually recompiling all the ports depending on it was a huge
amount of work...
Yes, I wish the port update process could be a bit more automated
on the OpenBSD
mirror network, patching /usr/ports/sysutils/mtools/distinfo at
the same time?
Thank you very much for your consideration,
Ingo
P.S.
In case i misinterpreted the situation, sorry for the noise...
--
Ingo Schwarze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$ mkdir knaff; cd knaff
$ ftp http://www.tux.org/pub
When a file installed by a @sample packing list directive was changed
locally, manually updating it can be tedious after pkg_add -r.
Even worse, after updating many packages using pkg_add -u,
finding out which config files need updating is non-trivial.
The following patch prepares a diff between
Hi Marc,
Marc Balmer wrote on Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 04:38:29PM +0200:
There are new Zope version out for all major branches, I would like to
update it in -current and -stable, however... these new versions drive
me nuts: when I start a zope in foreground (bin/zopectl foreground)
/Software/psi-0.10.diff
Could you cross-check and possibly resubmit?
Thank you very much for your work and your consideration,
and sorry for bursting in so late,
Ingo
--
Ingo Schwarze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usta.de / studis.de system operation
Index: net/psi/Makefile
I regard this as a typical case for RUN_DEPENDS.
and everything should work properly now.
I just cross-checked the port once more, all is fine now on i386-current.
Please commit!
--
Ingo Schwarze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usta.de / studis.de system operation
Hi Alex,
Does that mean I can expect to see it in 4.1?
No, it has not been committed yet, so it won't be in 4.1-release.
Holger Mauermann submitted updates on Jan 25, 29 and 30,
implementing ideas from Lars Hansson. Nobody else commented,
not even the MAINTAINER. Peter Valchev announced ports
Gerardo Santana Gómez Garrido wrote on Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 10:59:59PM -0600:
net/jabberd# Ingo Schwarze may want to take this one?
Well, i'm running it in production on 4.0-stable, i have a box
running 4.0-current for development, i had some quite useful
discussions with Mike Erdely
Hi Mike,
Mike Erdely wrote on Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 11:14:59AM -0500:
Ingo Schwarze wrote:
Could you check whether jabberd2 also uses large numbers of file
descriptors?
Mine is set to 1024 in both files (defaults).
Er, well, i meant the number of file descriptors jabberd,
in particular c2s
Hi,
jabberd-2.0s11 contains a file descriptor leak. I have seen my server
eat up all available file descriptors, so this can very probably be
exploited to construct a DOS attack.
In August 2006, my colleague Klara Mall prepared a patch
and sent it upstream [1]. It was ignored.
For that
Mike Erdely wrote on Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 12:07:19PM -0500:
I'm running jabberd2 from ports on an 4.0-release+patches, P4 2GHz, 1 GB
RAM box for ~50 users. This box is running nothing but jabber mysql.
Jabber is configured to use the local mysql (its only purpose is jabber)
for storage and
to the net/jabberd directory in the OpenBSD
ports CVS between 3.9 and 4.0.
Thanks for your consideration,
Ingo
--
Ingo Schwarze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Ingo Schwarze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:45:27 +0200
To: Gerardo Santana Gómez Garrido XXX
Subject: Re: bugfix jabberd
Hi
601 - 652 of 652 matches
Mail list logo
