Re: [UPDATE] x11/dwm

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 06:33:56PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: > Joerg Jung wrote: > > So this is not only needed by dwm but all suckless ports and leads to a > > suckless bsd.port.mk module. > > Now we're going a bit far afield. For today, I'm ok with the update as is, > with the man page bits.

Re: [UPDATE] x11/dwm

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:44:20PM +0100, Joerg Jung wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 04:24:00PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: > > > (All that said, since I had to build 6.1 by myself to test, I also changed > > the > > font to ubuntu mono to match my xterms, so maybe I will just keep building > >

Re: [UPDATE] x11/dwm

Joerg Jung wrote: > > > On 09 Nov 2015, at 22:07, Ted Unangst wrote: > > Joerg Jung wrote: > >> > >> please find below an update for x11/dwm to 6.1. This release contains > >> various fixes and improvements, see announcement [1] for more details. > >> > >> OK? > > > > so

Re: [UPDATE] x11/dwm

Joerg Jung wrote: > So this is not only needed by dwm but all suckless ports and leads to a > suckless bsd.port.mk module. Now we're going a bit far afield. For today, I'm ok with the update as is, with the man page bits. I do like the consistency our port offers, vs reflecting whatever the whim

Re: [UPDATE] x11/dwm

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:30:02AM +0100, Joerg Jung wrote: > > > On 09 Nov 2015, at 22:07, Ted Unangst wrote: > > Joerg Jung wrote: > >> > >> please find below an update for x11/dwm to 6.1. This release contains > >> various fixes and improvements, see announcement [1]

Re: [UPDATE] x11/dwm

Seems like this program could do with a configuration file!

Re: [UPDATE] x11/dwm

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 07:44:06PM -0300, Gleydson Soares wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:30:02AM +0100, Joerg Jung wrote: > > > > > On 09 Nov 2015, at 22:07, Ted Unangst wrote: > > > Joerg Jung wrote: > > >> > > >> please find below an update for x11/dwm to 6.1. This

Re: [UPDATE] x11/dwm

> On 10 Nov 2015, at 02:48, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > > From .Xr, mandoc -Tman produces just "uxterm(1)" without any > markup. The man(7) manual recommends ".BR uxterm ( 1 ).", > i.e. keeping the punctuation out of bold face. But for > consistency with the rest of the page, you

Re: [UPDATE] x11/dwm

> On 09 Nov 2015, at 22:07, Ted Unangst wrote: > Joerg Jung wrote: >> >> please find below an update for x11/dwm to 6.1. This release contains >> various fixes and improvements, see announcement [1] for more details. >> >> OK? > > so now that we finally changed the

Re: [UPDATE] x11/dwm

Joerg Jung said: > Remove the uxterm patch and keep st as the default terminal. Although I am not dwm user any more, this makes sense to me. FWIW I used to have a local patch that made dwm inspect env variable TERMINAL and call whatever it contains. -- Dmitrij D. Czarkoff

Re: [UPDATE] x11/dwm

> On 10 Nov 2015, at 14:58, Jack J. Woehr wrote: > > Joerg Jung wrote: >> I wonder what dwm users think about the following proposal: Remove the >> uxterm patch and keep st as the default terminal > > dwm user here. > > Since we can always change that in seconds and recompile,

Re: [UPDATE] x11/dwm

Joerg Jung wrote: I wonder what dwm users think about the following proposal: Remove the uxterm patch and keep st as the default terminal dwm user here. Since we can always change that in seconds and recompile, hardly matters. OT, have you tried to run NetBeans 6.9.1 under dwm? It loads but

Re: [UPDATE] x11/dwm

Joerg Jung wrote: > Hi, > > please find below an update for x11/dwm to 6.1. This release contains > various fixes and improvements, see announcement [1] for more details. > > OK? so now that we finally changed the default xterm back to uxterm, they changed it to st. needs another man page

Re: [UPDATE] x11/dwm

On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 04:07:56PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: > Joerg Jung wrote: > > Hi, > > > > please find below an update for x11/dwm to 6.1. This release contains > > various fixes and improvements, see announcement [1] for more details. > > > > OK? > > so now that we finally changed the

Re: [UPDATE] x11/dwm

Hi Joerg, Joerg Jung wrote on Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 10:31:10PM +0100: > Index: patches/patch-dwm_1 > === > RCS file: patches/patch-dwm_1 > diff -N patches/patch-dwm_1 > --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 - > +++

Re: UPDATE x11/dwm to 6.0

I'll test this evening. Thanks, jim@ * Joerg Zinke m...@umaxx.net [120708 04:22]: On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 10:37:47PM +0200, Joerg Zinke wrote: please find below an update for x11/dwm to version 6.0. Any objections, OKs? Previous diff got mangled, new one below. Index: Makefile

Re: UPDATE x11/dwm to 6.0

On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 10:37:47PM +0200, Joerg Zinke wrote: please find below an update for x11/dwm to version 6.0. Any objections, OKs? Previous diff got mangled, new one below. Index: Makefile === RCS file:

Re: UPDATE: x11/dwm

* Stanley Lieber stanley.lie...@gmail.com [100606 20:49]: Update dwm to 5.8.2. Uses the updated dmenu 4.1 previously posted to the mailing list. Tested on i386 running the June 5 snapshot of 4.7-CURRENT. Please test and comment. -sl I'll handle this one. Thanks for the patch. jim

Re: UPDATE: x11/dwm

builds and works well on amd64.

Re: UPDATE: x11/dwm

On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 09:40:06AM -0400, Jim Razmus wrote: Uplift dwm to 4.9. Fixes several bugs. This update is dependent on Tobias update to dmenu. I've been using it daily since 4.9 was tagged. Please test. Jim, How about the diff below? It honors our CFLAGS and drops the $V

Re: UPDATE: x11/dwm

On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 12:15:23PM -0400, Mike Erdely wrote: How about the diff below? It honors our CFLAGS and drops the $V variable (as you don't use the version more than once now). As jasper@ pointed out to me, the dwm diff does not require the updated dmenu diff: Index: Makefile

Re: UPDATE: x11/dwm

On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 12:34:07PM -0400, Mike Erdely wrote: On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 12:15:23PM -0400, Mike Erdely wrote: How about the diff below? It honors our CFLAGS and drops the $V variable (as you don't use the version more than once now). As jasper@ pointed out to me, the dwm diff

Re: UPDATE: x11/dwm

On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 07:37:50PM +0200, Tobias Ulmer wrote: On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 12:34:07PM -0400, Mike Erdely wrote: As jasper@ pointed out to me, the dwm diff does not require the updated dmenu diff: It does, dmenu_run is new. We could replace it with the old dmenu_path | dmenu

Re: UPDATE: x11/dwm

On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 07:37:50PM +0200, Tobias Ulmer wrote: - remove patch-Makefile, doesn't do anything except eye candy Well, this (and probably other dwm stuff) is initially from me, and I don't think it's eye candy. I prefer to see every single command run from make, with all arguments,

Re: UPDATE: x11/dwm

On 2008/04/09 02:37, Matthias Kilian wrote: On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 07:37:50PM +0200, Tobias Ulmer wrote: - remove patch-Makefile, doesn't do anything except eye candy Well, this (and probably other dwm stuff) is initially from me, and I don't think it's eye candy. I prefer to see every

Re: UPDATE: x11/dwm

On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 02:37:05AM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote: On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 07:37:50PM +0200, Tobias Ulmer wrote: - remove patch-Makefile, doesn't do anything except eye candy Well, this (and probably other dwm stuff) is initially from me, and I don't think it's eye candy. I

Re: UPDATE: x11/dwm

* Gleydson Soares [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080328 16:58]: 4.7 - 4.8 Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11/dwm/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.6 Makefile --- Makefile 25 Nov 2007 12:07:06 - 1.6 +++

Re: UPDATE: x11/dwm

On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 08:48:36AM -0400, Jim Razmus wrote: Uplift dwm to version 4.5. Adds a patch for config.h to encourage dwm to respect Xresources when starting an xterm. Lastly, folds in my color preferences so I don't have to maintain my own one off in my tree. Tested on three i386