> On 3. Sep 2024, at 08:28, Stefan Hagen wrote:
>
> David Uhden Collado wrote (2024-09-03 07:41 CEST):
>> In this email, I have attached a diff to update x11/dwm to version 6.5.
>>
>> OK? Comments?
>>
>> Additionally, I would like to suggest adding x
On 2024/09/03 09:17, David Uhden Collado wrote:
> > Please don't. People are using dwm with other terminal emulators. And
> > more important, people use dwm with patched versions of st, which would
> > create a conflict when the ports vanilla st is installed as well.
>
> I understand this reality,
> On 3. Sep 2024, at 09:17, David Uhden Collado wrote:
>
>>> In this email, I have attached a diff to update x11/dwm to version 6.5.
>>>
>>> OK? Comments?
>>>
>>> Additionally, I would like to suggest adding x11/st as a dependency in this
&g
In this email, I have attached a diff to update x11/dwm to version 6.5.
OK? Comments?
Additionally, I would like to suggest adding x11/st as a dependency in this
window manager, as well as x11/dmenu, this window manager is intended to be
used with this terminal emulator, and I do not understand
David Uhden Collado wrote (2024-09-03 07:41 CEST):
> In this email, I have attached a diff to update x11/dwm to version 6.5.
>
> OK? Comments?
>
> Additionally, I would like to suggest adding x11/st as a dependency in this
> window manager, as well as x11/dmenu, this window m
In this email, I have attached a diff to update x11/dwm to version 6.5.
OK? Comments?
Additionally, I would like to suggest adding x11/st as a dependency in
this window manager, as well as x11/dmenu, this window manager is
intended to be used with this terminal emulator, and I do not
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 06:33:56PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Joerg Jung wrote:
> > So this is not only needed by dwm but all suckless ports and leads to a
> > suckless bsd.port.mk module.
>
> Now we're going a bit far afield. For today, I'm ok with the update as is,
> with the man page bits.
Ok
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:44:20PM +0100, Joerg Jung wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 04:24:00PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
>
> > (All that said, since I had to build 6.1 by myself to test, I also changed
> > the
> > font to ubuntu mono to match my xterms, so maybe I will just keep building
> > i
Joerg Jung wrote:
> So this is not only needed by dwm but all suckless ports and leads to a
> suckless bsd.port.mk module.
Now we're going a bit far afield. For today, I'm ok with the update as is,
with the man page bits.
I do like the consistency our port offers, vs reflecting whatever the whim
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 07:44:06PM -0300, Gleydson Soares wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:30:02AM +0100, Joerg Jung wrote:
> >
> > > On 09 Nov 2015, at 22:07, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > > Joerg Jung wrote:
> > >>
> > >> please find below an update for x11/dwm to 6.1. This release contains
> > >
Seems like this program could do with a configuration file!
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:30:02AM +0100, Joerg Jung wrote:
>
> > On 09 Nov 2015, at 22:07, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > Joerg Jung wrote:
> >>
> >> please find below an update for x11/dwm to 6.1. This release contains
> >> various fixes and improvements, see announcement [1] for more details.
> >>
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 04:24:00PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Joerg Jung wrote:
> >
> > > On 09 Nov 2015, at 22:07, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > > Joerg Jung wrote:
> > >>
> > >> please find below an update for x11/dwm to 6.1. This release contains
> > >> various fixes and improvements, see announce
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 04:24:00PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Joerg Jung wrote:
> >
> > > On 09 Nov 2015, at 22:07, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > > Joerg Jung wrote:
> > >>
> > >> please find below an update for x11/dwm to 6.1. This release contains
> > >> various fixes and improvements, see announce
Joerg Jung wrote:
>
> > On 09 Nov 2015, at 22:07, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > Joerg Jung wrote:
> >>
> >> please find below an update for x11/dwm to 6.1. This release contains
> >> various fixes and improvements, see announcement [1] for more details.
> >>
> >> OK?
> >
> > so now that we finally c
> On 10 Nov 2015, at 14:58, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
>
> Joerg Jung wrote:
>> I wonder what dwm users think about the following proposal: Remove the
>> uxterm patch and keep st as the default terminal
>
> dwm user here.
>
> Since we can always change that in seconds and recompile, hardly matters.
Joerg Jung wrote:
I wonder what dwm users think about the following proposal: Remove the uxterm
patch and keep st as the default terminal
dwm user here.
Since we can always change that in seconds and recompile, hardly matters.
OT, have you tried to run NetBeans 6.9.1 under dwm? It loads but
Joerg Jung said:
> Remove the uxterm patch and keep st as the default terminal.
Although I am not dwm user any more, this makes sense to me.
FWIW I used to have a local patch that made dwm inspect env variable
TERMINAL and call whatever it contains.
--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
> On 09 Nov 2015, at 22:07, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Joerg Jung wrote:
>>
>> please find below an update for x11/dwm to 6.1. This release contains
>> various fixes and improvements, see announcement [1] for more details.
>>
>> OK?
>
> so now that we finally changed the default xterm back to uxter
> On 10 Nov 2015, at 02:48, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>
> From .Xr, mandoc -Tman produces just "uxterm(1)" without any
> markup. The man(7) manual recommends ".BR uxterm ( 1 ).",
> i.e. keeping the punctuation out of bold face. But for
> consistency with the rest of the page, you probably want
>
>
Hi Joerg,
Joerg Jung wrote on Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 10:31:10PM +0100:
> Index: patches/patch-dwm_1
> ===
> RCS file: patches/patch-dwm_1
> diff -N patches/patch-dwm_1
> --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -
> +++ patches/patch-dwm_1
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 04:07:56PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Joerg Jung wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > please find below an update for x11/dwm to 6.1. This release contains
> > various fixes and improvements, see announcement [1] for more details.
> >
> > OK?
>
> so now that we finally changed the de
Joerg Jung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please find below an update for x11/dwm to 6.1. This release contains
> various fixes and improvements, see announcement [1] for more details.
>
> OK?
so now that we finally changed the default xterm back to uxterm, they changed
it to st. needs another man page patch
Hi,
please find below an update for x11/dwm to 6.1. This release contains
various fixes and improvements, see announcement [1] for more details.
OK?
Thanks,
Regards,
Joerg
[1] http://lists.suckless.org/dev/1511/27504.html
Index: Makefile
=
I'll test this evening.
Thanks,
jim@
* Joerg Zinke [120708 04:22]:
> On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 10:37:47PM +0200, Joerg Zinke wrote:
>
> > please find below an update for x11/dwm to version 6.0.
> >
> > Any objections, OKs?
>
> Previous diff got mangled, new one below.
>
> Index: Makefile
> ==
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 10:37:47PM +0200, Joerg Zinke wrote:
> please find below an update for x11/dwm to version 6.0.
>
> Any objections, OKs?
Previous diff got mangled, new one below.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11
Hi,
please find below an update for x11/dwm to version 6.0.
Any objections, OKs?
Regards,
Joerg
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11/dwm/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -p -r1.22 Makefile
--- Makefile13 Sep
* Stanley Lieber [100606 20:49]:
> Update dwm to 5.8.2. Uses the updated dmenu 4.1 previously posted to
> the mailing list.
>
> Tested on i386 running the June 5 snapshot of 4.7-CURRENT. Please test
> and comment.
>
> -sl
>
I'll handle this one. Thanks for the patch.
jim
>
>
> Index: Make
Update dwm to 5.8.2. Uses the updated dmenu 4.1 previously posted to
the mailing list.
Tested on i386 running the June 5 snapshot of 4.7-CURRENT. Please test
and comment.
-sl
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11/dwm/Makefi
Attached patch updates dwm to version 5.5.
Tested on two work stations I use daily running a recent snapshot of
i386. Terminals and web browsing work for me.
Please double check and commit.
Jim
Index: dwm/Makefile
===
RCS file: /cv
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 02:37:05AM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 07:37:50PM +0200, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> > - remove patch-Makefile, doesn't do anything except eye candy
>
> Well, this (and probably other dwm stuff) is initially from me, and
> I don't think it's eye candy.
On 2008/04/09 02:37, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 07:37:50PM +0200, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> > - remove patch-Makefile, doesn't do anything except eye candy
>
> Well, this (and probably other dwm stuff) is initially from me, and
> I don't think it's eye candy. I prefer to see ever
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 07:37:50PM +0200, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> - remove patch-Makefile, doesn't do anything except eye candy
Well, this (and probably other dwm stuff) is initially from me, and
I don't think it's eye candy. I prefer to see every single command
run from make, with all arguments, an
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 07:37:50PM +0200, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 12:34:07PM -0400, Mike Erdely wrote:
> > As jasper@ pointed out to me, the dwm diff does not require the updated
> > dmenu diff:
>
> It does, dmenu_run is new. We could replace it with the old
> dmenu_path | dm
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 12:34:07PM -0400, Mike Erdely wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 12:15:23PM -0400, Mike Erdely wrote:
> > How about the diff below? It honors our CFLAGS and drops the $V
> > variable (as you don't use the version more than once now).
>
> As jasper@ pointed out to me, the dwm
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 12:15:23PM -0400, Mike Erdely wrote:
> How about the diff below? It honors our CFLAGS and drops the $V
> variable (as you don't use the version more than once now).
As jasper@ pointed out to me, the dwm diff does not require the updated
dmenu diff:
Index: Makefile
===
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 09:40:06AM -0400, Jim Razmus wrote:
> Uplift dwm to 4.9. Fixes several bugs. This update is dependent on
> Tobias update to dmenu.
>
> I've been using it daily since 4.9 was tagged. Please test.
Jim,
How about the diff below? It honors our CFLAGS and drops the $V
vari
builds and works well on amd64.
Uplift dwm to 4.9. Fixes several bugs. This update is dependent on
Tobias update to dmenu.
I've been using it daily since 4.9 was tagged. Please test.
Thanks,
Jim
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /openbsd/mirror/ports/x11/dwm/Makefil
* Gleydson Soares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080328 16:58]:
> 4.7 -> 4.8
> Index: Makefile
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11/dwm/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.6
> diff -u -r1.6 Makefile
> --- Makefile 25 Nov 2007 12:07:06 - 1.
4.7 -> 4.8
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11/dwm/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.6 Makefile
--- Makefile25 Nov 2007 12:07:06 - 1.6
+++ Makefile28 Mar 2008 19:06:46 -
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
COM
Update from 4.6 to 4.7. Tested on i386.
Jim
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11/dwm/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -p -r1.5 Makefile
--- Makefile2007/10/27 12:41:48 1.5
+++ Makefile2007/11/25 04:26:01
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 08:48:36AM -0400, Jim Razmus wrote:
> Uplift dwm to version 4.5. Adds a patch for config.h to encourage dwm
> to respect Xresources when starting an xterm. Lastly, folds in my color
> preferences so I don't have to maintain my own one off in my tree.
>
> Tested on three i
Uplift dwm to version 4.5. Adds a patch for config.h to encourage dwm
to respect Xresources when starting an xterm. Lastly, folds in my color
preferences so I don't have to maintain my own one off in my tree.
Tested on three i386 machines that I use daily.
Questions? Concerns?
Jim
Index: Makef
Update to dwm-4.2.
>From Okan Demirmen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please test and comment.
Ciao,
Kili
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11/dwm/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.1 Makefile
--- Makefi
45 matches
Mail list logo
