Hello Stuart,
Thanks for your perspective.
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 05:39:51 -0400, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
Asking them to change license while also asking to provide binaries
for another OS is far too much in one go. Besides, adding a new OS
is "just" a technical and support issue, changing li
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 07:00:48 -0400, frantisek holop
wrote:
opera is commercial software. there is no point in asking for a change
of license or to go open source.
I do not think it is unreasonable to ask and to let a company, which
creates commercial software, to evaluate their licensing
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 18:14:51 -0400, Theo de Raadt
wrote:
I say so.
Is that enough?
Yep.
--
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its
victims may be the most oppressive. -- C. S. Lewis
> > It would take a lot more than change of license for
> > Opera to be available on CD. It has to be Open Source project.
>
> Where does it say that the packages on CD must only be open-source?
I say so.
Is that enough?
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 03:16:26 -0400, Predrag Punosevac
wrote:
It would take a lot more than change of license for
Opera to be available on CD. It has to be Open Source project.
Where does it say that the packages on CD must only be open-source? I see
that they must be freely redistributabl
Hai,
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 10:37:21PM +0200, Pau wrote:
> Hello,
>
> yes, I had seen the page but, since it's referred to OpenBSD 3.8--4.2,
> and I do not find teTex_base, I thought it was outdated.
I am unlikely to have time to fix this and it seems hardly worth it
considering TeX Live 2009 w
Hello,
yes, I had seen the page but, since it's referred to OpenBSD 3.8--4.2,
and I do not find teTex_base, I thought it was outdated.
Will you update the page? That would be very nice. I am itching to
stick to this laptop and forget about the linux one.
thanks,
Pau
2009/6/27 frantisek holop :
hmm, on Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 12:27:13AM +0200, Pau said that
> I have been using ConTeXt for a while but now I am running into a problem.
texlive comes with an ancient ConTeXt.
if you dont use anything else, but context,
you are better off with the old teTeX and
upgrading the components by hand.
Genere ganancias con su sitio Web... contáctenos
Cada vez son más las personas que se informan sobre empresas y sus
servicios buscando directamente su página Web. Las páginas Web se
convierten en su tarjeta de visita, en el primer impacto que reciba el
posible cliente.
Le ofrecemos la solución má
No version updates or new ports will be committed at this point
without truly exceptional circumstances. Then ports will lock, when
there will be no commits to ports at all. Then watch for an
announcement saying that ports is unlocked later on...
On 2009/06/27 14:06, Andreas Bihlmaier wrote:
> H
Hello,
here is a trivial update to print/latex-mk.
If you have no regressions either please commit.
Regards,
ahb
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/print/latex-mk/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -u -r1.3 Makefile
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this
format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
it's raining builds... build 4453 is here.
i have kept the other build numbers in the makefile
so it's easy to back if necessary.
regarding the comments:
opera is commercial software. there is no point in asking for a change
of license or to go open source. if that is a showstopper for you, the
Update for net/samba to samba-3.0.34p0. Builds upon my previous patch
set for "Back port from current minus the WANTLIB changes for current
cups.". NOTE the patch is against a fresh net/samba OPENBSD_4_5 tagged
tree and not incremental to my previous patch for samba.
Fixes this time round
On 2009/06/27 04:39, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 06:02:12PM -0600, Duncan Patton a Campbell said
> that
> > It would be nice to have Opera without the Linux baggage.
> >
> > Who would I nag at Opera for this to be accomplished?
>
> now before the release probably nobody
--- On Sat, 6/27/09, frantisek holop wrote:
> i wonder how many people use opera on openbsd...
I use Opera more instances (xauth).
I read it very sorry, that Linux compat and so Opera in this form has
not future. Can i receive a little bit more technical reason behind this?
I have not found oth
"Aaron W. Hsu" wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:39:58 -0400, frantisek holop
> wrote:
>
> > i wonder how many people use opera on openbsd...
>
> I wonder how many people would use it if there were a native build with a
> proper license that would permit redistribution of the packages and such
17 matches
Mail list logo
