Re: sparc64 and C++ exceptions

2019-01-31 Thread Tinker
On Friday, February 1, 2019 1:24 AM, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 05:17:33PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > On 2019/01/31 01:12, Tinker wrote: > > > > > Reading your log file > > > http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net//spar

Re: sparc64 and C++ exceptions

2019-01-31 Thread Tinker
On Thursday, January 31, 2019 2:00 PM, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 01:12:10AM +0000, Tinker wrote: > > > Hi Otto and Jeremie, > > I think I have the answer to your particular question, and it's > > platform-independent: > > Reading

Clarifications on GCC/LLVM C++ standard library incompatibilities and breakdown behavior

2019-01-30 Thread Tinker
(Last post, https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports=154889719922304=2 .)

Re: sparc64 and C++ exceptions

2019-01-30 Thread Tinker
doption-clang-stdlib , and Wakely comments it here https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19774778/when-is-it-necessary-to-use-use-the-flag-stdlib-libstdc . Also there's the ABI aspect, Gnu /usr/lib/libsupc++ and LLVM /usr/lib/libc++abi , didn't study how these play in. Tinker

Re: firefox 52 - crashes at startup or later due to oom

2017-03-12 Thread Tinker
On 2017-03-13 05:43, Theo de Raadt wrote: .. Yet again the diff in your email didn't come through! Are you using some weird encoding that the project mailserver doesn't allow through? My fiften-million-two-hundred-thousand-lines initial light warmup diff for Firefox codebase uncrapping

Re: firefox 52 - crashes at startup or later due to oom

2017-03-12 Thread Tinker
On 2017-03-13 05:40, Tinker wrote: On 2017-03-13 05:34, Sebastien Marie wrote: .. Note that the value is the total allocated bytes for javascript. It isn't a initial value, and it shouldn't grow (if I correctly understand the code). So I expect 128 Mo to be a bit "restrictive". ..

Re: firefox 52 - crashes at startup or later due to oom

2017-03-12 Thread Tinker
On 2017-03-13 05:34, Sebastien Marie wrote: .. Note that the value is the total allocated bytes for javascript. It isn't a initial value, and it shouldn't grow (if I correctly understand the code). So I expect 128 Mo to be a bit "restrictive". .. +-static const size_t MaxCodeBytesPerProcess =

Re: Security update textproc/wkhtmltopdf-0.12.3.2

2016-08-11 Thread Tinker
On 2016-08-11 15:38, Tinker wrote: On 2016-07-28 22:54, Frank Groeneveld wrote: On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 12:54:52PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2016/07/28 01:02, Tinker wrote: > On 2016-07-27 16:36, Frank Groeneveld wrote: > > Attached patch updates wkhtmltopdf to the latest rele

Re: Security update textproc/wkhtmltopdf-0.12.3.2

2016-08-11 Thread Tinker
On 2016-07-28 22:54, Frank Groeneveld wrote: On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 12:54:52PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2016/07/28 01:02, Tinker wrote: > On 2016-07-27 16:36, Frank Groeneveld wrote: > > Attached patch updates wkhtmltopdf to the latest release. Some important > >

Re: Security update textproc/wkhtmltopdf-0.12.3.2

2016-07-27 Thread Tinker
On 2016-07-27 16:36, Frank Groeneveld wrote: Attached patch updates wkhtmltopdf to the latest release. Some important security fixes (OpenSSL updates) were added .. Can't it use the system's LibreSSL version??

Re: sparc64 gd or libpng coredump

2016-05-29 Thread Tinker
On 2016-05-30 00:47, Otto Moerbeek wrote: On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 06:48:53PM +0200, Tinker wrote: On 2016-05-29 18:24, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > Hi, > > running analog on current sparc64 gives more coredumps coming from > libpng (via gd). At the moment I do not have time to investigat

Re: Please add ICU as dependency to Boost (i.e. change the "--without-icu" to "--with-icu") - thoughts?

2015-12-16 Thread Tinker
Jacoutot wrote: On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 01:32:21PM +0100, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: > Tinker <ti...@openmailbox.org> writes: > > > On 2015-12-16 05:04, j...@wxcvbn.org wrote: > >> Tinker <ti...@openmailbox.org> writes: > >> > >>> What

Re: Please add ICU as dependency to Boost (i.e. change the "--without-icu" to "--with-icu") - thoughts?

2015-12-16 Thread Tinker
On 2015-12-16 18:23, Landry Breuil wrote: On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 06:10:17PM +0800, Tinker wrote: Aha thank you very much for pointing these things out - great to know there was a discussion about it. Aha so maybe for OpenBSD 6.0 we'll have an ICU flavor at least. Flavors in libraries

Re: Please add ICU as dependency to Boost (i.e. change the "--without-icu" to "--with-icu") - thoughts?

2015-12-16 Thread Tinker
On 2015-12-16 05:04, j...@wxcvbn.org wrote: Tinker <ti...@openmailbox.org> writes: What would the decision be based on? I think that those points should be enough. - good reasons to use ICU in boost, not just "I need the ICU parts of Boost.". What would be the benefit fo

Re: Please add ICU as dependency to Boost (i.e. change the "--without-icu" to "--with-icu") - thoughts?

2015-12-16 Thread Tinker
and that's why you didn't do it already - I think I'll try with that flavor as per the patch in the other email, on my machine, and let you know if I see any issue. Thank you so much & happy holidays! Tinker On 2015-12-16 05:54, j...@wxcvbn.org wrote: Stuart Henderson <st...@openbsd.org&

Please add ICU as dependency to Boost (i.e. change the "--without-icu" to "--with-icu") - thoughts?

2015-12-15 Thread Tinker
icu4c" as a dependency to boost as to provide for that? Thanks! Tinker

Re: Please add ICU as dependency to Boost (i.e. change the "--without-icu" to "--with-icu") - thoughts?

2015-12-15 Thread Tinker
wrote: On Tue, December 15, 2015 19:48, Tinker wrote: Hi, I need the ICU parts of Boost. And, I really guess internationalized stuff is becoming more and more popular. Currently: /usr/ports/devel/boost$ grep -r icu * Makefile: --without-icu \ Would you feel like changint