Jeremie Courreges-Anglas writes:
> j...@wxcvbn.org (Jeremie Courreges-Anglas) writes:
>
>> Some time ago I took a look at hooking lua53 flavors in the ports that
>> support it. It turned out that some ports were already broken with
>> particular versions of lua (the most common
j...@wxcvbn.org (Jeremie Courreges-Anglas) writes:
> Some time ago I took a look at hooking lua53 flavors in the ports that
> support it. It turned out that some ports were already broken with
> particular versions of lua (the most common errors are missing functions
> at dlopen time, and
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
wrote:
>
> The switch to explicit FLAVORS is almost complete, there are two
> remaining ports, luaposix and lualdoc.
>
> lualdoc is packaged as a library that supports flavors, but afaik it is
> a standalone tool. Debian
The switch to explicit FLAVORS is almost complete, there are two
remaining ports, luaposix and lualdoc.
lualdoc is packaged as a library that supports flavors, but afaik it is
a standalone tool. Debian for example packages it as "lua-ldoc", not
"lua5.1-ldoc".
Here's a diff to switch it to a
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 05:42:00PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>
> Some time ago I took a look at hooking lua53 flavors in the ports that
> support it. It turned out that some ports were already broken with
> particular versions of lua (the most common errors are missing functions
> at