Re: UPDATE: LLVM - Fix building on arm

On 11/3/2020 3:37 PM, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: On Tue, Nov 03 2020, Brad Smith wrote: The following diff fixes building the LLVM port on arm. http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net/arm/2020-06-03/devel/llvm,,-main.log Is it supposed to fix this error? What was the problem? Yes, to

UPDATE: LLVM - Fix building on arm

The following diff fixes building the LLVM port on arm. pickles$ make install ===> Verifying specs: c++ c++abi pthread c edit m pthread z ===> found c++.5.0 c++abi.3.0 pthread.26.1 c.96.0 edit.5.2 m.10.1 z.5.0 ===> Installing llvm-10.0.1p3 from /usr/ports/packages/arm/all/ llvm-10.0.1p3: ok

Re: UPDATE: LLVM - Fix building on arm

On Tue, Nov 03 2020, Brad Smith wrote: > On 11/3/2020 3:37 PM, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 03 2020, Brad Smith wrote: >>> The following diff fixes building the LLVM port on arm. >> http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net/arm/2020-06-03/devel/llvm,,-main.log >> >> Is it supposed

Re: UPDATE: LLVM - Fix building on arm

On Tue, Nov 03 2020, Brad Smith wrote: > The following diff fixes building the LLVM port on arm. http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net/arm/2020-06-03/devel/llvm,,-main.log Is it supposed to fix this error? What was the problem? > pickles$ make install > ===> Verifying specs: c++ c++abi

Re: UPDATE: LLVM - mips64

ping. On 9/28/2019 4:45 PM, Brad Smith wrote: mips64 has switched over to Clang by default. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/devel/llvm/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.234 diff -u -p -u -p -r1.234 Makefile ---

UPDATE: LLVM - mips64

mips64 has switched over to Clang by default. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/devel/llvm/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.234 diff -u -p -u -p -r1.234 Makefile --- Makefile9 Sep 2019 21:15:16 - 1.234 +++

Re: UPDATE: LLVM 8.0.1

On Mon, Sep 02 2019, Brad Smith wrote: > Here is an update to LLVM 8.0.1. I'm testing a similar diff on amd64 and sparc64, thanks. -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE

UPDATE: LLVM 8.0.1

Here is an update to LLVM 8.0.1. Index: lang/clang/clang.port.mk === RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/lang/clang/clang.port.mk,v retrieving revision 1.33 diff -u -p -u -p -r1.33 clang.port.mk --- lang/clang/clang.port.mk6 Jul 2019

Re: UPDATE: LLVM

On Mon, Apr 29 2019, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > On Sat, Apr 27 2019, Brad Smith wrote: >> Now that the GCC compiler has been updated and we now have a C++11 compliant >> libstdc++ the workaround for lldb can be removed. > > Please state what you have tested and what you haven't tested, on

Re: UPDATE: LLVM

On Sat, Apr 27 2019, Brad Smith wrote: > Now that the GCC compiler has been updated and we now have a C++11 compliant > libstdc++ the workaround for lldb can be removed. Please state what you have tested and what you haven't tested, on which architectures. Here's an updated diff after the

UPDATE: LLVM

Now that the GCC compiler has been updated and we now have a C++11 compliant libstdc++ the workaround for lldb can be removed. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/devel/llvm/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.217 diff -u -p

Re: UPDATE: LLVM

On Sat, 16 Mar 2019 18:35:30 -0400 Brad Smith wrote: > Bring in some patches from upstream.. > > Make sure PowerPC backend is in sync with the frontend and enable Secure PLT > support their too. Hours ago, my PowerPC machine finished a build of devel/llvm. I tried to test your diff and my

UPDATE: LLVM

Bring in some patches from upstream.. Make sure PowerPC backend is in sync with the frontend and enable Secure PLT support their too. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/devel/llvm/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.216

Re: UPDATE: LLVM

On Fri, Feb 22 2019, Brad Smith wrote: > Merge in a diff from base: > > Improve the X86FixupGadgets pass I have committed this part. Thanks. -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE

Re: UPDATE: LLVM

On Fri, Feb 22 2019, Brad Smith wrote: > Merge in a diff from base: > > Improve the X86FixupGadgets pass > > Merge in a bug fix from upstream: > > [MC] Make symbol version errors non-fatal Regarding this part, should the fix go into base llvm/clang too? > Index: Makefile >

UPDATE: LLVM

Merge in a diff from base: Improve the X86FixupGadgets pass Merge in a bug fix from upstream: [MC] Make symbol version errors non-fatal Index: Makefile === RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/devel/llvm/Makefile,v retrieving revision

Re: UPDATE: LLVM

On Mon, Feb 18 2019, Brad Smith wrote: > Merge in bits from base.. > > - Merge LLVM commits r340844, r353818 and r353819 from the 8.0 branch > to fix a regression in floating point operations. > - When generating code for OpenBSD/powerpc, avoid unaligned floating-point > load and store

UPDATE: LLVM

Merge in bits from base.. - Merge LLVM commits r340844, r353818 and r353819 from the 8.0 branch to fix a regression in floating point operations. - When generating code for OpenBSD/powerpc, avoid unaligned floating-point load and store instructions. - Skip retguard instructions in prologue

Re: UPDATE: LLVM

On 2/11/2019 7:44 PM, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: cc'ing Alexander who reported the bug in base and Patrick who commented on upstream's bugzilla... On Mon, Feb 11 2019, Brad Smith wrote: Pull in 3 patches for the X86 backend.. - [X86] Add FPSW as a Def on some FP instructions that were

Re: UPDATE: LLVM

cc'ing Alexander who reported the bug in base and Patrick who commented on upstream's bugzilla... On Mon, Feb 11 2019, Brad Smith wrote: > Pull in 3 patches for the X86 backend.. > > - [X86] Add FPSW as a Def on some FP instructions that were missing it. > - [X86] Connect the default fpsr and

UPDATE: LLVM

Pull in 3 patches for the X86 backend.. - [X86] Add FPSW as a Def on some FP instructions that were missing it. - [X86] Connect the default fpsr and dirflag clobbers in inline assembly to the registers we have defined for them. - [X86] Add FPCW as a register and start using it as an implicit

Re: UPDATE: LLVM

On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 06:31:41PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 08:04:02PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: > > Re-merge the -msave-args diff plus fix and add a diff to make use > > of pthread_get_name_np. > > Comment tweak with the pthread_get_name_np patch being commited upstream.

Re: UPDATE: LLVM

On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 08:04:02PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: > Re-merge the -msave-args diff plus fix and add a diff to make use > of pthread_get_name_np. Comment tweak with the pthread_get_name_np patch being commited upstream. Index: Makefile

UPDATE: LLVM

Re-merge the -msave-args diff plus fix and add a diff to make use of pthread_get_name_np. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/devel/llvm/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.210 diff -u -p -u -p -r1.210 Makefile --- Makefile

Re: UPDATE: LLVM # -msave-args # lang/rust broken

On Sun, Feb 03 2019, Sebastien Marie wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 05:29:53PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: >> Pull in the save-args patch from base. > > with this llvm change, lang/rust is broken. it is not able to recompile > itself (`cd /usr/ports/lang/rust && make' fail). > > if I backout the

Re: UPDATE: LLVM # -msave-args # lang/rust broken

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 05:29:53PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: > Pull in the save-args patch from base. with this llvm change, lang/rust is broken. it is not able to recompile itself (`cd /usr/ports/lang/rust && make' fail). if I backout the change on devel/llvm, it build again. (I am Cc dlg@ as

UPDATE: LLVM

Pull in the save-args patch from base. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/devel/llvm/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.208 diff -u -p -u -p -r1.208 Makefile --- Makefile30 Jan 2019 07:36:06 - 1.208 +++

Re: UPDATE: LLVM

On Mon, Jan 28 2019, Brad Smith wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 03:38:38AM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: >> Merge in the other bits I had in the last diff I posted. >> >> - Simplify a patch >> - Add -z interpose >> - 4 patches from patrick's tree for Clang/lld > > And the i386 lld fix. Thanks, will

Re: UPDATE: LLVM

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 03:38:38AM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: > Merge in the other bits I had in the last diff I posted. > > - Simplify a patch > - Add -z interpose > - 4 patches from patrick's tree for Clang/lld And the i386 lld fix. Index: Makefile

UPDATE: LLVM

Merge in the other bits I had in the last diff I posted. - Simplify a patch - Add -z interpose - 4 patches from patrick's tree for Clang/lld Index: Makefile === RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/devel/llvm/Makefile,v retrieving revision

Re: UPDATE: LLVM

On 1/13/2019 3:32 PM, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: On Sun, Jan 13 2019, Brad Smith wrote: Sync in bits from base. Thanks, tests ongoing. While here: I plan to work on an update to llvm-7.0.1 soonish (like, in the next couple of days). If you or other folks already have a diff, please

Re: UPDATE: LLVM

On Sun, Jan 13 2019, Brad Smith wrote: > Sync in bits from base. Thanks, tests ongoing. While here: I plan to work on an update to llvm-7.0.1 soonish (like, in the next couple of days). If you or other folks already have a diff, please let me know. :) -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1

UPDATE: LLVM

Sync in bits from base. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/devel/llvm/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.204 diff -u -p -u -p -r1.204 Makefile --- Makefile5 Jan 2019 11:38:49 - 1.204 +++ Makefile12 Jan

Re: update llvm to 4.0.0

On (2017-03-14 18:50), Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > It's been updated minutes before I got your mail :) > Could you provide a diff to the intree version ? Haha, sure: Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/llvm/Makefile,v

Re: update llvm to 4.0.0

On March 14, 2017 6:46:17 PM GMT+01:00, Robert Nagy wrote: >Hi > >This diff updates llvm to 4.0.0 in ports. I've also changed the port to >use the official distfiles instead of our own crafted one, because I >prefer it this way. > >Index: Makefile

update llvm to 4.0.0

Hi This diff updates llvm to 4.0.0 in ports. I've also changed the port to use the official distfiles instead of our own crafted one, because I prefer it this way. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/llvm/Makefile,v

Re: UPDATE: LLVM 3.4

On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 04:50:03PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: Here is an update to LLVM 3.4. Any additional testing welcome. OK? One thing I wasn't expecting when testing this was the new requirement of linking against terminfo when linking the llvm libraries. While this llvm update is

Re: UPDATE: LLVM 3.4

On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 10:38:11PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 04:50:03PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: Here is an update to LLVM 3.4. Any additional testing welcome. OK? One thing I wasn't expecting when testing this was the new requirement of linking against

Re: UPDATE: LLVM 3.4

On 01/04/14 7:38 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote: On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 04:50:03PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: Here is an update to LLVM 3.4. Any additional testing welcome. OK? One thing I wasn't expecting when testing this was the new requirement of linking against terminfo when linking the llvm

Re: UPDATE: LLVM 3.4

On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 04:50:03PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: Here is an update to LLVM 3.4. Any additional testing welcome. OK? Here is a diff that lets xenocara build with XENOCARA_BUILD_GALLIUM=llvm using a commit from mesa git that doesn't seem to be in the 9.2 branch yet:

UPDATE: LLVM 3.4

Here is an update to LLVM 3.4. Any additional testing welcome. OK? Index: devel/llvm/Makefile === RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/devel/llvm/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.70 diff -u -p -u -p -r1.70 Makefile --- devel/llvm/Makefile 16

Re: UPDATE: LLVM 3.3

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 03:00:37PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2013/07/19 23:39, Jonathan Gray wrote: On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:08:26AM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote: On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org wrote: On 2013/07/18 22:48, Jonathan

Re: UPDATE: LLVM 3.3

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:08:26AM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote: On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org wrote: On 2013/07/18 22:48, Jonathan Gray wrote: @comment lib/libgtest.a @comment lib/libgtest_main.a +lib/libgtest.so +lib/libgtest_main.so

Re: UPDATE: LLVM 3.3

On 2013/07/19 23:39, Jonathan Gray wrote: On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:08:26AM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote: On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org wrote: On 2013/07/18 22:48, Jonathan Gray wrote: @comment lib/libgtest.a @comment lib/libgtest_main.a

Re: UPDATE: LLVM 3.3

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 03:30:17PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2013/06/20 23:16, Jonathan Gray wrote: On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:05:30AM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:03:20PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: Here is an update to LLVM 3.3. Comments? OK?

Re: UPDATE: LLVM 3.3

On 2013/07/18 22:48, Jonathan Gray wrote: Well this is what I need to compile mesa git with llvm support: Last time I tried with R600 support, it broke on i386, 22:01 sthen_ brad: /usr/obj/llvm-3.3/llvm-3.3.src/lib/Target/R600/SIISelLowering.cpp:356: error: integer constant is too large for

Re: UPDATE: LLVM 3.3

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 02:41:46PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2013/07/18 22:48, Jonathan Gray wrote: Well this is what I need to compile mesa git with llvm support: Last time I tried with R600 support, it broke on i386, 22:01 sthen_ brad:

Re: UPDATE: LLVM 3.3

On 2013/07/18 22:48, Jonathan Gray wrote: @comment lib/libgtest.a @comment lib/libgtest_main.a +lib/libgtest.so +lib/libgtest_main.so presumably the above 4 lines want replacing with @comment lib/libgtest.so @comment lib/libgtest_main.so ...? (not sure why this was originally commented,

Re: UPDATE: LLVM 3.3

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org wrote: On 2013/07/18 22:48, Jonathan Gray wrote: @comment lib/libgtest.a @comment lib/libgtest_main.a +lib/libgtest.so +lib/libgtest_main.so presumably the above 4 lines want replacing with @comment lib/libgtest.so

Re: UPDATE: LLVM 3.3

On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:05:30AM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:03:20PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: Here is an update to LLVM 3.3. Comments? OK? Here is an updated diff with the r600 backend enabled. Mesa seems to require llvm to be built as series of shared

Re: UPDATE: LLVM 3.3

On 2013/06/20 23:16, Jonathan Gray wrote: On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:05:30AM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:03:20PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: Here is an update to LLVM 3.3. Comments? OK? Here is an updated diff with the r600 backend enabled. Mesa seems to

Re: UPDATE: LLVM 3.3

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:03:20PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: Here is an update to LLVM 3.3. Comments? OK? Here is an updated diff with the r600 backend enabled. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/devel/llvm/Makefile,v

UPDATE: LLVM 3.3

Here is an update to LLVM 3.3. Comments? OK? Index: Makefile === RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/devel/llvm/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.62 diff -u -p -r1.62 Makefile --- Makefile2 May 2013 15:41:57 - 1.62 +++ Makefile

Re: UPDATE: LLVM 3.3

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:03:20PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: Here is an update to LLVM 3.3. Comments? OK? Can you enable the R600 target as well? It is still marked experimental in 3.3 but is required to build support for the latest radeon chips in mesa (radeonsi gallium target) and optional

UPDATE: LLVM - update library link spec

Re-sync LLVM to mimic the same library link spec as the base compilers. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/devel/llvm/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.50 diff -u -p -r1.50 Makefile --- Makefile21 Aug 2012 17:51:53

Re: UPDATE: LLVM - LLVM_ARCHS

On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:23:29PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: Here is a diff to update LLVM_ARCHS. sparc64 must be removed as the compiler doesn't support SPARCv9 and thus what is being built now is unusable, but there is support for SPARCv8 so sparc should be enabled. Although the compiler is

UPDATE: LLVM - update library link spec for libpthread

The diff below updates LLVM/Clang's Driver to mimic the new link spec behavior from gcc4. Looked over by Matthew and he thinks it looks good. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/devel/llvm/Makefile,v retrieving revision

UPDATE: LLVM - LLVM_ARCHS

Here is a diff to update LLVM_ARCHS. sparc64 must be removed as the compiler doesn't support SPARCv9 and thus what is being built now is unusable, but there is support for SPARCv8 so sparc should be enabled. Index: arch-defines.mk

Re: UPDATE: llvm-3.0rc1 just for testing...

On 2011/12/06 12:41, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: I also found why llvm did not compiled for me with cmake (I reported that before when you sent the rc2 I think): In my /etc/mk.conf I had defined: DEBUG=-g -O0 -O0 - this could very well explain why it was so slow ... personally I would

Re: UPDATE: llvm-3.0rc1 just for testing...

On Tuesday, December 6, 2011 13:23 CET, David Coppa dco...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 06 Dec 2011, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: It works for me on i386, and also it compiles fast. Whatever made the rc candidates so slow, seems to be gone. I also found why llvm did not compiled for

Re: UPDATE: llvm-3.0rc1 just for testing...

On 2011/12/06 13:23, David Coppa wrote: Try to add the chunk below to Makefile: .ifdef DEBUG CONFIGURE_ARGS += --disable-optimized --enable-debug-symbols .endif Ciao, David This is only with the cmake build, not the autoconf one ..

Re: UPDATE: llvm-3.0rc1 just for testing...

On Tuesday, December 6, 2011 15:17 CET, David Coppa dco...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 06 Dec 2011, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2011/12/06 13:23, David Coppa wrote: Try to add the chunk below to Makefile: .ifdef DEBUG CONFIGURE_ARGS += --disable-optimized --enable-debug-symbols

Re: UPDATE: llvm-3.0rc1 just for testing...

On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 09:28:35PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: Updated diff to llvm/clang 3.0 final; I have made a few timings (on amd64) - FWIW, I successfully built llvm 3.0 on sparc64. Regards, Simon

Re: UPDATE: llvm-3.0rc1 just for testing...

-prods.de wrote: attached patch to update llvm to 3.0 rc1. The 3.0 is supposed to be released in a couple of weeks release is scheduled for tomorrow; here is an updated diff for rc3, also switching the build to cmake. I kind of recognized it earlier, but now I started measuring times

Re: UPDATE: llvm-3.0rc1 just for testing...

Hi, On Thursday, November 24, 2011 04:21 CET, Jonathan Gray j...@goblin.cx wrote: On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 09:33:21AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2011-10-26, Sebastian Reitenbach sebas...@l00-bugdead-prods.de wrote: attached patch to update llvm to 3.0 rc1. The 3.0 is supposed

Re: UPDATE: llvm-3.0rc1 just for testing...

On Thursday, November 24, 2011 04:21 CET, Jonathan Gray j...@goblin.cx wrote: On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 09:33:21AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2011-10-26, Sebastian Reitenbach sebas...@l00-bugdead-prods.de wrote: attached patch to update llvm to 3.0 rc1. The 3.0 is supposed

Re: UPDATE: llvm-3.0rc1 just for testing...

On 2011/11/24 14:21, Jonathan Gray wrote: On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 09:33:21AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2011-10-26, Sebastian Reitenbach sebas...@l00-bugdead-prods.de wrote: attached patch to update llvm to 3.0 rc1. The 3.0 is supposed to be released in a couple of weeks

Re: UPDATE: llvm-3.0rc1 just for testing...

On 2011/11/24 09:47, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: This rc4 builds fine for me on i386, not like the rc3 from Sthen. rc4 builds fine on i386 with cmake too. I guess it will also not build on sparc64, see this bug I created in their bug tracker: I tested rc3 build on sparc64, that does work

Re: UPDATE: llvm-3.0rc1 just for testing...

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 09:33:21AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2011-10-26, Sebastian Reitenbach sebas...@l00-bugdead-prods.de wrote: attached patch to update llvm to 3.0 rc1. The 3.0 is supposed to be released in a couple of weeks release is scheduled for tomorrow; here is an updated

Re: UPDATE: llvm-3.0rc1 just for testing...

Hi, On Tuesday, November 15, 2011 10:33 CET, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote: On 2011-10-26, Sebastian Reitenbach sebas...@l00-bugdead-prods.de wrote: attached patch to update llvm to 3.0 rc1. The 3.0 is supposed to be released in a couple of weeks release is scheduled

Re: UPDATE: llvm-3.0rc1 just for testing...

On 2011-10-26, Sebastian Reitenbach sebas...@l00-bugdead-prods.de wrote: attached patch to update llvm to 3.0 rc1. The 3.0 is supposed to be released in a couple of weeks release is scheduled for tomorrow; here is an updated diff for rc3, also switching the build to cmake. any opinions

Re: UPDATE: llvm-3.0rc1 just for testing...

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote: On 2011-10-26, Sebastian Reitenbach sebas...@l00-bugdead-prods.de wrote: attached patch to update llvm to 3.0 rc1. The 3.0 is supposed to be released in a couple of weeks release is scheduled for tomorrow; here

UPDATE: llvm-3.0rc1 just for testing...

Hi, attached patch to update llvm to 3.0 rc1. The 3.0 is supposed to be released in a couple of weeks, so I thought, good time to test, and report back regressions, so that they maybe get fixed for the release. report bugs/problems there: http://www.llvm.org/bugs/ I use it to test compiling