Hiho,
I'm using debian 4.0r6 / postfix / postgrey ...
This works really fine for 99+% of emailsenders
From time to time I get
Nov 11 09:01:54 grey2 postfix/smtpd[28926]: lost connection after RSET from
unknown[xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]
... and users complaining about not being able to receive email
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt
ralf.hildebra...@charite.de wrote:
* Roman Gelfand rgelfa...@gmail.com:
Is it preferable that machine running postfix should have publlic
address as opposed NATed address?
That depends on what you want to use it for
I want to use it to
Zitat von Braun Björn bjoern.br...@igbau.de:
Hiho,
I'm using debian 4.0r6 / postfix / postgrey ...
This works really fine for 99+% of emailsenders
From time to time I get
Nov 11 09:01:54 grey2 postfix/smtpd[28926]: lost connection after
RSET from unknown[xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]
This has
I've been doing ha-proxy setups with apache and spamassassin for
a while and co-maintained some exim (oops, I used the 'e' word ;-)
based mail servers also.
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 01:21:13PM +0530, Manoj Burande wrote:
I am trying to setup a Postfix Mail Server on Fedora10. I am trying
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 2:51 AM, Manoj Burande
manoj.bura...@artificialmachines.com wrote:
Hello All,
I am trying to setup a Postfix Mail Server on Fedora10. I am trying
to learn the basic process of setting up and manage a Postfix Mail
Server. Also trying to build a High-Available
My logs (mail.log)
Nov 5 10:07:56 grey2 postfix/smtpd[7153]: connect from unknown[ddd.dd.ddd.dd]
Nov 5 10:07:56 grey2 postfix/smtpd[7153]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
unknown[ddd.dd.ddd.dd]: 450 4.7.1 a...@aaa.de: Recipient address rejected:
Greylisted, see
Zitat von Braun Björn bjoern.br...@igbau.de:
My logs (mail.log)
Nov 5 10:07:56 grey2 postfix/smtpd[7153]: connect from
unknown[ddd.dd.ddd.dd]
Nov 5 10:07:56 grey2 postfix/smtpd[7153]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from unknown[ddd.dd.ddd.dd]: 450 4.7.1 a...@aaa.de: Recipient
address rejected:
Braun Björn wrote:
My logs (mail.log)
Nov 5 10:07:56 grey2 postfix/smtpd[7153]: connect from unknown[ddd.dd.ddd.dd]
Nov 5 10:07:56 grey2 postfix/smtpd[7153]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[ddd.dd.ddd.dd]: 450 4.7.1
a...@aaa.de: Recipient address rejected: Greylisted, see
Zitat von Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi:
Braun Björn wrote:
My logs (mail.log)
Nov 5 10:07:56 grey2 postfix/smtpd[7153]: connect from
unknown[ddd.dd.ddd.dd]
Nov 5 10:07:56 grey2 postfix/smtpd[7153]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from unknown[ddd.dd.ddd.dd]: 450 4.7.1 a...@aaa.de:
--- On Thu, 11/26/09, Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com wrote:
From: Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com
Subject: Re: CMD tool to check if next SMTP hop can use TLS for messages?
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Date: Thursday, November 26, 2009, 3:33 PM
On Thu,
On 11/26/2009 9:43 PM, sosogh wrote:
Hi list
I am running two postfix on two servers.One acts as smtp tls client,
the other one acts as smtpd tls server.
I tried to send mails from smtp tls client to smtpd tls server
---
IP
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 06:56:16AM -0800, Harakiri wrote:
What problem are you actually trying to solve?
I know about all the difficulties with MX lookup etc, the original
goal would be - that i have a policy for external domains - and that
for certain domains a message should only be sent
Harakiri:
I know about all the difficulties with MX lookup etc, the original
goal would be - that i have a policy for external domains - and
that for certain domains a message should only be sent if TLS is
available - if a message to a certain domain is sent which does
not support TLS - it
Hello,
I have a Postfix mail server that needs to be set for two content filters as I
have two content filters.
One from AmaVis and another a custom content filter.
Please suggest some idea for configuring both on same Postfix.
Is it possible too?
Thanks in advance.
Ashish Sharma
At Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:51:15 +0100, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
Subject: Re: Multiple Mail domains for reverse ptr records? I'm confused
do not confuse this with multihoming, where you assign multiple IPs to
a single name (that is, you use multiple A for a single name).
Why d so many
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Sharma, Ashish ashish.shar...@hp.com wrote:
I have a Postfix mail server that needs to be set for two content filters as
I have two content filters.
One from AmaVis and another a custom content filter.
Can you not have amavis feed to your second content
Peter,
I don't know how to do it, please post some sample for doing what you are
suggesting.
Ashish
-Original Message-
From: petermbl...@gmail.com [mailto:petermbl...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Peter
Blair
Sent: Friday, November 27, 2009 11:23 PM
To: Sharma, Ashish
Cc: postfix users list
Greg A. Woods:
There _should_ be one PTR for every _valid_ hostname using a given IP
address.
Statements such as above remind me of silly knights fighting windmills.
There is a difference between right and useful, and it even
depends on where they are used - server or client side.
Multiple
Wietse Venema:
Greg A. Woods:
There _should_ be one PTR for every _valid_ hostname using a given IP
address.
Statements such as above remind me of silly knights fighting windmills.
There is a difference between right and useful, and it even
depends on where they are used - server or
Ralf Hildebrandt put forth on 11/27/2009 6:20 AM:
Then it of course needs a publich IP addresses
Or, at least, a public IP NAT/PAT'd to it by your firewall. It will
also obviously need PTR, A, and MX records.
Also, this may be helpful:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Sharma, Ashish ashish.shar...@hp.com wrote:
Peter,
I don't know how to do it, please post some sample for doing what you are
suggesting.
Read an Amavis document, and instead of pointing it to the postfix
reinjection port, send it to your other content
Brian Mathis put forth on 11/27/2009 7:49 AM:
I'm sure others can help with the HA setup, but I must say that you
should not be building a server (especially an HA one!) based on any
Fedora distro. Fedora is Redhat's testbed where they use very beta
software and is also mainly targeted for
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Ralf Hildebrandt put forth on 11/27/2009 6:20 AM:
Then it of course needs a publich IP addresses
Or, at least, a public IP NAT/PAT'd to it by your firewall. It will
also obviously need PTR, A, and MX records.
Well, I see no reason to have a MTA running on a public IP. As stated
above in the thread, as long as your server is HELO'ing out as the
name associated with the PTR record for its SRC-NAT, then you should
be fine.
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Roman Gelfand rgelfa...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 03:42:56PM -0500, Roman Gelfand wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Ralf Hildebrandt put forth on 11/27/2009 6:20 AM:
Then it of course needs a publich IP addresses
Or, at least, a public IP NAT/PAT'd to it by your
/dev/rob0 put forth on 11/27/2009 3:13 PM:
I am equally at a loss, and could turn the question back at you: is
there any reason why I would want to run Postfix behind NAT?
Inbound NAT/PAT are often confused, because they're implemented (from an
admin's standpoint) in an almost identical way.
Greg A. Woods a écrit :
At Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:51:15 +0100, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
Subject: Re: Multiple Mail domains for reverse ptr records? I'm confused
I didn't wrote this. if you can't use a mailer correctly, try an easier
sport. A friend of mine recently told me bowling is
Stan Hoeppner:
I'm running my Postfix firewall behind NAT/PAT and the setup didn't
require any non-default Postfix settings to make it work. I port
forwarded TCP 25 from my router to my internal Postfix host IP and all
worked without issue. What settings are you referring to?
--- On Fri, 11/27/09, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
From: Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
Subject: Re: CMD tool to check if next SMTP hop can use TLS for messages?
To: Postfix users postfix-users@postfix.org
Date: Friday, November 27, 2009, 11:14 AM
Harakiri:
1)
Harakiri:
1) Configure the Postfix SMTP client to REQUIRE TLS.
? ? smtp_tls_security_level=encrypt
no - as i said, my filer has own rules and can be based on recipient, sender,
or a combination of both - postfix cant do this, or at least not without
different policy servers
2)
I have two maps, ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-mailRoutingAddress.cf and
ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-mail.cf
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases, ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-mailRoutingAddress.cf,
ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-mail.cf
sender_canonical_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-mail.cf
This way,
* For users without an
Wietse Venema put forth on 11/27/2009 5:17 PM:
Stan Hoeppner:
I'm running my Postfix firewall behind NAT/PAT and the setup didn't
require any non-default Postfix settings to make it work. I port
forwarded TCP 25 from my router to my internal Postfix host IP and all
worked without issue.
At Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:16:58 +0100, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
Subject: Re: Multiple Mail domains for reverse ptr records? I'm confused
Greg A. Woods a écrit :
At Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:51:15 +0100, mouss mo...@ml.netoyen.net wrote:
Subject: Re: Multiple Mail domains for reverse ptr
At Fri, 27 Nov 2009 13:18:15 -0500 (EST), wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema)
wrote:
Subject: Re: Multiple Mail domains for reverse ptr records? I'm confused
Wietse Venema:
Greg A. Woods:
There _should_ be one PTR for every _valid_ hostname using a given IP
address.
Statements
34 matches
Mail list logo
