-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561
On Wed, April 29, 2015 20:47, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 06:56:44PM -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
Looks as if your resolver is appending the search path to unknown
domains.
Yes, I sort of gathered that. The questions I have are:
Is it a defect?
Is it a Postfix
On Wed, April 29, 2015 20:47, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 06:56:44PM -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
Looks as if your resolver is appending the search path to unknown
domains.
Yes, I sort of gathered that. The questions I have are:
Is it a defect?
Is it a Postfix
reject for unknown hosts so the configuration
is not at issue. Why is the host unknown at 16:54 and known at 17:05
is the question.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte
On Wed, April 1, 2015 12:19, Noel Jones wrote:
On 4/1/2015 8:04 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
I have a report this morning that email from one of our
correspondent domains is not being reliably received. The
specific case was that three out of four serial numbered
transmissions were received
? Can I just build and package 3.0 as I
have done previously with 2.11 and just install it as a simple (no
configuration changes) update over an existing 2.11 installation?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte
= yes
smtpd_tls_security_level = may
smtpd_tls_session_cache_database = btree:/var/lib/postfix/smtpd_scache
smtpd_tls_session_cache_timeout = 3600s
smtpd_use_tls = yes
Any ideas?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
On Tue, March 31, 2015 16:42, Wietse Venema wrote:
James B. Byrne:
Mar 31 16:17:58 inet08 postfix-p25/smtpd[20097]: warning: connect to
Milter service inet:127.0.0.1:8891: Connection refused
This normally means the port is not open (no process listening).
Use a suitable command to list all
are are graduating far too many lawyer wannabes
and not nearly enough people who can think.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905
On Mon, March 9, 2015 17:55, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 05:08:24PM -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
I have no idea what is going on.
So it seems, but you're also thinking clearly.
Thank you. I will show this to my wife. However, that statement may
reduce your stature
.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
that
traffic was in fact moving to our client that the truth came out.
Sincerely,
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561
be happening here? How can it be fixed?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario
is what we use here.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
):
unknown user
. . .
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
On Mon, March 9, 2015 14:49, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 02:10:16PM -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
x...@cuttingedgegrowersupply.com: host mx01.1and1.com[74.208.5.21]
refused to talk to me: 501 Syntax error in parameters or arguments
Perhaps they don't like your EHLO name
On Mon, March 9, 2015 15:23, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 03:08:15PM -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
report the output of:
$ printf ---%s---\n $(postconf -h myhostname)
$ printf ---%s---\n $(postconf -h smtp_helo_name)
Make that -hx instead of -h if your Postfix
On Mon, March 9, 2015 16:19, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 04:05:51PM -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
When I send directly to postmas...@land1.com then I see this:
Mar 9 16:02:41 inet08 postfix/smtp[6447]: 14604601DC:
to=postmas...@1and1.com, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024
Linux distributions some time to include the most recent
software.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
On Fri, January 30, 2015 11:52, Noel Jones wrote:
On 1/30/2015 10:41 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
I see this in our maillog:
Jan 30 11:15:47 inet08 postfix-p25/smtpd[4796]: NOQUEUE: reject:
RCPT
from unknown[69.17.131.33]: 450 4.7.1 mail4OA.4office.com: Helo
command rejected: Host not found
Never mind. I finally realized what you were telling me. There is no
forward dns for that address. I will contact them.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
;; ANSWER SECTION:
33.131.17.69.in-addr.arpa. 19371 IN PTR mail4oa.4office.com.
The dig was run on the host rejecting the mail. Any ideas as to what
is happening here? Am I missing something obvious?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrne
.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
eventually
because we whitelissted the domain when we realised what was
happening.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
On Fri, January 23, 2015 09:23, rogt3...@proinbox.com wrote:
James
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015, at 06:16 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
We have had to whitelist some of our larger clients because of this
very issue. We had one case where the same message was retried from
at least five different IPs
cause the
authors and users of the relevant RFCs to wince.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton
sent to subscribers with Gmail accounts.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario
on a domain and specifying a
txt record type I get a successful reply.
Totally baffled by this! Thanks for the suggestion.
On 18/01/2015 21:38, James B. Byrne wrote:
On Sun, January 18, 2015 10:30, SW wrote:
If I run /usr/local/bin/policyd-spf at the console it just does
nothing? (theres
specifically declares DLV trust rooted sites as DNSSEC
insecure. Is this correct? Has DLV been formally deprecated? Is
dlv.isc.org not considered trusted?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited
employ DLV.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E
for the incoming
fqdns serviced any faster than by postfix?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton
plus a possible timeout value.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561
tls_random_source = dev:/dev/urandom
transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual,
regexp:/etc/postfix/virtual.regexp
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrne
On Wed, December 31, 2014 08:35, James B. Byrne wrote:
One of our staff has requested that their United Parcel Service (UPS) account
password be changed. They have not received the expected email providing the
necessary ephemeral link to accomplish this. Checking the maillog I see
. I tried modifying our helo_checks.prce which
successfully dealt with the initial connection problem, but I am perplexed as
to how to best handle the invalid sender in this case. What is the
recommended procedure, if any?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrne
On Wed, December 31, 2014 08:35, James B. Byrne wrote:
One of our staff has requested that their United Parcel Service (UPS) account
password be changed. They have not received the expected email providing the
necessary ephemeral link to accomplish this. Checking the maillog I see
that reject_unknown_helo_hostname is in effect and domain.tld is not
excepted in the helo_checks map?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1
. So, either there was something specific to the
addressee's address or AOL experienced some transient issue with our domain.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9
is causing the AOL issue mainly because I lack anything much
in the way of practical experience in the matter.
Got to got.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9
be complaining about WRT to our DMARC
policy?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax
On Thu, December 18, 2014 19:19, Wietse Venema wrote:
Wietse Venema:
James B. Byrne:
xxuse...@aol.com: host mailin-02.mx.aol.com[152.163.0.99] said: 521
5.2.1 :
(DMARC) This message failed DMARC Evaluation and is being refused due
to
provided DMARC Policy (in reply to end
. And no manager with ambition would be
caught dead sitting at a word-processing machine. That was secretarial work.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley
B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
any issues.
Any idea on how I can nail down what process is generating the malformed
socket error?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive
On Tue, December 9, 2014 15:49, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 03:39:29PM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote:
Dec 9 15:12:08 inet08 postfix/smtp[3670]: fatal: shared lock
active/0A7EC60D8A: Resource temporarily unavailable
[...]
Dec 9 15:12:08 inet08 postfix/smtp[3758]: fatal
On Tue, December 9, 2014 17:27, Wietse Venema wrote:
James B. Byrne:
If you want to fix the label.
/var/spool/postfix/active/9934A60C7D default label should be
postfix_spool_t.
Then you can run restorecon.
Do
# /sbin/restorecon -v /var/spool/postfix/active/9934A60C7D
That's no good
On Sat, December 6, 2014 08:43, Wietse Venema wrote:
James B. Byrne:
In any case the issue is with a patch applied to support virtual mailboxes
for courier style maildirs. I have removed it.
FYI, The VDA patch does not modify the trivial-rewrite program.
Any changes in trivial-rewrite
On Sat, December 6, 2014 10:05, Wietse Venema wrote:
James B. Byrne:
I shall see if there are any other places in the patches that refer to /tmp.
The maildir spec uses *private* subdirectories named tmp, new
and cur.
SeLinux will flag an access violation when a private tmp directory
has
into these directories that have something to
do with mail?
#= postfix_smtp_t ==
allow postfix_smtp_t postfix_spool_maildrop_t:file { read write getattr };
Thanks,
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte
.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
what postfix-vda is or does
I would appreciate any suggestions.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
On Fri, December 5, 2014 20:33, Wietse Venema wrote:
James B. Byrne:
#= postfix_showq_t ==
allow postfix_showq_t tmp_t:dir read;
THIS is NOT proof that Postfix actually touches /tmp or /var/tmp.
Wietse
True. It is evidence that SELinux believes
responses to some other address?
Thanks,
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1
of these desires?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada
for something a little more interventionist. Of
course, if I have to do this myself then that would be a good place to start.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte
,
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
or maintaining the subject in replies impossible.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario
to happen here.
Thank you for the help. It is greatly appreciated.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
On Mon, May 5, 2014 22:23, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 13:11:31 -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
I am wrestling with the issues arising from Yahoo.com, and now
AOL.com, enforcing dkim for their addresses. Specifically we run a
small number of mailing lists using Mailman which have
not understand how that matches with the directives in main.cf.
Should the encryption option in master.cf be removed entirely?
Thank you for your assistance.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited
On Tue, May 6, 2014 10:20, Wietse Venema wrote:
James B. Byrne:
Well nothing works without correct configuration. Is your SMTP
server correctly set up to sign local submissions on 127.0.0.1
and the TCP port that mailman is talking to?
You'd have to verify that first. Only then does
On Tue, May 6, 2014 10:53, Wietse Venema wrote:
James B. Byrne:
This is my MSA configuration in Master.cf
submission inet n - n - - smtpd -v
[...]
Wietse:
[have you ever used this with mailman before?]
James B. Byrne:
I never tried before this incident
Message-ID: 607174e03d92b090d7568d96d50be307.squir...@webmail.harte-lyne.ca
Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 12:30:16 -0400
From: James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
To: logistic...@mailman.harte-lyne.ca
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22-4.el6
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Subject
= no
strict_rfc821_envelopes = yes
tls_random_source = dev:/dev/urandom
transport_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/transport
unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn
***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
message would take place.
Is this configuration not possible?
I tried modifying mm_cfg.py to resubmit to port 587 but that had no effect on
observed behaviour
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne
On Mon, May 5, 2014 14:58, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 05.05.2014 20:45, schrieb James B. Byrne:
Forgive me if I do not understand what you are trying to convey. We already
have Postfix DKIM correctly signing emails originating in our domains and
passing through our outgoing smtp gateway
.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
On Mon, May 5, 2014 15:38, Larry Stone wrote:
On Mon, 5 May 2014, James B. Byrne wrote:
And despite your claim that you told
Mailman to send to port 587 instead (no proof provided), you must not have
done what you thought you did. But the Mailman list is the place for what
you need
***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
postfix/master[20152]: warning:
/usr/libexec/postfix/smtpd: bad command startup -- throttling
I have no idea on how to proceed from here or even where to look. Is there
something obvious that I am missing?
Sincerely,
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrne
I cannot answer for Dovecot's behavior but in Cyrus-imap one does this:
mailbox+folder.subfolder.sub-subfol...@example.com
The spectators between subfolders is configurable in c-I and I speculate that
the same is true in other imap implementations. Check the imap
permissions on direct delivery
On Thu, June 28, 2012 15:21, Noel Jones wrote:
On 6/28/2012 10:54 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
And in virtual_aliases_maps those entries in virtual_mailbox_maps
need be mapped to actual delivery points that cyrus-imapd
recognizes:
Actual user-mailbox mapping is done is cyrus. Postfix neither
approach I would like to have some idea what the benefits would be.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton
On Thu, June 28, 2012 06:36, James B. Byrne wrote:
Perhaps this would be clearer to me if you would be so kind as to give
me the canonical use cases for virtual_aliases and for virtual_domains
This should read virtual_mailbox_domains
insofar as Postfix considers them. Why is the latter
?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
this extend to
virtual_transport as well? In other words, if using cryus-imapd
should virtual_transport = lmtp as well? If not then why not?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http
file?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
-imap and I am perforce left with
the examples provided by others who are.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
would appreciate being told
so.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905
On Wed, June 27, 2012 14:28, Noel Jones wrote:
On 6/27/2012 8:47 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
The background is this. We are moving from a Sendmail/Cyrus-imap
based system of many years to a Postfix/Cyrus-imap based email
system.
During the transitions the existing Sendmail/Cyrus-imap
and virtual_aliases_map?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561
On Mon, June 25, 2012 18:47, Bill Cole wrote:
On 25 Jun 2012, at 14:03, James B. Byrne wrote:
[...]
The virtual_aliases map contains this:
@example.com someuser
So that any address in example.com is entirely replaced with the local
address someuser
map. Otherwise I suspect that you will get a loop.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario
/virtual_aliases_regexp,
hash:/etc/postfix/virtual_aliases
Can anyone see what it is that is am doing wrong?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive
virtual_alias_domains = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual_domains
virtual_alias_maps =
regexp:/etc/postfix/virtual_aliases_regexp,hash:/etc/postfix/virtual_aliases
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http
smtpd_client_restrictions =
smtpd_data_restrictions =
smtpd_end_of_data_restrictions =
smtpd_etrn_restrictions =
smtpd_helo_restrictions =
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
reject_unauth_destination
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B
.
# On Linux, this does works correctly only with interfaces specified
# with the ifconfig command.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 04:06:28PM +0200, Frank Bonnet wrote:
This does not work -- /\@yahoo\.*$/smtp:[another.smtp.server]
Try /\@yahoo\..*$/
You are escaping the '.' and then matching zero or more periods.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrne
]: warning:
valid_hostname: empty hostname
14 07:48:10 nameserver postfix/smtp[16438]: warning: malformed
domain name in resource data of MX record for consensus.com:
Thanks
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte
feature on any
public facing web login page. That will greatly reduce the
attractiveness of your site to brute force login attempts.
HTH
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http
One more thing occurs to me. Your webmail site does require https
right? You do not accept plain text credentials over the Internet,
correct?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited
at all?
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
On Wed, June 13, 2012 12:23, Wietse Venema wrote:
James B. Byrne:
Given the requirement for the transport map on the MX hosts does the
relay_domains value need to be set at all?
If the destination is not on the machine itself, the destination
should be listed in relay_domains.
Thank you
it should not
have. It originated from the mail hub so the receiving element was
not exercised at all.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive
copied over from there and compared
to the clean distribution copies before replacing those.
If another pair of eyes sees anything I am doing that is wrong I would
appreciate being told what it is.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrne
. For the
PLUS+ addressing mechanism to work with Cyrus-imap the acl _p_
for the user id _anyone_ is required on each folder in the directory
tree containing the target mailbox.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte
101 - 199 of 199 matches
Mail list logo
