-hugo postfix/master[1418]: warning: process
/usr/lib/postfix/smtp pid 2633 killed by signal 11
Thank you
--kapetr
-
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 15:41:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
Subject: Re: SASL forward problem
kapetr:
220 mailout1.t-email.cz ESMTP
/master[1418]: warning: process
/usr/lib/postfix/smtp pid 2633 killed by signal 11
Thank you
--kapetr
-
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 15:41:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
Subject: Re: SASL forward problem
kapetr:
220 mailout1.t-email.cz ESMTP
EHLO 251-43-13
- PŮVODNÍ ZPRÁVA -
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 20:23:08 -0400 (EDT)
From: Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
Subject: Re: SASL forward problem
kapetr:
Hello,
I use posfix as forwarder.
The target server is connected via stunnel4. It
was working, but now
I have changed
...
yyy
You see - the difference is AUTH= in first case
Thanks
--kapetr
--
Jak se vyhnout nachlazení a dalším zdravotním potížím v nepříjemném
podzimním období? Čtěte speciál Zdraví na podzim na
http://web.volny.cz/data/click.php?id=1290
respond to special replay, which
was determined only for Peter Evans pe...@ixp.jp , who has ask me
for sending test e-mail directly ...
--kapetr
as in
original.
I make a connection and stunnel4 will be satisfied ?! It is crazy.
isn't it ?
Where is the security ?
--kapetr
:
message-id=20110309100908.1185da2...@108.234.broadband4.iol.cz
(FYI: This mail is send via webmail volny.cz)
--kapetr
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
Od: Jiří Pánek jiri.pa...@email.cz
Komu: Peter Evans pe...@ixp.jp
Předmět:Re: posfix rejected from google server
Datum: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 11:08:56
/faq.html, do not explain criteria how
someones IP can get into their CBL list.
--kapetr
certificate to
authenticate me, I thing. (?)
--kapetr
Hello,
r...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
Subject: Re: posfix rejected from google server
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 03:29:08PM +0100, kapetr wrote:
first I have to say: the problem with home/dynamic IP ranges,
business accounts, ... and therefore the need of using relay of
my ISP in my case I have well
. No spams. No one is abusing my system. I'm 99.99%
sure :)
Thanks to all
--kapetr
, that the communication with
ISPs server is encrypted. So my with SALS LOGIN/PLAIN send
name/passwd are +- safe.
Maybe I should at least use IP (not name) of my ISPs server in
stunnel conf, or add his name to my protected /etc/hosts.
--kapetr
with Postfix.
--kapetr
not spamer!
I hate spam and spamers !!
--kapetr
the server of Google mail ?
Haw to satisfy its requirements ?
I hope someone will help me, thanks
--kapetr
P.S.: sorry please my English
So you mean, that this is not problem of bad postfix config ?
So I can nothing do to get it working ?
Maybe must every, who wants to send mails to Google, have contract
with Google ?
It seems to be too improbable to be possible.
Is this sure or is there another possibility ?
--kapetr
Thank you,
I will have to :-(
In such situation the only function of Posfix left is the log.
--kapetr
- PŮVODNÍ ZPRÁVA -
Od: Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi
Komu: kapetr kap...@mizera.cz
Předmět: Re: posfix rejected from google server
Datum: 1.3.2011 - 9:59:26
2011/3/1 kapetr
Thank You for explanation.
--kapetr
- PŮVODNÍ ZPRÁVA -
Od: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
Komu: kapetr kap...@mizera.cz
Předmět: Re: posfix rejected from google server
Datum: 1.3.2011 - 10:40:28
Am 01.03.2011 09:28, schrieb kapetr:
So you mean, that this is not problem of bad
--
But on port 587 listens the ISPs server not.
What can I do ?
Thanks
--kapetr
believe it, but it works :-D
Before I could test it manually, my queued messages finally gone :-)
But ... it is Although nice, but I thing not very system - correct
solution.
So is there a possibility to do it correct - via Postfix
configuration ?
Thanks
--kapetr
server - what is exactly
what I have did not want.
2 . for Andreas - lst_ho...@kwsoft.de
the link http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=10336
works for you ?!
Thanks to all
--kapetr
21 matches
Mail list logo
