On 05/07/2013 02:02 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
[snip]
A PTR is not associated with a host, but with an IP address. That's
important because mail may be sent from different IP addresses,
depending on the recipient or other factors. And it seems that
some users forget to set up a PTR for all their
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:06:44 +0300
Indiana Jones indian...@inbox.lv wrote:
How can I forward all e-mail messages sent to a particular
address on my domain to another address on another domain?
What particular settings shall I add to Postfix?
The easy way, you can use dot forward
On 04/01/2013 04:59 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
so what you please have to suggest.
and obviously no option of third party like google calender etc.
we are looking for some centralized solution
In addition to the previous suggestions you can also check out Zarafa
and Open-Xchange.
Hi Fernando,
On 03/20/2013 05:40 PM, Fernando Maior wrote:
Patrick,
I do not use canonical maps at all when using LDAP. I do not need it,
because I just use mailForwardingAddress (actually an alias) to map the
incoming email to the real mailbox.
What I do:
1. Use the qmail.schema in
Hi Fernando,
On 03/19/2013 01:02 PM, Fernando Maior wrote:
Hello,
All this seems to be something very different from what postfix and
other smtp usually does. So, may be the problem is with the concept, not
with the implementation.
May I ask you why you need to change the domain name part of
Hi Viktor,
My apologies for getting your name wrong on the previous email.
On 03/19/2013 04:22 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
Nothing unusual at all about canonical mapping, the only anomaly
I'm making a fuss about is the underlying data model. It is OK to
turn secondary addresses into primary,
Hi Fernando,
On 03/16/2013 07:43 PM, Fernando Maior wrote:
Hi Patrick,
If you use the hash table, and issue the postmap command, what is the
output?
Here is the output:
$ cat /etc/postfix/canonical
@domainA.org@domainB.org
$ postmap -q t...@domaina.org hash:/etc/postfix/canonical
Hi Victor,
On 03/16/2013 11:25 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
[snip]
I've always avoided wildcard rewrites with LDAP, do the rewrite
only with actual valid user addresses.
Ok.
@domainA.org @domainB.org
I don't recall whether %d works with @domain input keys. I
would have guessed it does,
Hi Victor,
On 03/17/2013 07:38 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
[snip]
You really should not do this. Instead take the high road:
query_filter = mailDeliveryAddress=%s
result = mail
Will try that.
Keep in mind that there are many different LDAP email schemas and
yours may keep
On 03/17/2013 11:48 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
[snip]
Googling around I found a small postfix.schema and used the
maildrop attribute which works fine using this
This may not be the right choice. The schema that uses maildrop
IIRC typically uses:
mail: primary
Hi all,
Venturing into postfix+openldap country I bumped into a challenge: is it
possible to use an LDAP table for canonical_maps to generically rewrite
domainA to domainB (so for all email addresses @domainA.org)? It works
fine when I use this in a hash table:
@domainA.org @domainB.org
I have postfix 2.6.6 on centos 6, in use about 1 year, no known issues
couple of weeks ago struck a problem unable to deliver email to any user
on domain pinewood.ie with A record/host not found (1):
pinewood.ie mx are on cleanmail02.cdsoft.ie/cleanmail01.cdsoft.ie
tried putting MX IP/hostname
On 02/25/2013 02:14 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
I will evaluate the MDB client once there is an MDB library package
for a main-stream Linux or *BSD platform.
That is, something that installs MDB include files, an MDB object
library file, and MDB documentation in
On 02/25/2013 02:53 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
[snip]
I will evaluate the MDB client once there is a package for a
mainstream LINUX or *BSD distribution that people can install by
typing one or two commands.
(Resend without the (S)RPMs since it exceeded the allowed size)
Hi Wietse,
It seems
On 02/25/2013 07:19 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
FYI, in order to maintain Postfix in a meaningful manner I need to
know what the library will look like on OTHER people's systems.
Therefore I will wait until there is a package for a mainstream
LINUX or *BSD distribution that OTHER people can install
I was lurking around for the best solution to graph postfix usage, the
most detailed possible, in order to prevent and foresee problems.
I'm finding sparse results, I'm not sure which one is the most current /
complete.
Do you have any suggestions ?
have a look at Glen's cacti stuff
we have a contractor given an email address for use in contacting clients,
the boss would like to bcc all his outbound mails, is there a way to bcc
all outbound emails for one user ?
(I realize he can simply change his smtp to another smtp server to
overcome this, but, that's what the boss
On 12/29/2012 04:08 PM, Tim Smith wrote:
Hi Wietse,
Thanks for the response.
Using Dovecot which is Sieve enabled so no problem there. I also found a
list of Sieve enabled clients http://sieve.info/clients but can't see
that Outlook or any MS products are available there. My clients are
We relay email for our customers. They had some accounts Phished. I
wanted to hold email from those users so I could see the spam that was
going out and requeue the valid email.
In main.cf I have:
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
check_sender_access hash:$config_directory/sender_domains,
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 12/6/2012 4:29 PM, Dan Lists wrote:
We relay email for our customers. They had some accounts Phished. I
wanted to hold email from those users so I could see the spam that was
going out and requeue the valid email
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:48 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Taking a quick look at the source, it looks like 2.8 does not use the
thread-safe getpwnam_r. It does not appear that postfix is threaded,
so it should be safe to not use getpwnam_r.
It has NOTHING TO TO WITH THREADS.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
I will not base Postfix development on UNDOCUMENTED return values.
That is unmaintainable.
I've brought it up on the FreeBSD lists. I suggested that it is a bug
for getpwnam_r to act the way it is. I'll probably end
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Dan Lists:
Nov 30 10:39:59 server postfix/local[50947]: warning: error looking up
passwd info for user: Invalid argument
The getpwnam_r() SYSTEM LIBRARY ROUTINE reports an error,
with errno set to EINVAL (Invalid
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Dan Lists:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Dan Lists:
Nov 30 10:39:59 server postfix/local[50947]: warning: error looking up
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Dan Lists:
Does postfix need to treat the EINVAL as if the user does not exist?
Is there a way to change the behavior of getpwnam*?
EINVAL is not a documented result code.
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs
I recently upgraded our mail servers from FreeBSD 7.3 running postfix
2.8.7 to FreeBSD 8.3 running postfix 2.9.3. We have account
information stored in mysql and are using libnns-mysql to access the
information through the normal password routines.
After the upgrade, when a user does not exist I
On Wed, October 24, 2012 8:55 am, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
Jeroen, thanks
SSL != STARTTLS, which is what postfix submission supports normally.
Either you should choose TLS/STARTTLS here, or you need to provide an
SMTPS (465) interface for the device to connect to.
Postfix does not directly
On 10/22/2012 04:56 PM, Morten Stevens wrote:
[snip]
I have backported Postfix 2.9.x for my company and I am also package
maintainer for Fedora.
Here are my latest builds for el6:
http://mstevens.fedorapeople.org/el6/postfix/
Would you mind making the SRPM also available?
Regards,
Patrick
On 10/22/2012 05:29 PM, Patrick Lists wrote:
On 10/22/2012 04:56 PM, Morten Stevens wrote:
[snip]
I have backported Postfix 2.9.x for my company and I am also package
maintainer for Fedora.
Here are my latest builds for el6:
http://mstevens.fedorapeople.org/el6/postfix/
Would you mind
On 10/18/2012 10:24 PM, mouss wrote:
you can try
http://countries.nerd.dk/more.html
you can also try GeoIP.
Also check out http://ipdeny.com/
Regards,
Patrick
On Sun, August 26, 2012 9:21 am, Wietse Venema wrote:
Is there a way to warn postmaster/admin of such?
at the moment, i go 'mailq' and check \queuegraph few times daily to
watch for potential problems, what can one do get notified of such
potential issues ?
Yes, if you really want to.
On Sat, September 1, 2012 8:15 pm, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
how can I create some 'test' deffered queue emails..? that will hang
around till I don't want test anymore
send mail to someb...@hotmial.com
Ralf,
thanks, but, got 250 OK:
Sep 1 20:34:27 postfix/lmtp[4812]: 77471380B88:
On Sat, September 1, 2012 9:00 pm, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Oh wow, somebody got that domain :(
Currently in my queue for ages:
gm.de zfl.org bausch-lomb.de
Ralf,
thanks for your help!
trigger worked, BUT, I was still missing notify enable, now all seems
good, get email with cacti png, this
I've just received a 'open enclosed ZIP' email, looking at the header, it
was sent from non-resolving host, which I thought my Postfix should refuse
have I got something missing in my config, or am I misinterpreting logs
again ?
--
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 04:37 -0700, Thufir wrote:
On 08/28/2012 04:16 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Thufirhawat.thu...@gmail.com:
Aug 28 02:40:57 dur postfix/smtpd[22388]: error: open database
/var/lib/mailman/data/aliases.db: No such file or directory
postalias
On Sun, August 26, 2012 9:21 am, Wietse Venema wrote:
Voytek:
Yes, if you really want to. However I haven't used this code since
it was written many years ago. Let me know if it still works.
Wietse,
thanks.
hmmm, I think maybe it's not the best idea... perhaps I should try a cacti
threshold
On Sun, August 26, 2012 8:35 am, Reindl Harald wrote:
is it a 'good idea' to firewall block such when they're from
depends on your business
i tend to do so at least for some days
Reindl,
so either of the two anvil/IP log lines indicates excess, yes ?
Aug 27 06:00:03 postfix/anvil[4396]:
On Mon, August 27, 2012 6:27 am, Reindl Harald wrote:
Aug 27 06:00:03 postfix/anvil[4396]: statistics: max connection rate
15/1800s for (smtp:27.115.112.50) at Aug 27 05:59:14
Aug 27 06:00:03 postfix/anvil[4396]: statistics: max connection count 1
for (smtp:27.115.112.50) at Aug 27 05:50:26
On Sat, August 25, 2012 7:37 pm, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.08.2012 07:09, schrieb li...@sbt.net.au:
most likely an attack
there is no need to get notified because you can rate-control
anvil_rate_time_unit = 1800s smtpd_client_connection_rate_limi = 50
Reindl, thanks
how do I monitor to
On Sat, August 25, 2012 7:37 pm, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.08.2012 07:09, schrieb li...@sbt.net.au:
most likely an attack
there is no need to get notified because you can rate-control
anvil_rate_time_unit = 1800s smtpd_client_connection_rate_limi = 50
Reindl, thanks
how do I monitor to
just noticed I have large increase in smtp connections, looking at logs I
noticed a single ip continuous attempting connection, searching for that
IP in maillog I see like;
is this like a mail attack..?
I blocked the IP for now, how to monitor and get warned when such
incidents happen ?
grep
I'm just setting up a new Postix server with TLS on Centos 6, I've
generated self certified certificate, that all seems OK as follows:
smtpd_tls_cert_file = /etc/pki/tls/certs/server.crt
smtpd_tls_key_file = /etc/pki/tls/certs/server.key
but I'm 'missing' the CAfile part
looking at where my
setting up new Postfix 2.6.6 server on Centos 6 with SMTP AUTH
sending is only allowed with SMTP AUTH on 587
should I set smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes ?
currently have 'no', is likely to bite me if I change to 'yes' ?
I have a postfix mail server, 'server', all works fine
the 'old' server that was formerly used has been 'decommissioned' and is
on a NAT 192.x.x.x IP behind dynamic ADSL as a 'backup'
the old server still has it's old fullyQ tld.au hostname in it's config
in the backup server I've entered:
I have two email stuck in outbound queue, sender forgot to include '.au'
and has domain.tld where it should be domain.tld.au,
is there an approved way to edit/correct such errors on queued email, how ?
On Fri, August 17, 2012 7:02 am, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Rewrite using virtual_alias_maps, then (after you edited
virtual_alias_maps / postmapped it), requeue using postsuper -r ID
Ralf,
thanks
I have it in mysql, so I would need to do like domain.tld to domain.tld.au
entry ?
as there is
On Fri, August 17, 2012 8:26 am, Noel Jones wrote:
On 8/16/2012 3:43 PM, li...@sbt.net.au wrote:
If just delivering mail for your own domain, it should still work.
If you need to relay through the new server, you'll need to set up
some sort of authentication -- either SASL or use private TLS
On Fri, August 17, 2012 8:21 am, Noel Jones wrote:
On 8/16/2012 4:12 PM, li...@sbt.net.au wrote:
Your decision. Or you can add a transport entry to fail the bad
domain and return it to the sender. # transport
domain.tld error:5.1.2 try @domain.tld.au instead
Noel,
thanks, that was easy,
'recommended' rbl lists that people use ?
I have from long ago as below, perhaps I should revisit this:
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject_rhsbl_client dbl.spamhaus.org,
reject_rhsbl_sender dbl.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client psbl.surriel.com,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net
can anyone point me to any howtos if such exist: on setting up a head
office/branch office mail servers (is that correct way to name it?)
we have a mail server in Australia, the office is split up between AUS and
Asia, most of the users are in Asia, so emails from physically adjacent
users
On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 19:53 +0800, Feel Zhou wrote:
Tnaks for Ansgar Wiechers
Everytime I install the packages about Convert::BinHex, It will
give me the same message
[snip]
t/comp2bin.t .. Can't locate package Exporter for @Checker::ISA at
t/comp2bin.t line 3.
It seems you're missing
On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 22:25 +0800, Feel Zhou wrote:
Thank you for Rob
Install the Exporter, still can' install Convert::BinHex
So long messages
cpan[3] install Exporter
Exporter is up to date (5.66).
cpan[4] install Convert::BinHex
Running install for module 'Convert::BinHex'
[snip]
Hi,
My Postfix setup works quite well blocking most spam. But I sometimes
get spam with (to my untrained eye) valid MAIL from: and RCPT to: email
addresses but in the DATA section there is a forged From:
m...@mydomain.com. At least that's how it works when I use telnet to
port 25 on my Postfix
Hi Reindl,
On 01-06-12 02:10, Reindl Harald wrote:
I tried the example header_checks [1] from the BACKSCATTER_README which
work fine except that they also block my own email. What is the proper
way to block forged From: addresses in the DATA section?
there is no proper way
simply because
I am looking to switch one or more of my blacklists to run from
postscreen. I send custom replies based on the blacklist, which
reduces the number of calls I get. The relevant part of my current
configs:
smtpd_client_restrictions =
reject_rbl_client zen.local,
reject_rbl_client
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Dan Lists:
How much traffic can postscreen handle? Each mail server in our
cluster handles 800,000 to 1,000,000 messages per day. We typically
This is mainly limited by the whitelist database latency: the
time
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
I assume you are referring to the temporary whitelist. I do not see
any way to configure what is uses to store the temporary whitelist.
Is it configurable? Is there any way to share the temp whitelist
between
How much traffic can postscreen handle? Each mail server in our
cluster handles 800,000 to 1,000,000 messages per day. We typically
have 60-120 smptd processes, with peaks as high as 320. Adding a
greeting delay will result in a lot of open connections. Can
postscreen handle this volume even
On 08-03-12 03:01, francis picabia wrote:
Just starting today we've received dozens of spam from websites,
all coming from anonym...@www.example.com where
www.example.com is a website showing Plesk.
I've blocked dozens of IPs. Has anyone else seen this?
Iirc recently there was a hole in
I was curious, is it possible to create custom error messages? For example
when I get a bounce back error:
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
b...@test.com
(reason: 550 5.1.1 b...@test.com: Recipient address rejected: User
unknown in virtual mailbox table)
On 11/04/2011 02:13 PM, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hello
Does anyone has ever use Plesk or another graphical interface
to manage Postfix ?
Maybe http://sourceforge.net/projects/postfixadmin/
Regards,
Patrick
On 09/29/2011 12:00 PM, Tolga wrote:
mydestination = vps.ozses.net, localhost.ozses.net, , localhost
To my untrained eye the two comma's (.net, , localhost) don't seem
right and the error seems to suggest that you need to install, configure
and start cyrus-sasl.
Regards,
Patrick
Hi all,
On a CentOS 6 box with postfix-2.6.6-2.1.el6_0 I'm trying to setup a
virtual_mailbox_domain that is fed into Zarafa (the Open Source Exchange
replacement). I can't seem to get past the helo_access and relay denied
errors. So clearly I am doing something wrong but the postfix book and
On 09/03/2011 08:28 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, 10.0.0.0/24, 10.0.1.0/24
Oops, mynetworks contains only ip4 addresses.
Solution is to either disable ip6:
inet_protocols = ipv4
or add ip6 localhost to mynetworks:
mynetworks = [::1]/128 127.0.0.0/8, 10.0.0.0/24, 10.0.1.0/24
On 08/22/2011 05:31 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
[snip]
On a side note, very few desktop mail clients support TLS
certificate authentication. Make sure Thunderbird supports this
feature before you spend too much time on it. TLS certificate
authentication is mostly used for MTA-to-MTA auth.
I used
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 07:58 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 8/6/2011 1:26 AM, Rob Sterenborg (Lists) wrote:
On Sat, 2011-08-06 at 01:04 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Or do the smart thing: use a file transfer protocol for transferring
files instead of an email protocol. HTTP and FTP
On Sat, 2011-08-06 at 01:04 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Or do the smart thing: use a file transfer protocol for transferring
files instead of an email protocol. HTTP and FTP are readily available
good examples.
We don't know why the OP wants this so it may not be that simple.
Recently I had
I am seeing the following in my logs:
Apr 26 10:18:43 mailhost postfix/smtpd[46627]: connect from
unknown[98.118.152.26]
However, the IP does resolve:
mailhost # host 98.118.152.26
26.152.118.98.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer onlinecourseevaluations.com.
mailhost # host
I'm migrating virtual mail domain/users to new Postfix server,
new server setup and working, I'm altering MX to point to the new server;
I want the 'old' server to forward any new traffic over to the new server,
last time what I used was static entry in main.cf like:
transport_maps =
Am 09.04.2011 08:44, schrieb Voytek Eymont:
however you can set
smtpd_banner =
in main.cf
Robert, thanks
what I'm after is, should I set banner to match real host name;
or, can I get away with using my own host name ;
will it cause problems down the road ?
Hi guys,
Running Postfix 2.3.3-2.1.el5_2 (RHEL5.5), I have the following in main.cf:
smtpd_helo_restrictions = warn_if_reject reject_invalid_hostname
regexp:/etc/postfix/helo.regexp
and in helo.regexp:
/^[0-9.]+$/ 550 Your software is not RFC 2821 compliant
Hi,
I got a lot of spam lately from dynamic hosts so gradually I have been
adding rules to block them with the help of the rules from
http://gabacho.reto.jp/en/anti-spam/anti-spam-system.html
Unfortunately this type keeps slipping through:
Received: from 200-161-108-143.dsl.telesp.net.br
My
On 08/31/2010 12:40 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
[snip]
/^[12]?[0-9]{1,2}(-[12]?[0-9]{1,2}){3}\.(customer|dsl|dial-up)\.telesp\.net\.br$/
REJECT Generic - Please relay via ISP (telesp.net.br)
That's all one line, TB wrapped it. You may as well just use this.
Over 1600 regex patterns matching
imap2:~ root# telnet localhost 25
Trying ::1...
telnet: connect to address ::1: Connection refused
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 imap2.beth.k12.pa.us ESMTP Postfix
EHLO imap2.beth.k12.pa.us
250-imap2.beth.k12.pa.us
250-PIPELINING
250-SIZE
Hi list,
I use a unique email address (alias) for every web(service)
registration. I would like to limit or even block spam sent to these
unique addresses. I glanced through the Postfix book but couldn't find
an answer.
Example of what should be blocked:
From: Twitter System
On 05/06/2010 04:07 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
[snip]
You can use an external policy service such as postfwd to compare
envelope sender and recipient.
But it sounds as if you really need to compare the From: header with the
envelope recipient. You'll need a content_filter or milter to do that.
--
When a user mistypes an email address domain (eg @monsant.com), the
message is sitting in the queue for days before they know about it.
We'd like to give them immediate feedback instead of making them wail.
I'm trying to have the outbound mail server permanently reject email
with an invalid
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 1/29/2010 11:57 AM, Dan Lists wrote:
When a user mistypes an email address domain (eg @monsant.com), the
message is sitting in the queue for days before they know about it.
We'd like to give them immediate feedback
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Dan Lists:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
$ host monsant.com
Host monsant.com not found: 2(SERVFAIL)
This is a temporary error. The name server for monsant.com could not be
contacted. ?You
We host email for several domains. Occasionally an account will get
phished and our outbound server will get blacklisted by hotmail and
others. We'd like to separate the outbound email so that one domain
with a phished account doesn't get all outbound email blacklisted.
I'm trying to set up an
Hi All,
We are doing an upgrade on the machine that holds the postboxes
(mailenable) during the upgrade the server will need to be rebooted
which renders the boxes unreachable.
This causes a 550 error to be sent back to our spam catching server
(running MailScanner spamassassin and postfix).
Wietse Venema wrote:
Lists:
Hi All,
We are doing an upgrade on the machine that holds the postboxes
(mailenable) during the upgrade the server will need to be rebooted
which renders the boxes unreachable.
This causes a 550 error to be sent back to our spam catching server
(running
Eero Volotinen wrote:
Lists wrote:
Hi All,
We are doing an upgrade on the machine that holds the postboxes
(mailenable) during the upgrade the server will need to be rebooted
which renders the boxes unreachable.
This causes a 550 error to be sent back to our spam catching server
(running
Wietse Venema wrote:
Lists:
Hi all,
Setup is: we have a server that does the spam checking running
MailScanner / Spamassassin and of course postfix
Mail is then delivered to a machine running MailEnable (where the boxes
are held)
We had a situation where the MailEnable machine went
Hi all,
Setup is: we have a server that does the spam checking running
MailScanner / Spamassassin and of course postfix
Mail is then delivered to a machine running MailEnable (where the boxes
are held)
We had a situation where the MailEnable machine went down
*In the maillog of the server
LuKreme wrote:
On 26-May-2009, at 17:39, Lists wrote:
As part of my mail system I am using postgrey.
When stuff is stopped at the gate (so to speek) i.e. it doesn't even
get into the the system is there a log kept of this?
postgrey logs to the maillog. lines look like this:
May 26 16:27:18
Hi all,
As part of my mail system I am using postgrey.
I am running Centos 5.2, MailScanner latest version with postfix and
spamassassin
When stuff is stopped at the gate (so to speek) i.e. it doesn't even get
into the the system is there a log kept of this?
I thought it might be in the
Hello,
I typed the address in a message wrong. Pine copied ot to the
sendmail folder anyway. But postfix saw the message that the
address was wrong and put it in the mailq. (Fair enough).
Question is: can I resnd the message with the correct address
and if yes, how?
Regards,
Hans.
*** Antwoord op een bericht uit gebied LISTS.POSTFIX-USERS
(lists.postfix-users).
Hallo Ralf,
Op zondag 24 mei 2009 schreef Ralf Hildebrandt aan postfix-users@postfix.org:
Question is: can I resnd the message with the correct address
and if yes, how?
RH I fail to see how this is a postfix
*** Antwoord op een bericht uit gebied LISTS.POSTFIX-USERS
(lists.postfix-users).
Hallo Wietse,
Op zondag 24 mei 2009 schreef Wietse Venema aan Postfix users:
Question is: can I resnd the message with the correct address
and if yes, how?
WV I assume that the message is still queued because
Hello,
My postfix manages mail for a number of domains, e.g. gtwm.co.uk. The
MX records are set so that mail is filtered through a third party spam
catcher.
However the server has one domain that is the 'main' hostname of the
server, listed in /etc/hosts:
62.73.174.227
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
FYI,
The header_checks parameter does not control whether or not Milter
operation is invoked, so your observations are incorrect.
If you want to pursue this further, show a telnet mail submission
and the
I'm running postfix 2.5.6, and I'm using amavis through the milter interface
by setting 'smtpd_milters= inet:[127.0.0.1]:10023'.
I'm trying to set up a different port for skipping amavis checks on email
that has already been checked. In master.cf I have:
2525inetn - n
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
First, show that Postfix receives mail via port 2525. This requires
a transcript of a telnet session, and the Postfix logging for the
corresponding email delivery.
Second, show with ps command output that port 2525
Hi all,
Does anyone know where I could find information on the commonly seen
messages in maillog so that I can begin to better understand the log file?
Many thanks
Kate
Charles Marcus wrote:
On 10/7/2008, Lists ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I like the setup that allows the client to use pop details to
authenticate - I even managed to get that working ;)
If you're talking about pop-b4-smtp, then you should know that it is
insecure and likely to cause
Noel Jones wrote:
Please don't top-post. Put your answers below the text you refer to.
Lists wrote:
Will have a go at those instructions thanks.
I don't want to make things difficult for our clients. I like the
setup that allows the client to use pop details to authenticate - I
even managed
Jones wrote:
Lists wrote:
I have spent the last couple of hours trying to get TLS working,
sadly no luck.
When I telnet and and do STARTTLS I get the error no server certs
available TLS won't be enabled.
I followed the instructions on the how to forge (the link I was given
before was a tad over
We connect the spam machine through to a MailEnable email program that
handles both the pop and imap.
I will have a go at using sasldb. Thanks for the explanation on the
different methods it helps a lot.
Cheers
Kate
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
* Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks
Thanks for the suggestions, sounds like a good idea.
Which method is the simplest to implement and get up and running?
I am running MailScanner, Postfix, Spamassassin.
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
* Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Patrick,
I want a single username and password to be used
301 - 400 of 402 matches
Mail list logo
