Thanks Bob. I wasn't sure if Victor had a specific list in mind.
It's not as if this is the first place I came.
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Isaac Witmer wrote:
Could you point me to the specific list you're referring to?
A good catchall is
I would like to apologize for hijacking this mailing list, I didn't
realize it would be quite so off topic. I was having trouble finding
the answer in all the usual places.
After almost writing a response, I've almost found the answer (haven't
tested it yet) by searching for:
postfix
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/06/2010 11:22 PM, Fran Garcia wrote:
Postfix has no preferred LDAP schemas, it operates at a higher level of
abstraction, i.e. virtual_alias_maps, transport_maps, ... which can be
implemented via LDAP if you so choose. The mapping between an
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:02, Victoriano Giralt wrote:
On 07/06/2010 11:22 PM, Fran Garcia wrote:
Postfix has no preferred LDAP schemas, it operates at a higher level of
abstraction, i.e. virtual_alias_maps, transport_maps, ... which can be
implemented via LDAP if you so choose. The mapping
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/07/2010 01:24 PM, Fran Garcia wrote:
http://wiki.rediris.es/gtschema/Portada
I'm getting a Mediawiki internal error there, does it work for you?
Works for me right now (Wed Jul 7 13:29:29 CEST 2010)
- --
Victoriano Giralt
Systems Manager
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:02:15 +0200
Victoriano Giralt victori...@uma.es articulated:
On 07/06/2010 11:22 PM, Fran Garcia wrote:
Postfix has no preferred LDAP schemas, it operates at a higher level of
abstraction, i.e. virtual_alias_maps, transport_maps, ... which can be
implemented via
Hi all
status=bounced unknown user:
since MANY days I google, trial and error, read howtos
and .postfix.org-howto's/readme's
and still get above error
any precise help would be most welcome
setup:
postfix version 2.6.1 + dovecot on opensuse 11.2
2 MX servers
1 running since 4 years on
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 20:40:55 +0800
Hans Neukomm h...@kriyayoga.com articulated:
below postconf -n
alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
biff = no
broken_sasl_auth_clients =
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 at 14:40 CEST,
Hans Neukomm h...@kriyayoga.com wrote:
status=bounced unknown user:
since MANY days I google, trial and error, read howtos
and .postfix.org-howto's/readme's
and still get above error
[...]
1 mailbox = 1 mail user = NON-unix user = hans (me)
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 at 13:30 CEST,
Jerry postfix-u...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:02:15 +0200
Victoriano Giralt victori...@uma.es articulated:
I can suggest the Spanish schema it has provisions for mail routing
and is in use in several Universities and Higher
I am finally putting together a test mail server (something I wish I
had when putting together the first mail server, but lack of hardware
due to lack of funding flow limited that). But now I have another
machine.
But I am still seeing all the issues I had before with Ubuntu. At
first I tried
On 07/07/2010 05:25 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
I am finally putting together a test mail server (something I wish I
had when putting together the first mail server, but lack of hardware
due to lack of funding flow limited that). But now I have another
machine.
But I am still seeing all the issues
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:48, Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
I would suggest using a distribution or OS that allows you to configure
postfix properly.
Name it.
Anything that interferes with that is not worth the effort.
Which do you use?
Regardless, no specific distribution will
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 09:09 -0400, Jerry wrote:
Why are you setting configuration parameters to their default setting?
It doesn't serve any purpose that I am aware of.
NOE does it do any harm I am aware of
but it may be bad style - I am aware of that
but to know which lines are obsolete might
Where do I look in postfix to introduce the following behavior.
When mail arrives to the mail server,
I like to convert any attachment to link if it is bigger than say 1M and add
a footer in the body like below, before dropping/relaying it to the
mailbox local or remote.
all attachments 1M
On 7/7/2010 2:16 PM, Asif Iqbal wrote:
Where do I look in postfix to introduce the following behavior.
When mail arrives to the mail server,
I like to convert any attachment to link if it is bigger than say 1M and add
a footer in the body like below, before dropping/relaying it to the
On 2010-07-07 2:02 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:48, Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
I would suggest using a distribution or OS that allows you to configure
postfix properly.
Name it.
All of them?
Anything that interferes with that is not worth the effort.
Which
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 14:30, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 2010-07-07 2:02 PM, Phil Howard wrote:
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 12:48, Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl wrote:
I would suggest using a distribution or OS that allows you to configure
postfix properly.
Name it.
I do accept mail besides postini. But when I track this mail (spam)
back it is comming through postini. What I'm seeing is a spike in
spam. This will normally last for 1 week or so then stop. But during
that time. All heck breaks loose for me. I admin other domains besides
mychoice.cc.
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 14:42:29 Phil Howard wrote:
Ubuntu works reasonably OK with everything else I've used on it.
Problem exist with Postfix on it. They've said to address it with
Postfix. I personally think the specific problems are more of how
Ubuntu handles Postfix poorly. One
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 15:57 +0200, Magnus Bäck wrote:
1 mailbox = 1 mail user = NON-unix user = hans (me)
Local domains with deliveries via local(8) are meant for local (Unix)
users. Either
a) use another delivery agent in place of local(8) by setting
local_transport (rather
Phil Howard wrote:
No. Clearly not the case. Ubuntu is an example which interferes with
Postfix. I'm trying to determine if others are more or less so. I
suspect at least some surely must be less so.
No FUD please. I've deployed smtp servers running hpux, solaris,
slackware, redhat,
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 15:00, Scott Kitterman post...@kitterman.com wrote:
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 14:42:29 Phil Howard wrote:
Ubuntu works reasonably OK with everything else I've used on it.
Problem exist with Postfix on it. They've said to address it with
Postfix. I personally think
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 15:11, Joe j...@tmsusa.com wrote:
I currently run a number of production mail servers on ubuntu LTS and
have never seen any of the problems you're struggling with.
Are you using the packaged version of Postfix, or the source you
compile yourself?
--
sHiFt HaPpEnS!
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 15:14, Gary Chambers gwch...@gmail.com wrote:
No. Clearly not the case. Ubuntu is an example which interferes with
Postfix. I'm trying to determine if others are more or less so. I
suspect at least some surely must be less so.
Why not simply avoid whatever hassles
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 15:13:00 Phil Howard wrote:
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 15:00, Scott Kitterman post...@kitterman.com wrote:
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 14:42:29 Phil Howard wrote:
Ubuntu works reasonably OK with everything else I've used on it.
Problem exist with Postfix on it.
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 15:14:08 Gary Chambers wrote:
No. Clearly not the case. Ubuntu is an example which interferes with
Postfix. I'm trying to determine if others are more or less so. I
suspect at least some surely must be less so.
Why not simply avoid whatever hassles you're
Phil Howard wrote:
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 15:11, Joe j...@tmsusa.com wrote:
I currently run a number of production mail servers on ubuntu LTS and
have never seen any of the problems you're struggling with.
Are you using the packaged version of Postfix, or the source you
compile
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 03:58:54PM +0200, Magnus B?ck wrote:
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 at 13:30 CEST,
Jerry postfix-u...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:02:15 +0200
Victoriano Giralt victori...@uma.es articulated:
I can suggest the Spanish schema it has provisions
07.07.2010 20:27, Matt Hayes:
On 7/7/2010 2:16 PM, Asif Iqbal wrote:
Where do I look in postfix to introduce the following behavior.
When mail arrives to the mail server,
I like to convert any attachment to link if it is bigger than say 1M and add
a footer in the body like below, before
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 11:40:30PM +0200, Markus Schönhaber wrote:
07.07.2010 20:27, Matt Hayes:
On 7/7/2010 2:16 PM, Asif Iqbal wrote:
Where do I look in postfix to introduce the following behavior.
When mail arrives to the mail server,
I like to convert any attachment to link if
I'm new to Postfix, and I'm learning all I can from the readme files.
However, I'm using CentOS 5.5 and the repo contains v2.3 of postfix.
Building from source is causing strange problems with yum. Is there anywhere
I don't know about where I can find an RPM for a current version of Postfix?
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 12:32:43AM +0100, Matthew Valentino wrote:
I'm new to Postfix, and I'm learning all I can from the readme files.
However, I'm using CentOS 5.5 and the repo contains v2.3 of postfix.
Building from source is causing strange problems with yum. Is there anywhere
I don't
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 00:32:43 +0100, Matthew Valentino wrote:
I'm new to Postfix, and I'm learning all I can from the readme files.
However, I'm using CentOS 5.5 and the repo contains v2.3 of postfix.
Building from source is causing strange problems with yum. Is there
anywhere I don't know
Awesome! Thank you for that link!
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Sahil Tandon sa...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 00:32:43 +0100, Matthew Valentino wrote:
I'm new to Postfix, and I'm learning all I can from the readme files.
However, I'm using CentOS 5.5 and the repo contains
Anyone out there been able to configure postfix with TLS certificate support on
AIX?
I am trying to get postfix running on a RS/6000 running AIX 5.3.0.0. Postfix is
working, it sends mail, which is all we want this server to do (it will never
need to receive). Where I am running into trouble
Jerry put forth on 7/7/2010 8:09 AM:
Why are you setting configuration parameters to their default setting?
It doesn't serve any purpose that I am aware of.
I've seen this quite a bit. It leads me to believe there are some Linux
distros that ship with this stuff in main.cf by default. IIRC
On 07/07/2010 01:16 PM, Asif Iqbal wrote:
Where do I look in postfix to introduce the following behavior.
When mail arrives to the mail server,
I like to convert any attachment to link if it is bigger than say 1M and add
a footer in the body like below, before dropping/relaying it to the
On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 23:39 -0700, junkyardma...@verizon.net wrote:
Very aware spammers can create their own domains and and SPF records. They
can do essentially the same thing with any anti spam measures. And I have
see a number of them do just that, an SPF record of entire IPv4 address
39 matches
Mail list logo
