Aggelos put forth on 2/2/2011 10:49 PM:
on 02/03/2011 05:24 AM Aggelos wrote the following:
With that setup, if I wanted to accept mail from a specific Internet IP,
which would otherwise be filtered out, how would I do it?
I meant clients that are rejected like so:
Feb 3 06:46:59 viper
Dominik Schulz:
I'm currently planning to migrate an Exim mailserver to Postfix due to
performance issues and security concerns.
The Exim mailserver is configured to handle several virtual domains. If
a
recipient is not found in the virtual table, before rejecting this
recipient,
exim
l...@ds.gauner.org:
I've configured recipient_bcc_maps to capture outgoing mail to some
domains to debug delivery issues, i.e. some senders can't send mails to
yahoo and yahoo wants the full body. So I thought I could just capture
these mails using recipient_bcc_maps and later forward them to
on 02/03/2011 10:05 AM Stan Hoeppner wrote the following:
Aggelos put forth on 2/2/2011 10:49 PM:
on 02/03/2011 05:24 AM Aggelos wrote the following:
With that setup, if I wanted to accept mail from a specific Internet IP,
which would otherwise be filtered out, how would I do it?
I meant
Hello
I'm migrating my mailhub.
on the fly I'm converting the mailboxes format from MBOX to Maildir
and I wonder how to use the vacation program ( or equivalent ) with
Maiidir format ?
Thanks for any infos , links ... etc.
Am 03.02.2011 10:24, schrieb Frank Bonnet:
Hello
I'm migrating my mailhub.
on the fly I'm converting the mailboxes format from MBOX to Maildir
and I wonder how to use the vacation program ( or equivalent ) with
Maiidir format ?
Thanks for any infos , links ... etc.
Hi
take a look at
On 02/02/2011 11:54 PM, Steve Jenkins wrote:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
In the mean time, maybe give this a go. 1600+ expressions matching rDNS
patterns of many millions of broadband IPs worldwide that shouldn't be
sending
direct SMTP.
On 02/03/2011 10:36 AM, Daniel Bromberg wrote:
The following spam got past all my filters. They're constantly
evolving :-(
I can't find the IP in any RBLs. Some meta-RBLs claim it's listed, but
when I follow up to the actual RBL, it's clean. I use zen.spamhaus
spamcop. SpamAssassin was
On 2/3/2011 4:44 AM, J4K wrote:
[snip]
I can attest to the awesomeness of Stan's pcre file. I run it on all 5
of our Postfix servers, and it catches a LOT of stuff. From my logs,
what it seems to do best is block zombie mailers on dynamic IPs.
And I updated to your latest version today, Stan.
On 02/03/2011 10:56 AM, Daniel Bromberg wrote:
On 2/3/2011 4:44 AM, J4K wrote:
[snip]
I can attest to the awesomeness of Stan's pcre file. I run it on all 5
of our Postfix servers, and it catches a LOT of stuff. From my logs,
what it seems to do best is block zombie mailers on dynamic IPs.
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 18:44:46 -0600
Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com articulated:
Jeroen Geilman put forth on 2/2/2011 2:56 PM:
Debian won't have 2.8 in stable until at least 2013, although you
may be able to get it as a backport later this year:
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 10:44:13 +0100
J4K ju...@klunky.co.uk wrote:
On 02/02/2011 11:54 PM, Steve Jenkins wrote:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com
wrote:
In the mean time, maybe give this a go. 1600+ expressions matching rDNS
patterns of many millions of
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 04:36:26 -0500, Daniel Bromberg
dan...@basezen.com wrote:
Those who can block this, how did you do it? I hope whatever
technique(s) also help block many more like it.
Blocked here with bogofilter (bayesian header+body filter).
M.
On 2/3/2011 3:34 AM, Aggelos wrote:
on 02/03/2011 10:05 AM Stan Hoeppner wrote the following:
Aggelos put forth on 2/2/2011 10:49 PM:
on 02/03/2011 05:24 AM Aggelos wrote the following:
With that setup, if I wanted to accept mail from a specific Internet IP,
which would otherwise be filtered
Hi,
I have a server which accepts eMails for multiple Domains.
And I wanna provide for each Domain a SSL certificate.
How can I use SNI (Server Name Indication) with postfix or is there
another way to solve this problem?
Regards,
alokat
Hello
Just few words to say how postscreen is great !
Thanks for that !!!
Alokat:
Hi,
I have a server which accepts eMails for multiple Domains.
And I wanna provide for each Domain a SSL certificate.
How can I use SNI (Server Name Indication) with postfix or is there
another way to solve this problem?
This is not yet implemented in Postfix. One option is to
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 09:16:27AM +0100, l...@ds.gauner.org wrote:
I've tried Victor's suggestion using check_recipient_access backend by a
longish MySQL query and empty relay_recipient_maps, but I'm still unsure
wheter this'd be the best solution.
Using an access map instead of
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 10:30:33AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Alokat:
Hi,
I have a server which accepts eMails for multiple Domains.
And I wanna provide for each Domain a SSL certificate.
How can I use SNI (Server Name Indication) with postfix or is there
another way to solve
On 02/03/2011 05:03 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 10:30:33AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Alokat:
Hi,
I have a server which accepts eMails for multiple Domains.
And I wanna provide for each Domain a SSL certificate.
How can I use SNI (Server Name Indication) with postfix
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 05:16:58PM +0100, Alokat wrote:
For MUAs reaching a submission server, the picture is much more simple,
so this is perhaps viable, but which MUAs are SNI enabled?
Okay ... thanks for all your comments.
So how would you solve my problem? Multiple Instances?
Ideally,
Am 03.02.2011 17:16, schrieb Alokat:
Okay ... thanks for all your comments.
So how would you solve my problem? Multiple Instances?
Regards,
Alokat
* One Servername
* One Certificate
I see really no reason why not mail.yourcompany.tld using in all
MX-records and client-configs, nobody
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:44 AM, J4K ju...@klunky.co.uk wrote:
Its a good idea, but this would limit a user from using a server on his
residential ADSL from being an Email server, and force them to use their
ISPs relay. Else they might have to upgrade to a business package or spend
more money
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 03:31:07PM +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Just few words to say how postscreen is great !
Thanks for that !!!
Indeed, but I'd like to add some content to this thread and ask the
list as a whole:
1. What are you using for dnsbl sites and threshold?
2. Have you enabled
on 02/03/2011 04:13 PM Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote the following:
On 2/3/2011 3:34 AM, Aggelos wrote:
on 02/03/2011 10:05 AM Stan Hoeppner wrote the following:
Aggelos put forth on 2/2/2011 10:49 PM:
on 02/03/2011 05:24 AM Aggelos wrote the following:
With that setup, if I wanted to
On 03.02.2011 00:27, wrote Matt:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Mauricio Tavares raubvo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Matt mhop...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm working on replacing an ageing Posfix install with a new server.
On the old and new server we use virtual domains.
On 2/3/2011 11:53 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 03:31:07PM +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Just few words to say how postscreen is great !
Thanks for that !!!
Indeed, but I'd like to add some content to this thread and ask the
list as a whole:
1. What are you using for dnsbl sites
On 2/3/11 9:18 AM, l...@ds.gauner.org wrote:
l...@ds.gauner.org:
I've configured recipient_bcc_maps to capture outgoing mail to some
domains to debug delivery issues, i.e. some senders can't send mails to
yahoo and yahoo wants the full body. So I thought I could just capture
these mails using
Did anyone have tips to integrate PostScreen with SenderBase DNSBL has
the Cisco IronMail blacklist ?
Bestr regards
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 08:16:58 -0800, Alokat mail...@alokat.org wrote:
On 02/03/2011 05:03 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 10:30:33AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Alokat:
Hi,
I have a server which accepts eMails for multiple Domains.
And I wanna provide for each Domain a
Am 03.02.2011 20:05, schrieb Chris Tandiono:
You can get a multi-domain SSL certificate. It is one certificate that lists
all the
domains for which it is valid.
in theory xes
but this is not scaleable
If you get 3 new customers with their own domains you cert
does not include them and
Hi,
I have been reading about prioritizing mail in Postfix on this list. It seems
that the answer is, there is a shared queue and mail is not prioritized. I
want to make sure that I fully understand if this applies to my situation.
All of our servers that send mail go through our Postfix
On 02/03/2011 11:24 AM, James R. Marcus wrote:
Hi,
I have been reading about prioritizing mail in Postfix on this list. It seems
that the answer is, there is a shared queue and mail is not prioritized. I
want to make sure that I fully understand if this applies to my situation.
All of our
On 2/3/2011 11:53 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 03:31:07PM +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Just few words to say how postscreen is great !
The only drawback, which is minor from our point of view, but maybe
major for the DNSBL operators, is that every connection means a hit
on every
* David Touzeau da...@touzeau.eu:
Did anyone have tips to integrate PostScreen with SenderBase DNSBL has
the Cisco IronMail blacklist ?
Please rephrase and please do mention how one would query the
SenderBase DNSBL!
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité -
On 2/2/11 12:20 AM, Matthias Andree wrote:
Postfix logs the ID whenever one is available, and it did in your case.
I'm wondering what exactly you seem to be missing. If it's about the
client connection as logged by postfix/smtpd, then it has no connection
to individual messages, hence doesn't
Am 03.02.2011 20:41, schrieb Alan Batie:
On 2/2/11 12:20 AM, Matthias Andree wrote:
Postfix logs the ID whenever one is available, and it did in your case.
I'm wondering what exactly you seem to be missing. If it's about the
client connection as logged by postfix/smtpd, then it has no
Matt Rude:
On 2/3/2011 11:53 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 03:31:07PM +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Just few words to say how postscreen is great !
The only drawback, which is minor from our point of view, but maybe
major for the DNSBL operators, is that every connection
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:52:47 -0600, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
wrote:
list.dnswl.org*-5
this includes dnswl_none just a note
hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com=127.0.0.1*-5
super that its is supported, still missing rhsbl in postscreen ?
Benny Pedersen:
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:52:47 -0600, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
wrote:
list.dnswl.org*-5
this includes dnswl_none just a note
hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com=127.0.0.1*-5
super that its is supported, still missing rhsbl in postscreen ?
There is
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 03:01:56PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Benny Pedersen:
super that its is supported, still missing rhsbl in postscreen ?
There is not yet a user interface design for rhsbl in postscreen.
Suggestions are welcome.
I don't see how it would be useful. The only thing
/dev/rob0:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 03:01:56PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Benny Pedersen:
super that its is supported, still missing rhsbl in postscreen ?
There is not yet a user interface design for rhsbl in postscreen.
Suggestions are welcome.
I don't see how it would be useful.
Sorry, I rephrase
How can we set PostScreen to query SenderBase DNBSL ?
Best regards
Le jeudi 03 février 2011 à 20:37 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt a écrit :
* David Touzeau da...@touzeau.eu:
Did anyone have tips to integrate PostScreen with SenderBase DNSBL has
the Cisco IronMail blacklist ?
On 2/3/11 8:31 PM, Joe wrote:
On 02/03/2011 11:24 AM, James R. Marcus wrote:
Hi,
I have been reading about prioritizing mail in Postfix on this list.
It seems that the answer is, there is a shared queue and mail is not
prioritized. I want to make sure that I fully understand if this
On 2/4/11 12:33 AM, David Touzeau wrote:
Sorry, I rephrase
How can we set PostScreen to query SenderBase DNBSL ?
Best regards
Le jeudi 03 février 2011 à 20:37 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt a écrit :
* David Touzeauda...@touzeau.eu mailto:da...@touzeau.eu:
Did anyone have tips to integrate
On 2/3/11 1:44 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Jeroen Geilman put forth on 2/2/2011 2:56 PM:
Debian won't have 2.8 in stable until at least 2013, although you may be able to
get it as a backport later this year:
http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=postfix
They lag behind something awful.
On 02/03/2011 03:51 PM, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
On 2/3/11 8:31 PM, Joe wrote:
On 02/03/2011 11:24 AM, James R. Marcus wrote:
Hi,
I have been reading about prioritizing mail in Postfix on this
list. It seems that the answer is, there is a shared queue and
mail is not prioritized. I want to
On 2/3/2011 1:59 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:52:47 -0600, Noel Jonesnjo...@megan.vbhcs.org
wrote:
list.dnswl.org*-5
this includes dnswl_none just a note
I intentionally don't want to RBL block sometimes-legit hosts.
To only whitelist low..high trusted hosts,
Jeroen Geilman:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
On 2/3/11 8:31 PM, Joe wrote:
On 02/03/2011 11:24 AM, James R. Marcus wrote:
Hi,
I have been reading about prioritizing mail in Postfix on this list.
It seems that the answer is, there is a shared queue and mail is not
On 2/4/11 1:25 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jeroen Geilman:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
Oops... Bad Thunderbird.
On 2/3/11 8:31 PM, Joe wrote:
On 02/03/2011 11:24 AM, James R. Marcus wrote:
Hi,
I have been reading about prioritizing mail in Postfix on this list.
It seems that
Jeroen Geilman:
One huge improvement you can make is to specify the relay transport
for incoming mail.
To achieve what ?
Postfix has separate smtp and relay transports for a good
reason.
The scheduler uses round-robin destination selection.
Does this mean recipient domain or
On 2/4/11 3:38 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jeroen Geilman:
One huge improvement you can make is to specify the relay transport
for incoming mail.
To achieve what ?
Postfix has separate smtp and relay transports for a good
reason.
The scheduler uses round-robin destination selection.
Does this
Daniel Bromberg put forth on 2/3/2011 3:36 AM:
The following spam got past all my filters. They're constantly evolving :-(
I can't find the IP in any RBLs. Some meta-RBLs claim it's listed, but when I
follow up to the actual RBL, it's clean. I use zen.spamhaus spamcop.
SpamAssassin was
J4K put forth on 2/3/2011 3:44 AM:
Its a good idea, but this would limit a user from using a server on his
residential ADSL from being an Email server,
As the directions in the file itself state, fix situations like this with a
simple whitelist. Given the number of hobbyist servers your MX
J4K put forth on 2/3/2011 4:09 AM:
True. Some of the matches don't reject, but prepend this header:
X-GenericStaticHELO
What is this header used for?
This exists due to the grey area between residential and business
classification. Some providers offer static IP service to small businesses
Jerry put forth on 2/3/2011 5:19 AM:
FreeBSD had the 2.8 release in its ports system a few days after it was
officially released. The 2.9(beta) release will be released into the
ports system shortly. The original 2.8(beta) was available almost
from its inception. The speed with which a
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 12:51:36AM +0100, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
That will create a separate queue from the outgoing mail which is using
the smtp transport,
There is one queue.
Physically, yes. Logically, and this is what matters more: no. Each
transport has a separate pool of delivery
Steve Jenkins put forth on 2/3/2011 11:18 AM:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:44 AM, J4K ju...@klunky.co.uk wrote:
Its a good idea, but this would limit a user from using a server on his
residential ADSL from being an Email server, and force them to use their
ISPs relay. Else they might have to
Jeroen Geilman put forth on 2/3/2011 5:55 PM:
If it uses the common query method, just add it to your list of DNSBLs.
from: http://spamlinks.net/filter-dnsbl-lists.htm
query.senderbase.orgSENDERBASE ... Returns TXT records
Not suitable for direct Postfix use.
I manually dug a
Le 03/02/2011 10:24, Frank Bonnet a écrit :
Hello
I'm migrating my mailhub.
on the fly I'm converting the mailboxes format from MBOX to Maildir
and I wonder how to use the vacation program ( or equivalent ) with
Maiidir format ?
vacation has nothing to do with the storage.
Thanks for
Le 02/02/2011 21:25, Noel Jones a écrit :
On 2/2/2011 1:48 PM, mouss wrote:
Le 02/02/2011 19:28, Steve Jenkins a écrit :
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_sasl_authenticated,
permit_mynetworks,
reject_unauth_destination,
check_client_access
61 matches
Mail list logo
