Hello,
My mail gateway Postfix acts as mail exchanger for the domain
'recipientdomain.it'. After receiving a message for the domain, it forwards
emails to the postoffice server (MS Exchange 2010) with address
xxx.yyy.www.zzz. The mail gateway is configured for recipient verification for
Scappatura Rocco:
Aug 29 11:23:56 mailgw postfix/smtp[17683]: 6FF3AD5C79:
to=davide.dac...@recipientdomain.it,
relay=xxx.yyy.www.zzz[xxx.yyy.www.zzz]:25, delay=0.03,
delays=0.01/0.01/0.01/0.01, dsn=4.4.2, status=undeliverable (lost connection
with xxx.yyy.www.zzz[xxx.yyy.www.zzz] while
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Wietse Venema
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 12:37 PM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Exchange 2010 and recipient verification
Scappatura Rocco:
Aug 29 11:23:56
Is there a way to add more info to status=bounced entries? For
instance, I would like to see the from email and subject on the same
line.
Aug 25 11:40:27 mail postfix/smtp[22413]: 83A7643CEB:
to=u...@domain.com, relay=mxserver.domain.com[XX.XX.XX.XXX]:25,
delay=0.57, delays=0/0/0.41/0.16,
Am 29.08.2013 19:27, schrieb Roman Gelfand:
Is there a way to add more info to status=bounced entries? For
instance, I would like to see the from email and subject on the same
line.
grep for 83A7643CEB and you get from address and all sort of details
like the sender, client-IP and infos to
--On Thursday, August 29, 2013 3:59 PM +0900 peter evans pe...@ixp.jp
wrote:
Combine these two into one. put permit_sasl_ at the top
as it is a first match wins thing. And of course, re-educate
your client that auth belongs on port 587. (for example, Japan
has
On Aug 29, 2013, at 12:49 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Thursday, August 29, 2013 3:59 PM +0900 peter evans pe...@ixp.jp wrote:
Combine these two into one. put permit_sasl_ at the top
as it is a first match wins thing. And of course, re-educate
your client that auth
Am 29.08.2013 21:34, schrieb Glenn English:
I'm under the impression that 587 is to be used by my local users
(email clients to local MTA), and 25 is used by MTA-MTA. Is this wrong?
correct
And /etc/services says:
auth 113/tcp authentication tap ident
not 587...
grep
On Aug 29, 2013, at 1:37 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 29.08.2013 21:34, schrieb Glenn English:
I'm under the impression that 587 is to be used by my local users
(email clients to local MTA), and 25 is used by MTA-MTA. Is this wrong?
correct
And /etc/services says:
auth
On 29 Aug 2013, at 13:34 , Glenn English g...@slsware.com wrote:
On Aug 29, 2013, at 12:49 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Thursday, August 29, 2013 3:59 PM +0900 peter evans pe...@ixp.jp
wrote:
Combine these two into one. put permit_sasl_ at the top
as it is a first
On Aug 29, 2013, at 2:18 PM, LuKreme wrote:
$ grep 587 /etc/services
submission 587/tcp
submission 587/udp
That's what mine says too. Does Postfix accept UDP submissions?
I looked at RFC6409 (the newest I could find on 587), and all it said was port
587 -- the protocol isn't
There are no MTAs that accept submission on UDP, yet, so maybe reserved for
future use?
t
From: Glenn Englishmailto:g...@slsware.com
Sent: 29/08/2013 3:44 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.orgmailto:postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: newbie check Was [Re: port
On 8/29/2013 3:43 PM, Glenn English wrote:
On Aug 29, 2013, at 2:18 PM, LuKreme wrote:
$ grep 587 /etc/services
submission 587/tcp
submission 587/udp
That's what mine says too. Does Postfix accept UDP submissions?
I looked at RFC6409 (the newest I could find on 587), and
Noel Jones:
On 8/29/2013 3:43 PM, Glenn English wrote:
On Aug 29, 2013, at 2:18 PM, LuKreme wrote:
$ grep 587 /etc/services
submission 587/tcp
submission 587/udp
That's what mine says too. Does Postfix accept UDP submissions?
I looked at RFC6409 (the newest I
On Aug 29, 2013, at 3:14 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
It's standard SMTP over tcp, typically with STARTTLS and AUTH. I
imagine the udp entry is a historical artifact.
Plaintext SMTP over UDP would require that the MTA invents major
parts of TCP, including the parts that deal with packet loss,
On 08/30/2013 08:53 AM, Terry Gilsenan wrote:
There are no MTAs that accept submission on UDP, yet, so maybe reserved
for future use?
No, it's just the assignment from IANA. In the past when either a TCP
or UDP port assignment was requested both were assigned, this does not
mean that there is
Hi
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:27:18 -0400, Roman Gelfand rgelfa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is there a way to add more info to status=bounced entries? For
instance, I would like to see the from email and subject on the same
line.
I usually do a extended log for all emails, so its easier to
parse
submission 587/udp
I've been doing this for a long time, and I've never seen anyone try
to do SMTP over anything other than TCP.
Regards,
John Levine, postmas...@cauce.org, CAUCE postmaster
http://www.cauce.org
18 matches
Mail list logo
