[This message bounced because the words "c h a n g e" and "a d d r e s s" were
on the same line.]
I currently have recipient_bcc.pcre:
if !/backup.*@/
/^([^+_]*).*@(.*)/ backup+${1}.${2}@localdomain.tld
endif
I would like to change
this to add a date field
to the backup address.
(I am
Fwiw I keep a pre-queue instance of milter-regex
https://www.benzedrine.ch/milter-regex.html
in place, for just such 'emergencies', as well as longer-term header
match/action.
Although it's a bit long in the tooth, and not actively supported, it still
works well enough.
It's a clean, easy
Thanks. I went with:
IF /^Message-id:/
/@qq\.com/ Reject
ENDIF
It's not all that pretty, but it works fine. I have been watching the logs and
those messages are now being rejected. Thanks for all the help.
-- Doug
> On 7 September 2017, at 15:50, pgndev wrote:
>
Viktor Dukhovni:
> > [root@mail2 ~]# bash -c "ls -ld /var{,/lib{,/postfix{,/master.lock}}}"
> > drwxr-xr-x. 20 rootroot4096 Mar 2 2017 /var
> > drwxr-xr-x. 29 rootroot4096 Sep 7 03:46 /var/lib
> > drwxr--r--. 2 postfix postfix 4096 Sep 7 16:07 /var/lib/postfix
> > -rw-r--r--.
I missed the "message id" ...
You should be able to match/block any valid header name.
Add it to, or replace, what's in the match -- up to you. Personally, I've
never received a valid email from 'anything' @qq.com. YMMV.
If you're shutting down a flood, more extreme, blunt instrument
> On 7 September 2017, at 15:28, pgndev wrote:
>
> It ain't pretty, or recommended for the long term, but something like this
> should slow it down
>
> /etc/postfix/main.cf
> header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks.pcre
>
>
It ain't pretty, or recommended for the long term, but something like this
should slow it down
/etc/postfix/main.cf
header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks.pcre
/etc/postfix/header_checks.pcre
IF /^(To|From|Cc|Reply-To|Sender|Return-Path): /
/@qq\.com/i
My server is being hit pretty hard by spam from China. Every email is from a
different IP address. The only common item is the message id ends in @qq.com.
Is there any way to block those with that ID?
-- Doug
> On Sep 7, 2017, at 6:01 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>
> That suggests that postfix (actually master) is dying abnormally for some
> unknown reason.
>
> You might do "postfix check" to see if it finds any configuration errors.
>
> Then you might do "postfix start
Ok...
[root@mail2 pid]# service postfix stop
[root@mail2 pid]# service postfix start
Starting postfix: [ OK ]
[root@mail2 pid]# service postfix status
master dead but pid file exists
That suggests that postfix (actually master) is dying abnormally for
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 09:34:55PM +, Fazzina, Angelo wrote:
> Victor: I messed with it a little but no change.
I did not suggest "messing" with it. :-)
> [root@mail2 ~]# bash -c "ls -ld /var{,/lib{,/postfix{,/master.lock}}}"
> drwxr-xr-x. 20 rootroot4096 Mar 2 2017 /var
>
> On 7 Sep 2017, at 22:05, Bill Cole
> wrote:
>
> On 7 Sep 2017, at 11:09, Stroller wrote:
>
>>> On 6 Sep 2017, at 14:06, Bill Cole
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Obviously some Postfix users do use maildrop but it
On 7 Sep 2017, at 2:57, Markus Rosjat wrote:
I will take a look at the debug readme but well I can read my logs
I made that specific suggestion because that is where you will find a
detailed list of what information should be included when seeking help
on this mailing list.
The purpose of
I will try that Miles, thanks.
Victor: I messed with it a little but no change.
[root@mail2 ~]# bash -c "ls -ld /var{,/lib{,/postfix{,/master.lock}}}"
drwxr-xr-x. 20 rootroot4096 Mar 2 2017 /var
drwxr-xr-x. 29 rootroot4096 Sep 7 03:46 /var/lib
drwx--. 2 postfix postfix
after a reboot, you could just try "postfix stop" and delete the lock
file, then "postfix start"
to find zombie processes, you could try "pstree" (shows a tree of
processes & sub-processes, in the order they were started at init time -
note that none of them are named postfix - the top-level
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 08:54:48PM +, Fazzina, Angelo wrote:
> postfix/postfix-script[3214]: starting the Postfix mail system
> postfix/master[3215]: fatal: open lock file /var/lib/postfix/master.lock:
> cannot open file: Permission denied
> [root@mail2 postfix]# ls -l /var/lib/postfix/
>
Server has only been on 25 minutes, I rebooted it.
Can you see it in this list ?
Thanks for trying.
-ALF
[root@mail2 log]# ps -ef
UIDPID PPID C STIME TTY TIME CMD
root 1 0 0 16:46 ?00:00:00 /sbin/init
root 2 0 0 16:46 ?00:00:00
On 7 Sep 2017, at 11:09, Stroller wrote:
On 6 Sep 2017, at 14:06, Bill Cole
wrote:
Obviously some Postfix users do use maildrop but it is not the most
common LDA choice for Postfix. I'd be surprised if it is even in the
top 4.
Perhaps this
you have a zombie master process hanging around. Stop postfix. Get a list of
all running processes and check if there's a orphaned master process hanging
around. Kill it. Start postfix.
p@rick
* Fazzina, Angelo :
> Hi,
> All of a sudden postfix won't load ? where
Hi,
All of a sudden postfix won't load ? where should I look next ? thanks.
I tried
[root@mail2 postfix]# service postfix start
Starting postfix: [ OK ]
Logs show
Sep 7 16:50:47 mail2 postfix/postfix-script[3214]: starting the Postfix mail
system
Matus:
>why just outgoing? Are you willing to accept spam with fake from in your
>domain?
I am not willing. Inbound is already restricted and functioning properly.
That said, I migrated my configs from an older version of PF so now you made me
worry about *how* it is restricted.
I have
On 9/5/2017 2:48 PM, techlist06 wrote:
Is it possible to restrict outgoing mail to be from one of my "valid"
local or virtual aliases? And I want to restrict outbound from one
address in particular.
On 05.09.17 15:25, Noel Jones wrote:
The easiest way would be to add
-o
Am 07.09.2017 um 17:09 schrieb Stroller:
>
>> On 6 Sep 2017, at 14:06, Bill Cole
>> wrote:
>>
>> Obviously some Postfix users do use maildrop but it is not the most common
>> LDA choice for Postfix. I'd be surprised if it is even in the top 4.
>
>
> On 6 Sep 2017, at 14:06, Bill Cole
> wrote:
>
> Obviously some Postfix users do use maildrop but it is not the most common
> LDA choice for Postfix. I'd be surprised if it is even in the top 4.
Perhaps this question is off topic, but what MTAs
We have a private cloud with all of the servers sending mail via mandrill,
and each app/server has its own key. We have a few legacy apps, for example
a .net 1.1 app, that can't send via TLS over 587 (and mandrill doesn't
support plan smtp over 25), so we set up a postfix server to do relay to
We have a medium sized cloud with 90% of servers sending via mandrill and each
app/server having its own key. We have a few legacy apps, for example a .net
1.1 app, that won't send via TLS over 587, and mandrill doesn't support plan
smtp over 25, so we set up a postfix server to do relay to
postfix-user:
> Hello everybody.
> I want to start the another smtpd process, binded to a UNIX socket, and
> configure this smtpd with maximally relaxed policies.
> I added a line to master.cf:
> lsmtp unix n y n - - smtpd -o smtpd_tls_security_level=none -o
> mynetworks_style=host -o
On Mon, 4 Sep 2017 10:53:48 +0200
Enrico Morelli wrote:
> Dear, I installed a new mail server under a Debian 9 using postfix
> 3.1.4 (like smtp) and dovecot (like lmtp) in a virtual user
> environment. I coming from qmail, so when I want that all mails are
> delivered to a
well I looked at MAILDROP_README ...didn't help much because it explains
the config and I did so. I will take a look at the debug readme but well
I can read my logs and it didnt help me even with a very verbose output.
for maildrop, I need to migrate courier maildirs so I need to support
Hello everybody.
I want to start the another smtpd process, binded to a UNIX socket, and
configure this smtpd with maximally relaxed policies.
I added a line to master.cf:
lsmtp unix n y n - - smtpd -o smtpd_tls_security_level=none -o
mynetworks_style=host -o
30 matches
Mail list logo