At 06:45 PM 2/10/2009, post...@corwyn.net wrote:
At 07:22 PM 2/10/2009, Nate wrote:
At 03:53 PM 3/18/2008, you wrote:
Wietse Venema wrote:
We're using SMTP AUTH in postfix, querying the dovecot auth socket
which works well; however, in our virtual hosted environment it
requires that
At 05:24 PM 2/10/2009, mouss wrote:
You can create dummy mailboxes that use the folders as their maildir.
for example:
joe+s...@example.com/some/path/example.com/joe/Maildir/.Spam/
then tell amavisd-new to add the +spam extension to mail tagged as spam.
This may or may not be easy depending
jeff_homeip a écrit :
[snip]
that creates some complications...and might be too difficult
a script and a Makefile... or sql as below:
but why not use wildcard virtual aliases? You noted below that they
break
recipient
validations. Do you mean that smtp_recipient_restrictions won't
At 11:04 PM 2/10/2009, post...@corwyn.net wrote:
At 05:24 PM 2/10/2009, mouss wrote:
While I can readily create a user b...@example.com, who has a
default maildir location for that sql of 'example.com/bob/' I can't
quite figure out how to change the SQL to get the folder for
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:55:31AM -0500, post...@corwyn.net wrote:
At 11:04 PM 2/10/2009, post...@corwyn.net wrote:
At 05:24 PM 2/10/2009, mouss wrote:
While I can readily create a user b...@example.com, who has a default
maildir location for that sql of 'example.com/bob/' I can't quite
At 01:05 AM 2/11/2009, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:55:31AM -0500, post...@corwyn.net wrote:
This is a bad idea. You are allowing external parties to construct
mailbox filenames on your system. Potential for various directory pathname
injection attacks:
At 01:31 AM 2/11/2009, post...@corwyn.net wrote:
At 01:05 AM 2/11/2009, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:55:31AM -0500, post...@corwyn.net wrote:
This is a bad idea. You are allowing external parties to construct
mailbox filenames on your system. Potential for various directory
And a last betterer/simpler way to do it.
SELECT
if(INSTR(maildir,'+'),concat(left(maildir,instr(maildir,'+')-1),'/Maildir/.',right(maildir,length(maildir)-instr(maildir,'+'))),CONCAT(maildir,'Maildir/'))
from mailbox where username ='%s' and active='1'
Hi.
I have a strange problem monitoring the pickup process: we have a
monitoring system that, sometimes, warns us with pickup process not in
memory (master and qmgr seems to continue running). When we enter the
machine, we notice that pickup is really in memory, but after that
alarm, every
I have some problem with postfix and amavisd-new.
Postfix is configured as a mx backup and use amavisd-new to check about spam.
I setup amavisd-new to rejict messages that are disoverd as SPAM, but
seem that postfix bounce this messages and sent a sender non-delivery
notification.
Why this
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 09:00:14AM +0100, Santiago Romero wrote:
I have a strange problem monitoring the pickup process: we have a
monitoring system that, sometimes, warns us with pickup process not in
memory
What is the meaning of this message?
Does the wake up restart the process
Bastian Blank escribió:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 09:00:14AM +0100, Santiago Romero wrote:
I have a strange problem monitoring the pickup process: we have a
monitoring system that, sometimes, warns us with pickup process not in
memory
What is the meaning of this message?
This
Hi,
yes, you are right using mynetworks is ok. I also though for this way. I
just didn't understood from beginning why it didn't work with access
file, but now is clear.
Thanks!
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 04:35 -0500, Digest of postfix-users list wrote:
your access file is used for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I now have added dnswl to my config to whitelist.
Can I get some comments it looks okay please?
smtpd_client_restrictions = check_client_access
hash:/etc/postfix/whitelist, check_sender_access
hash:/etc/postfix/check_backscatterer,
On 2/11/2009, Vittorio Manfredini (vitto...@vitsoft.bz) wrote:
I setup amavisd-new to rejict messages that are disoverd as SPAM, but
seem that postfix bounce this messages and sent a sender non-delivery
notification.
Never bounce a message once its been accepted.
Either setup amavisd-new as a
On Feb 10, 2009, at 9:05 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Jason Wohlford wrote:
Is there a way to notify me (i.e. postmaster) when my
smtpd_proxy_filter
fails? I see in the logs where a warning: connect to proxy service
127.0.0.1:10024: Connection refused occurs. How do I get a
Hello All,
I have researched this without a 100% clear reason that an exchange server
would return this error:
The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 #5.1.0 Address
rejected
My guess is it's an invalid email address that we attempted to be delivered
to, but I want to be
Jason Wohlford schrieb:
I thought
'notify_classes=bounce,delay,policy,protocol,resource,software' would do
the trick, but no luck.
I have the default setting notify_classes = resource, software active
and receive those notifications all the time.
Check the value of error_notice_recipient and
Ilo Lorusso wrote:
Hi
is their a way I can reject messages when its from address does not
match the envelope from address?
Doing that will drop tons of legit email.
Mike Katz
http://messagepartners.com
using postfix ofcourse
Thanks
Regards
Ilo
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 04:27:07PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
When sending to nashfinch.com I get:
Feb 11 16:23:36 mail postfix/smtp[22382]: setting up TLS connection to
nashfinch.com.s5a1.psmtp.com[64.18.4.10]:25
Feb 11 16:23:37 mail postfix/smtp[22382]: Trusted TLS connection
Andy Spiegl wrote:
On 2009-02-10, 12:00, Noel Jones wrote:
This should get you started:
Thanks!
# relay_recipients
... list of valid recipients at example.com ...
us...@example.com OK
us...@example.com OK
...
Hm, but I don't have the list of valid recipients. :-(
All I have is the list
Can someone have a look at this patch for Postfix = 2.5? The patch
for Postfix 2.3 does not work because I had to add a SASL mechanism
filter feature.
Wietse
*** xsasl_dovecot_server.c.orig Sun Mar 16 19:09:04 2008
--- xsasl_dovecot_server.c Wed Feb 11 10:26:37 2009
***
David Cottle wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I now have added dnswl to my config to whitelist.
Can I get some comments it looks okay please?
smtpd_client_restrictions = check_client_access
hash:/etc/postfix/whitelist, check_sender_access
G?ran H?glund:
virtual_alias_maps =
proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual-alias-maps.cf,
proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual-mailbox-to-alias-maps.cf
hash:/usr/local/mailman/data/aliases
As I suspected, you are mixing local alias syntax with virtual
alias syntax.
The two have
Hi,
Looking to get educated on postfix, and I started browsing through
amazons reviews. I've found the book 'The book of postfix' and that
everyone seemed quite happy with it. But the problem is the book is from
2005 / 2006.
Is this book still current? Or has there been enough revisions that I
Hi there,
Yahoo starts blocking e-mails from our server.
It is possible that someone/somehow is sending spams.
Please help me find what is sending spam from our server.
First please explain to me the following logs (ourdomain is hosted on
our server):
Feb 3 14:45:57 softexp
Charlie wrote:
Hi,
Looking to get educated on postfix, and I started browsing through
amazons reviews. I've found the book 'The book of postfix' and that
everyone seemed quite happy with it. But the problem is the book is from
2005 / 2006.
Is this book still current? Or has there been enough
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 08:05:56PM +0200, ddaas wrote:
Feb 3 14:45:57 softexp postfix/smtpd[23394]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
unknown[117.87.x.x]: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host
[117.87.x.x] blocked using sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org;
ddaas wrote:
Hi there,
Yahoo starts blocking e-mails from our server.
It is possible that someone/somehow is sending spams.
Please help me find what is sending spam from our server.
First please explain to me the following logs (ourdomain is hosted on
our server):
Feb 3 14:45:57 softexp
Hello, I'm doing some experiments with a synthetic benchmark and
postfix. My current postfix configuration can deliver ~3000
msg/sec to 1000 virtual mailboxes; however, the system (16
core/4x4 AMD opteron) is ~90% idle. All logs and queues reside
in a RAM filesystem, so disk IO is not a
Noel Jones wrote:
Charlie wrote:
Hi,
Looking to get educated on postfix, and I started browsing through
amazons reviews. I've found the book 'The book of postfix' and that
everyone seemed quite happy with it. But the problem is the book is from
2005 / 2006.
Is this book still current? Or
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 01:41:19PM -0500, Silas Boyd-Wickizer wrote:
Hello, I'm doing some experiments with a synthetic benchmark and
postfix. My current postfix configuration can deliver ~3000
msg/sec to 1000 virtual mailboxes; however, the system (16
core/4x4 AMD opteron) is ~90% idle.
Hi
Thanks that helped!
Now i just have to get the listmanager deliver the mails ... But that is
another list I assume.
/GH
Wietse Venema skrev:
G?ran H?glund:
virtual_alias_maps =
proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-virtual-alias-maps.cf,
With 16 logical CPUs, in this configuration you'll find your CPU load
to be 1/16th of the theoretical maximum + overhead. Your report of 10%
is about right.
The system has 16 physical execution units: four quad core AMD
Opterons. In the configuration I described, 90% of total cycles
are
This has not happened before: two messages sent to me, and received, but
not delivered to my mailbox. Here's what the maillog shows:
Feb 9 11:43:59 salmo postfix/qmgr[32715]: E4041AAE:
from=usern...@gte.net, size=4572, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Feb 11 11:33:33 salmo postfix/qmgr[21684]:
Rich Shepard wrote:
This has not happened before: two messages sent to me, and received,
but
not delivered to my mailbox. Here's what the maillog shows:
Feb 9 11:43:59 salmo postfix/qmgr[32715]: E4041AAE:
from=usern...@gte.net, size=4572, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Feb 11 11:33:33 salmo
Paweł Leśniak a écrit :
mouss pisze:
João Miguel Neves a écrit :
OK, I'll take that into consideration if I re-enable SAV.
if you re-enable SAV, do as much checks as you can. the minimum is
zen.spamhaus.org. but you can also use spamcop.
it would also be good to do it after
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Terry Carmen wrote:
What do you get with:
grep E4041AAE /var/log/maillog
Terry,
Feb 9 11:43:58 salmo postfix/smtpd[17963]: E4041AAE:
client=vms173007pub.verizon.net[206.46.173.7]
Feb 9 11:43:59 salmo postfix/cleanup[17966]: E4041AAE:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
[snip]
This is helpful, but I still need the query to take all the other
alias domains into account. So, I need the IF condition, or a second map.
I don't think so. I used this. I don't remember the details, but the
idea is that you can often get rid of flow
Rich Shepard wrote:
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Terry Carmen wrote:
What do you get with:
grep E4041AAE /var/log/maillog
Terry,
Feb 9 11:43:58 salmo postfix/smtpd[17963]: E4041AAE:
client=vms173007pub.verizon.net[206.46.173.7]
Feb 9 11:43:59 salmo postfix/cleanup[17966]: E4041AAE:
Rich Shepard wrote:
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Terry Carmen wrote:
What do you get with:
grep E4041AAE /var/log/maillog
Terry,
Feb 9 11:43:58 salmo postfix/smtpd[17963]: E4041AAE:
client=vms173007pub.verizon.net[206.46.173.7]
Feb 9 11:43:59 salmo postfix/cleanup[17966]: E4041AAE:
Silas Boyd-Wickizer:
Hello, I'm doing some experiments with a synthetic benchmark and
postfix. My current postfix configuration can deliver ~3000
msg/sec to 1000 virtual mailboxes; however, the system (16
core/4x4 AMD opteron) is ~90% idle. All logs and queues reside
Why do you believe
post...@corwyn.net a écrit :
And a last betterer/simpler way to do it.
SELECT
if(INSTR(maildir,'+'),concat(left(maildir,instr(maildir,'+')-1),'/Maildir/.',right(maildir,length(maildir)-instr(maildir,'+'))),CONCAT(maildir,'Maildir/'))
from mailbox where username ='%s' and active='1'
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 02:28:40PM -0500, Silas Boyd-Wickizer wrote:
With 16 logical CPUs, in this configuration you'll find your CPU load
to be 1/16th of the theoretical maximum + overhead. Your report of 10%
is about right.
The system has 16 physical execution units: four quad core AMD
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 09:24:25PM +0100, mouss wrote:
post...@corwyn.net a ?crit :
And a last betterer/simpler way to do it.
SELECT
Victor Duchovni a écrit :
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 09:24:25PM +0100, mouss wrote:
post...@corwyn.net a ?crit :
And a last betterer/simpler way to do it.
SELECT
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Terry Carmen wrote:
Postfix delivered it to procmail, so postfix is done with it.
I saw that, but there's nothing in ~/procmail/log since 2007.
Time to look further.
Thanks,
Rich
--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. | IntegrityCredibility
Rich Shepard wrote:
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Terry Carmen wrote:
Postfix delivered it to procmail, so postfix is done with it.
I saw that, but there's nothing in ~/procmail/log since 2007.
Time to look further.
Yep.
That's definitely a good place to start. At a minimum the procmail log
I have a few requirements which seem to be opposed to each other, as
what I'm currently doing is causing a mail loop and bounce. Here's
what I'm trying to accomplish:
1) This server is a standalone server sending outgoing mail, it is not
receiving anything other than locally posted messages
2)
At 03:46 PM 2/11/2009, mouss wrote:
Victor Duchovni a écrit :
SELECT
if(INSTR(maildir,'+'),concat(left(maildir,instr(maildir,'+')-1),'/Maildir/.',right(maildir,length(maildir)-instr(maildir,'+'))),CONCAT(maildir,'Maildir/'))
from mailbox where username ='%s' and active='1'
you are still
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
I'm still trying to get my head wrapped around all the options and how
they interact with each other and non-Postfix stuff.
I have questions in regards to a mail server that will be a virtual
mailbox server.
I have set
I did the modification and it seems it
work better. Since that modification I got no message rejected from
yahoo.
1. Could you please explain to me why should the RBL
checks be done before Sender Address Verification? And why it is not
advisable to do SAV at all?
2. It is correct that my
ddaas a écrit :
I did the modification and it seems it work better. Since that
modification I got no message rejected from yahoo.
1. Could you please explain to me why should the RBL checks be done
before Sender Address Verification? And why it is not advisable to do
SAV at all?
2. It is
Zitat von Silas Boyd-Wickizer s...@mit.edu:
Why do you believe that this should use 100% of ALL Cpus?
If you look at your synthetic test then you will likely find that
there are at any point in time only a few mail receiving processes
and mail delivering processes, and that these processes
Justin Piszcz a écrit :
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Victor Duchovni wrote:
You are doing Sender Address Verification (reject_unverified_sender)
before doing RBL checks. Fix this. Do the RBL checks first, and consider
not doing SAV at all, but if you do use it, do SAV *last*.
post...@corwyn.net a écrit :
OK, so I've become intrigued with recipient delimiters.
My users are currently stored in a mysql database, 'postfix'. The table
format is as postfixadmin sets it up, so in the username is the user
email address u...@example.com
Before I started
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list,
after having implemented dynamic aliases using ldap I have the
following problem:
I want to hold mails for a specific recipient which is an alias to
multiple addresses so admin interaction is required to send to this
alias. Problem
Hi everybody!
I need add X-Envelope From: and X-Envelope To: into incoming mail from envelope
mail, no from head mail! I use Postfix and procmail. Can you help me, please?
Urban Hillebrand:
Hello list,
is there a way to enforce TLS dependent on the sender domain?
Yes. Use check_sender_access and reject_plaintext_session.
Wietse
Background:
Many customers are using our SMTP infrastructure (opportunistic TLS is
active). Now one customer wants to
Petr Hude?ek:
Hi everybody!
I need add X-Envelope From: and X-Envelope To: into incoming mail from
envelope mail, no from head mail! I use Postfix and procmail. Can you help
me, please?
Use PREPEND actions in access maps.
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.5.html
Hello All,
I work on a project where we annotate emails coming through a mail server.
By annotation I mean attaching additional possibly useful information to
email body based on the email content. Annotation is enacted selectively
based on users preferences.
What is your opinion, what is the
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 07:13:19AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Urban Hillebrand:
Hello list,
is there a way to enforce TLS dependent on the sender domain?
Yes. Use check_sender_access and reject_plaintext_session.
Thank you Wietse, but isn´t this a smtpD setting? My problem is about
* Zoltan Balogh zee.bal...@gmail.com:
Hello All,
I work on a project where we annotate emails coming through a mail server.
By annotation I mean attaching additional possibly useful information to
email body based on the email content. Annotation is enacted selectively
based on users
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Curtis:
Hi,
I'm looking for a safe way to re-inject an archived queue file that
was backed up and removed (via postsuper) from the hold queue. (Not
just this once, but on a regular basis.) I realize that it would be
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 06:51:20AM -0700, Curtis wrote:
So, on a box that I know has nothing else feeding into the maildrop
queue, it would be safe to skip the step of dropping it in the idle
queue of a second instance (on the same filesystem) and running
postsuper -s to get a properly named
It happened again :(
Not in connection with backup, but in another situation with high load.
Output of ps
http://div.org/postfix_debug/postfix.processes.txt
http://div.org/postfix_debug/stack_trace.28848 - qmgr
http://div.org/postfix_debug/stack_trace.7175 - smtp
Victor Duchovni:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 08:33:35AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
is there a way to enforce TLS dependent on the sender domain?
This would have to be simulated with sender_dependent_relayhost_maps.
Specify a Postfix instance that encrypts all outbound mail. Postfix
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 7:10 AM, Petr Hudeček ph...@seznam.cz wrote:
Hi everybody!
I need add X-Envelope From: and X-Envelope To: into incoming mail from
envelope mail, no from head mail! I use Postfix and procmail. Can you help
me, please?
I believe by default there is an: X-Original-To
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 08:46:51AM -0700, Curtis wrote:
Perfect. Does the pickup command have a trigger like qmgr that I can
use with postkick to get the queue file picked up from the maildrop
queue immediately? I'm guessing not since there's no mention of it in
the man page, but I thought
Christoph Erdle wrote:
I want to hold mails for a specific recipient which is an alias to
multiple addresses so admin interaction is required to send to this
alias. Problem is that the mail is now held twice (following is the
output of mailq and releasing the message):
Feb 12 12:40:08
At 04:28 AM 2/12/2009, mouss wrote:
recipient_delimiter works out of the box. there is no need to change
your tables, your sql statements nor add users.
The problem is I don't know what the out of the box behavior should be.
If I set recipient_delimiter = + then mail to u...@example.com,
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:33:57PM -0500, post...@corwyn.net wrote:
At 04:28 AM 2/12/2009, mouss wrote:
recipient_delimiter works out of the box. there is no need to change
your tables, your sql statements nor add users.
The problem is I don't know what the out of the box behavior should be.
Hello,
Is there a way to check the result of a iteration(email address) on
virtual_alias_maps(cleanup) against the local_recipient_maps (smtp) ?
Best Regards
Jakjr
jakjr wrote:
Hello,
Is there a way to check the result of a iteration(email address) on
virtual_alias_maps(cleanup) against the local_recipient_maps (smtp) ?
Best Regards
Jakjr
No. If you describe your problem maybe someone can give some
helpful suggestions.
-- Noel Jones
http://stats.dnsbl.com/
As victor said, ZEN is usually enough for most people, but it's always
good to know why you're not using the rest.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Linux Addict linuxaddi...@gmail.com wrote:
Please see below my smtpd_recipient_restrictions. On my rbl client list I
have
Including every solicited bulk email. They usually create unique
bounce addresses to track dead target mailboxes etc.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Michael Katz
mkn...@messagepartners.com wrote:
Ilo Lorusso wrote:
Hi
is their a way I can reject messages when its from address does not
Mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a �crit :
[snip]
This is helpful, but I still need the query to take all the other
alias domains into account. So, I need the IF condition, or a
second map.
I don't think so. I used this. I don't remember the details, but the
idea is that you can often get
Hi,
We're building a box to run two postfix instances to receive and send high
volume of emails. According to the documentation it's better to run the two
instances on separate disks for performance reason. I'm trying to understand
how exactly does the disk I/O affect the postfix performance? By
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Petr Hude?ek wrote:
I need add X-Envelope From: and X-Envelope To: into incoming mail from
envelope mail, no from head mail! I use Postfix and procmail. Can you help
me, please?
Would Return-Path: and X-Original-To: suffice? Postfix adds these headers by
default.
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 12.02.2009 um 18:02 schrieb Noel Jones:
Christoph Erdle wrote:
I want to hold mails for a specific recipient which is an alias to
multiple addresses so admin interaction is required to send to this
alias. Problem is that the mail is now
Sorry for the delay..
Could you explain - in the same terms - how is quantified the
time
before
a message is passed to the queue manager, after it is
processed
by
the
content filter?
The time to deliver is measured as the time between MAIL FROM
and
end-of-data.
Hello Newsgroup,
i will implement a holiday/out of office message in my postfix.
the user should sent a message to holiday@domain.de and the
holiday/out of office notification for the mailsender are active.
with a 2. mail to holiday@domain.de the notification will be inactive.
Can anybody
Hi all. Im want something for throtling msgs, say if user X sends more
than 10 emails/minute, then requeue next msgs from user X with some
lower priority. Policyd is not bad, but it rejects emails when the limit
is reached.
Anyone knows an application like this? Will involve hacking/patching
Hi
Im new postfix and Im learning how to use. My first problem is about the
spam because in my server are incoming mails with my domain but using bad
adresses and making copy to the aol.com domain. Im making:
#postqueue -p | grep ' Feb @aol.com' | sed 's/*//' | awk '{print $1}'
spam.txt
but
On 2/13/2009, sim085 (sim...@hotmail.com) wrote:
Any suggestions?
You'll get a lot more help if you follow the instructions that were in
the welcome message you got when you signed up to the list...
Specifically and for starters, output of postconf -n and logs exhibiting
the problem?
--
Best
Hi there,
I have 2 problems I want to discuss with you guys.
1. I want to block e-mails from some specific address. So I used
header_checks = regexp:/usr/local/etc/postfix/header_checks and in
header_checks I have:
/^From: badaddr...@domain.com/ REJECT message
But nothing happens.
2. I
On 2/13/2009 6:36 AM, deconya wrote:
Im new postfix and Im learning how to use. My first problem is about the
spam because in my server are incoming mails with my domain but using
bad adresses and making copy to the aol.com http://aol.com domain. Im
making:
Don't accept messages for invalid
Wietse Venema:
Yu (Irvin) Fan:
Hi,
We're building a box to run two postfix instances to receive and send high
volume of emails. According to the documentation it's better to run the two
instances on separate disks for performance reason. I'm trying to understand
how exactly does the
Hello again,
I just want to confirm before I change this that I'm not missing
something that will cause me some pain...
Currently I have all of my restrictions under
smtpd_recipient_restrictions, but after seeing some questions about
these on the list, I'm thinking that there are two that should
Gerardo Herzig:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Gerardo Herzig:
Hi all. Im want something for throtling msgs, say if user X sends more
than 10 emails/minute, then requeue next msgs from user X with some
lower priority.
Postfix has no queue priotity. When the street to the airport is
rafa wrote:
Hello everyone,
I created a second cleanup for the submission service to have separate
header checks from incoming emails.
cleanup-out unix n - - - 0 cleanup
-o header_checks=pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks-out
-o
Hi,
I have a simple postfix server that was working fine for
more than one year. I have now many mail transport error
that seems to begin after an update, and I do need some
help !
Thanks in advance
This server is a debian etch and postfix is 2.3.8-2+etch1
A strange thing : I've send e-mail
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2/13/2009, Ralf Hildebrandt (ralf.hildebra...@charite.de) wrote:
I'm thinking it would be better to move the check_client_access check to
smtpd_client_restrictions, and the check_sender_access check to
smtpd_sender_restrictions, so I'd then have:
ddaas wrote:
Hi there,
I have 2 problems I want to discuss with you guys.
1. I want to block e-mails from some specific address. So I used
header_checks = regexp:/usr/local/etc/postfix/header_checks and in
header_checks I have:
/^From: badaddr...@domain.com/ REJECT message
But nothing
Noel Jones wrote:
To fix this, just add
-o receive_override_options=
(ie. an empty value)
to your submission service.
Now it's working.
Thanks.
rafael.
Hi!
I'm using Postfix 2.5.4 and it worked well. Thanks ;-)
One of my academic user received this error message
Google didn't help me much
Do you know what can cause this failure ?
Is it cause by my server ?
Thanks,
Eddy
Sujet : Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
Date : Thu,
Hello,
I need to setup a mail server for outgoing email only. I clearly would
like to restrict access to my networks only.
Moreover, I would like to permit only to some envelope senders to relay
email trhough a such MTA. And no other envelope sender should be able to
relay trhough this MTA.
So
Henri Chevreton:
Feb 13 14:25:37 alty postfix/master[3972]: warning: process
/usr/lib/postfix/local pid 19045 killed by signal 6
That is your problem.
Wietse
Thank you Noel !
Your regex worked.
But related the second problem, how can I block this kind of spams?
Spams from remote servers From: myaddr...@myvirtualdomain.com To:
myaddr...@myvirtualdomain.com?
It is ok for me to block all e-mail that are comming from remote smtp
servers From
On 2/13/2009, Justin Piszcz (jpis...@lucidpixels.com) wrote:
I have one question to add to this thread, in the past it has always
been up to the admin whether to put all beneath recipient
restrictions (with the exception of SAV), is this still considered
best-practice? Or should one follow
401 - 500 of 96097 matches
Mail list logo
