quite put my finger on it.
If you need further details, feel free to ask.
thanks in advance,
Curtis Maurand
On 6/1/2010 2:22 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 02:09:23PM -0400, Curtis Maurand wrote:
I have in the main.cf
relay_domains= a couple of domains mysql:/etc/postfix/transport.cf
transport_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/transport.cf
Don't use the transport table
On 6/2/2010 1:20 PM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 08:21:03AM -0400, cur...@maurand.com wrote:
defer_code = 550
Why?
Why not? I'll look more at the docs.
Because it is an incredibly bad idea. Transient errors need to
generate *transient* (4XX)
currently I have in my smtpd_client_restrictions: ...
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org, reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net, permit
Is flat out rejecting clients on the RBL's considered too agressive?
should I just let spamassassin handle this and score accordingly?
Thanks in advance,
I've been doing it with postfix and dbmail for several years. It works
very well. I also have it running amavisd-new/spamassassin, clam
anti-virus as well as the fuzzyocr plugin for spamassassin. Along with
additional rule set and bayes database in MySQL, it works well.
On 12/1/2010
fafaforza wrote:
On 10/12/2011 10:59 AM, Joel Roberts wrote:
Hi all, new to the group. Have recently setup
POSTFIX as an SMTP relay
front end to an Exchange 2007
backend. Have encountered the following
issue:
I'm using POSTFIX as an SMTP fronted relay to an
Exchange
On 11/9/2011 4:12 AM, Robert Hass wrote:
Hi
I'm using Postfix at my server. I would like to relay all outgoing
e-mails via my main SMTP server (relayhost = ... in main.cf).
But my main SMTP server needs SMTP authorization. Where I can
configure authentication (login and password) for relayhost ?
On 1/27/2012 6:00 AM, nick wrote:
Il 27/01/2012 11.47, Nickalf ha scritto:
Hi Fellow Postfixers, ( belated H a P p Y N e W Y e A r )
Looking to find out the pros and cons of
using MySQL based Postfix over the current basic (text based)
setup
Check out dbmail, http://www.dbmail.org
I've been using
it for several years. It works, though nobody's server management
tools interface with it.
--Curtis
Krzysztof
Trybowski wrote:
Hello all,
I've been setting up
Postfix recently. I'm using virtual mailboxes and
store user
data in
I'm running amavisd-new/spamassassin/spamassassin-fuzzyocr/clamav.
Would it behoove me to run Postgrey, too?
--Curtis
On 12/5/2010 11:10 AM, Roger Marquis wrote:
Zitat von Grant emailgr...@gmail.com:
I just noticed that postgrey is listening on localhost:10030. Would
it be better to have
I would argue that its partially Microsoft's fault for allowing
scripts in email or from web pages to have access to anything on your
machine outside of the message viewer or the browser. ActiveX is not
your friend in these cases.
--Curtis
Dennis Carr
wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011, Frank
We use combination of POP/IMAP before SMTP or SMTP auth.
--C
Bernhard Rohrer wrote:
seconded,
only that submission is 587 ;)
original message-
From:
Ðlsquo;ак
Ðoelig;икаел
mikael@yandex.ru
To: Postfix users
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:59:05
This has probably been asked in the past, but is it worth it to go through
the contortions to set up SPF?
Thanks,
Curtis
I had a server running on gentoo and it was running OK, but the latest
updates in the gentoo tree killed it. So I spent yesterday afternoon
setting up new mail server using Ubuntu 12.04 LTS.
It took a
while, but I have it all working except for smtp authentication (which
was working on the
I had a server running on gentoo and it was running OK, but the latest
updates in the gentoo tree killed it. So I spent yesterday afternoon
setting up new mail server using Ubuntu 12.04 LTS.
It took a
while, but I have it all working except for smtp authentication (which was
working on the
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
* Curtis Maurand cur...@maurand.com:
I had a server running on gentoo and it was running OK, but the latest
updates in the gentoo tree killed it. So I spent yesterday afternoon
setting up new mail server using Ubuntu 12.04 LTS.
It took a
while, but I have
On 2/13/2013 7:35 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
Curtis Maurand wrote:
Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
However, nothing in my configuration says to open the sasldb file
anywhere as the auth machanism is set to imap, but postfix seems
intent on opening this file anyway.
Cyrus SASL opens sasldb as fallback
Carlos L wrote:
Hello all,
I'm looking for a bit
of help on a complicated scenario that I can't seem
to get to
work.
I have mail that comes into a server a server
with both a to and 'original
to' address
What i would like to achieve is that mail going to the to addresses to
go
I use a system called dbmail to handle the mail store, pop3/imap/lmtp.
It works great, and my users all use their email addresses as their
logins and I don't have to have system accounts for them. dbmail.org
I'm using imap SASL to authenticate smtp users and it works fine.
Cpanel doesn't
I'm not sure if this is on topic or not. I can't tell whether this is
mailman issue or a postfix issue.
I have set up mailman.
I have set up a virtual domain for mailman in the mm_cfg.py via the
add_virtualhost() function.
I have successfully created the list. I subscribed to the list, got
Hello
Sorry, I hit send too soon.
I'm not sure if this is on topic or not. I can't tell whether this is
mailman issue or a postfix issue.
I have set up mailman.
I have set up a virtual domain for mailman in the mm_cfg.py via the
add_virtualhost() function.
I have successfully created the
Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Fri, 2014-04-04 at 14:55:49 -0400, Curtis Maurand wrote:
I'm getting local user unknown errors when I try to send email to the
list., but as far as I know, I shouldn't need local aliases with this
configuration that anything destined for lists.delrc.org should go
Ron Guerin wrote:
In mm_cfg.py I have this to generate the aliases:
MTA='Postfix'
In main.cf I use the aliases under:
alias_maps hash:/var/lib/mailman/data/aliases
In in my master.cf for the mailman transport, I have ${user} where you
have ${mailbox} , don't know if that's got anything to
i've been really trying to tighten up spam rejection after getting lots of
complaints from users. I've added a bunch of things to the main.cf
for doing rejects, I'm not having any trouble sending email, but one of my
clients is and they are authenticating and I have
permit_sasl_authenticated
On 11/21/2014 12:03 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
On 11/21/2014 10:51 AM, Curtis Maurand wrote:
i've been really trying to tighten up spam rejection after getting
lots of complaints from users. I've added a bunch of things to the
main.cf for doing rejects, I'm not having any trouble sending email
running against a remote dbmail imap.
Anyone have any ideas?
Thanks in advance,
Curtis
--
Curtis Maurand
cur...@maurand.com mailto:cur...@maurand.com
207-252-7748
Interesting. Just fixed that, too.
You added the socket to the jail. It would be simpler to disable
chroot on port 587, not much point when port 25 is not chrooted.
See above.
--
Curtis Maurand
cur...@maurand.com mailto:cur...@maurand.com
207-252-7748
On 4/20/2015 8:36 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 08:08:08PM -0400, Curtis Maurand wrote:
Anyone have any ideas?
1. http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
2. Send logs! Do not set verbose logs produced via debug_peer_list
or -v options in master.cf unless
e postfwd configured correctly to listen on port
10040, I just need Postfix to talk to it.
Don
--
Curtis Maurand
cur...@maurand.com <mailto:cur...@maurand.com>
207-252-7748
that I have postfwd configured correctly to listen on port
10040, I just need Postfix to talk to it.
Don
--
Curtis Maurand
cur...@maurand.com <mailto:cur...@maurand.com>
207-252-7748
On 2/20/2016 5:19 PM, Curtis Maurand wrote:
On 2/20/2016 1:46 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 01:37:39PM -0500, Curtis Maurand wrote:
Nothing is chrooted. resolv.conf is world readable. Wietse's program
returns a valid address. It might not match the reverse
On 2/22/2016 3:03 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 02:57:23PM -0500, Curtis Maurand wrote:
The problem was in the /etc/nsswitch.conf.
I changed the line
hosts: files dns
to
hosts:dns files
and that solved the trouble
ender_domain,
reject_unknown_recipient_domain,
reject_unauth_pipelining,
reject_unauth_destination,
reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client b.barracudacentral.org
--
Curtis Maurand
cur...@maurand.com <mailto:cur...@maurand.com>
207-252-7748
On 2/20/2016 11:12 AM, Christian Kivalo wrote:
On 2016-02-20 16:45, Curtis Maurand wrote:
Not sure if I found something or not. A client tried to send email
to one of my other addresses. The requisite portion of the main.cf
follows at the end of the message. The logs are telling me:
Feb
On 2/20/2016 11:26 AM, Curtis Maurand wrote:
On 2/20/2016 11:12 AM, Christian Kivalo wrote:
On 2016-02-20 16:45, Curtis Maurand wrote:
Not sure if I found something or not. A client tried to send email
to one of my other addresses. The requisite portion of the main.cf
follows at the end
On 2/20/2016 12:17 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 11:40:09AM -0500, Curtis Maurand wrote:
i just sent myself a test message from the client's system. Here is what I
got. I immediately ran the lookups using dig. postfix can't seem to
resolve things properly. Running
On 2/20/2016 1:46 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 01:37:39PM -0500, Curtis Maurand wrote:
Nothing is chrooted. resolv.conf is world readable. Wietse's program
returns a valid address. It might not match the reverse, but it did return
an address.
# ./getaddr
a resource hog
as it is.
Cheers,
Curtis
--
Best Regards Curtis Maurand
mailto:cur...@maurand.com
layers.
DNS has become very ugly as Google and Cloudflare attempt to monopolize it.
--
Best Regards
Curtis Maurand
mailto:cur...@maurand.com
possible, I would like to avoid writing a list of all my user
mailbox @ all domain names neither in virtual, nor in relay_recipients
file.
Thanks a lot for your help.
Samuel
--
Best Regards Curtis Maurand
mailto:cur...@maurand.com
Wouldn't procmail do something like this? I haven't used procmail for quite
some time, but iirc it can handle passing to a filter program, then the filter
can hand it to the lmtp (dovecot for instance).
Just a thought. I now return to the lurkers lair.
--Curtis
On February 15, 2019 6:58:00
ot;mail.xxx.net"
Thanks
--
Best Regards Curtis Maurand
mailto:cur...@maurand.com
Not competitors. Oligarchs. Colluders market fixers. Competition killers.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 17, 2019, at 4:44 AM, Wesley Peng wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> though this is a little OT, but I was curious since verizon has bought yahoo
> for long days, why ATT still host its customer email
you could set up the mail aliases in transport maps to pass them to mailman
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 14, 2020, at 10:43 AM, Peter Fraser wrote:
>
>
> Hi All
> I am trying to figure out how to get this working. I run Mailman through
> Postfix. The Mailman aliases are in alias_maps. I
it should be. use ldap. active directory is nothing but a glorified ldap
server and listens on port 389.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 9, 2020, at 7:04 AM, John Regan wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible for postfix to directly access the email addresses or userlist
> from an Exchange
On 2/9/20 12:39 PM, Gerard E. Seibert wrote:
On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 07:56:53 -0500, Curtis Maurand stated:
it should be. use ldap. active directory is nothing but a glorified
ldap server and listens on port 389.
If it were ldap over ssl the port is 636 I believe.
I stand corrected.
> On Aug 9, 2020, at 8:09 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
>
> - Mail to managed lists with an owner-alias
>- Mail to pipes
>- Mail to :include:/some/file lists.
this can be put into the transports table and you can skip the /etc/aliases
altogether.
easier than that. use linux heartbeat on the two postfix service. the
failover happens within seconds. use the unison file system to keep the
spool folders and other necessary folders needed to pick up on the
failover machine and when the primary fails, whatever services that need
to be
It's part of the config in main.cf You can specify "myhostname"
myhostname = host.domain.tld
Cheers, Curtis
On 6/30/20 4:55 PM, Istvan Prosinger wrote:
On 6/30/20 10:34 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Istvan Prosinger:
On 6/30/20 9:49 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Istvan Prosinger:
Hi, I hope this
On 6/30/20 6:40 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Istvan Prosinger:
On 6/30/20 10:34 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Istvan Prosinger:
On 6/30/20 9:49 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Istvan Prosinger:
Hi, I hope this letter finds you well,
I have Postfix behind NAT, and added one failover IP to the main
How about a general sieve rule in your dovecot server or a filter in your
delivery agent?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 1, 2020, at 5:11 PM, lists wrote:
>
> About 70% of my spam these days contains links to Google Forms. I've been
> googling for tips on how to reject such email but Google
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 20, 2021, at 10:27 AM, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
>
> Dnia 20.01.2021 o godz. 15:48:29 Ganael Laplanche pisze:
>>> So just try to create some simple "proxy" to your LDAP server that does only
>>> one thing: if LDAP is available, just return the response from LDAP; if
> On Jan 19, 2021, at 10:00 AM, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 03:03:49PM +0100, Ganael Laplanche wrote:
>
>>> http://www.postfix.org/memcache_table.5.html
>>
>> Maybe memcache with a *very* long TTL could be used here, but I was looking
>> for a pseudo-dictionay
for the blackhole lists, etc. take a look ar mxtoolbox.com
postfix should be passing sasl requests to dovecot’s imap process. I use a
tool called ispconfig which sets all of this up along with other tools such as
clamav, rspamd or amavisd along with per user policies.
my $0.02. I like its
Jumping in as an observer with 25 years of admin experience with public facing
equipment and servers. this problem seems more of a problem with the tls
libraries. it’s not up to the app to close the tls connection. that layer is
below the application layer. when the application terminates its
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 7, 2021, at 11:44 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> On 2021-02-07 17:33, Marek Kozlowski wrote:
>> :-)
>
> +1
>
>> Presumably it's my fault but I cannot find such an option. If so -
>> thank you for directing me to it. I'm wondering if it possible to
>> limit
your a record and fqdn, your helo/ehlo hostname and the ptr record all need to
match.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 9, 2021, at 12:36 PM, Greg Sims wrote:
>
>
> We are receiving the following in our email logs:
>
> Mar 09 08:12:15 mail01.raystedman.org postfix/smtpd[13431]: warning:
I totally agree with this and I am going to work to scrub the prior terminology
from my system.
Thank you, Wietse
—Curtis
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 24, 2021, at 12:12 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> The following is from the postfix-3.6-20210221 release notes.
>
>Wietse
>
> Postfix
On 9/28/21 10:23 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 09:50:11AM +0200, Christophe Lohr wrote:
Well.. so, my question is: how to configure postfix to be more verbose?
(not in the log files, but on the smtp connexions)
This would be a programming exercise. The relevant source
using syslog-ng within the container.
> Em sáb., 6 de nov. de 2021 às 09:56, Curtis Maurand <
> cur...@maurand.com> escreveu:
> > On Fri, 2021-11-05 at 13:34 -0300, Rafael Azevedo wrote:
> > > One last thing, is it possible to change the date format of the
> > > out
On Fri, 2021-11-05 at 13:34 -0300, Rafael Azevedo wrote:
> One last thing, is it possible to change the date format of the
> output?
> Current format:
> Nov 05 13:20:06 smtp21 postfix/smtp[136]: 9D86C60BBE
>
> I'd like to use ISO format:
> 2021-10-29T19:37:52.017684-03:00 smtp21 postfix/smtp
>
>
On 9/5/22 11:23, Wietse Venema wrote:
Viktor Dukhovni:
Perhaps your resolver settings in the chroot jail become stale, and
are fixed when the "init script" resyncs the chroot with the /etc.
You might try running without chroot.
To turn off chroot for all Postfix daemons, update master.cf:
I might also suggest pdns-recursor. very fast.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 8, 2022, at 4:18 PM, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>
> On 8/7/22 09:50, Linkcheck wrote:
>>> On 07/08/2022 1:12 pm, Rob McGee wrote:
>>> dig 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org. any
>>
>> ANY has to be after DIG, not at the end,
Sadly MS is as fallible as the rest of us.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 2, 2022, at 4:56 AM, Linkcheck wrote:
>
> Thanks, Viktor. That's interesting. You'd think someone like MS could get it
> right. :(
>
On 1/23/23 12:30, White, Daniel E. (GSFC-770.0)[AEGIS] wrote:
“replace Amavis with something faster”
Any suggestions ?
RSPAMD
*From: * on behalf of Viktor Dukhovni
*Reply-To: *"postfix-users@postfix.org"
*Date: *Monday, January 23, 2023 at 12:28
*To: *"postfix-users@postfix.org"
Hello list,
At least I think they're stupid questions.
I'm running Postfix with rspamd which is a milter. At what point in the
email conversation does the DKIM lookup happen? Does Postfix handle that
or am I asking on the wrong list and I should be asking the question on
the rspamd list?
On 3/7/23 15:36, Bernardo Reino via Postfix-users wrote:
On Tue, 7 Mar 2023, John Stoffel via Postfix-users wrote:
So what's the option for a more upto date version of DKIM milter for
debian?
rspamd does DKIM, SPF, DMARC and ARC (and lots more), and doesn't
segfault (so far ;-)
I've
On 3/8/23 15:30, Scott Techlist via Postfix-users wrote:
On Tue, 7 Mar 2023, John Stoffel via Postfix-users wrote:
So what's the option for a more upto date version of DKIM milter for debian?
rspamd does DKIM, SPF, DMARC and ARC (and lots more), and doesn't segfault (so
far ;-)
I'm STILL
On 6/23/23 04:26, Luciano Mannucci via Postfix-users wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 21:05:35 +0200
André Rodier via Postfix-users wrote:
What are you using on your side ?
I have a small script that scans the log for failed login attempts,
banning the offending ip via firewall if it sees more
69 matches
Mail list logo
