.
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 01.10.2012 16:54, schrieb achal:
I want to add a line in body of every email sent from my postfix centos
5
smtp server
postfix is a MTA and does not mangle
with a
slightly more positive attitude, who
had the same problem.
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 01.10.2012 16:54, schrieb achal:
I want to add a line in body of every email sent from my postfix centos
...@example.com.this is also in body of email.I am doing this
as less people see the headers of an
email and mostly they view the email body and subject. If not by postfix
then can it be done by php as i use
interspire mail marketer.
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Reindl Harald
*bruhahaha* *effective*
proven by what?
Am 01.10.2012 17:37, schrieb intelligent me:
I know that but addition of this in email message body can be effective as
many providers use this.
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Mark Goodge m...@good-stuff.co.uk
mailto:m...@good-stuff.co.uk wrote:
Am 01.10.2012 18:17, schrieb Alumno Etsii:
Hi list!
I've successfully setup my Postfix server with virtual users (using MySQL),
let's call this machine 'mail'. I've
another server (machine) that relays through 'mail' to send mails, let's call
it 'client'. Whenever I try to send
an
Am 01.10.2012 19:00, schrieb Alumno Etsii:
Well, I meant in the local 'mail' server, it actually resolves. Or does it
HAVE to exist the DNS registry by
imperative?
the RCPT server does sender verification
so it connects to the MX of the sender and starts a mail-converastion
only if your
Am 23.09.2012 14:35, schrieb Андрей Клаус:
About domain name - the thing is that right now i see exactly the next
message (except ip address) Received: from mail.localdomain
([ip.add.re.ss]) by mx.google.com... And mail.localdomain is a
local alias.
Reveived is generated from DNS and not
.
Thanks to Reindl Harald for the answer, but i just have changed
$myhostname to mail2.localdomain. Sent email to myself. And see now
Received: from mail2.localdomain ([smtp.ip.add.ress]) by
mx.google.com ...
Nobody else except posfix knows name mail2.localdomain in my system
at all. Because i
not
matter)
* openvpn-rh.thelounge.net = PTR from DNS (as you see this is not a public
thing)
* 10.0.0.241 = IP of my client (this is also not a public thing)
these headers are the one from our mail-server
___
Am 23.09.2012 21:16, schrieb Reindl Harald:
* please do
Am 22.09.2012 16:41, schrieb Андрей Клаус:
1) At webserver postfix generates a message-id field. And it always has the
same hostname (hostname, which i
defined in $myhostname). I would like to have message id use domain which
will depend on sender address. So, if
sender address is
if will not find another
decigion. Then thing is that programmers
create scripts, not me.. it will rather big work now - go thru scripts and
fix mail sending... since 2 domains are
only for example, actually, we have more domains with simple scripts..
2012/9/22 Reindl Harald h.rei
Am 20.09.2012 15:00, schrieb Arnaud Jayet:
Hello
i have set up a smtp test server for nomad clients outside my network at work
(postfix + TLS + SASL + LDAP)
to prevent suspicious / infected client with spam (or usurpated login and
password) i would like to limit mail
submission
Am 17.09.2012 22:51, schrieb l...@airstreamcomm.net:
We would like to block a couple ranges of ips before a sasl login is able to
happen. Smtpd_recipient_restrictions
looks like this:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks,
check_client_access
your ISP is resposible for PTR's of HIS addresses
he CAN and he have to
if he refuses search a professional ISP and consider
reading manuals what you are needing for a well working
mail service
Am 15.09.2012 18:27, schrieb LEON:
Contact ISP is a good way,but my ISP cann't do it for me.Is there
Am 15.09.2012 18:52, schrieb LEON:
What command to get this information?
54.107.218.in-addr.arpa name server gz1-dns.gdgz.cncnet.net.
54.107.218.in-addr.arpa name server gz2-dns.gdgz.cncnet.net.
The SOA Record is:
54.107.218.in-addr.arpa has SOA record gz1-dns.gdgz.cncnet.net.
Am 15.09.2012 19:08, schrieb LEON:
*How to avoid receive the mail that i post to this mail list? *
On 09/16/2012 01:00 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* LEON l...@kingdest.com:
What command to get this information?
host -t ns 54.107.218.in-addr.arpa
why do you scream with HTML to a
Am 13.09.2012 05:32, schrieb M. Fioretti:
If we will receive this email of mine through the list, that was
indeed the whole trouble and the problem is solved. Sure enough,
sendmail was still active on this laptop, unlike on my previous
computer. Now I have erased it and restarted postfix.
Am 12.09.2012 18:02, schrieb M. Fioretti:
What does all this mean? Why the local postfix isn't able to reach that
server after changing ADSL? I'm quite puzzled right now, any pointer is
welcome
which port?
many ISP's blocking port 25 outgoing for very good reasons
it is easy to configure
Am 10.09.2012 16:56, schrieb Michael Monnerie:
Sorry, this is a beginners question, but it seems I'm blind on
the error. I'm sure someone finds it quickly.
This is a postfix, and should deliver mails to mydom.ain locally. That
works, but postfix always delivers all e-mail to anything
Am 08.09.2012 12:48, schrieb achal:
I have a linux smtp server with postfix installed on it.I want an email
marketing software on another linux server like interspire, but because
interspire is very expensive so i would like a suggestion as is there any
other opensource or less expensive
Am 08.09.2012 19:43, schrieb Naval saini:
wietse
This is the tcpdump output file i am sending u please find the attachment
there is NO attachment
upload large files to whatever service and post links
and please get rid of your top-posting
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
Am 07.09.2012 10:13, schrieb Denis Witt:
On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 13:24:41 -0500
/dev/rob0 r...@gmx.co.uk wrote:
I don't know if the problem is the tool. Consider using
recipient_delimiter and multiple .forward files as needed:
Hi Rob,
thanks for you reply. Sounds fine, I'll give it a
Am 05.09.2012 10:50, schrieb Josef Karliak:
Good morning,
did anybody solved recording sender,recipient and date into a mysql ?
Normally postfix log it into a maillog, I
want it into a database record sender recipient date. Or it is able to
change postfix's logging, where is summary
Am 04.09.2012 14:07, schrieb Titanus Eramius:
for postfix lookup tables you have usually a very simple
database scheme with very few changes and 99.9% of all
queries are readonly because postfix does even not need
any write permissions to the database (and does not have
it in any of my
Am 03.09.2012 23:56, schrieb Titanus Eramius:
Hello good folks
I have recently brought my very first mailserver online, and have been
testing it for the past month or so. Since the setup needs to be
redundant, I have also brought a secondary mailserver online on it's own
domain, and
Am 04.09.2012 01:15, schrieb Titanus Eramius:
where do you see a risk of silent data corruption?
if this would be the case it would be simply
impossible have a omplete dbmail-database running
on a replication salve over 3 years with a lot of
foreign constraints and a major scheme update
Am 27.08.2012 13:17, schrieb Jan Geep:
Good evening,
I was wonder if there is someone who could help point me in the right
direction so I can solve a spam problem I have.
I am running a mail server with Ubuntu + Postfix + Maia Mailguard +
Dovecot, all has been working well until
Am 27.08.2012 16:30, schrieb Ilja Beeskow:
Am 27.08.2012 13:17, schrieb Jan Geep:
[...] until recently people have started
receiving spam email that appear to be sent from my domain.
From: myn...@example.com
To: myn...@example.com
Subject: Fwd: Re: Scan from a
Am 26.08.2012 22:10, schrieb li...@sbt.net.au:
so either of the two anvil/IP log lines indicates excess, yes ?
Aug 27 06:00:03 postfix/anvil[4396]: statistics: max connection rate
15/1800s for (smtp:27.115.112.50) at Aug 27 05:59:14
Aug 27 06:00:03 postfix/anvil[4396]: statistics: max
Am 25.08.2012 07:09, schrieb li...@sbt.net.au:
just noticed I have large increase in smtp connections, looking at logs I
noticed a single ip continuous attempting connection, searching for that
IP in maillog I see like;
is this like a mail attack..?
Aug 25 14:11:36 postfix/anvil[32254]:
Am 26.08.2012 00:29, schrieb li...@sbt.net.au:
On Sat, August 25, 2012 7:37 pm, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.08.2012 07:09, schrieb li...@sbt.net.au:
most likely an attack
there is no need to get notified because you can rate-control
anvil_rate_time_unit = 1800s
Am 24.08.2012 05:57, schrieb Hari Hendaryanto:
it's not really a problem, just my curiosity. I wonder why Postfix does not
support comments such as //
comments or /* comments */ in configuration file.
is there any specific reason why those features not allowed/exist?
because it supports
Am 24.08.2012 11:09, schrieb Hari Hendaryanto:
On 8/24/2012 3:30 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 24.08.2012 05:57, schrieb Hari Hendaryanto:
it's not really a problem, just my curiosity. I wonder why Postfix does
not support comments such as //
comments or /* comments */ in configuration
would people be so gently and REMOVE [SPAM]-prefix
if replying to mailing-lists - any user of a barracuda
appliance with local rules in their client get the messages in
their junk-folder
proper configured mail-clients remove it automatically
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Am 20.08.2012 14:03, schrieb Harakiri:
I have a tcp table and policy service - when i shut these down, i close each
open session and unbind the listener port - for some reason postfix does not
close its client connection to them for about 60sec.
after i shutdown the server and made sure
Am 20.08.2012 22:41, schrieb Asai:
Thanks, I thought that may be that case, and unfortunately there doesn't seem
to be any way in the Windows 7 phone
configuration to manually set the port it's connecting to. Although I do
have it set to use SSL (TLS isn't an
option), so I'd think that
Am 15.08.2012 03:18, schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
I would also note that trivial-rewrite(8) (like proxymap(8)) is
already a multi-client service, so typically, there are a lot fewer
trivial-rewrite(8) processes than smtpd(8)'s or cleanup(8)'s.
Therefore any savings in further consolidating
.
/ /
--
Reindl Harald
the lounge interactive design GmbH
A-1060 Vienna, Hofmühlgasse 17
CTO / CISO / Software-Development
p: +43 (1) 595 3999 33, m: +43 (676) 40 221 40
icq: 154546673, http://www.thelounge.net/
http://www.thelounge.net/signature.asc.what.htm
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Am 07.08.2012 22:03, schrieb tobi:
Am 07.08.2012 20:04, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
The first thing you need to do is define for us what protect
backup-mx servers means. What, exactly, do you want to protect
them from?
Sorry if my intention was only clear to myself ;-)
I want to prevent
Am 06.08.2012 22:54, schrieb email builder:
I read in http://www.postfix.org/mysql_table.5.html for the %d substitution
in the query if the lookup is not a full email address with domain, the
entire query is not even executed? Is this right?
If that's the case, you can't do complex
Am 05.08.2012 21:03, schrieb Adam NEVERT:
On 05/08/12 19:51, Adam NEVERT wrote:
Hello,
I need to have a unical user who can send emails without
authentication and only on my domain how can I achieve that ?
How can you tell wether it is this user or not if it is not authenticated ?
I
Am 05.08.2012 22:27, schrieb Adam NEVERT:
Hello,
I need to have a unical user who can send emails without
authentication and only on my domain how can I achieve that ?
How can you tell wether it is this user or not if it is not authenticated ?
I can tell it is a user because it is in my
Am 05.08.2012 22:45, schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter:
* Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net:
Am 05.08.2012 22:27, schrieb Adam NEVERT:
Hello,
I need to have a unical user who can send emails without
authentication and only on my domain how can I achieve that ?
How can you tell wether
Am 04.08.2012 23:41, schrieb Chad M Stewart:
postscreen_greet_banner = Welcome to our mail server
This is non-compliant and a bad idea.
That is prepended to the banner, the banner becomes a multi-line response,
with the last line being the fqdn of the host.
this is a bad idea, this was
do not top-post
Am 02.08.2012 16:17, schrieb Wael MANAI:
Le mercredi 01 août 2012 à 10:50 -0400, Wietse Venema a écrit :
Wael MANAI:
I am using sendmail to send emails to postfix and I would like to know
if there is a way to get the filename given by postfix?
Wietse:
No. The file name
Am 02.08.2012 16:48, schrieb Wael MANAI:
Le jeudi 02 août 2012 à 16:27 +0200, Reindl Harald a écrit :
do not top-post
Am 02.08.2012 16:17, schrieb Wael MANAI:
Le mercredi 01 août 2012 à 10:50 -0400, Wietse Venema a écrit :
Wael MANAI:
I am using sendmail to send emails to postfix
Am 31.07.2012 12:58, schrieb Naval saini:
I have configured postfix mail server(r11.example.com) with multiple
instances and in /etc/postfix/main.cf relayhost=example.com
Now i want my php application (bou...@ab.example.com) on ab.example.com
.when mails bounce back to application
+0530
Von:Naval saini saininava...@gmail.com
An: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
sorry ...i forget postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
allow_percent_hack = no
broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc
Am 31.07.2012 15:43, schrieb Matthias Egger:
On 31.07.2012 14:56, Reindl Harald wrote:
one reply does not mean private support from now
on at mailing-lists.
Why so harsh? Ever thought it was just a mistake?
starting a thread with zero-informations followed
by reply off-list
Am 31.07.2012 21:50, schrieb Engin qwert:
Unfortunately there is no English option on their website so I'm unable
to locate and read their terms of service document. You will need to do
so. You're looking for a clause WRT hosting a mail server/web server on
your broadband circuit. You are
Am 29.07.2012 11:48, schrieb Mark Alan:
if you do not trust you OUTGOING traffic the only valid
reason is that you doubt your machine is comprimised
[The problem, as said in another email, is (mostly) solved]
- I do not trust anything connected 24h to the Internet
then shut it down
do
Am 29.07.2012 22:32, schrieb Engin qwert:
Hello again. About one month later I decided to make a clean Debian 6
install. This time I did'nt do much
modification to the system. Only installed OS and ehcp control panel.
But the new installation suffers the same problem, I cannot send mail (
a mail-client is usually configured to use port 587 (submissionn)
and not 25 (smtp) becuase 25 is for server-to-server communication
and blocking port 25 outgoing from home-users is a good weapon
to block their spam-bots
Am 30.07.2012 01:22, schrieb Engin qwert:
My router don't even have any
-Nachricht
Betreff: Re: no route to host error message
Datum: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:58:06 +0200
Von: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
Organisation: the lounge interactive design
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
BOAH DO NOT SWITCH TO TOP-POSTING
Am 13.07.2012 16:33, schrieb Engin qwert
before you insist make sure that you are allowed to
run a server and that your NAT-gateway is not broken
The internal IP address of the Server PC: 10.138.9.201
says there is a NAT-router in front of your box
Am 30.07.2012 01:36, schrieb Engin qwert:
Thank you all clarifiyng that my ISP is
Am 30.07.2012 01:57, schrieb Engin qwert:
before you insist make sure that you are allowed to
run a server and that your NAT-gateway is not broken
The internal IP address of the Server PC: 10.138.9.201
says there is a NAT-router in front of your box
Actually it is not router. It
Am 28.07.2012 20:03, schrieb Mark Alan:
The solution is to exempt traffic sent from the machine from the rate
controls.
In 2012, in a server facing the net and running other services besides
mail, I would not call it a safe bet. In the event (that must be
accounted for) of an intrusion,
Am 27.07.2012 13:36, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
jep this is a must have , i missed that entry for short looking,
permit_sasl_authenticated should be included right at the beginnig
at every restrictions ( here client ) to accept cons outside mynetworks
some restrictions are making sense
Am 27.07.2012 13:55, schrieb Christian Rohmann:
Hello postfix-users,
I'm looking for a way to limit the time or the number of messages an
established smtp authenticated session can be used for. I already have
rate limiting (anvil for anti-dos and policy delegation for maintaining
a quota
Am 25.07.2012 04:02, schrieb Marky Yehezkiel [SNC]:
Hi,
Recently I got request if our mail server can notify the receiver if there is
email spam and if the receiver feel
it genuine email then they can release it by them self. Does postfix can do
this? Or does anyone has implement this?
Am 24.07.2012 18:58, schrieb Michael Orlitzky:
Thanks, I actually tried this but ran into a problem:
Jul 24 01:45:50 localhost postfix/sendmail[26795]: fatal: open
/etc/postfix/main.cf: Permission denied
That alone is easy to fix (allow $authorized_submit_users read access to
Am 23.07.2012 16:03, schrieb Marius Lewies:
please strip qutoings a little bit!
Referring to Ansgar reply it seems that relay_domains.db is out of
date. Ansgar suggested You need to run the command to convert the
(plain text) map into the database file that Postfix uses How to do or
would you please strip your quotes a little bit
and at least remove multiple header-blocks
this starts to become complete unreadable
thank you!
Am 23.07.2012 16:39, schrieb Marius Lewies:
-Original Message-
From: James Day [mailto:james@ontraq.com]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012
Am 20.07.2012 03:11, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
Den 2012-07-19 10:13, Reindl Harald skrev:
so if it was a false positive, there won't be any copy whatsoever, anywhere
on your server?
well, we have days with 50 spams
log with the reason why it was blocked is enough
point is its accepted
Am 20.07.2012 03:31, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
Den 2012-07-19 11:52, Reindl Harald skrev:
* you send a message over your SMTP
* your mailserver contacts the MX
* if the MX rejects you get a bounce from YOUR mailserver
* postmaster is not filtered, so any admin can contact me
so there we
Am 20.07.2012 15:26, schrieb Kirill Bychkov:
Hello,
I need to add the header Header-Msg based on the subject header.
I.e., if email with the subject test, the my custom header should be
Header-Msg: test.
Is it real?
how does a fantasy-header based on the subject-header make any
Am 20.07.2012 16:18, schrieb Kris Deugau:
Reindl Harald wrote:
sieve is your friend for this crap :-)
That class of filtering gets **really** tiresome to maintain though. :/
Personally, I've found that running SpamAssassin with a threshold of 8
instead of 5 works quite well
Am 19.07.2012 07:32, schrieb M. Fioretti:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 21:52:56 PM +0530, Nalinda Herath wrote:
Hi all,
Recently I have integrated spmassassin to my existing postfix system. But
now I
need to tune my archiving settings in postfix to prevent from archiving
mails
tagged as spam.
Am 19.07.2012 13:36, schrieb M. Fioretti:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 10:13:36 AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
so if it was a false positive, there won't be any copy whatsoever,
anywhere on your server?
well, we have days with 50 spams log with the reason why it was
blocked is enough
Am 18.07.2012 12:58, schrieb John Doe:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
John Doe:
Hello,
A few days ago i received a email that has a send and a received
(from/to) field set to someth...@gmail.com, and in the header the
X-Original-To is set to
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY OFF-LIST
Am 18.07.2012 13:18, schrieb John Doe:
Thank you for answering and sorry for the double posting.
How can i debug this issue?
How can i stop postfix from delivering mail to the recipient mentioned
in the x-original-to field?
you still refuse to understand how
Am 18.07.2012 20:15, schrieb Ryan Bowman:
I've spent over four hours looking for a solution to this issue, still with
no luck. I have an centos vps with
apache and I'm trying to set up postfix so I can use the mail function in
php. I've tried countless tutorials such
as this one
:
to=root@host.local.domain,
orig_to=apache@host.local.domain, relay=local, delay=0.01,
delays=0/0/0/0.01, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered
to mailbox)
Jul 18 22:30:56 V-5040 postfix/qmgr[4081]: D2BE9354000A: removed
-Original Message-
From: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
that they don't correctly
implement SMTP, by rejecting mail from .
Wietse
--
Reindl Harald
the lounge interactive design GmbH
A-1060 Vienna, Hofmühlgasse 17
CTO / CISO / Software-Development
p: +43 (1) 595 3999 33, m: +43 (676) 40 221 40
icq: 154546673, http://www.thelounge.net/
http
nombre de Reindl Harald
Enviado el: martes, 17 de julio de 2012 17:12
Para: postfix-users@postfix.org
Asunto: Re: invalid domain (in reply to MAIL FROM command))
and that is why postmaster-address is mandatory by RFC
Am 17.07.2012 17:05, schrieb Tomas Garijo (Click):
Ok Wietse but the remote
Am 17.07.2012 19:08, schrieb Alvin Wong:
[Forgot to reply all, resend]
No route to host means your IP cannot reach the remote IP, not port
related.
that is not really true
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -m multiport --destination-port 25 -j REJECT
--reject-with icmp-host-unreachable
i still
Am 14.07.2012 09:27, schrieb Vishal Agarwal:
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Robert Schetterer
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2012 1:11 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: bypassing some email id's
Am 14.07.2012 21:01, schrieb Colin:
Hi all, I'm currently using aliases for a distribution list and
noticed that all messages sent to this alias are given just an id
queue.
So if have an alias with 400users, that message would be queued once
with 400 recipients. The problem is that for some
Am 13.07.2012 10:34, schrieb Tom Kinghorn:
On 13/07/2012 10:31, Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 13.07.2012 10:04, schrieb Tom Kinghorn:
you may use general rate limt per ip/client
perhaps look here
http://www.e-rave.nl/rate-limit-incoming-mail-on-postfix
Thanks for this.
However, I would
Am 13.07.2012 12:39, schrieb Engin qwert:
Hello, I set my postfix server using a ready made shell script. The Mail
server is working as excepted except the
localhost it self. So the Mail Server can not send mail using Icedove, Telnet
nor PHP' mail () function. When I run
mailq command the
Am 13.07.2012 12:49, schrieb Duncan B.:
You're not on a RedStation dedicated server are you, per-chance? The reason
I ask, is that I encountered this
exact error yesterday and investigating into it with a tcpdump, showed
RedStation's gateway was filtering SMTP
connections, forcing it
Am 13.07.2012 16:20, schrieb Engin qwert:
Hello and sorry for asking again.
I telnet'ted the hotmail.com from both port 25 and port 587 when I telnet
directly from server or any other
location in Istanbul
--
engin@xn--hadibakalm-5ub:~$ telnet hotmail.com 25
Trying
BOAH DO NOT SWITCH TO TOP-POSTING
Am 13.07.2012 16:33, schrieb Engin qwert:
--
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:25:54 +0200
From: h.rei...@thelounge.net
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: no route to host error message
Am 13.07.2012 16:20, schrieb Engin qwert:
Hello and
Am 10.07.2012 10:32, schrieb Leo Baltus:
Op 09/07/2012 om 13:52:04 -0400, schreef Wietse Venema:
Leo Baltus:
I would like postfix to not log to the default syslog-daemon to
have better control over where each specific postfix instance logs to. I
am running multiple instances on a server.
Am 10.07.2012 14:30, schrieb Leo Baltus:
Op 10/07/2012 om 06:55:43 -0400, schreef Wietse Venema:
Leo Baltus:
It would be nice if postfix could jut open a logfile and reopen on a
signal like any other daemon does.
Sending sighup to sendmail, postsuper, postqueue, etc. would not
be
Am 09.07.2012 19:00, schrieb Bill Cole:
On 9 Jul 2012, at 11:20, Curtis Maurand wrote:
This has probably been asked in the past, but is it worth it to go through
the contortions to set up SPF?
On the sending side, the simple answer is YES!
There is a more complex and nuanced answer.
Am 09.07.2012 19:43, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
strict spf has its problems with mail lists by breaking forward
so this may rise your users support, but its good to have
it in testing mode for income check at big mailers, also it helps little
on backscatter
mailinglists are not the problem
Am 09.07.2012 19:52, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Leo Baltus:
Hi,
I would like postfix to not log to the default syslog-daemon to
have better control over where each specific postfix instance logs to. I
am running multiple instances on a server.
Postfix has syslog_facility to split different
Am 09.07.2012 20:25, schrieb Bill Cole:
On 9 Jul 2012, at 13:15, Reindl Harald wrote:
If you expect to be able to safely use a -all tail on a record for a
domain
that is used on legit mail, you stand a strong chance of disappointment
why?
(1) There are many perfectly innocent systems
do not top-post after get reply at bottom!
Am 03.07.2012 13:53, schrieb Dentzer:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
Im Auftrag von Erwan David
Gesendet: Dienstag, 3. Juli 2012 13:21
An: postfix-users@postfix.org
Am 03.07.2012 14:48, schrieb Dentzer:
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Reindl Harald
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 2:02 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: special characters in mail
Am 30.06.2012 22:41, schrieb Andrew Beverley:
html_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix-2.3.3/html
Hmmm, 2.3.3 is very old, and did not have support for this:
Well spotted. I should have said: this is Postfix 2.7.1. That's a
hangover from the original installation.
make a bugreport to your
Am 29.06.2012 07:22, schrieb Kshitij mali:
Please delete this thread from the archive of the gmane.org or atleast hide
the
ipaddress and email address from the logs from the below archive.
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/227441
you got many replies from different people
Am 29.06.2012 07:18, schrieb Kshitij mali:
Hello sir ,
Please delete the thread or atleast hide the ipadress and email address in
the
content on the below archived post:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/227441
SHUT UP
how often will you send this idiotic message
Am 27.06.2012 16:40, schrieb Kshitij mali:
Hello Moderator ,
please delete this thread for security reason
you have no clue how email and maling-lists are working?
how do you imagine to delete a thread?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Am 27.06.2012 17:02, schrieb Kshitij mali:
please at least remove from this site , there is security audit going on in my
organisation i dont want to maintain this thread , please remove this
sorry you can not expect that someone maintains
informations you are sent to the public nor that
the
Am 27.06.2012 17:30, schrieb Kshitij mali:
remove my messages
who do you think you are telling people what to remove from
their local mail-archive since it was explained to you that
in global ones nobody can remove anything for you
do not send informations which are not meant for leave
your
Am 26.06.2012 09:02, schrieb J. Bakshi:
Dear list,
I need your suggestion to design a common organizational mailbox.
The concept is; Whatever developer1,2,3 send to client1,2,3 or receive from
them
will be stored in a separate mailbox which will be accessible from the both
end to see
Am 26.06.2012 12:59, schrieb Charles Marcus:
On 2012-06-26 6:21 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
remember that postfix is even not responsible for your sent-folder
on a IMAP-server because these messages are stored there by your
mail-client after send over SMTP was successful
Am 26.06.2012 13:22, schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter:
smtpd_save_to_sent_folder = Sent
I suppose this hypothetical feature would come with a little IMAP
client, configuration parameters that specify the IMAP server address
and port, IMAP server credentials, and so on.
In the hypothetical
301 - 400 of 1003 matches
Mail list logo
