spam and backscatter mails and may changing during runtime by analysing
logs
using real mailaddresses only, instead of catch all ist better
anytime anyway
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
s not allowed for safety reasons. Instead, use DUNNO in order to
exclude specific hosts from blacklists. This feature is available in
Postfix 2.1 and later.
or combinations of both
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
elay_recipients
us...@example1.com
us...@example1.com
us...@example2.com
us...@example2.com
...
using reject_unlisted_recipient
is working with this setup
but maybe gurus have better advice
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
them. result: these headers are useless.
>>
>> anyway, this is not a postfix issue.
>>
>>
Hi its like mouss said,
yahoo and aol will mark your mails as spam
sometimes, or block you in total
even if you postfix has super optimal setup
(helo matches, spf, dkim etc )
the only thing helps is whitelisting
using their guis, their Antispam
systems are simply broken in my eyes
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
ros and contras
so you may chosse what best fits to your needs
try google this was discussed many times before
i think the best way which is tec rightly is instruct
mailusers to use the submission port, which was recommended before,
unfourtunally i have learned this pulls up support questions
as many users are totaly lost in configure their mail clients
even if there is a guide well pictured faq side with descriptions
for mostly used mailclients
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
asked clamav developers to bring back
store in filesystem option, which makes it more easy to investigate
infected mails cause sometimes false positives happens
with anitpishing code etc
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Victor Duchovni schrieb:
> On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 06:16:33PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> havening them in hold is a nice option
>> but i am thinking of a script
>> getting them out of hold and store
>> in the filesystem and clean up hold
>
> Here&
Victor Duchovni schrieb:
> On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 07:01:08PM +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>>> Here's my suggestion:
>>>
>>> - Create a second Postfix instance in the same file-system.
>>> - Run a cron job to move (rename(2)) mes
is the nature of backscatter
any idea how to stop bounce in that case
i thought of something like ( not the right syntax here only as
principal example)
discard "Sender address rejected: not owned by user*"
mails in /etc/postfix/header_checks
any better idea?
--
Best Regards
Robert Schetterer schrieb:
> Hi @ll,
> i have a relay for exchange
> which is configured with reject_sender_login_mismatch
> with accounts allowed to send out for configured domains
> at last a infected host generated a faked sender
> which was rejected with not owned by user
&
d match kill them all
i have a three letter domain which is bombed since years from zombies
no feature got zombies out of the way, seems 3 letters are simply to
easy to type in bot programming, but others reported bots stopping after
a time
by whatever speculated reason
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
ocumentation
if Message Count Limit feature is enough for you
but i think you will not find a solution with scaleable account levels
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
t;
>
> -- Noel Jones
>
>
Hi,
using reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname
is mostly save to use these days, as many big mail providers use it too
i.e gmx.de
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
CARD
>
> In master.cf I configure cleanup with -v and I read a log, but rows
> X-Virus... and X-Spam are not in log, that is (I mean) why cleanup do
> not drop messages.
>
> Can anyone idea? Milters are after cleanup?
>
> Thanks
>
> Jirka
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
e to spamc.
Uses 'defaultuser' if there are multiple recipients.
-x: pass email address through alias and virtusertable expansion.
-- spamc args: pass the remaining flags to spamc.
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
h = /var/spool/postfix/private/auth
>> ...
>>
>> Then main.cf would say:
>>
>> smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot
>> smtpd_sasl_path = private/auth
>>
>> Wietse
>>
>>
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
> DateQueue ID Message ID From To Size
> Other Details
>
> Any Help Would be appreciated
>
look http://code.google.com/p/php-syslog-ng/
http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/hardy/man5/rsyslog.conf.5.html
this should help
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
olicy servers don't handle message content, and for
> another, Milters must be able to see every SMTP protocol step.
>
> Wietse
Hi Martin, after all most milters have option to whitelist hosts itself
why dont use it
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
dont forget this might brake you existing postfix setup etc , so
test it before, and/or make backups, in a testing server ( vmware etc )
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
gt;>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
i am not sure about what your mail setup really means
it doesnt not look right to me
but that maybe a understanding problem
why not simply use getmail
with spamassassin on your internal mailserver
http://pyropus.ca/software/getmail/faq.html#faq-integrating
very easy to setup
if you can configure your outside mailserver
using clamav with sanesecurity sigs
and rbls as well as other postfix antispam features
should do the job fine, do not use catch alls there,
always have a valid recipient list
you may bypass outbound virus scanning for internal mailservers ip or
sasl user ( recommended )
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
d
what is your Problem with ?
/Your message has been successfully relayed to the following recipients,
> but the requested delivery status notifications may not be generated by
> the destination./
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
t sure but maybe
http://www.postfix.org/DSN_README.html
helps
>
> Robert Schetterer ha scritto:
>> Am 20.01.2010 11:55, schrieb luca:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have a working postfix server from long time.
>>>
>>> Now i found out that
Am 21.01.2010 10:12, schrieb luca:
> I tried but nothing in that page seems to help me
>
> Robert Schetterer ha scritto:
>> Am 20.01.2010 12:48, schrieb luca:
>>
>>> Hi,
as i understand
http://www.postfix.org/DSN_README.html
you can disable dsn
nt
i need something like
SELECT username FROM mailbox WHERE username='%s' AND active = 1 OR
SELECT username FROM domain_admins WHERE username='%s' AND domain = '%d'
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 29.01.2010 14:57, schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List:
> On 1/29/2010 4:41 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> i have a sasl mysql map matching existing users in mysql
>>
>> SELECT username FROM mailbox WHERE username='%s' AND active = 1
>>
>
Am 29.01.2010 16:58, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 29.01.2010 14:57, schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List:
>> On 1/29/2010 4:41 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> i have a sasl mysql map matching existing users in mysql
>>>
>>> SELECT usernam
Am 29.01.2010 17:24, schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List:
> On 1/29/2010 11:02 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 29.01.2010 16:58, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
>>
>>>
>>> things with union work but , the problem
>>> seems to be the double result of equ
Am 29.01.2010 18:12, schrieb Victor Duchovni:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 05:57:30PM +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> jep that query works
>>
>> postmap -q "rob...@schetterer.org"
>> mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_sasl_login_maps-test.cf
>> @schetterer.or
Am 29.01.2010 18:36, schrieb Victor Duchovni:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 06:30:45PM +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> smtpd_sender_login_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_senders
>>
>> pico /etc/postfix/sasl_senders
>>
>> @domain.de username
>>
>&g
Am 29.01.2010 18:49, schrieb Victor Duchovni:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 06:41:48PM +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>>>> smtpd_sender_login_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_senders
>>>>
>>>> pico /etc/postfix/sasl_senders
>>>>
>>>&g
Am 29.01.2010 19:37, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 29.01.2010 18:49, schrieb Victor Duchovni:
>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 06:41:48PM +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>
>>>>> smtpd_sender_login_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/sasl_senders
>>>>>
>>>&g
Am 29.01.2010 23:13, schrieb Victor Duchovni:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:06:51PM +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> this works
>>
>> query = SELECT username FROM domain_admins WHERE domain='%d'
>> UNION SELECT username FROM mailbox WHERE username=
Hi Wietse, is their any
fixed release date for version 2.7 ?
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 08.02.2010 11:19, schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter:
> * Robert Schetterer :
>> Hi Wietse, is their any
>> fixed release date for version 2.7 ?
>
> famous last words ... :)
>
expected to hear "when its ready" *g
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
> Simon's RPMs are online!
>
> http://ftp.wl0.org/official/2.7/
>
>
hoping, suse gets them too in their build service, soon
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
ssible way
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 19.03.2010 11:41, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Robert Schetterer:
>> Hi @ll,
>> is there a way to overide
>> transport table for specific
>> sender domains
>
> Content filter overrides transport_maps.
>
> Wietse
Thx Wiestse for info, such was i
Am 19.03.2010 12:42, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Robert Schetterer:
>> Am 19.03.2010 11:41, schrieb Wietse Venema:
>>> Robert Schetterer:
>>>> Hi @ll,
>>>> is there a way to overide
>>>> transport table for specific
>>>&
ecently to test it and it catches a few per day,
> same as ZEN. YMMV.
>
everyone has own spam, and own policy to that
i have case where zen is massive helpfull in client stage
rbls have their pros and contras everyone is free to use them as he likes
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 21.03.2010 00:16, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 19.03.2010 12:42, schrieb Wietse Venema:
>> Robert Schetterer:
>>> Am 19.03.2010 11:41, schrieb Wietse Venema:
>>>> Robert Schetterer:
>>>>> Hi @ll,
>>>>> is there a way to ove
gt; e-mail.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
look at this in master.cf
invalid "-o content_filter" option value: missing '=' after attribute name
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
dont forget to postmap
and restart your postfix
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
uld be a possible example layout for writing
a policy server for dovecot-quota-mysql
i will test this in the near future
i have vda patch up and running too without any problems but my goal
ist using the policy server variant as it feels more code clean to postfix
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 22.03.2010 21:53, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 22.03.2010 20:05, schrieb Mauro Faccenda:
>> Hi Reinaldo,
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Reinaldo de Carvalho
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Mauro Faccenda wrote:
>>>>
>
Am 22.03.2010 22:36, schrieb Mauro Faccenda:
> Hi Robert,
>
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Robert Schetterer
> wrote:
> [snip]
>>>> 1. http://postfixquotareject.ramattack.net/
>>>
>>> I took a look at it and, unless I missunderstood, I'
longer..." thing is of course John Lennon's
> "Watching the wheels").
>
>>
>>> 2. Write a policyd to check the quota and reject the message.
>>
>> Can you recommend me any documentation/tips for doing it?
>>
>
> This is harder than it looks. do you really need to worry about all this
> stuff or are you inventing problems?
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
mple:
>
> mail to i...@goofyandtheregulars.com will be delivered to
> mx-cluster-b1.one.com or mx-cluster-b2.one.com. But will give a timeout
> when talking to that machine. So I want to redirect message to
> mx-cluster-b1.one.com and mx-cluster-b2.one.com to mx2.youngguns.nl.
>
ratio. I am not willing to give the name of the
> organisation so you will have to take my word for it.
i would prepare fallback_relays and special transports by
recipient domains
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
nks,
>
> Josh
>
>
Sorry Josh, what exactly is your question ?
where are your logs , where your postfix setup?
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Hi,
there was/is a Problem with the denic .de root servers
this might give you some Problems with mail
it looks like that it is recent partly working again
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Godewijckstraat 30 *|* 3311 GX
> Office Number: 05E21
> Dordrecht *|* The Netherlands
>
> —
>
> tel
>
>
>
> +31(78)6576446
>
> fax
>
>
>
> +31(78)6576302
>
> —
>
> www.springeronline.com <http://www.springeronline.com>
> www.springer.com <http://www.springer.com/>
>
> —
>
>
>
>
>
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
but at my spam domains , spam traffic was never
related to what antispam feature i ever integrated
it was always in waves
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
t exactly these
> messages [http://pastebin.com/4arTzeRu], less than at 1 of 100.000). After
> several hours of research there are only two possibilities: Either I made a
> weird mistake and have overseen something or there is a bug somewhere.
>
> Jan-Kaspar
you should reject all .dynamic.hinet.net by access table
you will never miss mail
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
h you can do before rbls
so not much leaves to spamhouse, not using them in any way is not really
clever, if you like a rbl advanced configurable modus try policy-weight
which you can also use selective and/or with whitelisting etc
by the way its up to what your using, but i would miss rbls
in my antispam chain
>
> Andreas
>
>
>
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
ter ips etc,
many combinations are possible, keep care that they make sense
rejecting valid bounce mails i.e from <> may loose you
urgent debug info
backscatter = permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated,
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/backscatter_recipient_access
Again attention , you should analyse your logs and setup
to match setup like this to your needs
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
s
> reject my mail.
>
> The question is probably more about setting up Linux to use aliases
> instead of basic IP0.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
use smtp_bind_address=
to bind outgoing mail to an ip
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
nd_address doesn't accept two IPs, local and public.
> Is there any other solution?
>
i am sure this can be fixed, but for now you send
to less info about your setup, what are you trying to goal
with running 2 instances of postfix?
>
> 2010/6/22 Robert Schetterer :
>> Am 2
f it always the same host sending backscatter
simple block the host by access list and/or firewall
lets see some logs, there are many way to deal with backscatter
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
29:56 gehirn postfix/smtpd[20525]: 8B7F4150AF6:
> client=localhost[127.0.0.1]
> Jul 8 12:30:43 gehirn postfix/smtpd[19854]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> post.vrus.de[85.182.133.62]: 554 5.7.1 : Recipient
> address rejected: Access denied; from=<>
>
> On 7/9/2010 12:42, Robert
Am 09.07.2010 13:00, schrieb Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL:
>> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Administrator
> Beckspaced.com
>> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 12:52 PM
>> To: Robert Schetterer
>>
Am 09.07.2010 13:35, schrieb Administrator Beckspaced.com:
>
>
> On 7/9/2010 13:27, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Am 09.07.2010 12:51, schrieb Administrator Beckspaced.com:
>>> hello robert,
>>>
>>> thanks a lot for your quick reply ...
>>> ac
Am 09.07.2010 16:13, schrieb Administrator Beckspaced.com:
>
>
> On 7/9/2010 14:40, Ram wrote:
>> On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 13:35 +0200, Administrator Beckspaced.com wrote:
>>> On 7/9/2010 13:27, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>>> Am 09.07.2010 12:51, schrieb Administ
ompanies who stopped filtering in
germany ( i dont know one ) have mostly a problem with helpless admins
ignorant managers/users etc, not with law or existing antispam solutions
so its mostly a human problem
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 16.07.2010 10:15, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
> Zitat von Robert Schetterer :
>
>> Am 16.07.2010 09:27, schrieb lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
>>> Zitat von Henrik K :
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:06:44PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>>>>
Am 16.07.2010 13:10, schrieb Steve:
>
> Original-Nachricht
>> Datum: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:03:27 +0200
>> Von: Robert Schetterer
>> An: postfix-users@postfix.org
>> Betreff: Re: Better spam filter for postfix
>
>> Am 16.07.2010 10:15, sch
Is it possible to have an additional mechanism to alter the second
> routing decision in respect to the senders address?
>
>
> kind regards
>
> Ilja
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#sender_dependent_default_transport_maps
should help
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
-
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
;
but you can use saslauthd with imap to ask imap service on exchange for
auth
i.e start saslauthd with rimap -O ex.ch.nage.serverip
if this is your intension ( dont read the whole thread )
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
, some other mail providers use a default sender forwarder
mailaddress when redirect
this may avoid problems at forwarding with spf etc
any other idea to reach this goal, pipe etc?
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 12.11.2010 15:24, schrieb Jeroen Geilman:
> On 11/12/2010 03:19 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Hi , this isnt really a dovecot/postfix question
>> in dove lda, there is sendmail_path =
>> someone tried other progs here like mini_sendmail ?
>>
>> http://ww
Am 12.11.2010 19:08, schrieb mouss:
> Le 12/11/2010 16:01, Robert Schetterer a écrit :
>> Am 12.11.2010 15:24, schrieb Jeroen Geilman:
>>> On 11/12/2010 03:19 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>>> Hi , this isnt really a dovecot/postfix question
>>>> in dove
all your posts
i stopped investigate in this
i dont think i was on the right way, after all
sieve cant execute external scripts and has no way to forward with
attach etc , as the problem is not heavy in real, there is no need for
me to investigate more time in it
forwards keep problematic these spam days
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
out expires, this is all managed by the netfilter layer in the
> kernel so you don't have to run any daemons beyond your log parser.
>
i have configured fail2ban with ipset works nice too
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
flogsumm etc
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
rokenness. Microsoft doesnt care.
>
> My 2 bits.
>
> T
the microsoft customer service as well others from big companies are
nightmares, if they react , it takes weeks at minimum, the only way may
get faster is by pressing from customer itself, mostly you have to fix
problems at your side
i think investing time to disuss that is loose
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Hi @ll,
sorry not really postfix
does anybody of you use
http://www.x-arf.org/tools.html
any meanings about it ?
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
at does not deliver mail), or when you are
probing them too often for a non-existent address. This is one reason
why you should use sender address verification sparingly, if at all,
when your site receives lots of email.
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
IN SOA dns-02.ns.aol.com.
hostmaster.aol.net. 304268691 43200 60 1209600 300
;; Query time: 93 msec
;; SERVER: 205.188.157.232#53(205.188.157.232)
;; WHEN: Tue Dec 21 11:01:20 2010
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 89
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 21.12.2010 11:04, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Hi , sorry off topic
> i see disapearing mx record from aol.com
> anyone else ?
>
> Domain Name.. aol.com
> Creation Date 1995-06-22
> Registration Date 2009-10-03
> Expiry Date.. 2011-11-
Am 21.12.2010 12:04, schrieb Mark Scholten:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
>> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Kammen van, Marco, Springer SBM NL
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 11:08 AM
>>
Am 21.12.2010 22:08, schrieb mouss:
> Le 21/12/2010 11:31, Robert Schetterer a écrit :
>> [snip]
>> funny now with 0
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
>> aol.com.3600IN MX 0 mailin-04.mx.aol.com.
>> aol.com.
ot;usually signs
>> with DKIM", "has a strict SPF record", "uses MS Exchange", ... etc.
>>
>> postfix can check DNSBL (reject_rbl_client, ... etc). spamassassin can check
>> that and other stuff such as URIBL, SPF, DKIM, ... etc.
>>
you may use http://www.dkim-reputation.org/
too
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
DAEMON comes from your
pop3 downloader putting mail in some remote smtp server
i had failure message in a equal setup by a buggy network interface on
the client pop side only with pdf attachments in the past
provide more info to debug
but postfix is mostly not involved in such problems ( until y
rd party site
you are trying to contact.
SpamCannibal does not scan remote hosts or otherwise test remote sites.
The ONLY way you can get into SpamCannibal's database is by sending
unsolicited email to our servers!
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
l in your server and that blocks
>> legitimate senders, then stop using spamcannibal.
>>
>>
>
>
>
some experience might be
spamcannibal is not widly used
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
days or more for update ( caching )
also an rbl sometimes needs time to delist
>
> Thank you so much for your help friends
>
>
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
load.
>
>
i have it up and running with dovecot no need for VDA
dovecot 2.09 has a debian auto build repo here
http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/pool/testing-auto/dovecot-2.0/
if problems with vda ask on their list
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
our mail be spam
you might always get into filters at big mail providers, or get in rbls etc
perhaps look i.e. here
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/mail/postmaster/
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
ng to you general mail layout )
read carefully altermine stuff about mailclients etc
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Hi, @ll, somebody working on
opensuse postfix-2.8 (s)rpm ?
cant find some on the opensuse reps recent
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
inform about dropping mail to
them, not longer getting your newsletter etc , usally companies react
better when they get asked by people
from which they want money, in heavy cases this might be work for lawers
whatever your story isnt rare as might you think, there are some big
mail isp out there ,which postmaster support is a desaster
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
n what they ship with.
>>
>> Joe
>
> guys, we at the bsd balcony find it funny to see linuxers fighting each
> other with "my distro is better" and "I can compile faster than you",
> and more funnily "I was born to destroy bill gates empire".
>
> but all this is off topic here.
so bsd is the answer to all universe questions? *g
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 06.02.2011 19:52, schrieb Mark Alan:
> Hello,
>
>
> Do you know any reliable Debian/Ubuntu repositories for the
> newest Postfix 2.8?
>
> Regards,
>
> M.
http://debian.incertum.net/
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 06.02.2011 21:51, schrieb Mark Alan:
> On Sun, 06 Feb 2011 20:01:17 +0100, Robert Schetterer
> wrote:
>
>>> Do you know any reliable Debian/Ubuntu repositories for the
>>> newest Postfix 2.8?
>>
>> http://debian.incertum.net/
>
> Thank you, but
blem is
> spam.
>
> Thanks
> Ralf
>
>
>
i never was clear why using ironport *g
75 a day mails are not that much, you could use
opensource filtering i.e spamassassin etc
with normal recent server hardware
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
>
/etc/postfix/wildcard.pem
i am not quite sure if or how i should include
intermediate ca in postfix
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 09.02.2011 02:50, schrieb Sahil Tandon:
> On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 22:04:38 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> Hi, geotrust
>> has changed ssl procedures
>> for this in i.e apache
>> i have to add intermediate in a extra
>> SSLCACertificateFile
>
> [
Am 09.02.2011 09:03, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 09.02.2011 02:50, schrieb Sahil Tandon:
>> On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 22:04:38 +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, geotrust
>>> has changed ssl procedures
>>> for this in i.e apache
Hi , i have relay which smtp transports
to an internal mail server ( work wonderfull )
now i want to use always_bcc
to a local user
seems not work any idea how to solve this?
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
Am 09.02.2011 16:56, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Robert Schetterer:
>> Hi , i have relay which smtp transports
>> to an internal mail server ( work wonderfull )
>> now i want to use always_bcc
>> to a local user
>> seems not work any idea how to solve this?
>
>
1 - 100 of 768 matches
Mail list logo