, but maybe easily forged without DKIM?
Could someone tell us more about this?
And what is a good solution for forwarding? Rewrite the sender? SRS?
With regards,
Paul van der Vlis
--
Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer Groningen
https://vandervlis.nl
exists
Preferrably use virtual_alias_maps, but if you need any of alias_maps
features, use that one.
Thanks for your explanation!
With regards,
Paul
--
Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer Groningen
https://vandervlis.nl/
___
Postfix-users mai
Op 09-04-2024 om 11:46 schreef Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users:
Dnia 9.04.2024 o godz. 11:11:31 Paul van der Vlis via Postfix-users pisze:
When I want to make an alias, I try this in /etc/aliases:
"al...@domain.nl": j...@domain.nl
But when I sent mail, I get a bounce with &qu
n.nl
This works fine, but for all domains on this server. And that's not what
I want.
Do you know a way how to use aliases with an @ in it?
BTW: I use Cyrus IMAP. In Postfix:
mailbox_transport = lmtp:unix:/var/run/cyrus/socket/lmtp
With regards,
Paul van der Vlis
--
Paul van der Vlis Linux sys
Hello Viktor,
Thanks for your quick answer! See my inline response:
Op 25-01-2024 om 20:40 schreef Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 08:31:44PM +0100, Paul van der Vlis via Postfix-users
wrote:
Hello,
Since over 20 years I use Postfix, but some things I don't
ports.
And I don't want authentication on port 25.
And what about milters, how can I configure them so that they are only
used for e.g. SMTP on port 25?
E.g. I don't want SPF checking on the submission-ports.
Or do I think wrong?
With regards,
Paul van der Vlis
--
Paul van der Vlis Linux
Op 16-11-2022 om 17:19 schreef Wietse Venema:
Paul van der Vlis:
Hello Wietse and others:
Op 16-11-2022 om 15:36 schreef Wietse Venema:
Paul van der Vlis:
Is there a way to get it refused before-queue?
Yes. IF A MILTER REJECTS A MESSAGE then Postfix will not accept it.
So far I see
, that was the point, now it works. Thanks for your help!
With regards,
Paul van der Vlis
root@hosting:~# echo "Test virus body" | mutt -a eicar.com.txt -s "This
is virus8" -- p...@vandervlis.nl
root@hosting:~# less /var/log/mail.log
root@hosting:~# grep 74D3C2304A /var/log/mail.log
Nov
Hello Wietse and others:
Op 16-11-2022 om 15:36 schreef Wietse Venema:
Paul van der Vlis:
Is there a way to get it refused before-queue?
Yes. IF A MILTER REJECTS A MESSAGE then Postfix will not accept it.
So far I see the message is queued as C6E2F880CEC:
root@hosting:~# echo "Test
in main.cf:
-
milter_protocol = 6
smtpd_milters =
{ inet:localhost:10026, connect_timeout=30s, default_action=reject }
{ inet:localhost:8891, connect_timeout=30s, default_action=accept }
non_smtpd_milters = $smtpd_milters
Is there a way to get it refused before-queue?
With regards,
Paul van der VLis
Hi Richard,
Op 12-04-2022 om 14:07 schreef Richard Rasker:
Op 11-04-22 om 18:34 schreef Paul van der Vlis:
Hi Richard, ...
Eventually you could use my mailserver as a relayhost.
That is a very friendly offer, but if I do, that would of course only
be temporary, so that I can send e-mail
Hi Richard,
Op 11-04-2022 om 18:20 schreef Richard Rasker:
Hi Paul,
Op 11-04-22 om 17:40 schreef Paul van der Vlis:
[snip]
Maybe switch to freedom.nl, they give you a good reverse DNS.
Also IPv6.
Thanks for the tip; I think that may be a good idea. They're a lot
cheaper as well than
Op 11-04-2022 om 17:19 schreef Paul van der Vlis:
Hi Richard and others,
Op 11-04-2022 om 16:52 schreef Richard Rasker:
#Set Username and Password
smtp_sasl_password_maps = static:Chosen-Username:Chosen-Password
What I use is this:
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/saslpasswd
for the time being. Perhaps I made a mistake in main.cf?
Maybe switch to freedom.nl, they give you a good reverse DNS.
Also IPv6.
Eventually you could use my mailserver as a relayhost.
Bye,
Paul
--
Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer Groningen
https://vandervlis.nl/
I am using now much of your setting and it seems to help. Thanks a lot!
Op 22-09-19 om 17:59 schreef Dominic Raferd:
> On Sun, 22 Sep 2019 at 14:36, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like some suggestions on how to get less spam, I will paste my
of fps) but I have found reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname very
> effective.
I have heard that more.
> I tried greylisting but gave it up - it isn't necessary and
> the delays were very irritating to users (e.g. for password reset
> emails).
I don't like it too.
With regards,
Paul
--
Paul van de
never used greylisting. Are you using it?
With regards,
Paul van der Vlis
root@server:~# postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
append_dot_mydomain = no
biff = no
broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
compatibility_level = 2
content_filter = amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
Op 16-09-19 om 15:25 schreef Scott Kitterman:
> On Monday, September 16, 2019 9:17:00 AM EDT Paul van der Vlis wrote:
>> I know a provider what is actually using this. I guess only the big
>> providers will have different servers for inbound and outbound email,
>> and you ca
Op 16-09-19 om 14:53 schreef John Peach:
> On 9/16/19 8:47 AM, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> How can I refuse mail from hosts who don't have an open port 25?
>>
>> What do you think from such a check?
>
>
> DO NOT DO THIS!
>
>
provider (reviced.nl) refuses all mail from
a host what does not have port 25 open. I have much problems with spam
and I would like to reduce it.
--
Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer Groningen
https://www.vandervlis.nl/
Op 23-10-16 om 13:32 schreef Ansgar Wiechers:
> On 2016-10-23 Paul van der Vlis wrote:
>> Op 22-10-16 om 18:23 schreef /dev/rob0:
>>> The only actual conclusion is that you have failed to put forth the
>>> necessary information, as Bill [I think] pointed you to the
untrie support.
>
> not a fix, but help avoiding this problem is abuse.
>
> and check if you landed on black lists.
I am. But I am not sure I can delist, because I don't know how they did
it. Maybe they start again.
With regards,
Paul van der Vlis.
--
Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer Groningen
https://www.vandervlis.nl/
sername presented by the spammer. Hopefully
> the sasl backend logging will show why this name is unexpectedly
> accepted, and is almost certainly not a bug or exploit.
I will look for a sasl backend logging method.
The spammers are still trying. Every time from another IP, so I cannot
log o
Op 22-10-16 om 18:23 schreef /dev/rob0:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 04:15:41PM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> The only actual conclusion is that you have failed to put forth the
> necessary information, as Bill [I think] pointed you to the
> http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.ht
Op 22-10-16 om 18:23 schreef /dev/rob0:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 04:15:41PM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
>> Is the conclusion now, that Postfix is relaying here?
>
> The only actual conclusion is that you have failed to put forth the
> necessary information, as Bill [I
gt;> introduced itself with "EHLO [127.0.0.1]" on an encrypted session and
>> proceeded to authenticate as the user whose name you've replaced with
>> p...@puk.nl.
>
> Thanks, I missed that.
Is the conclusion now, that Postfix is relaying here?
With regards,
Paul van der Vlis.
--
Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer Groningen
https://www.vandervlis.nl/
Op 22-10-16 om 04:32 schreef Bill Cole:
> On 21 Oct 2016, at 16:15, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
>>
>> Received: from [127.0.0.1] (87-92-55-206.bb.dnainternet.fi
>> [87.92.55.206])
>> (Authenticated sender: p...@puk.nl)
>> by mail.vander
Op 22-10-16 om 08:18 schreef Tomoyuki Murakami:
>
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 22:15:32 +0200, Paul van der Vlis <p...@vandervlis.nl>
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>
>> Some settings and logs:
>>
>> smtpd_relay_restrictions =
>> permit_mynetworks,
>> pe
Op 22-10-16 om 01:46 schreef Wietse Venema:
> Paul van der Vlis:
>> Received: from [127.0.0.1] (87-92-55-206.bb.dnainternet.fi [87.92.55.206])
>> (Authenticated sender: p...@puk.nl)
>> by mail.vandervlis.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 774B23E0285;
>>
ictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
> -o milter_macro_daemon_name=ORIGINATING
This is the only thing what I have:
submission inet n - - - - smtpd
Is this wrong?
I would like it to set rules for every port separate, but I didn't do it
till now.
With regards
to let Postfix think the mail
comes from localhost.
With regards,
Paul van der Vlis.
> -ALF
>
> -Angelo Fazzina
> Operating Systems Programmer / Analyst
> University of Connecticut, UITS, SSG-Linux/ M
> 860-486-9075
>
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-
d 774B23E0285;
Fri, 21 Oct 2016 18:57:14 +0200 (CEST)
As would my server sent it to my server...
Does somebody have a clou here?
With regards,
Paul van der Vlis.
Some settings and logs:
smtpd_relay_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated,
check_sender_acce
32 matches
Mail list logo
