That did the trick! Many thanks. ;)
On 2021-07-07 10:21, Kevin N. wrote:
It seems that in the MAIL command the IP address is still not between
[].
should be
On a quick look, it seems that you could try setting
resolve_numeric_domain = yes in your Postfix configuration and see if
that cha
You can fix MAIL FROM and other commands with smtpd_command_filter. See
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_command_filter
Wietse
It seems that in the MAIL command the IP address is still not between [].
should be
On a quick look, it seems that you could try setting
resolve_numeric_domain = yes in your Postfix configuration and see if
that changes anything.
From http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html
resolve_numeric
I believe you are correct, but again I have no control over that part.
Also, I mistakenly attached the log attempt from the telnet session I
tried, the actual systems having issues have the from address within
brackets, here is the system in question:
Jul 6 15:18:42 localhost postfix/smtpd[4
When using IP addresses in the email address, shouldn't the IP be
enclosed between []?
For example: noreply@[100.67.10.122] instead of noreply@100.67.10.122
Cheers,
K.
On 07/07/2021 17:49, j...@wrightthisway.com wrote:
Hello folks. I have set up a fresh instance of Postfix at my office to
h
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 11:51:37PM +, Pedro David Marco wrote:
> Hi!
> Is it possible to make Postfix Reject instead of warn for "Illegal
> address syntax"?
To avoid flooding logs with garbage, Postfix normally REJECTs command
syntax errors without logging anything.
However, there is a long h
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 11:51:37PM +, Pedro David Marco wrote:
> Hi!
> Is it possible to make Postfix Reject instead of warn for "Illegal address
> syntax"?
So I've actually mailed about the same issue last week. As far as
I can see, postfix does reject it.
My case was with a space in the u
On 06.05.20 23:51, Pedro David Marco wrote:
Hi!
Is it possible to make Postfix Reject instead of warn for "Illegal address
syntax"?
Thanks!
doesn't it reject? I have rejections here although log says warn:
May 7 08:22:43 mail postfix/smtps/smtpd[653]: connect from unknown[192.168.x.x]
May
Got it. Thanks for the answer!
2016-10-17 18:21 GMT+02:00 Wietse Venema :
> ego...@gmail.com:
> > Is it possible to notify a remote sender [for email that the SMTP
> > server rejects]
>
> No. When an SMTP server does not accept a message, it is the
> responsibility of the SMTP client to inform th
ego...@gmail.com:
> Is it possible to notify a remote sender [for email that the SMTP
> server rejects]
No. When an SMTP server does not accept a message, it is the
responsibility of the SMTP client to inform the sender that email
was not accepted.
Wietse
Thanks.
We understood that the white space was at least the largest part of the issue,
but
since this setup was a replacement "mail router" for different mail system,
which tolerated
the white space, we were looking to make this change over as transparent to end
users,
even programmers, as
Joe Acquisto-j4:
> Well, I can tell you it is SuSe 10, postfix 2.5 (mumble). Beyond
> that, I cannot divulge much more without running afoul of local
> security concerns.
>
> The author of the reporting scripts is reluctant, but willing, to
> correct the known issues, but I was hoping for some
Am 21.08.2014 um 19:52 schrieb Joe Acquisto-j4:
> Well, I can tell you it is SuSe 10, postfix 2.5 (mumble). Beyond that, I
> cannot divulge
> much more without running afoul of local security concerns.
so then you are at your own
learn to strip only what you *really* need to strip/mask
well
On 21 Aug 2014, at 20:04, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
> Please excuse the top posting, if that offends, as I am forced to use a web
> client that cannot bottom post. Easily.
>
> Here it is, only a bit obfuscated:
>
> "Aug 21 13:18:07 some_machine postfix/smtpd[23306]: warning: Illegal address
> s
Please excuse the top posting, if that offends, as I am forced to use a web
client that cannot bottom post. Easily.
Here it is, only a bit obfuscated:
"Aug 21 13:18:07 some_machine postfix/smtpd[23306]: warning: Illegal address
syntax from somehost.domedomain[aa.bb.cc.dd] in MAIL command: "
T
Well, I can tell you it is SuSe 10, postfix 2.5 (mumble). Beyond that, I
cannot divulge much more without running afoul of local
security concerns.
The author of the reporting scripts is reluctant, but willing, to correct the
known issues, but I was hoping for some simple change that would i
Am 21.08.2014 um 19:32 schrieb Joe Acquisto-j4:
> Some mail from local (mynetworks) machines are getting mail rejected with
> "warning: Illegal address syntax from blah in MAIL command: "
> This is despite "resolve_numeric_domain = yes" in main.cf, which I read was
> supposed to fix bad from ad
On 21 Aug 2014, at 19:32, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
> Some mail from local (mynetworks) machines are getting mail rejected with
> "warning: Illegal address syntax from blah in MAIL command: "
> This is despite "resolve_numeric_domain = yes" in main.cf, which I read was
> supposed to fix bad from
On 27/05/10 11:11, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Jonathan Tripathy:
too many errors after...
raise the soft_error_limit and/or the hard_error_limit
Ah! So my postfix server has a limit then. Where can I put these
settings? In main.cf ?
Yes, like almost all settings...
s
* Jonathan Tripathy :
> Even after removing those 2 address from the list, we are still
> getting the "too many errors after RCPT from
> office1.domain.local[10.86.1.101]" (Of course, the 2 email addresses
> aren't mentioned anymore)
And what's it complaining about now (BTW, that's why one uses m
* Jonathan Tripathy :
>
> >too many errors after...
> >
> >raise the soft_error_limit and/or the hard_error_limit
> >
>
> Ah! So my postfix server has a limit then. Where can I put these
> settings? In main.cf ?
Yes, like almost all settings...
smtpd_hard_error_limit = 1000
smtpd_soft_error_lim
too many errors after...
raise the soft_error_limit and/or the hard_error_limit
Ah! So my postfix server has a limit then. Where can I put these
settings? In main.cf ?
On 27/05/10 10:41, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I'm currently in the middle of watching a customer's mail.log file. He
is trying to send an email to a lot of people at once (Something like
5000), however the logs don't reflect this. Instead I'm seeing:
May 27 10:32:41 server1 postf
* Jonathan Tripathy :
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'm currently in the middle of watching a customer's mail.log file.
> He is trying to send an email to a lot of people at once (Something
> like 5000), however the logs don't reflect this. Instead I'm seeing:
>
> May 27 10:32:41 server1 postfix/smtpd[8144]
Eugene Vilensky wrote:
According to your problem report, the trading application sends:
MAIL FROM:''
The correct SMTP protocol syntax is:
MAIL FROM:
Not even Sendmail accepts the incorrect syntax.
You can easily view the command by logging the SMTP commands (main.cf:
debug_peer_list =
> According to your problem report, the trading application sends:
>
> MAIL FROM:''
>
> The correct SMTP protocol syntax is:
>
> MAIL FROM:
>
> Not even Sendmail accepts the incorrect syntax.
>
> You can easily view the command by logging the SMTP commands (main.cf:
> debug_peer_list = addres
Aravind M D:
>
> When we have done an smtp testing on one of our trading application
> server using the frontend smtp tool, we are not able to send out mails
> internally to the mailserver, as the mailserver is rejecting with the
> following error message.
>
> warning: Illegal address syntax from
* Aravind M D :
>
> When we have done an smtp testing on one of our trading application
> server using the frontend smtp tool, we are not able to send out mails
> internally to the mailserver, as the mailserver is rejecting with the
> following error message.
>
> warning: Illegal address syntax f
28 matches
Mail list logo
