Re: Question regarding smtp_per_record_deadlne parameter

2017-12-06 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
> On Dec 6, 2017, at 3:33 PM, J Doe wrote: > > I am guessing that would extend to most SATCOM connections (Iridium, etc.), > as well ? Satellite relays aren't necessarily low bandwidth, that's often not a problem, what you can't avoid is high(er) latency[1]. --

Re: Question regarding smtp_per_record_deadlne parameter

2017-12-06 Thread J Doe
Hi Wietse, > On Dec 6, 2017, at 8:00 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Viktor Dukhovni: > > With TLS turned on, the deadline is enforced per TLS message, which > can be up to 16kbytes. 16kbytes in 10s would be difficult with a > dialup or low-tech cellular network. > >

Re: Question regarding smtp_per_record_deadlne parameter

2017-12-06 Thread Wietse Venema
Viktor Dukhovni: > > > > On Dec 5, 2017, at 10:24 PM, J Doe wrote: > > > > That actually reminded me of something that crossed my mind, today - I > > forgot about the inherently dynamic nature of routing. > > > > Even though my server is within North America and it

Re: Question regarding smtp_per_record_deadlne parameter

2017-12-05 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
> On Dec 5, 2017, at 10:24 PM, J Doe wrote: > > That actually reminded me of something that crossed my mind, today - I forgot > about the inherently dynamic nature of routing. > > Even though my server is within North America and it is extremely likely that > I am

Re: Question regarding smtp_per_record_deadlne parameter

2017-12-05 Thread J Doe
> On Dec 5, 2017, at 1:46 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > > If you're only connecting to google over a decent internet link, I > doubt you'll see any effect whatsoever. Kinda like me using polar > bear bait in Tennessee. > > -- Noel Jones Hi Noel, That actually reminded me

Re: Question regarding smtp_per_record_deadlne parameter

2017-12-05 Thread Noel Jones
On 12/5/2017 11:30 AM, J Doe wrote: > Hi Noel and Wietse, > > Thank you for your prompt feedback. > > I think (in the quest to explore this more fully), I will try enabling this > for a short term and see what sort of TLS issues I may have. The server I > described in previous mails is low

Re: Question regarding smtp_per_record_deadlne parameter

2017-12-05 Thread J Doe
Hi Noel and Wietse, Thank you for your prompt feedback. I think (in the quest to explore this more fully), I will try enabling this for a short term and see what sort of TLS issues I may have. The server I described in previous mails is low volume so I believe it’s ideal for testing

Re: Question regarding smtp_per_record_deadlne parameter

2017-12-04 Thread Wietse Venema
Noel Jones: > On 12/4/2017 3:35 PM, J Doe wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I currently have a server that is configured as a mail forwarding domain > > [1]. Using example.com as an example: > > > > /etc/postfix/main.cf > > virtual_alias_domains = example.com > > virtual_alias_maps

Re: Question regarding smtp_per_record_deadlne parameter

2017-12-04 Thread Noel Jones
On 12/4/2017 3:35 PM, J Doe wrote: > Hello, > > I currently have a server that is configured as a mail forwarding domain [1]. > Using example.com as an example: > > /etc/postfix/main.cf > virtual_alias_domains = example.com > virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual >

Question regarding smtp_per_record_deadlne parameter

2017-12-04 Thread J Doe
Hello, I currently have a server that is configured as a mail forwarding domain [1]. Using example.com as an example: /etc/postfix/main.cf virtual_alias_domains = example.com virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual /etc/postfix/virtual u...@example.com