Steve Heaven wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 08:11 +0100, Clunk Werclick wrote:
>
>> Are you saying that it is not possible to configure it to reject users
>> that don't exist at the SMTP level? Are you *sure*? So if you telnet in
>> to it and send mail for anyoldrubb...@domain.co.uk it accepts it?
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 08:11 +0100, Clunk Werclick wrote:
> Are you saying that it is not possible to configure it to reject users
> that don't exist at the SMTP level? Are you *sure*? So if you telnet in
> to it and send mail for anyoldrubb...@domain.co.uk it accepts it?
>
> I would be gobsmacked
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 07:16 +0100, Steve Heaven wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 00:27 +0200, mouss wrote:
> > Steve Heaven a écrit :
> > >
> >
> >
> > the old: "try to pass to next, until final server accepts or rejects"
> > is n more acceptable. recipients must be checked at the "edge".
> >
> >
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 00:27 +0200, mouss wrote:
> Steve Heaven a écrit :
> >
>
>
> the old: "try to pass to next, until final server accepts or rejects"
> is n more acceptable. recipients must be checked at the "edge".
>
> postfix provides reject_unverified_recipient to help you for that
> (ass
yar mailer got borked?
Clunk Werclick a écrit :
> From:
> Clunk Werclick
>
> Reply-to:
> mailbacku...@googlemail.com
> Cc:
> postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject:
> Re: relay_domains
> vs
> virtual_mailbox_domains
&
Steve Heaven a écrit :
> On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 11:50 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>
>>
>> You should not accept mail for invalid recipients. Use existing
>> functionality to build a cache/database of valid recipients "on the fly".
>> See: http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html#reci
From:
Clunk Werclick
Reply-to:
mailbacku...@googlemail.com
Cc:
postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject:
Re: relay_domains
vs
virtual_mailbox_domains
Date:
Tue, 08 Sep 2009
09:28:36 +0100
Mailer:
Evolution 2.24.3
On Tue, 2009-09
Steve Heaven wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 11:50 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>
>>
>> You should not accept mail for invalid recipients. Use existing
>> functionality to build a cache/database of valid recipients "on the fly".
>> See: http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html#recipie
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 11:50 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
>
> You should not accept mail for invalid recipients. Use existing
> functionality to build a cache/database of valid recipients "on the fly".
> See: http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html#recipient
We have no way of kn
On Mon, 07 Sep 2009, Steve Heaven wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 12:32 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
>
> > List actual relay users in relay_recipient_maps, and the users aliased
> > to virtual.invaliud virtual_alias_maps. This takes care of recipient
> > validation.
>
> We dont know the actual u
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 12:32 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> List actual relay users in relay_recipient_maps, and the users aliased
> to virtual.invaliud virtual_alias_maps. This takes care of recipient
> validation.
We dont know the actual users on the relayed domains. One of the reasons
they are
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 08:04:06AM +0100, Steve Heaven wrote:
> We have a domain where some users have local mailboxes and some are
> passed on to an MS Exchange box.
> In the transport map we have:
>
> us...@mydomain.co.uk virtual:
> us...@mydomain.co.ukvirtual:
> us...@mydomain.co.uk vir
We have a domain where some users have local mailboxes and some are
passed on to an MS Exchange box.
In the transport map we have:
us...@mydomain.co.uk virtual:
us...@mydomain.co.ukvirtual:
us...@mydomain.co.uk virtual:
mydomain.co.uksmtp:[remote.mydomain.co.uk]
We have mydomain.co.uk
13 matches
Mail list logo
