On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 00:27 +0200, mouss wrote:
Steve Heaven a écrit :
the old: try to pass to next, until final server accepts or rejects
is n more acceptable. recipients must be checked at the edge.
postfix provides reject_unverified_recipient to help you for that
(assuming the
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 07:16 +0100, Steve Heaven wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 00:27 +0200, mouss wrote:
Steve Heaven a écrit :
the old: try to pass to next, until final server accepts or rejects
is n more acceptable. recipients must be checked at the edge.
postfix provides
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 08:11 +0100, Clunk Werclick wrote:
Are you saying that it is not possible to configure it to reject users
that don't exist at the SMTP level? Are you *sure*? So if you telnet in
to it and send mail for anyoldrubb...@domain.co.uk it accepts it?
I would be gobsmacked.
Steve Heaven wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 08:11 +0100, Clunk Werclick wrote:
Are you saying that it is not possible to configure it to reject users
that don't exist at the SMTP level? Are you *sure*? So if you telnet in
to it and send mail for anyoldrubb...@domain.co.uk it accepts it?
I
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 11:50 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
You should not accept mail for invalid recipients. Use existing
functionality to build a cache/database of valid recipients on the fly.
See: http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html#recipient
We have no way of knowing
Steve Heaven wrote:
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 11:50 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
You should not accept mail for invalid recipients. Use existing
functionality to build a cache/database of valid recipients on the fly.
See: http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html#recipient
We
From:
Clunk Werclick
mailbacku...@googlemail.com
Reply-to:
mailbacku...@googlemail.com
Cc:
postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject:
Re: relay_domains
vs
virtual_mailbox_domains
Date:
Tue, 08 Sep 2009
09:28:36 +0100
Mailer:
Evolution
Steve Heaven a écrit :
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 11:50 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
You should not accept mail for invalid recipients. Use existing
functionality to build a cache/database of valid recipients on the fly.
See: http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html#recipient
We
yar mailer got borked?
Clunk Werclick a écrit :
From:
Clunk Werclick
mailbacku...@googlemail.com
Reply-to:
mailbacku...@googlemail.com
Cc:
postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject:
Re: relay_domains
vs
virtual_mailbox_domains
Date
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 12:32 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
List actual relay users in relay_recipient_maps, and the users aliased
to virtual.invaliud virtual_alias_maps. This takes care of recipient
validation.
We dont know the actual users on the relayed domains. One of the reasons
they are
On Mon, 07 Sep 2009, Steve Heaven wrote:
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 12:32 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
List actual relay users in relay_recipient_maps, and the users aliased
to virtual.invaliud virtual_alias_maps. This takes care of recipient
validation.
We dont know the actual users on
We have a domain where some users have local mailboxes and some are
passed on to an MS Exchange box.
In the transport map we have:
us...@mydomain.co.uk virtual:
us...@mydomain.co.ukvirtual:
us...@mydomain.co.uk virtual:
mydomain.co.uksmtp:[remote.mydomain.co.uk]
We have mydomain.co.uk
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 08:04:06AM +0100, Steve Heaven wrote:
We have a domain where some users have local mailboxes and some are
passed on to an MS Exchange box.
In the transport map we have:
us...@mydomain.co.uk virtual:
us...@mydomain.co.ukvirtual:
us...@mydomain.co.uk virtual:
13 matches
Mail list logo
