Pawe? Grzesik:
> It's of course not a production code. I'm only trying to
> learn and understand how exactly it works.
>
> I cannot find anything about "--" in the postfix documentation
> (or I'm looking on the wrong page?). There is any explanation
> somewhere? (instead of at the source code).
Hi,
On 10/14/2016 02:30 PM, Dave wrote:
I'm running multiple Postfix MX servers behind HAProxy load balancer. I was
just configuring "MX Policy test" in postscreen and I couldn't get it work.
please clarify whether you are using the haproxy PROXY protocol (See:
There still many many logs in /var/log/mail.log
How can I eliminate or ignore this kind of logs if doing this do not harm mail
server?
On 星期四, 13 十月 2016 00:02:45 -0700Benny Pedersen m...@junc.eu wrote
On 2016-10-13 08:30, vod vos wrote:
Oct 12 14:38:50
Dave:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running multiple Postfix MX servers behind HAProxy load balancer. I was
> just configuring "MX Policy test" in postscreen and I couldn't get it work.
> Then I tried to use the external IP (the one on the proxy) instead of the
> one Postfix listens on. I suggest it could be
It's of course not a production code. I'm only trying to
learn and understand how exactly it works.
I cannot find anything about "--" in the postfix documentation
(or I'm looking on the wrong page?). There is any explanation
somewhere? (instead of at the source code).
Thanks for your help!
On 13 Oct 2016, at 1:06, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
On the surface, SA hitting multiple RBLs sounds inefficient.
SpamAssassin is inherently inefficient. That's why in a production
environment with heavily loaded systems, it is important to have layers
ahead of it to deal with the bulk of
Hi,
I'm running multiple Postfix MX servers behind HAProxy load balancer. I was
just configuring "MX Policy test" in postscreen and I couldn't get it work.
Then I tried to use the external IP (the one on the proxy) instead of the
one Postfix listens on. I suggest it could be mentioned in docs for
