RE: manitu.net RBL, opinions? Re: postwhite? (why not?)

2018-03-06 Thread L . P . H . van Belle
# > -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > Van: postfixlists-070...@billmail.scconsult.com > [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] Namens Bill Cole > Verzonden: dinsdag 6 maart 2018 15:44 > Aan: Postfix users > Onderwerp: Re: manitu.net RBL, opinions? Re: postwhite? (why not?)

Re: manitu.net RBL, opinions? Re: postwhite? (why not?)

2018-03-06 Thread Bill Cole
On 6 Mar 2018, at 1:26, MRob wrote: On 2018-03-05 18:05, Bill Cole wrote: Would you mind sharing which RBLs you recommend to use in postscreen? postscreen_dnsbl_sites = zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.2*2 zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.3*2 zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.4*2

Re: spamhaus zen response codes in postscreen Re: postwhite? (why not?)

2018-03-06 Thread Bill Cole
On 6 Mar 2018, at 1:18, MRob wrote: On 2018-03-05 18:05, Bill Cole wrote: Would you mind sharing which RBLs you recommend to use in postscreen? postscreen_dnsbl_sites = zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.2*2 zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.3*2 zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.4*2

Re: manitu.net RBL, opinions? Re: postwhite? (why not?)

2018-03-05 Thread li...@lazygranch.com
On Tue, 06 Mar 2018 06:26:49 + MRob wrote: > On 2018-03-05 18:05, Bill Cole wrote: > >> Would you mind sharing which RBLs you recommend to use in > >> postscreen? > > > > postscreen_dnsbl_sites = zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.2*2 > > zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.3*2

manitu.net RBL, opinions? Re: postwhite? (why not?)

2018-03-05 Thread MRob
On 2018-03-05 18:05, Bill Cole wrote: Would you mind sharing which RBLs you recommend to use in postscreen? postscreen_dnsbl_sites = zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.2*2 zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.3*2 zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.4*2 zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.10*2 zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.11*2

spamhaus zen response codes in postscreen Re: postwhite? (why not?)

2018-03-05 Thread MRob
On 2018-03-05 18:05, Bill Cole wrote: Would you mind sharing which RBLs you recommend to use in postscreen? postscreen_dnsbl_sites = zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.2*2 zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.3*2 zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.4*2 zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.10*2 zen.spamhaus.org=127.0.0.11*2 Why

Re: FQRDNS blacklist why not? Re: postwhite? (why not?)

2018-03-05 Thread Bill Cole
On 5 Mar 2018, at 16:38, MRob wrote: Bill Cole said: The postscreen DNSBL configuration should be designed to only block IPs that *only* send spam. So why, I like to ask is fqrdns list not recommended for use in postscreen? Did you see "DNSBL" in that sentence? The "fqrdns" list is not a

Re: FQRDNS blacklist why not? Re: postwhite? (why not?)

2018-03-05 Thread Benny Pedersen
MRob skrev den 2018-03-05 22:38: Bill Cole said: The postscreen DNSBL configuration should be designed to only block IPs that *only* send spam. So why, I like to ask is fqrdns list not recommended for use in postscreen? https://github.com/stevejenkins/hardwarefreak.com-fqrdns.pcre too

Re: FQRDNS blacklist why not? Re: postwhite? (why not?)

2018-03-05 Thread Noel Jones
On 3/5/2018 3:38 PM, MRob wrote: > Bill Cole said: >> The postscreen DNSBL >> configuration should be designed to only block IPs that *only* send >> spam. > > So why, I like to ask is fqrdns list not recommended for use in > postscreen? >

FQRDNS blacklist why not? Re: postwhite? (why not?)

2018-03-05 Thread MRob
Bill Cole said: The postscreen DNSBL configuration should be designed to only block IPs that *only* send spam. So why, I like to ask is fqrdns list not recommended for use in postscreen? https://github.com/stevejenkins/hardwarefreak.com-fqrdns.pcre Its maintained by same person as postwhite

Re: postwhite? (why not?)

2018-03-05 Thread Bill Cole
On 5 Mar 2018, at 3:59, Karol Augustin wrote: On 2018-03-05 6:39, Bill Cole wrote: On 3 Mar 2018, at 14:25, J Doe wrote: Should I then continue to use postscreen for the zombie detection but then move my DNSRBL entries to smtpd restrictions ? Apologies for belabouring the point - I’m just

Re: postwhite? (why not?)

2018-03-05 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 3 Mar 2018, at 14:25, J Doe wrote: Should I then continue to use postscreen for the zombie detection but then move my DNSRBL entries to smtpd restrictions ? I forgot to add: when you use dnsbl entries at postscreen level, you apparently won't need them in other postfix restrictions. if

Re: postwhite? (why not?)

2018-03-05 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 3 Mar 2018, at 14:25, J Doe wrote: Should I then continue to use postscreen for the zombie detection but then move my DNSRBL entries to smtpd restrictions ? Apologies for belabouring the point - I’m just not understanding. On 2018-03-05 6:39, Bill Cole wrote: Not all DNSBLs are

Re: postwhite? (why not?)

2018-03-05 Thread Karol Augustin
On 2018-03-05 6:39, Bill Cole wrote: > On 3 Mar 2018, at 14:25, J Doe wrote: > >> Should I then continue to use postscreen for the zombie detection but then >> move my DNSRBL entries to smtpd restrictions ? >> >> Apologies for belabouring the point - I’m just not understanding. > > Not all

Re: postwhite? (why not?)

2018-03-04 Thread Bill Cole
On 3 Mar 2018, at 14:25, J Doe wrote: Should I then continue to use postscreen for the zombie detection but then move my DNSRBL entries to smtpd restrictions ? Apologies for belabouring the point - I’m just not understanding. Not all DNSBLs are equivalent. SOME are suited for use in

Re: postwhite? (why not?)

2018-03-03 Thread Wietse Venema
J Doe: > Hi Wietse, > > > On Mar 2, 2018, at 1:49 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > > Postscreen blocks sites based on: > > > > - Their reputation that hey don't send legitimate mail. > > zen.spamhaus.org and bl.spamcop.net are examples of that. > > > > - Their behavior.

Re: postwhite? (why not?)

2018-03-03 Thread J Doe
Hi Wietse, > On Mar 2, 2018, at 1:49 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Postscreen blocks sites based on: > > - Their reputation that hey don't send legitimate mail. > zen.spamhaus.org and bl.spamcop.net are examples of that. > > - Their behavior. The postscreen pregreet test

Re: postwhite? (why not?)

2018-03-03 Thread Karol Augustin
On 2018-03-03 5:06, MRob wrote: > On 2018-03-02 13:46, Karol Augustin wrote: >> I also added some hosts to my list from banks, Amazon SES etc. I have >> about 800 lines in the generated file, which is reasonable. I have about >> 60-75% passing connections whitelisted now. > > Would you share

Re: postwhite? (why not?)

2018-03-02 Thread MRob
On 2018-03-02 13:46, Karol Augustin wrote: On 2018-03-02 12:09, MRob wrote: Asking for opinions about postwhite. https://github.com/stevejenkins/postwhite Below is the default whitelist domains. It's nice idea, but what about the time when spammers got hold of 10.000 hotmail accounts? OTOH

Re: postwhite? (why not?)

2018-03-02 Thread Wietse Venema
J Doe: > Hi Wietse, > > > On Mar 2, 2018, at 10:15 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > > Perhaps it is time to repeat what postscreen is and is not. > > > > Don't use postscreen to block spam. Use postscreen to block spambots. > > Those who misunderstand the difference will be

Re: postwhite? (why not?)

2018-03-02 Thread J Doe
Hi Wietse, > On Mar 2, 2018, at 10:15 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Perhaps it is time to repeat what postscreen is and is not. > > Don't use postscreen to block spam. Use postscreen to block spambots. > Those who misunderstand the difference will be disappointed. > > In

Re: postwhite? (why not?)

2018-03-02 Thread Wietse Venema
MRob: > Asking for opinions about postwhite. > https://github.com/stevejenkins/postwhite > > Below is the default whitelist domains. It's nice idea, but what about > the time when spammers got hold of 10.000 hotmail accounts? Perhaps it is time to repeat what postscreen is and is not. Don't

Re: postwhite? (why not?)

2018-03-02 Thread Karol Augustin
On 2018-03-02 12:09, MRob wrote: > Asking for opinions about postwhite. > https://github.com/stevejenkins/postwhite > > Below is the default whitelist domains. It's nice idea, but what about > the time when spammers got hold of 10.000 hotmail accounts? > > OTOH this is only for postscreen and