Re: Mail Filtering

Joe Hallett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Here is the problem: We frequently receive messages that are addressed > to each of us as individuals. The filters treat each copy as if it were > a new message. This results in forwarding duplicate copies, confusing > our filing and labeling system, and ca

Re: Mail Filtering

Joe Hallett said: >We frequently receive messages that are addressed >to each of us as individuals. The filters treat each copy as if it were >a new message. You mean the sender has sent a message to each of you with the exact same content? Then each "copy" as you call it are unique messages, des

Mail Filtering

My wife and I share a computer running PowerMail. Each of us has several email accounts - a total of nine. All incoming mail is filtered. Spam is removed and remaining messages are organized into folders. Some are automatically forwarded to an external business acount. All are labeled. Here is the

Re: Why no "Body" option in mail filtering..??!!

Scott at HobbyLink Japan on 5/22/03 said >>This is one of the first things SpamSieve teaches itself to do once you >>start using it - in fact, if I remember correctly, the manual says that >>one of the simplest predictors of spam is the "word" FF (the HTML >>hexcode for the color red). >>

Re: Why no "Body" option in mail filtering..??!!

>This is one of the first things SpamSieve teaches itself to do once you >start using it - in fact, if I remember correctly, the manual says that >one of the simplest predictors of spam is the "word" FF (the HTML >hexcode for the color red). > I have no k

Re: Why no "Body" option in mail filtering..??!!

On Wed, 21 May 2003 18:16:37 +0900, Scott at HobbyLink Japan wrote: >>I was much surprised when I found out -- can we have it? Soon ...? > >I second that!! It would be so easy to filter a lot of spam if you could >just tell it to look for basic HTML coding in the body, etc. This is one of the f

Re: Why no "Body" option in mail filtering..??!!

>I was much surprised when I found out -- can we have it? Soon ...? I second that!! It would be so easy to filter a lot of spam if you could just tell it to look for basic HTML coding in the body, etc. --- Scott T. Hards President HobbyLink Japan (www.hlj.com)

Why no "Body" option in mail filtering..??!!

I'm running a couple of eLists using Macjordomo for OSX. (A freeware list server found at ). There are limitations in Macjordomo's capability to bounce mails back to senders who may have sent a mail to a list using an address that isn't subscribed etc. You can