As an example providing information on bugs, see Mike Bombich's forum
page for Carbon Copy Cloner:
http://forums.bombich.com/viewforum.php?
f=12sid=f1fc006f711bb1c03a2502b875bd32ff
Another program I use, PDFPen, has several workarounds listed in its
FAQs for specific problems.
I have seen
That is a great idea, and one CTM should have both on its site and in a
Read Me with the installer.
- Winston
Mikael Byström wrote:
I'd prefer if we had a bug list or something and could point to that.
Mikael Byström wrote:
We on this list are not employed by you, which seems to be the common
feature for most of the situations you list where you have found this
approach productive.
The point is not about my trying to influence the discussion list, but
about trying to influence CTM. CTM is
Winston Weinmann suggested:
That is a great idea, and one CTM should have both on its site and in a
Read Me with the installer.
In a Readme? What other products put their buglists there? Isn't an URL
to some kind of online source sufficient?
After all buglists are not primarily around to warn
Winston Weinmann suggested:
That is a great idea, and one CTM should have both on its site and in a
Read Me with the installer.
In a Readme? What other products put their buglists there? Isn't an URL
sufficient?
Mikael
Tech facts:
PM 5.5.3 Swedish | OS X 10.4.8 | Powerbook G4/400 Mhz | 1GB RAM
Winston Weinmann asked
please support CTM by patiently ask for requests
Have I been impatient? How do you define patience?
Patience should be adopted to the company in question. CTM could be
snappier in the their development and sometimes bugfixing, but I'd
rather they keep PM stable and
Wayne Brissette said it like this:
That's where CTM gets to decide what they feel the community needs and where
they want to spend their efforts.
If you had paid any attention at all, which is obvious you haven't, you
would have discovered that I've been repeating that CTM decides over
and over
Mikael -
I am not sure I fully understand your comments. If I did not support CTM
I would not bother to give an opinion on features. I'd just go
elsewhere. In particular, I have focussed on behavior which in any other
software would be considered beta level. or worse. Having great
features does
Matthias Schmidt suggested:
Understand Powermail is a textmailer, so if you want to have html use
something else.
Matthias, why do you have to bring up that old nonsense again? Powermail
displays HTML messages and it's natural to expect that it should print
such messages fine, even if third
Mikael:
I think the thing to understand is that when PowerMail was developed it was
developed as something that was 100% RFC compatible. Currently there are some
things that are under discussion, by other companies and not full panels on
HTML email. Thus, I would argue that there isn't
Steve Abrahamson / 07.9.22 / 7:01 PM wrote:
Which, I think, comes back to my issue of what is PowerMail? Is it a
Mercedes? Or a nice Pontiac?
Y'know, my 1995 E320 Wagon, which is now 170,000+ miles and still
kicking hard, even doesn't have a cup holder and glove box. My ex-1990
Volvo even had
On 9/21/07 at 11:04 PM, Winston Weinmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
This does not mean PowerMail does not rock in lots of other areas. But
would you expect a Mercedes 500 SL to have steel wheels or lack ABS?
Which, I think, comes back to my issue of what is PowerMail? Is it a
Mercedes? Or a nice
Winston Weinmann schrieb:
While I love PowerMail, it has some bugs in it that are like beta level
software. CTM should be embarrassed, and probably is.
That pretty much confirms my suspicion. I was thinking about using
PowerMail but wanted to see how it is supported first, so I subscribed
to
Bernd,
Am/On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 08:07:57 +0200 schrieb/wrote Bernd Fröhlich:
Winston Weinmann schrieb:
While I love PowerMail, it has some bugs in it that are like beta level
software. CTM should be embarrassed, and probably is.
That pretty much confirms my suspicion. I was thinking about
Matthias -
With all due respect, I think it is more accurate to say that the flaws
which PowerMail has (such as not being able to print HTML mail) do not
bother /you/. That does not mean PowerMail does not have flaws, nor does
it excuse CTM for not acknowledging or addressing those flaws if they
Winston,
you are wining here around on the list since you subscribed.
Understand Powermail is a textmailer, so if you want to have html use
something else.
Powermail is not a 1200$ product, it is shareware and in this price-range.
Recently I wrote a E-Mail implementation for a database and I
Matthias -
I think you have missed my point. I also think you have overlooked at
least an occasional attempt to be helpful.
As to html, I am not asking for anything new. I am asking for an
existing feature to work as expected (printing).
How many other Mac programs do you know of which can't
17 matches
Mail list logo
